throbber
MiclHAEl P. KEATINQ
`
`CEOMETRic, PlnysicAi,
`d VisuAl Opiics
`AN
`
`SECONCI EdiiiON
`
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ET AL.
`Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`GEOMETRIC,
`PHYSICAL, AND
`VISUAL OPTICS
`
`Second Edition
`Michael P. Keating, Ph.D.
`Professor, Michigan College of Optometry,
`Ferris State University,
`Big Rapids, Michigan
`
`1^ U T T E R W O R T H
`GF N E M A N
`
`BOSTON OXFORD AUCKLAND JOHANNESBURG MELBOURNE NEW DELHI
`
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ET AL.
`Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Copyright © 2002 by Butterworth-Heinemann
`
`A member of the Reed Elsevier group
`
`All rights reserved.
`
`No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
`means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the
`publisher.
`
`Every effort has been made to ensure that the drug dosage schedules within this text are accurate and conform to
`standards accepted at time of publication. However, as treatment recommendations vary in the light of continuing
`research and clinical experience, the reader is advised to verify drug dosage schedules herein with information found
`on product information sheets. This is especially true in cases of new or infrequently used drugs.
`Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Butterworth-Heinemann prints its books on acid-
`free paper whenever possible.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Fublication Data
`
`Keating, Michael P.
`Geometric, physical, and visual optics
`1. Optics 2. Optometry
`I. Title
`617.7'5
`ISBN: 0-7506-7262-5
`
`British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
`
`The publisher offers special discounts on bulk orders of this book.
`For information, please contact:
`
`Manager of Special Sales
`Butterworth-Heinemann
`225 Wildwood Avenue
`Wobum, MA 01801-2041
`Tel: 781-904-2500
`Fax: 781-904-2620
`
`For information on all Butterworth-Heinemann publications available, contact our World Wide Web home page at:
`http://www.bh.com
`
`1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ET AL.
`Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`6
`
`Geometric, Physical, and Visual Optics
`
`wavelength 530 nm is referred'to as green light, mono­
`chromatic light of vacuum wavelength 650 nm is
`referred to as red light, and monochromatic light of
`vacuum wavelength 460 nm is referred to as blue light.
`
`1.8 ABSORPTION
`Different materials have different absorption strengths
`for visible light. In many cases, the absorption strength
`of a material is also a function of the incident wave­
`length. A material may absorb the long (or red) wave­
`lengths more than the short (or blue) wavelengths.
`Wavelength-dependent absorption is called selective
`absorption.
`The total amount of light absorbed in a medium
`depends on the absorption strength and on the dis­
`tance that the light travels in the medium. A strong
`absorber is usually opaque, but when made thin
`enough it can transmit a significant percentage of the
`incident light.
`Gold, like other metals, is a strong absorber and is
`opaque for a typical thickness. However, a thin film of
`gold, deposited by vacuum evaporation techniques,
`transmits a significant percentage of light. The trans­
`mission of the thin gold film is actually a selective
`transmission. Gold absorbs more strongly in the red
`part of the spectrum. Thus, the transmitted light is
`greenish-blue.
`At the other extreme are weak absorbers. Weak
`absorbers are usually transparent, but even a weak
`absorber can become opaque if the thickness is great
`enough. Water absorbs red light weakly. In typical
`quantities, such as in fishbowls, bathtubs, and swim­
`ming pools, water is transparent for all wavelengths
`including red. However, in oceans illuminated by sun­
`light, the red light fails to penetrate deeper than 30 m.
`Clear glass is evenly transparent for a normal thick­
`ness. Tinted glass, as in stained glass windows, has a
`reduced transmission for the absorbed wavelengths.
`
`1.9 REFLECTION
`Transmission of light through a medium is decreased
`by any absorption that may be present. In addition to
`absorption, the amount of transmitted light can be
`reduced by surface reflection. The word reflection
`comes from the Latin word reflectere, which means to
`bend hack. Reflection is a surface or boundary phenom­
`enon. In general, whenever light is incident on a sur­
`face or a boundary between two different mediums,
`some of the incident light is reflected or bent back. The
`percent of the light reflected, and the wavelength
`dependence of that percentage, depends on the mater-
`
`ials involved and the angle of incidence of the incident
`light.
`level, the reflection process
`On a molecular
`involves an interaction of the incident light with the
`electrons in the atoms and molecules of the surface
`layers. There is a connection between a material's
`absorption properties and its reflection properties.
`Strong absorbers, such as metals, are strong reflectors.
`Weak absorbers, such as water and clear glass, are
`weak reflectors.
`Reflection is classified as either specular or diffuse.
`The word specular means mirror-like. Specular reflec­
`tion occurs when the surface is smooth and is the
`reflection involved in the formation of images by mir­
`rors or other smooth surfaces such as a pond of water.
`Diffuse reflection occurs when the surface is rough.
`Let us consider specular reflection first. Under
`rectilinear propagation conditions, the direction that
`light is traveling can be represented by straight lines
`called rays. Figure 1.4a shows a ray incident on a
`smooth surface. The line perpendicular to the surface
`is called the normal to the surface. The angle of incidence
`of the ray is defined as the angle 0-, that the ray makes
`with the normal. The angle of reflection is defined
`as the angle 9S that the reflected ray makes with the
`normal. The law of reflection states that the angle of
`reflection 9S is equal to the angle of the incidence 0t,
`or mathematically.
`
`6»i = es
`
`(1.1)
`
`The law of reflection is easy to determine and was
`known by the ancient Greeks. The law of reflection is
`independent of the wavelength of the incident light.
`Figure 1.4b shows three parallel rays incident on
`the smooth surface. The law of reflection applies to
`each ray so the three reflected rays are still parallel.
`Figure 1.4c shows three rays diverging from a point
`source of light. Again, the law of reflection applies to
`each ray. A scaled drawing easily shows that the
`reflected rays appear to be diverging away from a
`point below the surface. This is the image point that
`an observer looking at the reflected light would see.
`Flat bathroom mirrors as well as smooth water sur­
`faces form reflected images in this manner.
`Now let us consider diffuse reflection. Figure 1.5
`shows four parallel rays incident on a rough surface.
`Here the law of reflection still applies for each ray;
`however, the incident angles of each ray are different
`and, consequently, the reflected light is diffused in all
`directions. In diffuse reflection, the information car­
`ried by the incident light beam is lost and no reflected
`image of the original source can be seen. Instead, the
`diffusing surface itself becomes a secondary source.
`
`EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ET AL.
`Exhibit 1016
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket