throbber
Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee In Support Of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`In re Inter Partes Review of:
`U.S. Patent No. 7,489,786
`Issued: February 10, 2009
`Application No.: 10/316,961
`Filing Date: December 11, 2002
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`For: Audio Device Integration System
`FILED VIA E2E
`
`DECLARATION OF INGRID HSIEH-YEE, PH.D,
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.68
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 001
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`I, Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, Ph.D., do hereby declare as follows:
`
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained as an independent expert witness on behalf
`
`of JAGUAR LLC (“Jaguar”) for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,489,786.
`
`2.
`
`I am being compensated for my work in this matter at my
`
`accustomed hourly rate. I am also being reimbursed for reasonable and
`
`customary expenses associated with my work and testimony in this
`
`investigation. My compensation is not contingent on the results of my
`
`study, the substance of my opinions, or the outcome of this matter.
`
`3.
`
`In the preparation of this declaration, I have reviewed the
`
`exhibits referenced below, each of these is a type of material that experts in
`
`my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their opinions:
`
`(1) Mufid, A.M. (2000). Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem
`
`Interconnect Technologies (“Mufid”), in Automotive Electronics :
`
`Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference Proceedings,
`
`no. 360 (2000), pp. 167-182, obtained from Library of Congress
`
`on May 11, 2018, Exhibit-1;
`
`(2) Bibliographic record for Automotive Electronics available at the
`
`online catalog of Library of Congress at
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 002
`
`

`

`
`
`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`https://lccn.loc.gov/2001269738, accessed May 8, 2018, Exhibit-
`
`2;
`
`(3) MARC record for Automotive Electronics available at the online
`
`catalog of Library of Congress at
`
`https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/staffView?searchId=9511&recPoint
`
`er=0&recCount=25&searchType=0&bibId=12452747, accessed
`
`May 8, 2018, Exhibit-3;
`
`(4) Mufid, A.M. (2000). Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem
`
`Interconnect Technologies (“Mufid”), in Automotive Electronics :
`
`Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference Proceedings,
`
`no. 360 (2000), pp. 167-182, obtained from the library of the
`
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology through WTS (Wisconsin
`
`TechSearch) on May 22, 2018, Exhibit-4;
`
`(5) Bibliographic record for Automotive Electronics available at the
`
`online catalog of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
`
`Libraries at http://library.mit.edu/item/000959917, accessed May
`
`22, 2018, Exhibit-5;
`
`(6) MARC record for Automotive Electronics available at the online
`
`catalog of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries at
`
`http://library.mit.edu/F/37UUX4LQB1MHNPQFHSLA7TP5S212
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 003
`
`

`

`
`
`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`MH7YAKU66UGES4DCSECHG6-01482?func=full-set-
`
`set&set_number=018233&set_entry=000001&format=001,
`
`accessed on May 22, 2018, Exhibit-6;
`
`(7) Mufid, A.M. (2000). Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem
`
`Interconnect Technologies (“Mufid”), in Automotive Electronics :
`
`Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference Proceedings,
`
`no. 360 (2000), pp. 167-182, obtained from the library of the
`
`Pennsylvania State University through WTS on May 22, 2018,
`
`Exhibit-7;
`
`(8) Bibliographic record for Automotive Electronics available at the
`
`online catalog of the Pennsylvania State University Libraries at
`
`https://cat.libraries.psu.edu/ from a title search on May 22, 2018,
`
`Exhibit-8;
`
`(9) MARC record for Automotive Electronics available at the online
`
`catalog of the Pennsylvania State University Libraries at
`
`https://cat.libraries.psu.edu/ from a title search and a display of
`
`detailed information in MARC on May 22, 2018, Exhibit-9.
`
`4.
`
`In forming the opinions expressed within this declaration, I
`
`have considered:
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 004
`
`

`

`
`
`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`(1) The documents listed above;
`
`(2) The reference materials cited herein; and
`
`(3) My own academic background and professional experiences, as
`
`described below.
`
`5. My complete qualifications and professional experience are
`
`described in my curriculum vitae, a copy of which is provided as Appendix
`
`A. The following is a brief summary of my relevant qualifications and
`
`professional experience.
`
`6.
`
`I am currently a Professor in the Department of Library and
`
`Information Science at the Catholic University of America. I have
`
`experience working in an academic library, a medical library, and a
`
`legislative library and have been a professor for more than 25 years. I hold a
`
`Ph.D. in Library and Information Studies from the University of Wisconsin-
`
`Madison and a Masters in Library and Information Studies from the
`
`University of Wisconsin-Madison.
`
`7.
`
`I am an expert on library cataloging and classification and have
`
`published two books on this subject, Organizing Audiovisual and Electronic
`
`Resources for Access: A Cataloging Guide (2000, 2006). I teach a variety of
`
`courses, including Cataloging and Classification, Advanced Cataloging and
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 005
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`Classification, Organization of Internet Resources, Organization of
`
`Information, Digital Content Creation and Management, Internet Searches
`
`and Web Design, Information Literacy Instruction, and Advanced
`
`Information Retrieval and Analysis Strategies. My research interests cover
`
`cataloging and classification, information organization, metadata,
`
`information retrieval, information architecture, digital collections, scholarly
`
`communication, user interaction with information systems, and others.
`
`8.
`
`I am fully familiar with a library cataloging encoding standard
`
`known as the “Machine-Readable Cataloging” standard, also known as
`
`“MARC,” which became the national standard for sharing bibliographic data
`
`in the United States by 1971 and the international standard by 1973. MARC
`
`is the primary communications protocol for the transfer and storage of
`
`bibliographic metadata in libraries. Experts in my field would reasonably
`
`rely upon MARC records when forming their opinions.
`
`9.
`
`A MARC record comprises of several fields, each of which
`
`contains specific data about the work. Each field is identified by a
`
`standardized, unique, three-digit code corresponding to the type of data that
`
`follows. Appendix B is a true and correct copy of Parts 7 to 10 of
`
`“Understanding MARC Bibliographic” (http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/)
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`from the Library of Congress that explains commonly used MARC fields.
`
`For example, the personal author of the work is recorded in Field 100, the
`
`title is recorded in Field 245, publisher information is recorded in Field 260,
`
`the physical volume and characteristics of a publication are recorded in Field
`
`300, and topical subjects are recorded in the 650 fields.
`
`10. The Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) is the largest
`
`bibliographic network of the world, with more than 380 million records and
`
`more than 16,964 member institutions (many of which are libraries of some
`
`type) from 122 countries. According to the “Third Article, Amended
`
`Articles of Incorporation of OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.,”
`
`OCLC was created “to establish, maintain and operate a computerized
`
`library network and to promote the evolution of library use, of libraries
`
`themselves, and of librarianship, and to provide processes and products for
`
`the benefit of library users and libraries, including such objectives as
`
`increasing availability of library resources to individual library patrons and
`
`reducing the rate of rise of library per-unit costs, all for the fundamental
`
`public purpose of furthering ease of access to and use of the ever-expanding
`
`body of worldwide scientific, literary and educational knowledge and
`
`information.” The Third Article, Amended Articles of Incorporation of
`
`OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. was last revised on November
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 007
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`30, 2016 and is available at
`
`https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/membership/articles-of-
`
`incorporation.pdf (presented as Appendix C).
`
`11. OCLC members can contribute original cataloging records in
`
`MARC to the system or derive cataloging records from existing records, an
`
`activity referred to as “copy cataloging.” When an OCLC participating
`
`institution acquires a work, it can create an original MARC record for this
`
`work in OCLC’s Connexion system (a system for catalogers to create and
`
`share MARC records), and the system will automatically generate a code for
`
`the date of record creation in the yymmdd format, and the creating library’s
`
`OCLC symbol is recorded in subfield ǂa of the 040 field. Once the MARC
`
`record is in Connexion, it becomes available (i.e., copy cataloging) to other
`
`OCLC members for adoption to their local online catalogs.
`
`12. OCLC uses a master record system in which the creation date
`
`of an original record (i.e., the master record) is never changed in the OCLC
`
`Connexion cataloging system unless the master record is replaced by another
`
`record. When a library uses a master record to create a copy cataloging
`
`record, changes made to the master record will result in a copy cataloging
`
`record, which is saved in the copy cataloging agency’s account and exported
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 008
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`into the local cataloging system and displayed in that library’s online
`
`catalog, but the master record remains unchanged in the OCLC Connexion
`
`cataloging system. In most library catalogs, copy cataloging records
`
`exported from OCLC Connexion retain the creation date of the original
`
`record in Field 008, and libraries use other internal systems to keep track of
`
`the time when a copy cataloging record is added to the local cataloging
`
`system. The practice varies. Some libraries use local note fields to
`
`document their copy cataloging activities, while others use holdings records
`
`to document the time when a record is added to a local system. The catalog
`
`of Library of Congress uses a slightly different approach in that the system
`
`uses Field 008 to record the time a record, original or copy cataloging, is
`
`added to the system, and uses Field 955 to document cataloging and
`
`processing activities associated with a publication.
`
`13. After a MARC record is created in Connexion, it also becomes
`
`searchable and viewable on WorldCat, which is a web portal to more than
`
`10,000 libraries worldwide. The record in WorldCat, however, is not
`
`presented in MARC fields. Instead, the data elements are labeled to help
`
`users interpret the record.
`
`14. WorldCat (http://www.worldcat.org) is “the world’s largest
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 009
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`network of library content and services” and its features are summarized in
`
`“What is WorldCat” (http://www.worldcat.org/whatis/default.jsp). Through
`
`WorldCat users can search for information in their local libraries and
`
`libraries around the world. WorldCat allows users to search for books, CDs,
`
`videos, and many new types of digital content, such as audiobooks, in many
`
`languages. Users can also retrieve research materials and article citations
`
`with links to their full text. After an item is retrieved, WorldCat helps users
`
`identify a library nearby that holds the item or all the libraries that hold the
`
`item. WorldCat is an efficient way to explore the content held by more than
`
`10,000 libraries around the world.
`
`15. Library online catalogs are based on MARC records that
`
`represent their collections in order to help the public understand what
`
`materials are publicly accessible in those libraries. Most libraries with
`
`online catalogs have made their catalogs freely available on the Web. These
`
`online catalogs offer user-friendly search interfaces. Strong user interest in
`
`keyword searches and the popularity of Google have led to the
`
`“googlization” of library search systems. As a result, many library catalogs
`
`now provide a single search box for users to conduct keyword searches, with
`
`additional support for searches by author, title, subject terms, and other data
`
`elements such as ISBN (International Standard Book Number). Library
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 010
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`catalogs these days also offer features for users to narrow their search results
`
`by language, year, format, and other elements. Many libraries display
`
`MARC records on their online catalogs with labels for the data elements to
`
`help the public interpret MARC records. Many libraries also offer the
`
`option to display MARC records in MARC fields.
`
`16.
`
`I am personally familiar with many online catalogs, databases,
`
`and search engines. In preparing for this declaration I used authoritative
`
`information systems such as WorldCat, the online catalog of the Library of
`
`Congress, the online catalog of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
`
`(MIT) Libraries and the online catalog of the Pennsylvania State University
`
`(Penn State) Libraries to search for records. These records are identified and
`
`discussed in this declaration. Experts in the field would reasonably rely on
`
`the data described herein to form their opinions.
`
`Exhibit-1 (Library of Congress)
`
`17.
`
` Exhibit-1 is a true and correct copy of Future Automotive
`
`Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies (“Mufid”), in Automotive
`
`Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference
`
`Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), pp. 167-182, which I obtained from Library of
`
`Congress on May 11, 2018. When I was originally asked to prepare this
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 011
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`declaration, I searched WorldCat (http://www.worldcat.org) for this article
`
`by its title “Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect
`
`Technologies” and the search results informed me that Library of Congress
`
`holds the physical volume of the conference proceedings that contains this
`
`article. I then searched the online catalog of the Library of Congress at
`
`https://catalog.loc.gov for “automotive electronics delivering technology’s
`
`promise” and the search results confirmed that Library of Congress holds
`
`this publication. Library of Congress records inform me the publication is
`
`assigned “TL272.5 .I577 2000” as its call number and the library has one
`
`copy that is available for request at the “Jefferson or Adams Building
`
`Reading Rooms.” I requested access to this copy and visited Library of
`
`Congress on May 11, 2018 to use it. While the physical volume was in my
`
`possession at the Jefferson Reading Room I personally scanned the cover,
`
`title page, copyright page, Conference Committee page, introduction, table
`
`of contents, and the “Mufid” article (presented as Exhibit-1).
`
`18. The cover of Exhibit-1 presents “Convergence 2000
`
`Proceedings,” “Automotive electronics delivering technology’s promise,”
`
`and “International Congress on Transportation Electronics” together with the
`
`date and place of the conference. The title page presents “AUTOMOTIVE
`
`ELECTRONICS Delivering Technology’s Promise” as the title with a
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 012
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`subtitle “proceedings of the 2000 International Congress on Transportation
`
`Electronics” and a number “P-360.” The title page also presents the Society
`
`of Automotive Engineers, Inc. in Warrendale, PA as the publisher and lists
`
`“October 2000” as the publication date. The copyright page shows a written
`
`call number for this volume, “TL272.5 .I577 2000,” an ISBN (International
`
`Standard Book Number) of “0-7680-0667-8” and an LC control number of
`
`“2001 269738.” The Conference Committee page shows a date stamp of
`
`“Library of Congress December 11 2000 Copyright Office.” The table of
`
`contents shows on page 8 of Exhibit-1 “2000-01-C028 Future Automotive
`
`Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies” by “Akram M. Mufid,
`
`Visteon Automotive Systems” that appears from pages 167 to 182. Page 14
`
`of Exhibit-1 shows the document number “2000-01-C028,” the article title,
`
`and the company “Visteon Automotive Systems” but not the name of Akram
`
`M. Mufid.
`
`Exhibit-2 (Library of Congress)
`
`19. Exhibit-2 is a true and correct copy of the Bibliographic record
`
`for Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE
`
`Conference Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), which contains the Mufid article,
`
`Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies (pp.
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 013
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`167-182). I personally identified and located this record on May 8, 2018,
`
`which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their
`
`opinion. Exhibit-2 informs me Library of Congress holds the Convergence
`
`2000 conference proceedings, which has a call number of “TL272.5 .I577
`
`2000.” Copy 1 is held at one of the reading rooms, while Copy 2 is stored
`
`offsite at Fort Meade, and users can request access to these copies at the
`
`“Jefferson or Adams Building Reading Rooms.”
`
`Exhibit-3 (Library of Congress)
`
`20. Exhibit-3 is a true and correct copy of the MARC record for
`
`Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference
`
`Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), which contains the Mufid article, Future
`
`Automotive Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies (pp. 167-
`
`182). I personally identified and located this MARC record on May 8, 2018,
`
`which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their
`
`opinion. Subfield ǂa of Field 040 of the MARC record informs me the
`
`record was originally created by “EYG,” the OCLC symbol for the General
`
`Motors R&D Center Library in Michigan, according to the Directory of
`
`OCLC Members (https://www.oclc.org/en/contacts/libraries.html); and
`
`subfield ǂd indicates “DLC,” the OCLC symbol for Library of Congress,
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 014
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`modified the original record. Field 042 clarifies this record is “lccopycat”
`
`meaning the Library of Congress record is a copy cataloging record that is
`
`based on a record created earlier by another agency. While most copy
`
`cataloging agencies display their copy catalog record with the master
`
`record’s creation date in Field 008, Library of Congress does not do that.
`
`Instead, Library of Congress uses Field 008 to indicate the date a record is
`
`added to the Library of Congress system and Field 955 to keep track of their
`
`cataloging activities. Field 008 shows the LC record was created on
`
`“010626” (i.e., June 26, 2001) and Field 955, a field for local notes on the
`
`cataloging process at Library of Congress, shows the record was forwarded
`
`to the DDC unit on “2001-09-26” for a Dewey Decimal number to be
`
`assigned, which is typically the last step of cataloging at Library of
`
`Congress. In most academic libraries, newly cataloged books are made
`
`available soon after cataloging records are completed, usually within a week.
`
`The volume of materials for processing at Library of Congress means it may
`
`take longer than a week for a newly cataloged publication to be available to
`
`the public. My conservative estimate is that after the record was completed
`
`on September 26, 2001, the publication would have been available to the
`
`public at Library of Congress no later than December 26, 2001, three months
`
`after record completion.
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 015
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`21. Field 010 shows the LC control number (LCCN) for this
`
`
`
`publication is “2001269738,” which is the same as the number printed on the
`
`copyright page of Exhibit-1. Library of Congress has used LCCN to control
`
`its cataloging records since 1898. LCCN is a unique identifier that enables
`
`users to locate a catalog record for a publication quickly. The year portion
`
`of LCCN typically represents the year when the control number was
`
`assigned. The reason that a 2000 publication carries a 2001 control number
`
`is due to the fact that Library of Congress has a Preassigned Control Number
`
`Program (PCN) that assigns “control numbers in advance of publication to
`
`those titles that may be added to the Library's collections” (see more about
`
`PCN at https://www.loc.gov/publish/pcn/about/).
`
`22. Field 020 shows the ISBN (International Standard Book
`
`Number) for this publication is “0768006678,” which is identical to the
`
`ISBN printed on the copyright page of Exhibit-1. Field 111 informs me the
`
`name of the conference established for cataloging purposes is “International
`
`Congress on Transportation Electronics (2000 : Detroit, Mich.)” and Field
`
`245 shows the main title is “Automotive electronics : delivering technology's
`
`promise : proceedings of the 2000 International Congress on Transportation
`
`Electronics.” Two 246 fields show the publication has two variant titles--
`
`“Proceedings of the 2000 International Congress on Transportation
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 016
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`Electronics” and “Convergence 2000”--and users can use these titles, in
`
`addition to the main title in Field 245, to locate this publication. Field 260
`
`shows the Society of Automotive Engineers in Warrendale, PA published
`
`this book in 2000. Field 490 and Field 830 show the publication belongs to
`
`a series “P (Society of Automotive Engineers)” and its number is “P-360.”
`
`Field 050 shows this publication has a call number by which users can
`
`request the item. Subfield ǂa of Field 050, “TL272.5” in this case, indicates
`
`the subject matter of this publication. The number is assigned from the
`
`Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system, which is used by most
`
`research and academic libraries in the United States and many other
`
`countries. LCC consists of 21 main classes covering many disciplines, such
`
`as philosophy, religion, arts, science, technology, and military science.
`
`“TL272.5” represents the “Electronic equipment” in motor vehicles category
`
`of the LCC scheme. Users interested in this topic could explore a library’s
`
`materials in this topic area by entering this number in a library catalog as a
`
`keyword. The Library of Congress online catalog, for example, will retrieve
`
`materials that have been assigned this subject number when a user enter
`
`“TL272.5” in its single search box. Field 082 shows the publication is
`
`assigned a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) number of “629.27,” which
`
`represents the “other equipment” of motor vehicles category of the DDC
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 017
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`system. DDC is another major classification system for library materials. It
`
`was originally designed by Melvil Dewey in 1876 and has been expanded
`
`through 23 editions. DDC consists of 10 classes that represent many
`
`disciplines and subjects. It is used by more than 200,000 libraries in more
`
`than 135 countries. DDC is mainly used by public and school libraries.
`
`Users interested in a topic represented by a DDC number, such as “629.27”
`
`in this case, could search it as a keyword in the Library of Congress catalog
`
`to retrieve materials that have been assigned the same DDC number.
`
`Subjects of this publication are also represented by three Library of
`
`Congress subject headings: Automobiles with a topical subdivision,
`
`Electronic equipment; Intelligent control systems; and Intelligent
`
`transportation systems. Subfield ǂv “Congresses” indicates these topics were
`
`presented at a conference. These subject terms can be searched in library
`
`catalogs as keywords to retrieve like items. This MARC record (Exhibit-3)
`
`makes this publication searchable at the online catalog of Library of
`
`Congress, and users interested in the topics of the book can find it by the
`
`subject terms listed in Field 650 or the classification numbers listed in Field
`
`050 and Field 082. Field 035 indicates this MARC record has an OCLC
`
`control number of “45252210,” which makes this publication searchable on
`
`WorldCat. In other words, when users locate this publication on WorldCat,
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 018
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`they will learn that Library of Congress holds this publication, as I did
`
`during my research on WorldCat.
`
`23. Taken together, the date stamp, the bibliographic record and the
`
`MARC record inform my opinion that Library of Congress received their
`
`copy of Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise on
`
`December 11, 2000. The records, together with my knowledge of cataloging
`
`practices and standards and the customary library practices for processing
`
`materials for user access, inform my opinion that the physical volume of
`
`Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise : proceedings of
`
`the 2000 International Congress on Transportation Electronics, which
`
`contains the Mufid article, was available (e.g., searchable in the library
`
`catalog and available in the library) for public access at Library of Congress
`
`no later than Dec. 26, 2001, three months after the cataloging process was
`
`completed. The three months estimate for processing materials for user
`
`access is a conservative estimate because of the large volume of materials
`
`that are processed at Library of Congress.
`
`Exhibit-4 (MIT Libraries)
`
`24. Exhibit-4 is a true and correct copy of Future Automotive
`
`Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies (“Mufid”), in Automotive
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 019
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference
`
`Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), pp. 167-182, which I obtained, with the
`
`assistance of Wisconsin TechSearch (WTS), a document delivery service of
`
`the University of Wisconsin-Madison, from the Massachusetts Institute of
`
`Technology (MIT) Libraries on May 22, 2018. When I was originally asked
`
`to prepare this declaration, I searched WorldCat (http://www.worldcat.org)
`
`for the conference title “Automotive electronics : delivering technology's
`
`promise” and found more than 20 holding libraries. To provide evidence
`
`that the 2000 conference proceedings, which includes the “Mufid” article,
`
`was available soon after its publication in 2000, I asked WTS to deliver
`
`scanned pages from two separate libraries beyond my local libraries.
`
`Exhibit-4 is the true and correct copy WTS obtained from the MIT Libraries
`
`according to my specifications. The file includes the cover, title page,
`
`copyright page, page with the date stamp, table of contents and the Mufid
`
`article. I have examined Exhibit-4 and Exhibit-1 closely, which I
`
`personally scanned at Library of Congress, and found that the two files have
`
`the same content. The only differences are that Exhibit-4 has an MIT
`
`barcode sticker on the cover, a call number “TL272.5 .I57 2000” written on
`
`the copyright page (p.4), and a date stamp of “M.I.T. Libraries Nov 8 2000
`
`RECEIVED” on the copyright page (p. 4).
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 020
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`Exhibit-5 (MIT Libraries)
`
`25. Exhibit-5 is a true and correct copy of the Bibliographic record
`
`for Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE
`
`Conference Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), which contains the “Mufid”
`
`article, Future Automotive Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect
`
`Technologies (pp. 167-182). I personally identified and located this record
`
`from the online catalog of the MIT Libraries at http://library.mit.edu on May
`
`22, 2018, which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when
`
`forming their opinion. Exhibit-5 presents bibliographic information about
`
`this publication, including the conference name, title, publisher, description,
`
`series, format, note, bibliography, subjects, other author, other title, and
`
`ISBN. In addition, it presents information specific to the MIT Libraries. A
`
`permalink informs me the record can be located consistently at
`
`http://library.mit.edu/item/000959917. The “Shelf Access” field has a link
`
`for users to find the item in the library or request it, and the “Shelf Location”
`
`field indicates it is shelved at “Barker Library - Stacks | TL272.5.I57 2000.”
`
`The “local system number” indicates this item’s number is “000959917.”
`
`Exhibit-6 (MIT Libraries)
`
`26. Exhibit-6 is a true and correct copy of the MARC record for
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 021
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`Automotive Electronics : Delivering Technology’s Promise, SAE Conference
`
`Proceedings, no. 360 (2000), which contains the “Mufid” article, Future
`
`Automotive Multimedia Subsystem Interconnect Technologies (pp. 167-
`
`182). I personally identified and located this record from the online catalog
`
`of the MIT Libraries at
`
`http://library.mit.edu/F/37UUX4LQB1MHNPQFHSLA7TP5S212MH7YA
`
`KU66UGES4DCSECHG6-01482?func=full-set-
`
`set&set_number=018233&set_entry=000001&format=001 on May 22,
`
`2018, which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming
`
`their opinion. Subfield ǂa of Field 040 informs me the original creator of the
`
`record is “EYG” and Subfield ǂd informs me “MYG” is the library that
`
`modifies this record. According to the Directory of OCLC Members
`
`(https://www.oclc.org/en/contacts/libraries.html), “EYG” is the OCLC
`
`symbol for the General Motors R&D Center Library and “MYG” the OCLC
`
`symbol for the MIT Libraries. This means the MIT record is a copy
`
`cataloging record based on the EYG record. Field 008 informs me the
`
`original record by EYG was created on “001030” (i.e., Oct. 30, 2000). Most
`
`libraries do not clearly indicate the date when a copy cataloging record is
`
`added to the cataloging system on their MARC bibliographic records. In
`
`this case, the MIT MARC record (Exhibit-6) itself does not indicate the
`
`Jaguar Land Rover
`Exhibit 1012
`Page 022
`
`

`

`Declaration of Dr. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee in Support of
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of USP 7,489,786
`
`
`copy cataloging date, but the MARC holdings record attached to the bottom
`
`of Exhibit-6 has an 008 field date of “010623” (i.e., June 23, 2001) that
`
`indicates the date the record was entered into the system.
`
`27. Because the MIT MARC record (Exhibit-6), like the LC
`
`MARC record (Exhibit-2), is a copy cataloging record based on the record
`
`originally created by EGY, the General Motors R&D Center Library, it is
`
`not surprising that the MIT MARC record and the LC MARC record are
`
`very similar in content. From Field 111 to Field 830 the two records provide

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket