`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: March 5, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Cases
`IPR2018-01152
`IPR2018-01153
`IPR2018-01154
`IPR2018-012401
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, DANIEL N. FISHMAN, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Louis Tompros
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues pertaining to the above-identified proceedings.
`We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153,
`IPR2018-01154, IPR2018-01240
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`
`Petitioner (“Intel Corporation”) filed an Motion for Admission Pro
`Hac Vice of Louis Tampros in each of the above-captioned proceedings.
`IPR2018-01152 Paper 13; IPR2018-01153 Paper 13; IPR2018-01154 Paper
`13; IPR2018-01240 Paper 13 (collectively “Motions”). Petitioner also filed
`Declarations of Mr. Tampros in support of its Motions. IPR2018-01152 Ex.
`1025; IPR2018-01153 Ex. 1125; IPR2018-01154 Ex. 1226; IPR2018-01240
`Ex. 1327.
`Patent Owner did not oppose Petitioner’s motion within the shortened
`time period specified in our Notice of Filing Date Accorded. See, e.g.,
`IPR2018-01152, Paper 5, 2 (incorporating Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7)).
`We have reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Tampros pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Louis Tampros are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tampros will be authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tampros is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153,
`IPR2018-01154, IPR2018-01240
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, upon filing corrected declarations, Mr.
`Tampros shall be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Richard Goldenberg
`Theodoros Konstantakopoulos
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`theodoros.konstantakopoulos@wilmerhale.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph M. Sauer
`David B. Cochran
`Richard A. Graham
`David M. Maiorana
`Joshua R. Nightingale
`Matthew W. Johnson
`JONES DAY
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`dcochran@jonesday.com
`ragraham@jonesday.com
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`jrnightingale@jonesday.com
`mwjohsnon@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`