throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 10
`
`
` Entered: March 29, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RIMFROST AS,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01178
`Case IPR2018-01179
`Patent 9,375,453 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, TINA E. HULSE, and
`JOHN E. SCHNEIDER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.121(a)
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01178
`IPR2018-01179
`Patent 9,375,453 B2
`
`
`On March 29, 2019, a conference call was held among counsel for the
`parties and Judges Franklin, Hulse, and Schneider to discuss general
`guidance for motions to amend.
`We explained that the requirements for a motion to amend are set
`forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.121. We referred the parties to that rule and to the
`Memorandum re: Guidance on Motions to Amend in view of Aqua Products
`(Nov. 21, 2017) (available at https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/
`documents/guidance_on_motions_to_amend_11_2017.pdf).
`We also referred the parties to additional guidance on motions to
`amend discussed in the following cases: Lectrosonics, Inc. v Zaxcom, Inc.,
`Case IPR2018-01129, 01130 (PTAB February 25, 2019) (Paper 15)
`(precedential), and Amazon.com, Inc. v. Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., Case
`IPR2017-00948 (PTAB Jan. 18, 2019) (Paper 34) (precedential).
`Furthermore we explained, as set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.24, that
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend and Petitioner’s opposition are each
`limited to twenty-five pages. 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.24(a)(1)(vi), 42.24(b)(3).
`Patent Owner’s reply and Petitioner’s sur-reply are limited to twelve pages.
`Id. § 42.24(c)(3). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, the papers are currently
`due on April 15, July 15, August 14, and September 16, 2019, respectively.
`Paper 8. If the parties wish to stipulate to different deadlines, the parties
`may do so. Id. at 1 (“The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE
`DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6).”).
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01178
`IPR2018-01179
`Patent 9,375,453 B2
`
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the conference requirement under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.121(a) is hereby satisfied.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01178
`IPR2018-01179
`Patent 9,375,453 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`James F. Harrington
`Michael I. Chakansky
`Ronald J. Baron
`John T. Gallagher
`HOFFMANN & BARON LLP
`jfhdocket@hbiplaw.com
`micdocket@hbiplaw.com
`rjbdocket@hbiplaw.com
`jtgdocket@hbiplaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`David A. Casimir, Ph. D
`J. Mitchell Jones, Ph. D
`CASIMIR JONES S.C.
`docketing@casimirjones.com
`dacasimir@casimirjones.com
`jmjones@casimirjones.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket