throbber
Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CASES IPR 2018-01152;-01153;-01154;-1240
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,698,558
`
`_________________________________
`)
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`))
`
`))
`
`_________________________________)
`
`DEPOSITION OF ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
`March 6, 2019
`
`New York, New York
`
`TRANSCRIPT of the stenographic notes of
`
`the deposition of ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D., in the
`
`above-entitled matter, as taken by and before
`
`LORRAINE B. ABATE, a Certified Shorthand Reporter and
`
`Notary Public of the State of New York and Registered
`
`Professional Reporter, held at the offices of Wilmer
`
`Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 7 World Trade
`
`Center, New York, New York, on March 6, 2019,
`
`commencing at 9:30 a.m., pursuant to Notice.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
`IPR2018-01153
`Exhibit 2006
`
`))
`
`))
`
`))
`
`Petitioner,
`
`vs.
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE and DORR LLP
`
`Attorneys for the Plaintiff
`
`60 State Street
`
`Boston, Massachussetts 02109
`
`BY: LOUIS W. TOMPROS, ESQ.
`
`(617)526-6886
`
`louis.tompros@wilmerhale.com
`
`-and-
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE and DORR, LLP
`
`7 World Trade Center
`
`New York, New York 10007
`
`BY: THEODOROS KONSTANTAKOPOULOS, ESQ.
`
`(212) 295-6367
`
`theodoros.konstantakopoulos@wilmerhale.com
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S (CONTINUED):
`
`JONES DAY
`
`Attorneys for the Defendant
`
`North Point - 901 Lakeside Avenue
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190
`
`BY: JOSEPH M. SAUER, ESQ.
`
`(216)586-3939
`
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`
`-and-
`
`JONES DAY
`
`500 Grant Street - Suite 4500
`
`Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-2514
`
`BY: JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, ESQ.
`
`jrnightingdale@jonesday.com
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 4
`
` I N D E X
`
` WITNESS: Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D
`
` EXAMINATION BY PAGE
`
` Mr. Sauer 5
`
` *********
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` ( NONE MARKED )
`
` *********
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1 2
`
`3 4 5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A L Y S S A B. A P S E L, Ph.D.,
`
` Having been first duly sworn by a Notary
`
` Public of the State of New York, was
`
` examined and testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION BY MR. SAUER:
`
` Q. Hi, Professor. You understand that
`
` you're under oath this morning?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Is there any reason you can't testify
`
` truthfully today?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. And you've been deposed before?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So you know the drill. Just a couple of
`
` preliminaries. I'm going to try to ask clear
`
` questions.
`
` If I ask a question that you don't
`
` understand or isn't clear, if you could just let me
`
` know. I'll try to make it better.
`
` For the court reporter's sake, we need
`
` to try to not talk over one another. And if we need
`
` to take a break, just let me know. We can take a
`
` break at any time. The only thing I'll ask is if we
`
` are in the middle of a question, that you finish your
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` answer and then we can take a break afterwards.
`
` For the record, this deposition pertains
`
` to four IPR matters, and those matters are IPR 2018
`
` 01152, 01153, 01154, and 01240.
`
` Is that your understanding as well?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If I'm asking a question specific to any
`
` one of those four IPRs, I'll try to make that clear.
`
` But if it's not clear on the record or to you which
`
` IPR matter I'm referring to, if you could just ask
`
` and I'll make it clear. Okay?
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. I'm handing the witness what has been
`
` premarked as Intel Exhibit 1203.
`
` Sorry, these are double-sided to save a
`
` little space in my bag.
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. Do you recognize this document,
`
` Professor, as a copy of the declaration that you
`
` submitted in IPR 2018 01154?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And specifically, this declaration -- or
`
` back up a minute. This declaration relates to patent
`
` No. 8,698,558, correct?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And specifically, this declaration
`
` relates to claims 15 through 20 of that patent,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Would it be all right if we refer to
`
` that as the '558 patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. I'm now handing the witness what has
`
` been premarked as Intel Exhibit 1201.
`
` Professor, do you recognize this as a
`
` copy of the '558 patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Did you review the '558 patent in
`
` connection with the preparation of your declaration?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Would you consider yourself to be
`
` familiar with the technology described in the '558
`
` patent?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You can set that aside for a moment.
`
` If we can turn back to your declaration,
`
` please, and on page 83, is this your signature on
`
` page 83?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Did you write this document?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Are there any mistakes in this document
`
` that you're aware of?
`
` A. There may be some typos or minor issues,
`
` but I believe the opinions stated in here are all
`
` accurate.
`
` Q. Is there any opinions you would like to
`
` change?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Can you turn to page 85. Starting on
`
` page 85 is a copy of your CV, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is this a current copy?
`
` A. I believe it's a little bit old. It's
`
` probably a year, might be a year old.
`
` Q. Since --
`
` A. Eight months old or something.
`
` Q. Since you created this CV, is there any
`
` experience or publications or anything that is
`
` pertinent to the technology in the '558 patent?
`
` A. I don't think so, but my position has
`
` changed.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` Q. What's your new position?
`
` A. I'm director of electrical and computer
`
` engineering at Cornell now.
`
` Q. Congratulations. I think I saw that in
`
` here somewhere.
`
` And what do the duties entail?
`
` A. I need to give an honest answer. A lot
`
` of cat herding.
`
` Q. Administrative duties?
`
` A. A lot of administrative duties, yes.
`
` Q. Do you still teach?
`
` A. No. Not right now.
`
` Q. So on page 87, there's a list, starting
`
` on page 87, that's a list of ten, I believe, patents
`
` that you're one of the inventors on; is that correct?
`
` A. I haven't counted, but I take your word
`
` for that.
`
` Q. I just counted. I'll represent there
`
` are ten.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Are there -- is this a current list?
`
` A. I think so, yes.
`
` Q. Based on your current recollection, are
`
` any of those patents relevant to the technology
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` described in the '558 patent?
`
` A. The first one is a little bit relevant.
`
` It is a patent related to design of power amplifiers.
`
` Q. Any others?
`
` A. There are some related concepts in the
`
` third one somewhat. Actually, the third and fourth,
`
` because they're connected, but they're related to low
`
` power transceiver design.
`
` Q. And then starting on page 94, there a
`
` long list of many publications and book chapters and
`
` articles.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And I know this is a long list, but I'm
`
` going to ask you the same question; based on your
`
` current recollection, are there any publications that
`
` are relevant to the technology described in the '558
`
` patent?
`
` A. Yes. I'd say that the third one is
`
` related to the design of on chip power regulators,
`
` DCD convertors, ways of networking them together.
`
` Q. And specifically, that's the third
`
` journal paper?
`
` A. That's the third journal paper.
`
` The fourth one is related to the design
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` of power amplifiers, and also, some of the power
`
` control for power amplifiers at some level.
`
` Let's see. The one in September 2013 is
`
` related to low power transevers. There is
`
` probably -- if I look at the conference papers,
`
` there's also -- let's see. Probably the first one,
`
` the third one.
`
` Q. The first one and the third one?
`
` A. Of the conference papers, so conference
`
` proceedings and papers.
`
` MR. TOMPROS: Page 97.
`
` MR. SAUER: Thank you.
`
` A. Sorry, the first, third, fourth, sixth,
`
` seventh, eighth. Those are all related --
`
` Q. Okay. Great.
`
` A. -- to this area.
`
` Q. Well, thank you. I have some reading to
`
` do.
`
` A. Maybe I shouldn't have pointed them all
`
` out.
`
` Q. I'm sure they will be brilliant.
`
` If you could turn, then, to the
`
` declaration and pages -- excuse me.
`
` At the table of contents of the
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` declaration, pages i, and ii, your declaration
`
` includes three grounds challenging the '558 patent,
`
` correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`And specifically, ground 1 challenges
`
` claims 15, 17 through 18, and 20 as anticipated by
`
` Kwak, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Claim 16 -- ground 2 is claim 16 as
`
` obvious in view of Kwak, correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`And ground 3 alleges that claim 19 is
`
` obvious in view of Kwak combined with Choi 2010; is
`
` that correct?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`I'm handing the witness now what has
`
` been premarked as Intel 1211.
`
`Professor, do you recognize the document
`
` I just handed you as a copy of the Kwak reference
`
` that is referenced in your declaration?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Did you review the Kwak reference in
`
` connection with the preparation of your declaration?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` Q. Would you consider yourself familiar
`
` with the technology described in Kwak?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If you can go back to go your
`
` declaration, then, on page 40, please. Starts on
`
` page 40 of your declaration. You address why, in
`
` your opinion, claim 15 of the '558 patent is
`
` anticipated by the Kwak reference, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is it your understanding that for a
`
` reference to anticipate a claim, that that single
`
` reference must disclose each and every element of the
`
` claim?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And is it your opinion that Kwak
`
` discloses each and every element of claim 15?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If you turn to page 43. Sorry, that
`
` double sided is a little awkward, but it saved me a
`
` lot of space.
`
` Starting at the bottom of page 43,
`
` subheading C, you address an element of claim 15
`
` requiring a switcher operative to sense an input
`
` current and generate the switching signal to charge
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` and discharge the inductor to provide the supply
`
` current, the switcher adding an offset to the input
`
` current to generate a larger supply current via the
`
` inductor than without the offset, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is it your opinion that Kwak discloses
`
` this limitation of the claim?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. It's a long claim element, so let's take
`
` it one part at a time.
`
` The claim starts a switcher operative to
`
` sense an input current, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Referring to paragraph 92 on page 44,
`
` it's your opinion that Kwak discloses a switcher
`
` which is highlighted in yellow in the highlighted
`
` version of figure 5 on page 44, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Referring to that highlighted version of
`
` figure 5, can you tell me what in the highlighted
`
` portion of this circuit is operative to sense an
`
` input current.
`
` A. Yes. So the switcher contains a PFET
`
` and an NFET that are switched via these drivers that
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` are controlled such that either one or the other is
`
` on. Right? So basically, they are -- they have a
`
` single input signal and they respond to opposite
`
` polarity of that input signal. That signal is
`
` modulated by this kind of thresholding circuit
`
` beforehand, and the thresholding circuit is comparing
`
` the sawtooth to the output -- the output of this
`
` integrator. This integrator is kind of a conceptual
`
` integrator. It's a block of an integrator. And so
`
` the integrator is basically integrating the sum of
`
` two currents, in this case. And so the current
`
` that's being sensed is really, the sum of those two
`
` currents.
`
` Q. Which two currents?
`
` A. There are two inputs into this summer.
`
` Again, a conceptual summer shown in this picture,
`
` that are coming out of the block labelled As and the
`
` black labelled Af.
`
` Q. So in figure 5, specifically, is it the
`
` summer that's doing the sensing, in your opinion?
`
` A. I wouldn't say it that way. I would say
`
` the sensing is a combination of the summation, the
`
` integration and the comparison.
`
` Q. And those three functions are being
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` performed by the summation circuit that you've
`
` highlighted in brown on this figure 5 and the
`
` integrator and the comparitor that are both
`
` highlighted in red; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. What in figure 5 of Kwak corresponds to
`
` the claimed input current?
`
` A. There's not an explicitedly drawn
`
` current signal here, but the input current would be a
`
` signal, the summed result of these two -- oh,
`
` actually, what am I saying? Scratch that. I said
`
` that wrong.
`
` Sorry. The input current is coming from
`
` the -- that's the current coming from the linear
`
` amplifier the way this is described. Scratch what I
`
` said before.
`
` Q. And the linear amplifier is the block
`
` highlighted in purple; is that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So the current coming out of the block
`
` highlighted in purple is labeled in figure 5 ia; is
`
` that correct?
`
` A. That is the -- yes, that is the current
`
` coming out of the linear amplifier into the load, and
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` depending on how the sensing is done -- depending on
`
` how the sensing is done, that's essentially what is
`
` being sensed and used -- and used to sum with the
`
` offset current to drive the switcher.
`
` Q. So it's your opinion, then, that ia in
`
` figure 5 corresponds to the claimed input current?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. How does the yellow highlighted switcher
`
` in figure 5 sense the current, sense the input
`
` current?
`
` A. There's a block As which is, again, a
`
` behavioral model of something. It could be done in a
`
` variety of different ways, but essentially, what
`
` that's showing is that that is measuring the output
`
` of that linear amplifier. You know, there are a
`
` variety of ways that that could be done. It could be
`
` done with a current mirror, or by just, you know,
`
` leaking off a small portion of the current that's
`
` proportional to that current coming out of that
`
` block. There are a number of ways it could be done.
`
` It's not shown in detail here, but that's essentially
`
` the idea.
`
` Q. Okay. You had said that the summation
`
` circuit in figure 5 receives two input signals,
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And looking at figure 5, one of those
`
` input signals coming out of this block that's
`
` labelled As, right?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And the other input signal to the
`
` summation circuit comes out of the block labelled Af,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. The output of block As that you were just
`
` talking about is an AC signal, correct?
`
` A. It may have a DC component, but ideally
`
` it's an AC signal.
`
` Q. But essentially has an AC component?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Being a signal with an AC component or
`
` ideally, a pure AC signal, the output of block As
`
` would include both a magnitude and a phase, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. The next part of this claim element,
`
` looking back at the top of page 44, requires adding
`
` offset to the input current, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` Q. So again, referring to your highlighted
`
` version of figure 5, what in Kwak provides the
`
` claimed offset to the input current?
`
` A. The output of Af.
`
` Q. Af is a gained value, correct?
`
` A. Yes. I should clarify, the output of
`
` the block labelled with the label Af. Af is
`
` presumably the gain of that block.
`
` Q. So to be clear, the output of block
`
` labelled Af provides, in your opinion, the offset to
`
` the input current?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And you refer to that in some place as
`
` the offset current; is that correct?
`
` A. Could you direct me where I'm looking.
`
` Q. So as an example, let's look at
`
` paragraph 95 where you say the offset current is
`
` added to the sensed signal by the summing circuit.
`
` So in that sentence, when you're
`
` referring to the offset current, you're referring to
`
` the current out of block Af, correct?
`
` A. Yes, or the equivalent circuit.
`
` Q. What do you mean the equivalent?
`
` A. I mean, this is a block diagram. So...
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` Q. So whatever --
`
` A. Whatever is performing that function,
`
` yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Fair enough.
`
` But the output of block Af that you're
`
` referring to as the offset current is also an AC
`
` signal, correct?
`
` A. It is probably not a pure AC signal. It
`
` probably has a DC component as well.
`
` Q. It would have an AC component?
`
` A. It is -- it has probably both.
`
` Q. Can you turn to Kwak for a moment.
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. Look at page 2669 of Kwak on the upper
`
` right-hand corner of the little page numbers, and
`
` specifically, this is at the page with figure 6.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And figure 6 has, on the left-hand side,
`
` a dotted box that's labelled feedforward path.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is it your opinion that this feedforward
`
` path corresponds with the feedforward path that
`
` includes block Af in figure 5?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A. Can you repeat the question.
`
` Q. Sure. It wasn't asked very well.
`
` Figure 5 includes block Af in a
`
` feedforward path, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is this the same feedforward path in
`
` figure 6? Let me ask it this way; is it your opinion
`
` that the components within the feedforward path in
`
` figure 6 would be an implementation of block Af in
`
` figure 5?
`
` A. Yes, I think that's fair.
`
` Q. And you see in the feedforward path in
`
` figure 6 there's a capacitor labelled C1?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Wouldn't that capacitor C1 block any DC
`
` components of the output?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So in view of that, wouldn't the output
`
` of block Af in figure 5 be a pure AC signal?
`
` A. In the implementation in figure 6, it is
`
` a pure AC signal.
`
` Q. It is.
`
` So referring back, then, to your
`
` declaration, at paragraph 95, and we read this
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` earlier, I'm going to read it again.
`
` The first sentence in paragraph 95 says
`
` the offset current is added to the sensed signal by
`
` the summing circuit (the summation sign, outlined in
`
` brown.)
`
` So the summation circuit is outlined in
`
` brown in figure 5 in your highlighted version of
`
` figure 5, correct? Sorry, let me back up. Sorry. I
`
` messed up.
`
` Referring to paragraph 95 of your
`
` declaration, it's your opinion that the offset
`
` current, which you've testified is the output of
`
` block labelled Af in your highlighted version of
`
` figure 5, is added to the sensed signal by the
`
` summing circuit, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And that summing circuit is the circuit
`
` that's highlighted in brown in your highlighted
`
` version of figure 5?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And you agree that both of the inputs to
`
` this summation circuit that's circled in brown in
`
` your highlighted version of figure 5 are AC signals,
`
` correct?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A. I think there still are potentially DC
`
` components of those. In the extenuation in figure 5,
`
` you know, it's not clear that it's pure AC, but
`
` it's -- certainly the intention of the circuit is to
`
` have AC components.
`
` Q. So let me ask it this way, then.
`
` The two inputs -- you would agree that
`
` the two inputs to the summation circuit highlighted
`
` in brown in figure 5 include AC components?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Both inputs?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And so then the output of that summation
`
` circuit would include a combination of those two AC
`
` inputs, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. In combining the two AC inputs, the
`
` magnitude of AC output from that summation circuit is
`
` going to be dependent on the phase alignment to the
`
` two AC components; isn't that correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. If we can turn to page 50 of your
`
` declaration.
`
` On page 50, the paragraph 103, you
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` address Kwak's equation 4, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And if we look at Kwak on page 2669,
`
` equation 4 appears on that page, right?
`
` A. It does.
`
` Q. And the equation in paragraph 103 of
`
` your declaration is the same equation as on page 2669
`
` of Kwak, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. One of the variables in equation 4 is
`
` the current output from the envelope amplifier A --
`
` ia, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And that's the same ia that's shown in
`
` figure 5, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Which is the envelope amplifier output
`
` current, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And the envelope amplifier output
`
` current ia is an AC signal, correct?
`
` A. It has an AC component, as we said
`
` before.
`
` Q. Another variable in Kwak's figure 4 is
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` Vin, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And this is the input voltage shown in
`
` figure 5, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is the input voltage Vin also an AC
`
` signal?
`
` A. In the sense that it has an AC
`
` component, yes.
`
` Q. Fair enough.
`
` So back on page 50 of your declaration,
`
` in paragraph 103, beneath Kwak's equation 4, you've
`
` provided another equation, correct? And you
`
` explain -- was that a yes?
`
` A. I'm sorry, it's not exactly an equation,
`
` but there's only one piece of an equation. It's an
`
` expression.
`
` Q. Okay. You provided a piece of an
`
` equation underneath Kwak's equation 4 on page 50?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And you explain that this portion of
`
` equation 4 that you've included on page 50 is
`
` representative of the total output current that is
`
` provided by the switcher id, correct?
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 26
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Then you then state below the portion of
`
` the equation according to this expression, the supply
`
` current from the switcher id is proportional to the
`
` offset current Af:as the offset Af increases, so will
`
` the supply current from the switcher id, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Af is a gained value, right?
`
` A. It's a gained value, but in this case, I
`
` mean, it's being used to represent the output of that
`
` block.
`
` Q. So in what sense?
`
` A. In this description. The Af times the in
`
` is pointing to the output current. So it's kind of a
`
` proxy for --
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` A. -- current.
`
` Q. So what you're saying is --
`
` A. It's a bad way of describing it, I
`
` agree.
`
` Q. How would you describe it?
`
` A. Af is not -- is not a current.
`
` Q. Would it be better to say that the
`
` supply current from the switcher is proportional to
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` the -- to Af multiplied by Vin? I'm just trying to
`
` understand what you meant here.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And that Af times Vin corresponds to what
`
` you're calling the offset current, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. According to this portion of
`
` Kwak's equation 4 that you list here on page 50,
`
` though, the supply current from the switcher id is
`
` proportional to the sum of As times ia and Af times
`
` Vin, right?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You agree that ia and Vin are signals
`
` that include AC components, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And so according to this equation, the
`
` magnitude of current id is going to be dependent on
`
` the phase alignment of ia and Vin, correct?
`
` You want me to re-ask that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. According to this equation, the
`
` magnitude of the current i -- I'm trying to read it,
`
` but let me re-ask it.
`
` According to this equation, the
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`

`

`Alyssa B. Apsel, Ph.D. - March 6, 2019
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` ALYSSA B. APSEL, Ph.D.
`
` magnitude of the current id is going to be dependent
`
` on the phase alignment of AC signals ia and Vin?
`
` A. Sorry, I have to --
`
` Q. You want me to say it one more time?
`
` A. Yeah, say it one more time.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket