throbber
ORIGINAL. CONTRIBUTION
`
`Immediate Anticoagulation With Heparin for
`Immediate Anticoagulation With Heparin for
`First-Ever Ischemic Stroke in the Carotid Artery
`First-Ever Ischemic Stroke in the Carotid Artery
`Territories Observed Within 5 Hours of Onset
`Territories Observed Within 5 Hours of Onset
`Massimo Camerlingo, MD; Luciano Casto, MD; Bruno Censori, MD; Bruno Ferraro, MD;
`Massimo Camerlingo, MD; Luciano Casto, MD; Bruno Censori, MD; Bruno Ferraro, MD;
`GianCarlo C. Gazzaniga, MD; Bruno Cesana, MD; Angelo Mamoli, MD
`GianCarlo C. Gazzaniga, MD; Bruno Cesana, MD; Angelo Mamoli, MD
`
`Objective: To evaluate the safety and possible efficacy
`Objective: To evaluate the safety and possible efficacy
`of heparin sodium anticoagulation within 5 hours of the
`of heparin sodium anticoagulation within 5 hours of the
`onset of first-ever nonlacunar ischemic strokes in the in-
`onset of first-ever nonlacunar ischemic strokes in the in-
`ternal carotid artery territories.
`ternal carotid artery territories.
`
`Design: Pilot study, prospective and open.
`Design: Pilot study, prospective and open.
`
`Setting: Inpatient stroke unit.
`Setting: Inpatient stroke unit.
`
`Patients: Of 360 stroke patients observed during 13
`Patients: Of 360 stroke patients observed during 13
`months, 45 (12.5%) were included in the study.
`months, 45 (12.5%) were included in the study.
`
`Interventions: Heparin sodium was administered in-
`Interventions: Heparin sodium was administered in-
`travenously, starting with a bolus of 10 000 U, followed
`travenously, starting with a bolus of 10 000 U, followed
`by continuous infusion over 4 days at a rate adjusted to
`by continuous infusion over 4 days at a rate adjusted to
`maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time ratio
`maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time ratio
`between 2 and 2.5. The mean interval from stroke to treat-
`between 2 and 2.5. The mean interval from stroke to treat-
`ment was 197 minutes.
`ment was 197 minutes.
`
`Results: Two patients had cerebral hemorrhage, one of
`Results: Two patients had cerebral hemorrhage, one of
`
`which was fatal. None had extracranial major bleeding,
`which was fatal. None had extracranial major bleeding,
`while six had minor bleeding. The conditions of 23 pa-
`while six had minor bleeding. The conditions of 23 pa-
`tients improved, 16 patients were stable, and six patients
`tients improved, 16 patients were stable, and six patients
`worsened by day 1, while 29 patients improved, eight pa-
`worsened by day 1, while 29 patients improved, eight pa-
`tients were stable, and eight patients worsened by day 7.
`tients were stable, and eight patients worsened by day 7.
`Six patients died by the first month and five more by the
`Six patients died by the first month and five more by the
`sixth month. Twenty-one patients were self-sufficient, both
`sixth month. Twenty-one patients were self-sufficient, both
`at 1 and 6 months. Hemorrhagic complications were un-
`at 1 and 6 months. Hemorrhagic complications were un-
`related to any investigated factor. Multivariate analysis in-
`related to any investigated factor. Multivariate analysis in-
`dicated that short-term outcome was predicted only by in-
`dicated that short-term outcome was predicted only by in-
`farct size (P<.0001) and long-term outcome by infarct size
`farct size (P<.0001) and long-term outcome by infarct size
`(P=.002) and large vessel status (P=.0235).
`(P=.002) and large vessel status (P=.0235).
`
`Conclusions: Our study suggests that immediate hepa-
`Conclusions: Our study suggests that immediate hepa-
`rin treatment for ischemic carotid stroke is feasible and
`rin treatment for ischemic carotid stroke is feasible and
`generally safe and that patients whose conditions im-
`generally safe and that patients whose conditions im-
`prove are those with smaller infarct size and no evidence
`prove are those with smaller infarct size and no evidence
`of large vessel obstruction.
`of large vessel obstruction.
`
`(Arch Neurol. 1994;51:462-467)
`(Arch Neurol. 1994;51:462-467)
`
`H EPARIN SODIUM is
`HEPARIN SODIUM is
`
`widely used in the
`widely used in the
`treatment of brain
`treatment of brain
`ischemia1 despite in¬
`ischemia' despite in-
`conclusive available
`conclusive available
`data,2-3 which are derived from several
`data,2'3 which are derived from several
`uncontrolled studies4 8 and few random¬
`uncontrolled studies' and few random-
`ized studies.910 Those studies delayed
`ized studies.'''' Those studies delayed
`initiation of treatment from the onset of
`initiation of treatment from the onset of
`stroke, using heparin as a preventive
`stroke, using heparin as a preventive
`drug against early stroke recurrence or
`drug against early stroke recurrence or
`enlargement of thrombi. By contrast,
`enlargement of thrombi. By contrast,
`experimental data"·12 support the earli¬
`experimental data' I .' support the earli-
`est treatment possible to save ischemie
`est treatment possible to save ischemic
`but still viable brain tissue.
`but still viable brain tissue.
`Because cardiac embolism is a fre¬
`Because cardiac embolism is a fre-
`quent cause of the arterial occlusions
`quent cause of the arterial occlusions
`seen during the first few hours after
`seen during the first few hours after
`stroke,13 patients with early observed
`stroke,' patients with early observed
`stroke might benefit from anticoagula-
`stroke might benefit from anticoagula-
`
`ARCH NEUROUVOL 51, MAY 1994
`462
`
`tion therapy.14 Thus, we have prospec¬
`tion therapy.' Thus, we have prospec-
`tively evaluated the safety and possible
`tively evaluated the safety and possible
`effectiveness of heparin, which was ad¬
`effectiveness of heparin, which was ad-
`ministered within 6 hours of the onset
`ministered within 6 hours of the onset
`of a first-ever nonhemorrhagic stroke in
`of a first-ever nonhemorrhagic stroke in
`the internal carotid artery territories.
`the internal carotid artery territories.
`
`RESULTS
`RESULTS
`
`Of 360 consecutively screened patients,
`Of 360 consecutively screened patients,
`48 were treated within 6 hours of
`48 were treated within 6 hours of
`stroke, and 45 (12.5%) were included in
`stroke, and 45 (12.5%) were included in
`
`See Patients and Methods
`See Patients and Methods
`on next page
`on next page
`
`From the Second Neurological
`From the Second Neurological
`Department, Ospedali Riuniti
`Department, Ospedali Riuniti
`Bergamo (Drs Camerlingo,
`Bergamo (Drs Camerlingo,
`Casto, Censori, Ferraro,
`Casto, Censori, Ferraro,
`Gazzaniga, and Mamoli)
`Gazzaniga, and Mamoli)
`and Ospedale Maggiore
`and Ospedale Maggiore
`Epidemiologic Laboratory,
`Epidemiologic Laboratory,
`Istituto di Ricerca e Cura
`Istituto di Ricerca e Cura
`a Carattere Scientifico
`a Carattere Scientifico
`(Dr Cesana),
`(Dr Cesana),
`Milan, Italy.
`Milan, Italy.
`
`Downloaded From: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/ by a West Virginia University Library User on 06/21/2015
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1035
`
`

`

`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`From February 1, 1991, to March 31,1992, all patients re¬
`From February 1, 1991, to March 31, 1992, all patients re-
`ferred to our stroke unit because of a first-ever, acute neu¬
`ferred to our stroke unit because of a first-ever, acute neu-
`rological deficit of presumed vascular origin, suggesting in¬
`rological deficit of presumed vascular origin, suggesting in-
`volvement of carotid artery territories referred within 5 hours
`volvement of carotid artery territories referred within 5 hours
`of onset. These patients were considered for immediate hepa¬
`of onset. These patients were considered for immediate hepa-
`rin anticoagulation therapy. Those patients underwent a
`rin anticoagulation therapy. Those patients underwent a
`computed tomographic (CT) scan immediately after hos¬
`computed tomographic (CT) scan immediately after hos-
`pital admission.
`pital admission.
`Table 1 summarizes our exclusion criteria. We ex¬
`Table 1 summarizes our exclusion criteria. We ex-
`cluded lacunar syndromes, defined according to Bamford
`cluded lacunar syndromes, defined according to Bamford
`et al,13 because of their peculiar, usually benign prognosis.
`et al,'5 because of their peculiar, usually benign prognosis.
`We also retrospectively excluded treated patients without
`We also retrospectively excluded treated patients without
`demonstration of a recent consistent infarction in the an¬
`demonstration of a recent consistent infarction in the an-
`terior circulation on the second CT scan because of am¬
`terior circulation on the second CT scan because of am-
`biguous location of the brain ischemia. Suitable patients
`biguous location of the brain ischemia. Suitable patients
`underwent a scored neurological examination using the Ca¬
`underwent a scored neurological examination using the Ca-
`nadian Neurological Scale16 and ultrasounds (both extra-
`nadian Neurological Scale and ultrasounds (both extra-
`cranial and transcranial). Patients with poor signal quality
`cranial and transcranial). Patients with poor signal quality
`at transcranial Doppler ultrasounds also were submitted to
`at transcranial Doppler ultrasounds also were submitted to
`cerebral angiography before treatment.
`cerebral angiography before treatment.
`After receiving informed consent from the patients,
`After receiving informed consent from the patients,
`they were treated intravenously with a 10 000-U bolus of
`they were treated intravenously with a 10 000-U bolus of
`heparin sodium, followed by continuous pump-assisted ad¬
`heparin sodium, followed by continuous pump-assisted ad-
`ministration at a rate adjusted to achieve an activated par¬
`ministration at a rate adjusted to achieve an activated par-
`tial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio between 2 and 2.5
`tial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio between 2 and 2.5
`times the control ratio. The aPTT, together with the pro-
`times the control ratio. The aPTT, together with the pro-
`thrombin time international normalized ratio and platelet
`thrombin time international normalized ratio and platelet
`count, were obtained at 4 hours after administration of the
`count, were obtained at 4 hours after administration of the
`bolus and then every day, up to day 7.5 Heparin therapy
`bolus and then every day, up to day 7.5 Heparin therapy
`
`was discontinued on the fifth day after stroke, and treat¬
`was discontinued on the fifth day after stroke, and treat-
`ment with oral aspirin (325 mg/d) was begun. Patients with
`ment with oral aspirin (325 mg/d) was begun. Patients with
`atrial fibrillation who were self-sufficient after the first month
`atrial fibrillation who were self-sufficient after the first month
`of stroke were then shifted to oral anticoagulation therapy.
`of stroke were then shifted to oral anticoagulation therapy.
`The CNS test was repeated on days 1 and 7, and a second
`The CNS test was repeated on days 1 and 7, and a second
`CT scan was performed by day 4. If hemorrhagic transfor¬
`CT scan was performed by day 4. If hemorrhagic transfor-
`mation of the brain ischemia was suspected, another CT
`mation of the brain ischemia was suspected, another CT
`scan was performed. An increase or decrease of at least 1
`scan was performed. An increase or decrease of at least 1
`point on the CNS test between day 1 and hospital admis¬
`point on the CNS test between day 1 and hospital admis-
`sion and day 7 and hospital admission was considered to
`sion and day 7 and hospital admission was considered to
`show clinical improvement or worsening. Modifications of
`show clinical improvement or worsening. Modifications of
`±0.5 points were considered to show no change. Func¬
`±0.5 points were considered to show no change. Func-
`tional outcome was rated at 1 and 6 months using the
`tional outcome was rated at 1 and 6 months using the
`Rankin17 score. Good outcome was self-sufficiency ( Rankin
`Rankin" score. Good outcome was self-sufficiency ( Rankin
`score, <3), a poor outcome was disability (Rankin score,
`score, <3), a poor outcome was disability (Rankin score,
`S3) or death. All adverse experiences possibly related to
`or death. All adverse experiences possibly related to
`heparin therapy and death were recorded.
`heparin therapy and death were recorded.
`Variables related to outcome at months 1 and 6 ( 2 test),
`Variables related to outcome at months 1 and 6 (x' test),
`death, and hemorrhagic complications (Fisher's Exact Test)
`death, and hemorrhagic complications (Fisher's Exact Test)
`were sought. The investigated variables included age (<70
`were sought. The investigated variables included age (<70
`vs S70 years), sex, history ofhypertension, side of the brain
`vs 70 years), sex, history of hypertension, side of the brain
`ischemia, timing ofstart ofheparin bolus (< 180 or a 180 min¬
`ischemia, timing of start of heparin bolus (<180 or 180 min-
`utes after stroke), CNS score atstudy entry and at day 1 (<6.5
`utes after stroke), CNS score at study entry and at day 1 (<6.5
`vs &6.5), electrocardiogram (normal, atrial fibrillation, or left
`vs 6.5), electrocardiogram (normal, atrial fibrillation, or left
`ventricular hypertrophy), arterial obstruction detected by ul¬
`ventricular hypertrophy), arterial obstruction detected by ul-
`trasound, size ofbrain infarction at CT scan (<3 vs &3 cm in
`cm in
`trasound, size of brain infarction at CT scan (<3 vs
`diameter), prothrombin time international normalized ratio
`diameter), prothrombin time international normalized ratio
`after bolus (< 1.25 vs a 1.25), aPTT ratio after bolus (<4 vs
`after bolus (<1.25 vs 1.25), aPTT ratio after bolus (<4 vs
`>4), and lowest platelet count (<150X 107L vs >150X 107
`and lowest platelet count (<150 X 109/L vs .150 X 109/
`L). The relative risk for significant variables was assigned by
`L). The relative risk for significant variables was assigned by
`an odds ratio test. Finally, the selected variables were entered
`an odds ratio test. Finally, the selected variables were entered
`into a multiple logistic regression analysis.
`into a multiple logistic regression analysis.
`
`Table 1. Exclusion Criteria
`Table 1. Exclusion Criteria
`
`Age <40 and >80 y
`Age <40 and >80 y
`Stupor or coma
`Stupor or coma
`Brain hemorrhage
`Brain hemorrhage
`Canadian Neurological Scale score >8
`Canadian Neurological Scale score >8
`Lacunar syndromes
`Lacunar syndromes
`Regression of signs before treatment
`Regression of signs before treatment
`Contraindications to anticoagulants
`Contraindications to anticoagulants
`Ongoing medication with anticoagulants
`Ongoing medication with anticoagulants
`Cancer or other life-threatening diseases
`Cancer or other life-threatening diseases
`Renal or hepatic failure
`Renal or hepatic failure
`Pregnancy
`Pregnancy
`Lack of informed consent from patients or relatives
`Lack of informed consent from patients or relatives
`Start of treatment with heparin beyond 6 h after stroke
`Start of treatment with heparin beyond 6 h after stroke
`Patients with undetermined or inconsistent lesions on initial
`Patients with undetermined or inconsistent lesions on initial
`computed tomographic scan
`computed tomographic scan
`
`the study. Reasons for exclusion are listed in Table 2.
`the study. Reasons for exclusion are listed in Table 2.
`The demographic characteristics and the risk factors of
`The demographic characteristics and the risk factors of
`the enrolled patients are summarized in Table 3.
`the enrolled patients are summarized in Table 3.
`
`Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. Their
`Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. Their
`mean score on the CNS was 5.0 (range, 1.5 to 8.0) at
`mean score on the CNS was 5.0 (range, 1.5 to 8.0) at
`hospital admission, 5.9 (range, 0.0 to 9.0) on day 1,
`hospital admission, 5.9 (range, 0.0 to 9.0) on day 1,
`and 6.4 (range, 0.0 to 10.0) on day 7. No direct or in¬
`and 6.4 (range, 0.0 to 10.0) on day 7. No direct or in-
`direct signs of acute ischemia18 on the baseline CT
`direct signs of acute ischemia" on the baseline CT
`scan were noted in 41 patients (91.1%).
`scan were noted in 41 patients (91.1%).
`All patients underwent extracranial and transcra¬
`All patients underwent extracranial and transcra-
`nial ultrasound examinations. Eight patients under¬
`nial ultrasound examinations. Eight patients under-
`went cerebral angiography on both carotid sides.
`went cerebral angiography on both carotid sides.
`Twenty-eight patients (62.2%) had obstructions of
`Twenty-eight patients (62.2%) had obstructions of
`symptomatic arterial vessels: seven with obstructions
`symptomatic arterial vessels: seven with obstructions
`of both extracranial internal carotid artery and middle
`of both extracranial internal carotid artery and middle
`cerebral artery stem, seven of internal carotid artery
`cerebral artery stem, seven of internal carotid artery
`alone, four of carotid siphon, 10 of middle cerebral ar¬
`alone, four of carotid siphon, 10 of middle cerebral ar-
`tery alone, and 17 with no detectable obstructions
`tery alone, and 17 with no detectable obstructions
`(but possibly obstructions of the middle cerebral ar¬
`(but possibly obstructions of the middle cerebral ar-
`tery branches, which are undetectable by ultra¬
`tery branches, which are undetectable by ultra-
`sounds19). All of the detected obstructions were occlu¬
`sounds'). All of the detected obstructions were occlu-
`sions, except two cases with tight stenosis of the
`sions, except two cases with tight stenosis of the
`extracranial internal carotid artery. All patients who
`extracranial internal carotid artery. All patients who
`underwent angiography had occlusion of the middle
`underwent angiography had occlusion of the middle
`
`ARCH NEUROUVOL 51, MAY 1994
`463
`
`Downloaded From: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/ by a West Virginia University Library User on 06/21/2015
`
`

`

`Table 2. Primary Reasons for Exclusion on 360
`Table 2. Primary Reasons for Exclusion on 360
`Observed Strokes*
`Observed Strokes*
`
`Table 4. Clinical Results*
`Table 4. Clinical Results*
`
`Reasons
`Reasons
`Age
`Age
`Stupor-coma
`Stutior-coma
`Recurrence of stroke
`Recurrence of stroke
`Referral time >5 h
`Referral time >5 h
`Hemorrhages
`Hemorrhages
`Vertebro-basilar territory
`• Vertebro-basilar territory
`Regression of signs and CNS score >8
`Regression of signs and CNS score >8
`Lacunar syndromes
`tacunar syndromes
`Ongoing anticoagulants
`Ongoing anticoagulants
`Life-threatening disease or cancer
`Ufe-threatening disease or cancer
`Start of heparin >6 h after stroke
`Start of heparin >6 h after stroke
`No consistent lesion at CT scan
`No consistent lesion at CT scan
`.
`- Total
`Total
`
`No. (%)
`No. (%)
`33(10.5)
`33 (10.5)
`7 (2.2)
`7 (2.2)
`15 (4.7)
`15 (4.7)
`147(46.7)
`147 (46.7)
`28 (8.9)
`28 (8.9)
`25 (7.9)
`25 (7.9)
`7 (2.2)
`7 (22)
`13(4.1)
`13 (4.1)
`4(1.3)
`4 (1.3)
`(1.9)
`6 (1.9)
`27 (8.6)
`27 (8.6)
`3 (0.9)
`3 (0.9)
`315
`315
`
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`tomographic.
`tomographic.
`
`Table 3. Patients' Characteristics (N=45)
`Table 3. Patients' Characteristics (N.45)*
`
`26
`26
`19
`19
`68 (45-80)t
`88(45-80)1
`18 (40)
`18 (40)
`10 (22.2)
`10 (22.2)
`7 (15.5)
`7 (15.5)
`5(11.1)
`5 (11.1)
`
`Sex
`Sex
`M
`M
`F
`Mean age, y (range)
`Mean age, y (range)
`Hypertension, No. (%)
`Hypertension, No. (%)
`Smoker, No. (%)
`Smoker, No. (%)
`Coronary heart disease, No. (%)
`Coronary heart disease, No. (%)
`Diabetes, No. (%)
`Diabetes, No. (%)
`Side of infarction
`Side of infarction
`L
`L
`R
`Mean CNS score at entry (range)
`Mean CNS score at entry (range)
`Atrial fibrillation at entry, No. (%)
`Atrial fibrillation at entry, No. (%)
`Normal CT scan at entry, No. (%)
`Normal CT scan at entry, No. (%)
`Symptomatic vessel obstructions, No. (%)
`Symptomatic vessel obstructions, No. (%)
`Mean time from stroke to heparin, min (range)
`Mean time from stroke to heparin, min (range)
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`tomographic.
`tomographic.
`\There were 22 patients older than 70 years.
`1. There were 22 patients older than 70 years.
`XThere were 30 patients with a score lower than 6.5.
`There were 30 patients with a score lower than 6.5.
`§7ftere were 24 people who received heparin before 180 minutes from
`§There were 24 people who received heparin before 180 minutes from
`stroke.
`stroke.
`
`22
`22
`23
`23
`5.0 (1.5-8.0)
`5.0 (1.5-8.0)$
`16 (35.5)
`16 (35.5)
`41 (91.1)
`41 (91.1)
`28 (62.2)
`28 (62_2)
`197 (60-360)§
`197 (60-360)§
`
`Mean CNS score (range)
`Mean CNS score (range)
`Day 1
`Day 1
`Day 7
`Day 7
`Improved patients, No.
`Improved patients, No.
`Day 1
`Day 1
`Day 7
`Day 7
`Stable patients, No.
`Stable patients, No.
`Day1
`Day 1
`Day 7
`Clay 7
`Worsened patients, No.
`Worsened patients, No.
`Day 1
`Day 1
`Day 7
`Day 7
`Deaths, No.
`Deaths, No.
`Month 1
`Month 1
`Month 6
`Month 6
`Good outcome, No.
`Good outcome, No.
`Month 1
`Month 1
`Month 6
`Month 6
`Poor outcome, No.
`Poor outcome, No.
`Month 1
`Month 1
`Month 6
`Month 6
`CT scan, No.
`CT scan, No.
`Cerebral hematoma
`Cerebral hematoma
`Infarction
`infarction
`a3cm
`3cm
`<3cm
`<3cm
`Stroke recurrence
`Stroke recurrence
`.alter 2 RIO, No.
`after 2 mo, No.
`
`5.9 (0.0-9.0)1
`5.9 (0.0-9.0)1'
`6.4 (0.0-10.0)1;
`6.4 (0.0-10.0)#
`
`23
`23
`29
`29
`
`16
`16
`8
`8
`
`6
`6
`8
`8
`
`6
`6
`11
`11
`
`21
`21
`21
`21
`
`24
`24
`24
`24
`
`2
`2
`
`25
`25
`18
`18
`
`2
`2
`
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`*CNS indicates Canadian Neurological Scale; CT, computed
`tomographic.
`tomographic.
`t There were 24 patients with a score lower than 6.5.
`T There were 24 patients with a score lower than 6.5
`XThere were 19 patients with a score lower than 6.5.
`$There were 19 patients with a score lower than 6.5
`
`Table 5. Causes of Death
`Table 5. Causes of Death
`
`Ceases of Death
`Causes of Death
`1st month
`1st month
`Cerebral hematoma
`Cerebral hematoma
`Stroke
`Stroke
`Pulmonary embolism
`Pulmonary embolism
`6th month
`6th month
`Pneumonia
`Pneumonia
`Cardiac death
`Cardiac death
`Pulmonary embolism
`Pulmonary embolism
`
`No. of Patients
`No. of Patients
`
`1
`4
`1
`
`2
`2
`1
`
`cerebral artery stem. Twenty-four patients (53.3%)
`cerebral artery stem. Twenty-four patients (53.3%)
`had an abnormal electrocardiogram (16 had atrial fi¬
`had an abnormal electrocardiogram (16 had atrial fi-
`brillation; eight had left ventricular hypertrophy). The
`brillation; eight had left ventricular hypertrophy). The
`heparin bolus increased the mean aPTT ratio from
`heparin bolus increased the mean aPTT ratio from
`0.91 (range, 0.77 to 1.05) to 3.46 (range, 0.98 to 7.0).
`0.91 (range, 0.77 to 1.05) to 3.46 (range, 0.98 to 7.0).
`The mean prothrombin time international normalized
`The mean prothrombin time international normalized
`ratio went from 1.01 (range, 0.85 to 1.34) to 1.40
`ratio went from 1.01 (range, 0.85 to 1.34) to 1.40
`(range, 1.05 to 2.27). Four patients had no response to
`(range, 1.05 to 2.27). Four patients had no response to
`the bolus dose. Platelet counts declined to less than
`the bolus dose. Platelet counts declined to less than
`100X107L only in two patients (97X107L and
`100X 109/L only in two patients (97X 109/L and
`
`89X109/L, respectively) by day 7. Neither patient had
`89X109/1.., respectively) by day 7. Neither patient had
`clinical evidence of adverse effects.
`clinical evidence of adverse effects.
`None of the patients died before day 4, when con¬
`None of the patients died before day 4, when con-
`trol CT scans were scheduled. Heparin was discontin¬
`trol CT scans were scheduled. Heparin was discontin-
`ued before the fifth day of stroke only in patients who
`ued before the fifth day of stroke only in patients who
`developed hemorrhagic complications. The conditions
`developed hemorrhagic complications. The conditions
`of 23 patients (51.1%) were improved, 16 (35.5%)
`of 23 patients (51.1%) were improved, 16 (35.5%)
`were stable, and six (13.3%) were worse by day 1. By
`were stable, and six (13.3%) were worse by day 1. By
`
`ARCH NEUROUVOL 51, MAY 1994
`464
`
`Downloaded From: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/ by a West Virginia University Library User on 06/21/2015
`
`

`

`Table 6. Statistical Results (Univariate Analysis)
`Table 6. Statistical Results (Univariate Analysis)*
`
`Figure 1. Computed tomographic scan of patient 28 performed 24 hours
`Figure 1. Computed tomographic scan of patient 28 performed 24 hours
`after administration of heparin sodium bolus when the patient became
`after administration of heparin sodium bolus when the patient became
`comatose.
`comatose.
`
`Age
`Age
`Sex
`Sex
`Side of infarction
`Side of infarction
`Hypertension
`Hypertension
`AF on ECG
`AF on ECG
`LVH on ECG
`LVH on ECG
`Heparin start
`Heparin start
`CNS
`CNS
`At entry
`At entry
`At day 1
`At day 1
`Lesion size on CT
`Lesion size on CT
`Vessel obstruction
`Vessel obstruction
`PTINR
`PT INR
`aPTT ratio
`aPTT ratio
`Platelet count
`Platelet count
`
`Age
`Age
`Sex
`Sex
`Side of infarction
`Side of infarction
`Hypertension
`Hypertension
`AF on ECG
`AF on ECG
`LVH on ECG
`LVH on ECG
`Heparin start
`Heparin start
`CNS
`CNS
`At entry
`At entry
`At day 1
`At day 1
`Lesion size on CT
`Lesion size on CT
`Vessel obstruction
`Vessel obstruction
`PTINR
`PT INR
`aPTT ratio
`aPTT ratio
`Platelet count
`Platelet count
`
`r
`
`OR (95% CL)
`OR (95% CL)
`6th Month
`1st Month
`6th Month
`1st Month
`Predictors of Death
`Predictors of Death
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`10.0(1.6,73.3)
`10.0 (1.6, 73.3)
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`Predictors of Poor Outcome
`Predictors of Poor Outcome
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`22.0 (2.3,152.9)
`22.0 (2.3, 152.9)
`10.3(1.1,90.9)
`10.3 (1.1, 90.9)
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`8.0(1.2,21.5)
`8.0 (1.2, 21.5)
`3.8(1.0,17.1)
`3.8 (1.0, 17.1)
`35.7(5.1,178.5)
`35.7 (5.1, 178.5)
`4.3(1.0,19.7)
`4.3 (1.0, 19.7)
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`5.2(1.2,26.9)
`5.2 (1.2, 26.9)
`5.0(1.2,22.2)
`5.0 (1.2, 22.2)
`12.5(2.5,70.3)
`12.5 (2.5, 70.3)
`8.1 (1.7,42.3)
`8.1 (1.7, 42.3)
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`
`-
`
`J
`
`*OR indicates odds ratio; CL, confidence limits; AF, atrial fibrillation;
`*OR indicates odds ratio; CL, confidence limits; AF, atrial fibrillation;
`left ventricular hypertrophy; CNS, Canadian
`ECG, electrocardiogram; LVH,
`ECG, electrocardiogram; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; CNS, Canadian
`Neurological Scale; PTINR, prothrombin time international normalized
`Neurological Scale; PT INR, prothrombin time international normalized
`ratio; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CT, computed
`ratio; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CT, computed
`tomography; and NS, not significant.
`tomography; and NS, not significant.
`
`Table 7. Statistical Results (Logistic Regression Analysis*
`Table 7. Statistical Results (Logistic Regression Analysis*
`
`OR (95% CL)
`OR (95% CL)
` -'-
`6th Month
`1st Month
`6th Month
`1st Month
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`35.7(6.1,207.5)
`35.7 (6.1, 207.5)
`NS
`NS
`
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`9.6(2.1,44.3)
`9.6 (2.1, 44.3)
`5.8(1.2,27.8)
`5.8 (1.2, 27.8)
`
`CNS Score
`CNS Score
`At entry
`At entry
`At day 1
`At day 1
`Lesion size on CT
`Lesion size on CT
`Vessel obstruction
`Vessel obstruction
`
`*OR indicates odds ratio; CL, confidence limits; CNS, Canadian
`*OR indicates odds ratio; CL, confidence limits; CNS, Canadian
`Neurological Scale; CT, computed tomography; and NS, not significant.
`Neurological Scale; CT, computed tomography; and NS, not significant.
`
`month and another five (11.1%) within 6 months, for
`month and another five (11.1%) within 6 months, for
`a total of 11 deaths (24.4%). The timing and causes of
`a total of 11 deaths (24.4%). The timing and causes of
`death are outlined in Table 5.
`death are outlined in Table 5.
`
`Figure 2. Computed tomographic scan of patient 39 performed 48 hours
`Figure 2. Computed tomographic scan of patient 39 performed 48 hours
`after administration of heparin sodium bolus when the patient, after having
`after administration of heparin sodium bolus when the patient, after having
`a dramatic improvement of her right hemiparesis, became drowsy and
`a dramatic improvement of her right hemiparesis, became drowsy and
`hémiplégie.
`hemiplegic.
`
`day 7, the conditions of 29 patients (64.4%) were im¬
`day 7, the conditions of 29 patients (64.4%) were im-
`proved, eight (17.8%) were stable, and eight (17.8%)
`proved, eight (17.8%) were stable, and eight (17.8%)
`were worse. Two patients (4.4%) had homolateral re¬
`were worse. Two patients (4.4%) had homolateral re-
`currence of stroke between 2 and 3 months after the
`currence of stroke between 2 and 3 months after the
`qualifying stroke. At both 1 and 6 months, functional
`qualifying stroke. At both 1 and 6 months, functional
`outcomes were rated as good in 21 patients (46.7%)
`outcomes were rated as good in 21 patients (46.7%)
`(Table 4). Six patients (13.3%) died within the first
`(Table 4). Six patients (13.3%) died within the first
`
`ARCH NEHROLNOL 51, MAY 1994
`465
`
`Downloaded From: http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/ by a West Virginia University Library User on 06/21/2015
`
`

`

`Cerebral hematomas, which were associated with
`Cerebral hematomas, which were associated with
`clinical worsening, were observed in two patients
`clinical worsening, were observed in two patients
`(4.4%) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). One of them died
`(4.4%) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). One of them died
`by day 5. Extracranial bleeding occurred in six pa¬
`by day 5. Extracranial bleeding occurred in six pa-
`tients (13.3%): in four it was in the gastrointestinal
`tients (13.3%): in four it was in the gastrointestinal
`tract; in one, in the genitourinary tract; and in one it
`tract; in one, in the genitourinary tract; and in one it
`was subcutaneous. None of the hemorrhages was life-
`was subcutaneous. None of the hemorrhages was life-
`threatening or required blood transfusion. All hemor¬
`threatening or required blood transfusion. All hemor-
`rhages occurred within 48 hours of receiving the bolus
`rhages occurred within 48 hours of receiving the bolus
`dose.
`dose.
`Clinically silent hemorrhagic infarctions were de¬
`Clinically silent hemorrhagic infarctions were de-
`tected on the second CT scan in four patients (8.9%).
`tected on the second CT scan in four patients (8.9%).
`A CNS score of less than 6.5 at study entry (P=.0084)
`A CNS score of less than 6.5 at study entry (P=.0084)
`and at day 1 (P=.0503), obstruction of large vessels
`and at day 1 (P=.0503), obstruction of large vessels
`(P=.0498), and a brain lesion 3 cm in diameter or
`(P=.0498), and a brain lesion 3 cm in diameter or
`greater at initial CT scan (P<.0001) were associated
`greater at initial CT scan (P<.0001) were associated
`with poor outcomes at 1 month. A CNS score of less
`with poor outcomes at 1 month. A CNS score of less
`than 6.5 at study entry (P=.0194) and at day 1
`than 6.5 at study entry (P=.0194) and at day 1
`(P=.0024), obstruction of large vessels (P=.0049), and
`(P=.0024), obstruction of large vessels (P=.0049), and
`a brain lesion 3 cm in diameter or greater (P=.0005)
`a brain lesion 3 cm in diameter or greater (P=.0005)
`were also associated with poor outcomes at 6 months.
`were also associated with poor outcomes at 6 months.
`Mortality alone during the first month was unrelated
`Mortality alone during the first month was unrelated
`to any investigated variable, whereas death by the
`to any investigated variable, whereas death by the
`sixth month was related to left ventricular hypertro¬
`sixth month was related to left ventricular hypertro-
`phy on electrocardiogram (P=.009), CNS score of less
`phy on electrocardiogram (P..009), CNS score of less
`than 6.5 at day 1 (P=.0018), and arterial obstruction
`than 6.5 at day 1 (P=.0018), and arterial obstruction
`(P=.0349) (Table 6). Hemorrhagic complications
`(P=.0349) (Table 6). Hemorrhagic complications
`were unrelated to any coagulation parameters.
`were unrelated to any coagulation parameters.
`After multivariate analysis (Table 7), infarct size
`After multivariate analysis (Table 7), infarct size
`at initial CT scan was the only independent predictor
`at initial CT scan was the only independent predictor
`of both 1-month (P<.0001) and 6-month (P=.002)
`of both 1-month (PC.0001) and 6-month (P=.002)
`outcomes, and large vessel status was an independent
`outcomes, and large vessel status was an independent
`predictor of 6-month outcome (P=.0235). The number
`predictor of 6-month outcome (P=.0235). The number
`of deaths was insufficient to perform multivariate
`of deaths was insufficient to perform multivariate
`analysis for mortality alone.
`analysis for mortality alone.
`
`COMMENT
`
`Despite the findings of several studies,4"10 the risks-
`Despite the the findings of several studies,'" the risks-
`
`benefits of heparin anticoagulation therapy for
`benefits of heparin anticoagulation therapy for
`ischemie stroke remain to be ascertained. Our pro¬
`ischemic stroke remain to be ascertained. Our

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket