`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: August 22, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NICHIA CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases1
`IPR2018-01165 (Patent 7,524,087 B1)
`IPR2018-01167 (Patent 6,949,771 B2)
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BARBARA A. BENOIT, SCOTT C. MOORE, and
`BRENT M. DOUGAL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BENOIT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Mr. Thomas R. Makin
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are substantially similar in the
`proceedings. We exercise our discretion to issue one order to be entered in
`each case.
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01165 (Patent 7,524,087 B1)
`IPR2018-01167 (Patent 6,949,771 B2)
`
`
`Petitioner filed motions for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Thomas R.
`Makin in each of these proceedings. Paper 7.2 Each motion was
`accompanied by a declaration from Mr. Makin in support of the motion. Id.
`at 2–3; Paper 8 (“Declaration of Thomas R. Makin in Support of Petitioner’s
`Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice”).3 Each motion indicates
`that Patent Owner does not oppose the motion. Paper 7, 2.
`Having reviewed the motions and the declarations of Mr. Makin, we
`conclude that Mr. Makin has sufficient qualifications to represent Petitioner
`in these proceedings and that Petitioner has shown good cause for pro hac
`vice admission of Mr. Makin. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron,
`LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (setting forth the requirements
`for pro hac vice admission) (Paper 7). Mr. Makin will be permitted to
`appear pro hac vice in these proceedings as back-up counsel only. See
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`ORDER
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Mr. Thomas R. Makin are granted, and Mr. Makin is authorized to represent
`Petitioner only as back-up counsel in these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these proceedings;
`
`
`2 Paper numbers refer to IPR2018-01165.
`3 Petitioner filed the declaration as a Paper. Petitioner is reminded that
`affidavits and declarations must be filed as exhibits so that they may be
`referenced individually by exhibit number. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01165 (Patent 7,524,087 B1)
`IPR2018-01167 (Patent 6,949,771 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Makin is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Makin is subject to the USPTO’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Patick Colsher
`Matt Berkowitz
`Eric Lucas
`Patrick.colsher@shearman.com
`Matt.berkowitz@shearman.com
`Eric.lucas@shearman.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Wayne M. Helge
`James T. Wilson
`Aldo Noto
`whelge@dbjg.com
`jwilson@dbjg.com
`anoto@dbjg.com
`
`
`3
`
`