throbber

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-01166
`Patent 7,256,486
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`Nichia Corporation
`v.
`Document Security Systems, Inc.
`
`IPR2018-01166 (USP 7,256,486 B2)
`
`Oral Hearing Date: August 28, 2019
`
`Before Hon. Scott C. Moore, Amber L. Hagy, and Brent M. Dougal,
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`Paper 9, pp. 7‐9
`
`Summary of Asserted Grounds
`
`

`

`3DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Overview of Oral Hearing Issues
`
`Issue
`
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`Do Grounds 16-24 Render Claim 6 Obvious?
`
`Does Petitioner Offer a Correct Construction of
`“Metallized…Major Surface”?
`Does Secondary Reference Weeks Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`Does either Kish or Edmond Teach or Suggest a “Metallized Top
`Major Surface of the LED” as Recited in Claim 2?
`
`16-24
`
`1-24
`
`1, 4, 7, 10, 13,
`16, 19, 22
`2-3, 5-6, 11-12,
`14-15, 17-18,
`20-21, 23-24
`
`6
`
`1-6
`
`1-6
`
`2-3
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`Issue #1:
`
`Issue
`
`Do Grounds 16-24 Render Claim 6 Obvious?
`
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`16-24
`
`6
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Petition (Paper 2), pp. 82-84;
`PO’s Response (Paper 13), pp. 14-24;
`PO’s Sur-Reply (Paper 17), pp. 1-5.
`
`

`

`’087 Fig. 1
`
`’486 Patent: Claim 6’486 Patent: Claim 6
`
`…
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 1001, 12:6‐22, 40‐46, 50‐55;
`Paper 13, p. 14 
`
`

`

`
`Nakajima’s Tungsten Relied On Against Nakajima’s Tungsten Relied On Against
`
`Claim 4Claim 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`Petition (Paper 2), 50; see also id., 66, 81
`
`

`

`
`
`Petitioner’s Substitution Theory For Claim 6Petitioner’s Substitution Theory For Claim 6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`Petition (Paper 2), 83‐84
`
`

`

`
`
`Dr. Shealy’s Substitution Theory for Claim 6Dr. Shealy’s Substitution Theory for Claim 6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`Ex. 1003, ¶ 227.
`
`

`

`’087 Fig. 1
`
`Jochym Does Not Use TungstenJochym Does Not Use Tungsten
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`Exhibit 1010, 4:15‐17;
`Paper 13, p. 16 
`
`

`

`
`Shealy’s Testimony on Jochym:Shealy’s Testimony on Jochym:
`
`“I do not find tungsten in here”“I do not find tungsten in here”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`Exhibit 2016, 75:18‐76:18;
`Paper 13, p. 17 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`Exhibit 2016, 77:5‐8;
`Paper 13, p. 18 
`
`
`
`Shealy’s TestimonyShealy’s Testimony
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`Exhibit 2016, 79:10‐16;
`Paper 13, p. 21 
`
`
`
`Shealy’s TestimonyShealy’s Testimony
`
`

`

`’087 Fig. 1
`
`Jochym’s Printed Circuit Board DisclosureJochym’s Printed Circuit Board Disclosure
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`Exhibit 1010, p.1; 1:7‐8;
`Paper 13, p. 19 
`
`

`

`’087 Fig. 1
`
`Diameter of a Jochym’s Through-Hole Diameter of a Jochym’s Through-Hole
`
`“Stay[s] the Same”“Stay[s] the Same”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`Exhibit 1010, 1:60‐63;
`Paper 13, p. 23 
`
`

`

`
`Petitioner: Substitute to “Maintain a Small Petitioner: Substitute to “Maintain a Small
`
`Diameter”Diameter”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`Exhibit 1003, ¶227
`
`

`

`’087 Fig. 1
`
`Diameter of Jochym’s Through-HolesDiameter of Jochym’s Through-Holes
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`Exhibit 1010, 4:50‐56;
`Paper 13, p. 20 
`
`

`

`
`Shealy on Diameter of Jochym’sShealy on Diameter of Jochym’s
`
`Through-HolesThrough-Holes
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`Exhibit 2016, 77:9‐20;
`Paper 13, p. 20 
`
`

`

`
`Shealy on Diameter of Nakajima’s Shealy on Diameter of Nakajima’s
`
`Through-HolesThrough-Holes
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`Exhibit 2016, 72:1‐21;
`Paper 13, p. 20, 23 
`
`

`

`
`Unaddressed Issues with Petitioner’s Unaddressed Issues with Petitioner’s
`
`SubstitutionSubstitution
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`Exhibit 2016, 67:12‐68:15;
`Paper 13, p. 20 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`Issue #2:
`
`Issue
`
`Does Petitioner Offer a Correct Construction of
`“Metallized…Major Surface”?
`
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`1-24
`
`1-6
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Petition (Paper 2), pp. 11-14;
`PO’s Response (Paper 13), pp. 10-14;
`PO’s Sur-Reply (Paper 17), pp. 5-8.
`
`

`

`
`
`“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 1; 12:6‐21;
`Paper 13, pp. 7‐8
`
`

`

`’297 Fig. 1
`
`“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`Exhibit 1001, Abstract; 1:20‐24;
`Paper 13, p. 10 
`
`

`

`
`
`“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 4;
`Paper 13, p. 10 
`
`

`

`
`
`“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent“Pad” versus “Surface” in ’486 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`Exhibit 1001, p. 5;
`Paper 13, p. 10 
`
`

`

`
`
`Petitioner’s Metal “Portion” is a “Pad”Petitioner’s Metal “Portion” is a “Pad”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`Pet. (Paper 2), 12; Exhibit 1001, p. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`“Surfaces” in the ‘486 Patent Are Not “Pads”“Surfaces” in the ‘486 Patent Are Not “Pads”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`Pet. (Paper 2), 12
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`Issue #3:
`
`Issue
`
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`Does Secondary Reference Weeks Disclose or Suggest a Light
`Emitting Diode Having a Metallized Bottom Major Surface?
`
`1, 4, 7, 10, 13,
`16, 19, 22
`
`1-6
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Petition (Paper 2), pp. 18-20, 30-32, 36-38,
`54-55, 57-59, 70, 73-74;
`PO’s Response (Paper 13), pp. 24-26, 39-41, 50-52;
`PO’s Sur-Reply (Paper 17), pp. 8-10.
`
`

`

`
`Weeks Does Not Disclose an LED Having a Weeks Does Not Disclose an LED Having a
`
`Metallized Bottom Major SurfaceMetallized Bottom Major Surface
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`Exhibit 1007, p. 6;
`Paper 13, p. 25 
`
`

`

`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`Issue #4:
`
`Issue
`
`Does either Kish or Edmond Teach or Suggest a “Metallized Top
`Major Surface of the LED” as Recited in Claim 2?
`
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`2-3, 5-6, 11-12,
`14-15, 17-18,
`20-21, 23-24
`
`1-6
`
`Answer: No
`
`See Petition (Paper 2), pp. 20-22, 41-43, 64-65, 79-80;
`PO’s Response (Paper 13), pp. 28-30, 43-45, 55-57;
`PO’s Sur-Reply (Paper 17), pp. 10-11.
`
`

`

`
`Kish Does Not Disclose an LED Having a Kish Does Not Disclose an LED Having a
`
`Metallized Top Major SurfaceMetallized Top Major Surface
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`Exhibit 1008, p. 8;
`Paper 13, pp. 29, 44, 56 
`
`

`

`
`Edmond Does Not Disclose an LED Having Edmond Does Not Disclose an LED Having
`
`a Metallized Top Major Surfacea Metallized Top Major Surface
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT –NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`Exhibit 1009, p. 2;
`Paper 13, pp. 30, 45, 57 
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 23, 2019, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Demonstrative Exhibits was served via email, by
`
`consent, to Petitioner by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as
`
`follows:
`
`
`Patrick R. Colsher (Reg. No. 74,955)
`patrick.colsher@shearman.com
`Eric S. Lucas (Reg. No. 76,434)
`eric.lucas@shearman.com
`Thomas R. Makin
`thomas.makin@shearman.com
`Shearman & Sterling LLP
`599 Lexington Avenue
`New York, New York 10022
`
`Matthew G. Berkowitz (Reg. No. 57,215)
`matthew.berkowitz@shearman.com
`Shearman & Sterling LLP
`1460 El Camino Real
`Menlo Park, California 94025
`
`Email: nichia-dss@shearman.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 23, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Wayne M. Helge
`Wayne M. Helge (Reg. No. 56,905)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket