throbber
AO120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`FRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 38 U.S.C. § 296 and/or 15 U.S.C, § L116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`Aled in the U.S, District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(J Trademarks or
`(4 Patents.
`(
`[1]
`the patent action invelves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`DOCKETNO.
`DATE FILED
`
`US. DISTRICT COURT
`2:17-cv-424
`May 12, 2017
`Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`TATA MOTORS LTD., ET AL.
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PAPENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pT
`ee
`
`April 19, 2012
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`DECISIONTUDGEMENT (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO,
`
`OO Amendment
`BATI OF PATENT
`
`OO Answer
`
`In the above-—cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or Judgement issued:
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upontermination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 1 of 1462
`
`BMW EXHIBIT 1011
`
`Page 1 of 1462
`
`BMW EXHIBIT 1011
`
`

`

`Case: 4:17-cv-00052-DMB-JMV Doc #: 3 Filed: 05/05/17 1 of 1 PagelD #: 23
`AO 120 (Rev, 08/10
`
`
`
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the LS. District Court
`Northern District of Mississippi
`on the following
`L] Trademarks or
`Patents.
`¢ 1 the patentaction involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.}:
`
`
`
`DOCKETNO.
`DATL FILED
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`4:17-cv-00052-DMB-4
`4/27/2017
`
`Northern District of Mississippi
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DEFENDANT
`
` Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
`Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`6/12/2012
`
`+
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
`
`
`
`a p
`
` PATENT OR
`
`
`
`
`O
`
`
`
`[} Amendment
`(Q Answer
`L] Cross Bill
`CL) Other Pleadinie.
`ORTRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`eo
`
`En
`
`
`TRADEMARKNO.
`1 RE43,.462
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`TRADERIARw6
`
`
` CLERK
`
`DECISION/IUDBGEMENT
`
`David Crews,
`
`, eg
`5{5/2017
`EMEA
`Le
`()
`Ep
`SAN
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copyto Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy lo Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copyto Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 2 of 1462
`
`Page 2 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00423-JRG Document4 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 19
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fled in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 12, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:17-cv-423
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION and MAZDA MOTOR
`OF AMERICA, INC., d/b/a MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN
`OPERATIONS, ING.
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 3--Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Cepy 1-—-Lpen initiation of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 3 of 1462
`
`Page 3 of 1462
`
`

`

`AO120 (Rev 98710)
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. $1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`tiled in the ULS. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(J Trademarks or
`Mi! Patents.
`¢ () the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`DOCKET NO.
`DATE FILED
`
`—
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`2:17-cv-430
`5/15/2017
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFE
`
`
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ET AL.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`2 8,155,342
`
`2/10/2009
`
`4/10/2012
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`TO:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`po
`eo
`; po
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`Ir. the above—entitled case, the following patent(s¥ trademark(s) have beenincluded:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO
`
`DO Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`C] Answer
`
`C1 Cross Bill
`
`CC] Gther Pleading
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered ar judgementissued:
`DECISION/AFUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—I'pon initiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination ofaction, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—1pon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Page 4 of 1462
`
`Page 4 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00422-JRG Document 10 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1of1PagelID#: 29
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fled in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 12, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:17-cv-422
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| DAIMLER AG, ETA
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 3--Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Cepy 1-—-Lpen initiation of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 5 of 1462
`
`Page 5 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00430-JRG Document4 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 22
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRABEMARK
`
`Mail Stop8
`Directorof the U.S. Patent and Trademark Otfice
`P.O. Box 1456
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`|
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`on the folowing co
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshail Division
`( [9 the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`
`[| Patents.
`
`(] Trademarks or
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:17-cv-430
`PLAINTEPF
`
`DATE FILED
`5/15/2017
`
`US. DISTRICT COURT
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshal! Division
`[DEPENDANT
`
`I
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ETAL.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO,
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`,
`7
`ee
`a
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`i 7,489,786
`
`2 8,155,342
`
`2/10/2009
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`4/10/2012
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLG
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`BATE OF PATENT
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 1-—Dpon initiation of action, mail this copy te Director Cepy 3--Upon termination of aclion, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 6 of 1462
`
`Page 6 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00418-JRG Document4 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 24
`AO 126 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 U.S.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 LLSAL. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 14, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:17-cv-418
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, ET AL.
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Cepy 3—-Upon termination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy i-—Dpon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Page 7 of 1462
`
`Page 7 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00420-JRG Document4 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 20
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fled in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 14, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:17-cv-420
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| ZHEJIANG GEELY HOLDING GROUP CO.,LTD. ET AL.
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 3--Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Cepy 1-—-Lpen initiation of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 8 of 1462
`
`Page 8 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00421-JRG Document4 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 20
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fled in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 14, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:1 7-cyv-427
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| SUBARU CORPORATION, ETAL.
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 3--Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Cepy 1-—-Lpen initiation of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 9 of 1462
`
`Page 9 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00424-JRG Document4 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1of1PagelD#: 20
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10}
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1456
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORTON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OFAN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 ULS.C, § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 vou are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fled in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(] Trademarks or
`EX Patents.
`(
`(9)
`the patent action involves 35 USAC. § 202.3:
`DATE FILED
`May 12, 2017
`
`DOCKET NO,
`2:17-cv-424
`PLAINTIFF
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLCO
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`| Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`| DEFENDANT
`| TATA MOTORS LYO., ET AL.
`
`[] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 7,489,786
`
`6,155,342
`
`February 10, 2009
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`| April 10, 2012
`
`Bitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`“| Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[i Apswer
`
`Li} Cross Bill
`
`{n the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECTISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 3--Upontermination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Cepy 1-—-Lpen initiation of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—-Upeon filing decument adding patent(s), mail this copy te Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`Page 10 of 1462
`
`Page 10 of 1462
`
`

`

`
`
`ro:
`“
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O, Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshail Division
`onthe following
`
`OO Trademarks ur
`(¥ Patents.
`(¢
`([]
`the patent action involves 35 U.S.C, § 292.):
`DOCKET NO,
`DATE FILED
`ULS, DISTRICT COURT
`2:17-cv-422
`May 12, 2017
`Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, Lic
`DAIMLER AG, ET AL.
`
`
`
`AQ 120 (Rev, 08-10
`
`
`PATENT OR OK PATENTORTRAREDATE QE PATENT SR
`
`
`
`
`TRADEMARK NO.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Es
`CN
`Ee
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—cntitled case, the following patent(s)/ wademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`[] Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK.
`
`CL] Answer
`]
`
`U Cross Bill
`a
`MN
`DATE RE
`
`:
`
`C1 OtherPleading
`&
`
`oy
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`DATE
`
`In the above-—-cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or Judgementissued:
`DECISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of aetion, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy te Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling decument adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 11 of 1462
`
`Page 11 of 1462
`
`

`

`AC 120 (Rew 08510)
`
`TO:
`‘
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, ETAL.
`
`DATE OF PATENT RO PATENTORTRADE :
`
`
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 38 U18.C. § 290 and/or 5 US.C, § 1116 you are herebyadvised that a cour: action has been
`hled in the US. Distriet Cour.
`for the Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`(3 Frademarks or
`[4 Patents,
`¢
`(1)
`the patent action involves 35 ULS.C. § 292.):
`DATE FILED
`DOCKET NO.
`
`
`US. DISTRICT COURT
`
`2:17-cv-418
`Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`May 11, 2017
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`
` PATENT OR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2? 8,155,342
`
`April 10, 2012
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`
`
`3 4
`
`Inthe above—entitled case, the following patent(s¥trademark(s) have been included:
`BATE INCLUDED
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`D1) Amendment
`BATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`LJ Answer
`
`C] Cross Bill
`
`(J Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`In the above—ontitled ease, the following decision has been renderedor judgement issued:
`DECISIONTUDGE MENT
`
`Copy I1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—U ponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 12 of 1462
`
`Page 12 of 1462
`
`

`

`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`Blitzsafe Texas, LLC
`
`Robert Bosdh LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH
`
` PATENTOR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`— > DATENT
`DATE
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDEROF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`aa
`
`4p
`
`
`
`o
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 youare hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`on the following
`Cl rademarks or
`Gf Patents. (L]the patentactioninvolves 35U.S.C,§ 292.):
`
`
`
`DOCKETNO.
`DATE FILED
`.
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division
`2:17-CV-105
`2/3/2017
`
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDEDBY
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`(1 Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`C] Answer
`
`0 Cross Bill
`
`(1 Other Pleading
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director©Copy 3—Upontermination of action, mail this copyto Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s}, mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 13 of 1462
`
`Page 13 of 1462
`
`

`

`CaSast TBIG4HOA0T2GRIRRSRSMDobomenesbs Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD#: 20296
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`on the following
`(
`[1]
`C Trademarks or
`[Mf Patents.
`the patentaction involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`DOCKE
`DATE FILED
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`2:15Oy01274-JRG
`7/16/2015
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`HONDA MOTORCO., LTD., et al.
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`1 U.S. No, 7,489,786
`
`2/10/2009
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`2 U.S. No. 8,155,342
`
`4/10/2012
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`ef
`eo
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`(1 Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`OO Answer
`
`CJ Cross Bill
`
`C1 Other Pleading
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Honda Defendants againstPlaintiff Blitzsafe, are hereby dismissed with prejudice CLERK
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`it is hereby ORDEREDthatall claims and causes ofaction asserted by Plaintiff Blitzsafe in this action agai
`Defendants Honda MotorCo., Ltd. and the U.S. Honda Defendants, andall Counterclaimsfiled by the U.S
`
`WOawbD A. 0 asok
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Nakisha Love
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 14 of 1462
`
`Page 14 of 1462
`
`

`

`Came 2IBOVOGIRGIREP Damuneeit22 Frit CO0Bi57 PRagpe Todt 1 Pees D4: 65a.
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`on the following
`C Trademarks or
`[Mf Patents.
`the patentaction involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`[1]
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:15-cv-01276-JRG
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`7/16/2015
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD. and NISSAN NORTH
`AMERICA,INC.
`
`aa
`aa
`sp
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
` (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`(1 Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`pT
`eo
`eo
`
`CJ Cross Bill
`
`C1 Other Pleading
`
`OO Answer
`
`eo
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`Nakisha Love
`
`DATE
`
`4/4/17
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 15 of 1462
`
`Page 15 of 1462
`
`

`

`Case 2:15-cv-01277-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1of1PagelID#: 941
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`on the following
`C Trademarks or
`[Mf Patents.
`the patentaction involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`[1]
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:15-cv-01277-JRG
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`7/16/2015
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, etal.
`
`aa
`aa
`sp
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`eo
`
`(1 Amendment
`PATENT OR
`DATE OF PATENT
`TRADEMARK NO.
`OR TRADEMARK
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`pT
`eo
`eo
`
`CJ Cross Bill
`
`C1 Other Pleading
`
`OO Answer
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`ORDEREDthatall claims and causesof action asserted by Plaintiff Blitzsafe in this action against Defendants
`Toyota andall Counterclaimsfiled by Toyota against Plaintiff Blitzsafe are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
`
`
`
` (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Nakisha Love
`
`DATE
`
`2/21/17
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`Page 16 of 1462
`
`Page 16 of 1462
`
`

`

`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`.
`
`Paper 28
`Entered: February 21, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`Vv.
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-00421
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`Before JAMESONLEE, MIRIAM L. QUINN,and KERRY BEGLEY,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`37 CFR. § 42.72
`
`On February 17, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to terminatethis
`
`inter partes review with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner, on the
`
`basis that they have settled. Paper 26, 1. Also on February 17, 2017, the
`
`parties filed a copy of their written settlement agreement covering Patent
`
`Page 17 of 1462
`
`Page 17 of 1462
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00421
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`No. 7,489,786 B2 involvedin this inter partes review (Ex. 2001), and a joint
`
`request to have their settlement agreementtreated as business confidential
`
`information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 27).
`
`Under35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding before the request for terminationis filed.” The
`
`requirement for terminating this proceeding with respect to Petitioner is met.
`
`Under35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “If no petitioner remains in the inter partes
`
`review,the Office may terminate the review or proceedto a final written
`
`decision undersection 318(a).” Toyota Motor Corporation is the sole
`
`petitioner in this proceeding. The Board hasdiscretion to terminate this
`
`proceeding with respect to Blitzsafe Texas, LLC as Patent Owner.
`
`In this proceeding, all substantive papers have been filed by the
`
`parties, and we have ordered that no oral hearing will be held. Paper 25. A
`
`final written decision is expected by July 7, 2017, one year from institution
`
`of trial on July 7, 2016. In the joint motion,the parties indicate that they
`
`havesettled their related district court action involving Patent No. 7,489,786
`
`B2 and have movedbefore the district court for dismissal of the action.
`
`Paper 26, 1. They also indicate that they have agreed to seek termination of
`
`this inter partes review proceeding. Id.
`
`In the circumstancesofthis case, particularly in light of the fact that a
`
`final written decision is not due until more than four months from now, we
`
`Page 18 of 1462
`
`Page 18 of 1462
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00421
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`determinethat termination with respect to both Petitioner and Patent Owner
`
`is appropriate.
`
`It is
`
`ORDEREDthat the joint motion to terminate IPR2016-00421 both as
`
`to Petitioner and Patent Owneris granted, andthat this inter partes review is
`
`hereby terminatedas to all parties including Toyota Motor Corporation as
`
`Petitioner and Blitzsafe Texas, LLC as Patent Owner; and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe parties’ joint request (Paper 27) to
`
`havetheir settlement agreement (Exhibit 2001) treated as business
`
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`is also granted.
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`William H. Mandir
`John F. Rabena
`Brian K. Shelton
`Sughrue Mion PLLC
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`jrabena@sughrue.com
`bshelton@sughrue.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`
`Page 19 of 1462
`
`Page 19 of 1462
`
`

`

`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 7
`Filed: February 2, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTORCO., INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-01472
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, MIRIAM L. QUINN, and KERRY BEGLEY,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`DenyingInstitution of Inter Partes Review
`37 CER. § 42.108
`
`Page 20 of 1462
`
`Page 20 of 1462
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01472
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Background
`A.
`On July 21, 2016, Petitioner filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.””) to
`
`institute inter partes review of claims 1, 5-8, 10, 14, 57, 60-62, 64, and 65
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,489,786 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’786 patent”). On
`
`November15, 2016, Patent Ownerfiled a Preliminary Response (Paper6,
`
`“Prelim. Resp.”).
`
`To institute an inter partes review, we must determinethat the
`
`information presented in the Petition shows ‘“‘that there is a reasonable
`
`likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the
`
`claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). Having considered
`
`both the Petition and the Preliminary Response, we determine that Petitioner
`
`has not demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in
`
`establishing the unpatentability of any of claims 1, 5—8, 10, 14, 57, 60-62,
`
`64, and 65. We do notinstitute an inter partes review of any claim ofthe
`
`°786 patent.
`
`B.
`
`Related Matters
`
`Petitioner indicates that the ’786 patent was asserted by Patent Owner
`
`against Petitioner in Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al.,
`
`No. 2:15-cv-1274 (E.D. Tex.). Pet. 2. The parties indicate that the
`
`°786 patent is the subject of four other actions in the Eastern District of
`Texas. Pet. 58-59; Paper 3, 1. Theparties further indicate that the
`°786 patent is the subject of two concluded matters in the District of New
`
`Jersey. Pet. 59; Paper 3,2. The ’786 patent also is the subject patent in
`
`these inter partes review proceedings: IPR2016-00421, IPR2016-00422,
`
`IPR2016-01448, and IPR2016-01477. U.S. Patent No. 8,155,342 B2 isa
`
`Page 21 of 1462
`
`Page 21 of 1462
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01472
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`related patent, and that related patent is involved in IPR2016-00118,
`
`IPR2016-00418, IPR2016-00419, IPR2016-01445, IPR2016-01449,
`
`IPR2016-01473, IPR2016-01476, IPR2016-01533, IPR2016-01557, and
`
`IPR2016-01560.
`
`C.
`
`The ’786 Patent
`
`The ’786 patentis titled “Audio Device Integration System.”
`
`Ex. 1001, (54). The Abstract portion of the Specification explains:
`
`[O]ne or more after-market audio devices, such as a CD player,
`CD changer, MP3player, satellite receiver, DAB receiver, or the
`like, is integrated for use with an existing OEM or after-market
`car stereo system, wherein control commands can be issued at
`the car stereo and responsive data from the audio device can be
`displayed on the stereo.
`
`Id. at Abstr.
`
`In the Background of the Invention portion of the Specification, a
`
`problem with which the ’786 patent is concernedis described as follows:
`
`A particular problem with integrating after-market audio
`systems with existing car stereos is that signals generated by the
`car stereo is in a proprietary format, and is not capable of being
`processed by the after-market system. Additionally, signals
`generated by the after-market system are also in a proprietary
`format that is not recognizable by the car stereo. Thus, in order
`to integrate after-market systems with car stereos, it is necessary
`to convert signals between such systems.
`Id. at 1:36-44. In the Summary ofthe Invention portion of the
`
`Specification,it is stated:
`
`The commandsgenerated at the control panel [of a car stereo]
`are received by the present invention and converted into a format
`recognizable by the after-market audio device. The formatted
`commandsare executedby the audio device, and audio therefrom
`is channeledto the car stereo. Information from the audio device
`is received by the present invention, converted into a format
`
`Page 22 of 1462
`
`Page 22 of 1462
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01472
`Patent 7,489,786 B2
`
`recognizable by the car stereo, and forwarded to the car stereo
`for display thereby.
`
`Ex. 1001, 2:35—-42.
`
`The ’786 patent describes:
`
`Control commands generated at the car stereo are received,
`processed, converted into a format recognizable by the audio
`device, and dispatched to the audio device for execution.
`Information from the audio device, including track, disc, song,
`station,
`time, and other information,
`is received, processed,
`converted into a format recognizable by the car stereo, and
`dispatched to the car stereo for display thereon.
`Id. Additional auxiliary sources also may be integrated together, and “a user
`
`can select between the [audio] device or the one or more auxiliary input
`
`sources by issuing selection commandsthroughthe car stereo.” Id.
`
`Figures 2A—2C are reproduced below:
`
`FIG, 2A
`
`FIG. 28
`
`Figure 2A illustrates an embodimentintegrating a CD player with the car
`stereo; Figure 2B illustrates an embodimentintegrating a MP3 player with a
`car stereo; and Figure 2C illustrates an embodimentinte

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket