throbber
SEMINAR
`
`Seminar
`
`Pulmonary embolism
`
`Samuel Z Goldhaber
`
`Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common illness that can cause death and disability. It is difficult to detect because
`patients present with a wide array of symptoms and signs. The clinical setting can raise suspicion, and certain
`inherited and acquired risk factors predispose susceptible individuals. D-dimer concentration in blood is the best
`laboratory screening test, and chest CT has become the most widespread imaging test. Treatment requires rapid and
`accurate risk stratification before haemodynamic decompensation and the development of cardiogenic shock.
`Anticoagulation is the foundation of therapy. Right-ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography and higher than
`normal concentrations of troponin identify high-risk patients who might need escalation of therapy with thrombolysis
`or embolectomy even if the blood pressure is normal on presentation. When patients are admitted to medical wards or
`when patients undergo surgery, their physicians should prescribe prophylactic measures to prevent PE. After hospital
`discharge, prophylaxis should continue for about a month for patients at high risk of thromboembolism.
`
`Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common, potentially life-
`threatening cardiopulmonary illness that has only recently
`attracted the attention of the general public, when a
`healthy young woman died of PE shortly after a flight
`from Australia to the UK. Although PE can be difficult to
`diagnose, early recognition is important because prompt
`medical or surgical
`intervention can be
`life-saving.
`Therefore, physicians, health-care providers, and the
`public need to understand the rapidly progressing
`advances in PE epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis,
`treatment, and prevention strategies. The interdisciplinary
`nature of PE means that knowledge about this disease can
`no longer be consigned to the domain of specialists.
`
`Epidemiology
`Although PE and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be
`notoriously difficult to diagnose,1 hospital admission rates
`for venous thromboembolism (VTE) increased in the UK
`in the 1990s.2 Despite challenges in detection of VTE,
`cohort studies show consistency in incidence estimates
`among western populations. In the Brest district of
`France, the annual incidence was 1·83 per 1000.3 In
`Olmsted County, MN, USA, the most recent annual
`incidence estimate was 1·22 per 1000 among adults.4 In
`the Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism
`Etiology, which combined two separate US cross-
`sectional studies totalling 148 054 person-years, the
`annual incidence was 1·45 per 1000.5 If the annual
`incidence of recognised VTE is 1·50 per 1000, and if only
`one of every three cases of VTE is detected, the USA,
`with a population of almost 300 million, has about
`450 000
`recognised
`incident cases and 900 000
`unsuspected incident cases, totalling about 1 350 000
`VTE cases each year.
`Mortality from recognised PE is higher than generally
`acknowledged. In a population-based cohort study from
`
`Lancet 2004; 363: 1295–305
`
`Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard
`Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA (S Z Goldhaber MD)
`Correspondence to: Dr Samuel Z Goldhaber, Brigham and Women’s
`Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
`(e-mail: sgoldhaber@partners.org)
`
`Olmsted County, the 30-day mortality rate after PE or
`DVT was 28%.6
`In the International Cooperative
`Pulmonary Embolism Registry of 2454 consecutive
`patients from 52 institutions in seven countries, the
`3-month mortality rate was 17·4 %.7 In a Japanese registry
`of 533 patients with PE, the in-hospital mortality rate was
`14·0%.8 Many patients die from underlying comorbid
`disorders,
`especially
`cancer
`and
`cardiorespiratory
`diseases.9 The mortality from PE in registries such as the
`international one mentioned above, which enrol
`consecutive patients without any exclusions, is far higher
`than that in selective registries such as the Prospective
`Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis, in which
`the 1-year mortality rate from PE was 2·5%.10 In an
`overview of 1302 patients in five clinical studies of PE, 19
`died of PE and there were 11 other sudden deaths, giving
`a low overall mortality rate of only 2·3%.11
`
`Risk factors
`Understanding of risk factors for VTE12,13 will increase the
`likelihood that DVT and PE can be diagnosed and
`prevented. These factors include environmental, natural,
`and hormonal influences (panel 1).
`
`Travel
`Long-haul air travel is a rare (0·4 cases per million
`passengers) risk factor for massive PE.14 The risk increases
`substantially with flight distances of 5000 km or more.
`
`Search strategy and selection criteria
`
`I subscribe to about 15 journals in internal medicine,
`cardiology, haematology, and pulmonary disease. I use a
`"tear and file" system to track relevant articles. To ensure
`that I have not missed important articles in other journals, I
`check the venous thrombosis articles weekly on the AMEDEO
`web page. For selection in this seminar, I searched MEDLINE
`(1993–2003) with the search terms "pulmonary embolism"
`and "clinical" and "OVID full text". I chose mostly recent
`articles published in 2000–2003. I emphasised papers from
`journals with high impact factors that add critical knowledge
`to this field. I also included 22 articles recommended by the
`reviewers of this seminar.
`
`THE LANCET • Vol 363 • April 17, 2004 • www.thelancet.com
`
`1295
`
`For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet.
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1019
`
`

`

`SEMINAR
`
`Passengers at particularly high risk include those older
`than 50 years, and individuals with a history of previous
`VTE, thrombophilia, limitation of mobility, cancer, or
`large varicose veins.
`
`Obesity
`The magnitude of risk associated with obesity is related to
`the body-mass
`index. The Nurses’ Health Study
`identified risk factors for PE among a cohort of initially
`healthy female nurses, with 1 619 770 person-years of
`
`Panel 1: Risk factors for PE
`
`Environmental
`Long-haul air travel
`Obesity
`Cigarette smoking
`Hypertension
`Immobility
`
`Natural
`Increasing age
`
`Women’s health
`Oral contraceptives, including progesterone-only and
`especially third-generation pills
`Pregnancy
`Hormone replacement therapy
`
`Medical illness
`Previous PE or DVT
`Cancer
`Congestive heart failure
`Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
`Diabetes mellitus
`Inflammatory bowel disease
`Antipsychotic drug use
`Chronic in-dwelling central venous catheter
`Permanent pacemaker
`Internal cardiac defibrillator
`Stroke with limb paresis
`Nursing-home confinement or current or repeated hospital
`admission
`Varicose veins
`
`Surgical
`Trauma
`Orthopaedic surgery, especially total hip replacement, total
`knee replacement, hip fracture surgery, knee arthroscopy
`General surgery, especially for cancer
`Gynaecological and urological surgery, especially for cancer
`Neurosurgery, especially craniotomy for brain tumour
`
`Thrombophilia
`Factor V Leiden mutation
`Prothrombin gene mutation
`Hyperhomocysteinaemia (including mutation in
`methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase)
`Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
`Deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C, or protein S
`High concentrations of factor VIII or XI
`Increased lipoprotein (a)
`
`Non-thrombotic
`Air
`Foreign particles (eg, hair, talc, as a consequence of
`intravenous drug misuse)
`Amniotic fluid
`Bone fragments, bone marrow
`Fat
`Cement
`
`follow-up.15 The relative risk of PE was 1·7 (95% CI
`1·1–2·7)
`for
`those with a body-mass
`index of
`25·0–28·9 kg/m2 and 3·2 (1·7–6·0) for those with a body-
`mass index of 29·0 kg/m2 or higher. In the International
`Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry,
`the
`proportion of patients with a body-mass
`index of
`29·0 kg/m2 or higher was 29%.7 Even in Japan, with a
`much
`leaner population than western countries, a
`prospective PE registry found that body-mass index was
`25·3 kg/m2 or higher in 34% of cases.8
`
`Women’s health
`Oral contraceptives, pregnancy, and postmenopausal
`hormone replacement therapy raise the risk of PE.
`Inherited prothrombotic states further increase the risk.
`First-generation oral contraceptives contained more
`than 50 µg oestrogen. They were associated with an
`alarming increase in the frequency of massive PE and
`were withdrawn from the market in 1989. Second-
`generation oral contraceptives, containing less than 50 µg
`oestrogen, were introduced in the USA in 1967, but an
`excess, albeit lower, risk of VTE persisted. Third-
`generation
`oral
`contraceptives
`contain
`newer
`progestagens, such as desogestrel or gestodene, which
`improve acne and hirsutism. However, they cause adverse
`haemostatic changes, including acquired resistance to
`activated protein C16 and therefore increase the risk of
`VTE more than second-generation pills. Increasing age
`and cigarette smoking further increase the thrombotic risk
`among users of oral contraceptives.17
`Despite the increased relative risk of VTE from oral
`contraceptives, the absolute risk of fatal PE is low. In a
`New Zealand study, the absolute risk of death from PE in
`current users was estimated as one per 100 000 woman-
`years. Among the women who died, the median age was
`29 years. The risk of fatal PE was twice as high among
`women taking third-generation oral contraceptives.18
`A history of PE or DVT is an absolute contraindication
`to oral contraceptives. Relative contraindications include
`a strong
`family history of VTE or an
`inherited
`prothrombotic state, such as factor V Leiden or the
`prothrombin gene mutation. Whether women with a
`family history but no personal history of VTE should be
`screened
`for prothrombotic states
`is controversial.
`Overall, oral contraceptives are safe and effective. The
`absolute risk of VTE is very low.
`In pregnancy, the risk of PE increases with time, and
`most cases of VTE occur during pregnancy rather than
`post partum. Increasing maternal age and caesarean-
`section delivery increase the likelihood of VTE.19 Inherited
`prothrombotic states are associated with obstetric
`complications20 and with late fetal loss.21
`The Women’s Health Initiative
`is a randomised
`placebo-controlled primary prevention trial that enrolled
`16 608 women to assess the major benefits and risks of
`postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.22 The trial
`used a combined oestrogen and progesterone preparation
`that is most commonly prescribed in the USA. Though
`the trial duration was planned to be 8·5 years, the study
`was stopped early because overall health risks exceeded
`benefits after an average of 5 years of follow-up. The
`hazard ratio for PE in the treated group was twice that for
`controls. The absolute excess risk of PE was 8·0 per
`10 000 woman-years. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, the
`relative risk of VTE was 2·1 among current users and was
`highest (3·5) during the first year of use.23
`such as
`Selective oestrogen-receptor modulators
`raloxifene increase the risk of PE. In a study on prevention
`of breast cancer, 7705 postmenopausal women were
`
`1296
`
`THE LANCET • Vol 363 • April 17, 2004 • www.thelancet.com
`
`For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet.
`
`

`

`assigned raloxifene or placebo; by 40 months of follow-up
`the rate of PE was three times higher in patients assigned
`raloxifene than in those assigned placebo (0·3% vs 0·1%).
`The rate of DVT was also three times higher (0·7% vs
`0·2%).24
`Oestrogen agonists-antagonists such as tamoxifen are
`used to treat or prevent breast cancer. In a trial of
`7152 women randomly assigned tamoxifen or placebo,
`the VTE rate was 2·5 times greater in the tamoxifen group
`(1·20% vs 0·47%).25
`
`Cancer
`In patients with known cancer who develop VTE,
`recurrence and bleeding complications are common with
`conventional heparin followed by oral anticoagulation.26
`Low-molecular-weight heparin as monotherapy without
`oral anticoagulation can halve the rate of recurrence
`compared with oral anticoagulation.27
`Cancer, occult at the time of PE diagnosis in many
`cases, predisposes to PE. In the Swedish Cancer Registry,
`the risk of discovering a newly diagnosed cancer was
`increased for at least 2 years after the diagnosis of VTE.28
`However, when such cancers are discovered, they
`generally become apparent at an advanced stage and
`confer a poor prognosis.29 Cancer should be suspected,
`especially in patients who have idiopathic VTE and
`recurrence during follow-up.30
`
`Thrombophilia
`Inherited and acquired risk factors for PE commonly
`interact. In most inherited thrombophilias, impaired
`neutralisation of thrombin or failure to control thrombin
`generation causes VTE.31 To help define the role of
`heritability of the prethrombotic state, quantitative
`genetic-model fitting for hypercoagulability was done
`among participants in the St Thomas’ UK Adult Twin
`Registry.32 There was a high degree of heritability for
`markers of coagulation and inhibition of fibrinolysis,
`indicating substantial genetic control over fibrin formation
`and fibrinolysis.
`Factor V Leiden is an autosomal dominant single point
`mutation (G→A) that brings about resistance to activated
`protein C and an increased predisposition to VTE
`(roughly three times). The carrier frequency ranges from
`3% to 7%, and the mutation is especially prevalent in
`northern European people.33 Among participants in the
`Physicians’ Health Study, the carrier frequency was 5·3%
`for white Americans, 2·2% for hispanic Americans, 1·2%
`for African Americans, 0·45% for Asian Americans, and
`1·2% for native Americans.34 There is conflicting evidence
`on whether patients with VTE and factor V Leiden have
`an increased rate of recurrence after anticoagulation is
`discontinued compared with individuals who do not have
`this mutation.35,36
`A single point mutation (G→A at position 20210) has
`been identified in the prothrombin gene, which causes an
`increased risk of VTE.37 As with factor V Leiden,
`inheritance
`is autosomal dominant. However,
`the
`magnitude of the effect is slightly less than that of factor
`V Leiden.38
`Hyperhomocysteinaemia is associated with VTE and is
`most commonly caused by an acquired nutritional
`deficiency of folate exacerbated by inadequate intake of
`vitamin B12 or vitamin B6. Folate antagonists, such as
`methotrexate and phenytoin or vitamin B6 antagonists,
`such as oestrogens, tobacco, or theophylline, also raise
`homocysteine concentrations. Impaired renal function
`can cause hyperhomocysteinaemia because homocysteine
`is predominantly metabolised by the kidneys.39
`
`SEMINAR
`
`The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, an acquired
`disorder, is the most ominous hypercoagulable state for
`PE. Anatomically large and recurrent VTE is the most
`common clinical manifestation of this syndrome, but
`increases in antibodies to cardiolipin are also associated
`with myocardial infarction, stroke, and first-trimester
`miscarriage.40
`laboratory diagnosis of
`in
`Despite
`advances
`hypercoagulability, predisposing thrombophilic states are
`identifiable in only a minority of patients with VTE.
`Therefore, the most important action is to obtain a careful
`family history. Patients and their families should be
`reassured
`that
`some
`asymptomatic
`carriers
`of
`prethrombotic genetic risk factors will never develop
`clinical evidence of PE or DVT. There is no published
`evidence to support screening of first-degree relatives of
`patients with thrombophilia.41
`
`Pathophysiology
`Venous stasis and endothelial damage predispose to
`VTE, especially among patients with underlying hyper-
`coagulable states. Those with previous PE or DVT are
`particularly susceptible to recurrences. Most cases of PE
`result from thrombi that originate in the pelvic region or
`deep veins of the leg. When venous thrombi become
`dislodged from their sites of formation, they move
`through the venous system to the pulmonary arterial
`circulation. Extremely large emboli can lodge at the
`bifurcation of the pulmonary artery, forming a “saddle
`embolus”. More commonly, however, a pulmonary vessel
`of second, third, or fourth order is affected. In rare cases,
`thrombi in the axillary, subclavian, or other arm veins
`embolise to the pulmonary arteries.42
`PE can have the following pathophysiological effects:
`increased pulmonary vascular resistance resulting from
`vascular
`obstruction,
`neurohumoral
`agents,
`or
`pulmonary-artery baroreceptors; impaired gas exchange
`caused by increased alveolar dead space from vascular
`obstruction and hypoxaemia from right-to-left shunting,
`as well as impaired transfer of carbon monoxide due to
`loss of gas exchange surface; alveolar hyperventilation
`owing to reflex stimulation of irritant receptors; increased
`airway resistance resulting from bronchoconstriction; and
`decreased pulmonary compliance caused by lung oedema,
`lung haemorrhage, and loss of surfactant.
`
`Right-ventricular dysfunction
`The haemodynamic response to PE depends on the size of
`the embolus, coexisting cardiopulmonary disease, and
`neurohumoral activation. Pulmonary-artery obstruction
`and circulating neurohumoral substances decrease the
`pulmonary vascular bed and cause an increase in right-
`ventricular afterload. As right-ventricular and pulmonary-
`artery pressures rise, the right ventricle dilates, becomes
`hypokinetic, and ultimately fails. Progressive right-heart
`failure leads to reduced forward cardiac output and is the
`cause of death from acute PE in most cases.
`Sudden increases in right-ventricular pressure adversely
`affect left-ventricular function because of the anatomical
`juxtaposition of the two ventricles and ventricular
`interdependence. Moderate right-ventricular hypertension
`can displace the interventricular septum towards the left
`ventricle, resulting in decreased left-ventricular diastolic
`filling and end-diastolic volume. The subsequent
`reduction in coronary-artery perfusion pressure to the
`overloaded right ventricle can cause progressive right-
`ventricular
`ischaemia and failure. Ultimately, right-
`ventricular infarction, circulatory arrest, and death can
`ensue.43
`
`THE LANCET • Vol 363 • April 17, 2004 • www.thelancet.com
`
`1297
`
`For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet.
`
`

`

`SEMINAR
`
`Diagnosis
`Clinical suspicion
`Diagnosis of PE poses a major challenge because classic
`symptoms and signs are not present in many cases. PE
`can present with subtle findings in young, previously
`healthy patients who have excellent cardiac reserve. With
`increasing age, PE tends to masquerade as other illnesses
`such as acute coronary syndrome or exacerbation of
`chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Accurate
`diagnosis of PE is particularly difficult when patients
`present with two concurrent illnesses, such as obvious
`pneumonia plus occult PE or obvious congestive heart
`failure plus occult PE. Such patients may not improve
`clinically despite appropriate treatment for the apparent
`illness, until the PE is also recognised and treated.
`Detection of PE begins with consideration of VTE as a
`diagnostic possibility. The clinical scenario is crucial in
`assessing the likelihood of PE. Wells and colleagues44 have
`developed a rapid seven-feature bedside assessment that is
`useful because almost half of their study patients could be
`classified as “PE unlikely”. The researchers designated a
`score of 4·0 or less as PE unlikely. In this low-risk group,
`only about 5% of patients were subsequently found to
`have PE. The seven features are: clinical signs and
`symptoms of DVT (3·0 points); an alternative diagnosis is
`less likely than PE (3·0 points); heart rate above 100 bpm
`(1·5 points); immobilisation or surgery in the previous
`
`History
`Physical examination
`Clinical setting
`
`Assess clinical
`likelihood
`
`4
`
`Electrocardiogram
`Chest radiograph
`
`Patient
`already in
`hospital
`
`Patient in
`emergency
`department
`
`v
`D-dimer
`
`Normal
`
`High
`
`No PE
`
`Chest CT
`
`Lung scan if
`contrast allergy
`or renal insufficiency
`
`Normal
`
`Positive
`
`Equivocal
`
`Normal
`
`Ultrasonography
`of deep leg veins
`
`Positive
`
`Negative
`
`v
`No PE
`
`Treat for PE
`
`No PE
`
`Consider
`pulmonary
`angiography
`
`Figure 1: Diagnostic algorithm for suspected PE
`
`4 weeks (1·5 points); previous DVT or PE (1·5 points);
`haemoptysis (1·0 point); and cancer, being treated
`currently or within the previous 6 months or palliative
`(1·0 point).
`For optimum diagnostic accuracy, symptoms and signs
`should be integrated with appropriate laboratory tests,
`including electrocardiography, chest radiography, and,
`when available, D-dimer testing. In many cases, no
`further diagnostic
`investigation
`is warranted. When
`appropriate, though, imaging tests, such as a chest CT or
`lung scan, should be done (figure 1).
`
`Initial diagnostic studies
`The electrocardiogram (figure 2) is useful to help exclude
`a myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation and
`acute pericarditis. In patients with large PE, pulmonary
`hypertension and right-ventricular strain cause incomplete
`or complete right bundle-branch block, T-wave inversion
`in leads V1 to V4, an S wave in lead I, and both a Q wave
`and an
`inverted T wave
`in
`lead III.45 A normal
`electrocardiogram is very unusual in patients with acute
`PE.
`The chest radiograph cannot be used to diagnose or
`exclude PE. It is useful in the differential diagnosis
`because it can detect pneumonia, pneumothorax, rib
`fracture, and congestive heart failure. Common abnor-
`malities
`in patients with
`large PE
`include cardiac
`enlargement,
`pulmonary-artery
`enlargement,
`and
`oligaemia of the embolised lung.46 In patients with small
`PE, a small wedge-shaped density at the periphery of the
`lungs
`indicates pulmonary
`infarction—“Hampton’s
`hump”.
`
`Laboratory studies
`Testing of the arterial blood for hypoxaemia and
`calculation of the alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient have
`been basic tools in the investigation of PE for a long time.
`However, comparison of blood gas results with pulmonary
`angiography has shown that hypoxaemia is not specific
`and does not serve as a useful triage tool in patients with
`suspected PE.47 Furthermore, the alveolar–arterial oxygen
`gradient is normal in about 20% of patients with
`angiographically proven PE.48
`The D-dimer blood test has practical usefulness in the
`diagnostic investigation of some patients with suspected
`PE. Plasma D-dimers are cross-linked fibrin derivatives
`produced when fibrin is degraded by plasmin.49 Among
`most patients with PE, endogenous fibrinolysis (which
`was clinically ineffective in preventing thromboembolism)
`results in a rise in the amount of D-dimer circulating in
`plasma. By contrast, a normal D-dimer concentration has
`a very high negative predictive value for excluding the
`diagnosis of PE. However, raised D-dimer concentrations
`are not specific for PE and are observed among patients
`with myocardial
`infarction, pneumonia, sepsis, and
`cancer, during the second and third trimesters of
`pregnancy, and after surgery. Therefore, this test is most
`useful in the setting of the emergency department,
`because most patients already in hospital have raised
`D-dimer concentrations.
`At the Emergency Department of Brigham and
`Women’s Hospital, we introduced a requirement that the
`D-dimer ELISA was done for all patients with suspected
`acute PE.50 After a year, we found that 559 of 1106
`D-dimer assays had raised results and 547 were normal.
`Only two patients with normal D-dimer concentrations
`had PE. Thus, the sensitivity of the D-dimer ELISA for
`acute PE was 96·4%, and the negative predictive value
`was 99·6%. Therefore, chest CT and lung scanning are
`
`1298
`
`THE LANCET • Vol 363 • April 17, 2004 • www.thelancet.com
`
`For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet.
`
`

`

`SEMINAR
`
`utn 12
`
`aVR
`
`i
`
`1
`
`V I
`
`V4
`
`II
`
`aVL
`
`vi
`
`7-7
`
`V6
`
`Figure 2: Electrocardiogram of a haemodynamically stable 63-year-old woman
`The patient presented with acute PE and moderately severe right-ventricular dilatation and dysfunction on echocardiography. The electrocardiogram shows
`an S wave in lead I, Q wave in lead III, and T-wave inversion in leads III, AVF, and V1–V4 (the McGinn-White pattern), which is typical of right-ventricular
`strain due to massive PE.
`not indicated for most patients with normal D-dimer
`results. This strategy may improve diagnostic efficiency
`and reduce costs. However, there is not yet enough
`evidence to stop the investigation for PE in patients with
`high
`clinical
`probability
`and normal D-dimer
`concentrations.51,52 Such evidence may soon emerge.
`
`lung
`alternative diagnoses can be established on
`parenchymal images that are not evident on chest
`radiography.
`Chest CT takes less than 30 s with a single breath-hold
`to minimise respiratory motion. Although excellent
`vascular opacification of the pulmonary arteries with
`contrast agent can be achieved in most cases, the major
`limitation of conventional chest CT has been failure to
`detect PE beyond
`third-order pulmonary arterial
`branches.58 In a prospective study with first-generation
`CT, the sensitivity of CT compared with angiography was
`70%.58 Other management studies are needed to show the
`safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients
`with normal chest CT. With the newer multi-row detector
`CT scans, four slices can be acquired simultaneously
`during each rotation of the X-ray source. The total
`examination time
`is eight times
`faster than with
`conventional single-row detector systems. Fewer motion
`artifacts occur; resolution increases from 5·00 mm to
`1·25 mm; and subsegmental vessels can generally be well
`visualised. Compared with conventional CT,
`the
`
`Cardiac biomarkers
`Cardiac biomarkers are being used with increasing
`frequency to assess prognosis in patients with newly
`diagnosed PE. In the Management Strategies and
`Prognosis of Pulmonary Embolism 2 study,53
`raised
`troponin concentrations were related to overall mortality
`and a complicated in-hospital course, presumably because
`troponin
`serves as a marker of
`right-ventricular
`microinfarction.
`Low concentrations of pro-brain natriuretic peptide
`predict a benign clinical outcome in patients with acute
`PE.54 Conversely, high concentrations of brain natriuretic
`peptide predict an adverse outcome.55,56
`
`Imaging studies
`for
`test
`imaging
`The
`traditional
`suspected PE has been the ventilation/
`perfusion lung scan. High-probability
`lung scans and normal lung scans are
`well validated with paired contrast
`pulmonary angiograms for diagnosis
`and exclusion of PE, respectively.57
`The main difficulty with lung scanning
`is that most scans are of intermediate
`or indeterminate probability. These
`non-diagnostic
`scans
`can
`cause
`consternation among clinicians who
`have either to undertake additional
`imaging tests or to decide empirically
`to diagnose or exclude acute PE.
`Because of frustration with lung
`scanning and the clinical need for
`definitive diagnosis or exclusion of PE,
`chest CT is rapidly replacing lung
`scanning as the main imaging test for
`suspected acute PE. Lung scanning is
`becoming a second-line test reserved
`for patients with a history of allergy to
`contrast agent or renal insufficiency.
`Chest CT has two other advantages
`over lung scanning: thrombus can be
`directly visualised (figure 3); and
`
`Figure 3: Chest CT of the patient whose electrocardiogram is shown in figure 2
`The scan shows bilateral central PE, with larger thrombus burden in the left than in the right
`pulmonary artery.
`
`THE LANCET • Vol 363 • April 17, 2004 • www.thelancet.com
`
`1299
`
`For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet.
`
`

`

`SEMINAR
`
`sensitivity of multi-row detector scanners for acute PE
`increases
`from about 70%
`to more
`than 90%.59
`Nevertheless, few studies using multi-detector helical CT
`pulmonary angiography have been published. In future,
`contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography may
`supersede chest CT because the contrast agents are safer
`and no ionising radiation is used.60
`In the unusual circumstance that high clinical suspicion
`persists despite a normal or non-diagnostic chest CT,
`invasive pulmonary angiography or venous ultrasono-
`graphy should be done. However, this latter strategy is of
`limited use; at the time of confirmed PE, the clot might
`have embolised completely from the leg veins and the
`diagnostic study of the legs will be normal.61
`Echocardiography is also a disappointing diagnostic test
`for suspected PE. In a prospective study, echocardio-
`graphy was normal and failed to identify 50% of patients
`with angiographically proven PE.62
`the
`Contrast pulmonary angiography has been
`traditional gold standard for the diagnosis of PE, though
`this invasive test is now rarely done for diagnostic
`purposes. The complication rate is low when experts carry
`out this procedure.63 Contrast pulmonary angiography can
`be used as the final diagnostic test whenever a diagnostic
`dilemma persists.64
`The second trial by the Prospective Investigation of
`Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis investigators, now under
`way, will assess suspected PE prospectively with lung
`scanning, venous ultrasonography of the legs, digital
`subtraction pulmonary angiography, contrast venography,
`and chest CT. The study will provide a thorough analysis
`of the efficacy of chest CT.65
`The synthesis of history, physical examination, clinical
`setting, electrocardiography, chest radiography, D-dimer
`testing, and chest CT will in most cases lead to a
`definitive diagnosis or exclusion of PE. When clinical
`suspicion of PE is high and the necessary diagnostic tests
`are not immediately available, empirical treatment for PE
`should begin with anticoagulation in the absence of major
`contraindications, such as recent neurosurgery, while
`arrangements are made for further investigation.
`
`Treatment
`Risk stratification
`Clinically, PE ranges from massive thromboembolism
`with cardiogenic shock to asymptomatic, anatomically
`small emboli without haemodynamic, respiratory, or other
`adverse physiological consequences. The key
`to
`appropriate therapy is risk stratification. Low-risk patients
`have an excellent prognosis with anticoagulation alone.
`High-risk patients might benefit from thrombolysis or
`embolectomy in addition to intensive anticoagulation.
`The Geneva prognostic index identified six factors that
`predict adverse outcome: cancer, heart failure, previous
`DVT, hypotension, hypoxaemia,
`and DVT on
`ultrasonography.66 High troponin concentrations at the
`time of initial hospital admission signify right-ventricular
`microinfarction and also identify patients at high risk of a
`complicated hospital course.53
`Echocardiography, although a poor diagnostic tool for
`PE, is excellent for rapid and accurate risk assessment.67
`Right-ventricular dysfunction
`identifies patients who
`despite initial haemodynamic stability develop cardiogenic
`shock and are at increased risk of death while in hospital.68
`In a prospective study of 209 consecutive patients with
`acute PE, 31% presented with echocardiographic
`evidence of right-ventricular dysfunction. Of those with
`abnormal echocardiograms, 10% developed PE-related
`shock, and 5% died while in hospital. Conversely,
`
`right-ventricular
`without
`patients
`normotensive
`dysfunction had an excellent short-term prognosis.68
`Persistent pulmonary hypertension and right-ventricular
`dysfunction on echocardiography done 6 weeks after the
`diagnosis of PE identify high-risk patients with an
`increased likelihood of developing overt right-ventricular
`failure over the next 5 years.69
`
`Anticoagulation
`Heparin anticoagulation is the foundation of therapy for
`acute PE. The traditional approach uses unfractionated
`heparin in an initial bolus of 5000–10 000 units followed
`by a continuous intravenous infusion, commonly started
`at 1250 U/h, to maintain a partial thromboplastin time in
`the target range of 60–80 s. A potential drawback of this
`strategy is failure to achieve adequate anticoagulation
`rapidly.70 Use of nomograms, mostly weight based, can
`assist in reaching a therapeutic degree of anticoagulation
`more quickly than empirical dose adjustments.71
`More recently, clinicians have used weight-based
`dosing of subcutaneously administered low-molecular-
`weight heparins, without dose adjustment, to achieve an
`immediate anticoagulant effect. The scientific basis of this
`strategy is that low-molecular-weight heparins provide
`high and sustained plasma antithrombin activity.72 In
`clinical trials of acute PE, reviparin once daily73 and
`tinzaparin once daily74 have proven as effective and safe as
`unfractionated heparin as a bridge to oral anticoagulation.
`In a trial of acute DVT in which 32% of patients had
`confirmed PE, enoxaparin at 1·0 mg/kg twice daily or
`1·5 mg/kg once daily was as safe and effective as
`unfractionated heparin.75 In another DVT study, reviparin
`was more effective than unfractionated heparin
`in
`reducing the size of the thrombus and in preventing
`recurrent thromboembolism.76
`The obvious potential major adverse effect of heparin is
`haemorrhage. Less apparent, but potentially more serious,
`is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis,
`which is more likely w

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket