`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: March 5, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Cases
`IPR2018-01152
`IPR2018-01153
`IPR2018-01154
`IPR2018-012401
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, DANIEL N. FISHMAN, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Louis Tompros
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues pertaining to the above-identified proceedings.
`We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153,
`IPR2018-01154, IPR2018-01240
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`
`Petitioner (“Intel Corporation”) filed an Motion for Admission Pro
`Hac Vice of Louis Tampros in each of the above-captioned proceedings.
`IPR2018-01152 Paper 13; IPR2018-01153 Paper 13; IPR2018-01154 Paper
`13; IPR2018-01240 Paper 13 (collectively “Motions”). Petitioner also filed
`Declarations of Mr. Tampros in support of its Motions. IPR2018-01152 Ex.
`1025; IPR2018-01153 Ex. 1125; IPR2018-01154 Ex. 1226; IPR2018-01240
`Ex. 1327.
`Patent Owner did not oppose Petitioner’s motion within the shortened
`time period specified in our Notice of Filing Date Accorded. See, e.g.,
`IPR2018-01152, Paper 5, 2 (incorporating Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7)).
`We have reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Tampros pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Louis Tampros are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tampros will be authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tampros is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153,
`IPR2018-01154, IPR2018-01240
`Patent 8,698,558 B2
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, upon filing corrected declarations, Mr.
`Tampros shall be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David L. Cavanaugh
`Richard Goldenberg
`Theodoros Konstantakopoulos
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`theodoros.konstantakopoulos@wilmerhale.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph M. Sauer
`David B. Cochran
`Richard A. Graham
`David M. Maiorana
`Joshua R. Nightingale
`Matthew W. Johnson
`JONES DAY
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`dcochran@jonesday.com
`ragraham@jonesday.com
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`jrnightingale@jonesday.com
`mwjohsnon@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
