throbber
Transdermal Drug Delivery: Penetration Enhancement Techniques
`
`Current Drug Delivery, 2005, 2, 23-33
`
`23
`
`Heather A.E. Benson*
`
`Western Australian Biomedical Research Institute, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box
`U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845
`
`Abstract: There is considerable interest in the skin as a site of drug application both for local and systemic effect.
`However, the skin, in particular the stratum corneum, poses a formidable barrier to drug penetration thereby limiting
`topical and transdermal bioavailability. Skin penetration enhancement techniques have been developed to improve
`bioavailability and increase the range of drugs for which topical and transdermal delivery is a viable option. This review
`describes enhancement techniques based on drug/vehicle optimisation such as drug selection, prodrugs and ion-pairs,
`supersaturated drug solutions, eutectic systems, complexation, liposomes, vesicles and particles. Enhancement via
`modification of the stratum corneum by hydration, chemical enhancers acting on the structure of the stratum corneum
`lipids and keratin, partitioning and solubility effects are also discussed. The mechanism of action of penetration enhancers
`and retarders and their potential for clinical application is described.
`
`Keywords: Transdermal delivery, skin penetration, enhancer, retarder.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Transdermal delivery of drugs through the skin to the
`systemic circulation provides a convenient
`route of
`administration
`for a variety of clinical
`indications.
`Transdermal delivery systems are currently available
`containing scopolamine (hyoscine) for motion sickness,
`clonidine and nitroglycerin for cardiovascular disease,
`fentanyl for chronic pain, nicotine to aid smoking cessation,
`oestradiol (alone or in combination with levonorgestrel or
`norethisterone) for hormone replacement and testosterone for
`hypogonadism. Despite the small number of drugs currently
`delivered via this route, it is estimated that worldwide market
`revenues for transdermal products are US$3B, shared
`between the USA at 56%, Europe at 32% and Japan at 7%.
`In a recent market report it was suggested that the growth
`rate for transdermal delivery systems will increase 12%
`annually through to 2007 [1]. Transdermal products for
`cardiovascular disease, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s
`disease, depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity
`disorder (ADHD), skin cancer, female sexual disfunction,
`post-menopausal bone loss, and urinary incontinence are at
`various stages of formulation and clinical development. The
`application of transdermal delivery to a wider range of drugs
`is limited due to the significant barrier to penetration across
`the skin which is associated primarily with the outermost
`stratum corneum layer of the epidermis. Consequently the
`daily dose of drug that can be delivered from a transdermal
`patch
`is 5-10 mg, effectively
`limiting
`this route of
`administration to potent drugs. Significant effort has been
`devoted
`to developing
`strategies
`to overcome
`the
`impermeability of intact human skin. These strategies
`include passive and active penetration enhancement and
`
`*Address correspondence to this author at the Western Australian
`Biomedical Research Institute, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University of
`Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845; Tel: +618
`9266 2338; Fax: +618 9266 2769; E-mail: h.benson@curtin.edu.au
`
`technologies to bypass the stratum corneum. This review
`describes the routes of penetration, how drug properties
`influence penetration and the techniques that have been used
`to enhance penetration across human skin. Physical
`enhancement
`technologies
`such
`as
`iontophoresis,
`electroporation, phonophoresis, microneedles and
`jet-
`injectors are reviewed in a separate article in this journal by
`Cross and Roberts [2] and in other recent review articles [3,
`4].
`
`DRUG DELIVERY ROUTES ACROSS HUMAN SKIN
`Drug molecules in contact with the skin surface can
`penetrate by three potential pathways: through the sweat
`ducts, via
`the hair
`follicles and sebaceous glands
`(collectively called the shunt or appendageal route), or
`directly across the stratum corneum (Fig. 1). The relative
`importance of the shunt or appendageal route versus
`transport across the stratum corneum has been debated by
`scientists over
`the years (eg. [5-7]) and
`is further
`complicated by the lack of a suitable experimental model to
`permit separation of the three pathways. In vitro experiments
`tend to involve the use of hydrated skin or epidermal
`membranes so that appendages are closed by the swelling
`associated with hydration. Scheuplein and colleagues [8, 9]
`proposed that a follicular shunt route was responsible for the
`presteady-state permeation of polar molecules and flux of
`large polar molecules or ions that have difficulty diffusing
`across the intact stratum corneum. However it is generally
`accepted that as the appendages comprise a fractional area
`for permeation of approximately 0.1%
`[10],
`their
`contribution to steady state flux of most drugs is minimal.
`This assumption has resulted in the majority of skin
`penetration enhancement
`techniques being focused on
`increasing transport across the stratum corneum rather than
`via the appendages. Exceptions are iontophoretic drug
`delivery which uses an electrical charge to drive molecules
`into the skin primarily via the shunt routes as they provide
`less electrical resistance, and vesicular delivery.
`
` 1567-2018/05 $50.00+.00
`
`© 2005 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1039
`
`

`

`24 Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1
`
`Heather A. E. Benson
`
`Fig. (1). Simplified representation of skin showing routes of penetration: 1. through the sweat ducts; 2. directly across the stratum corneum;
`3. via the hair follicles.
`
`Considerable research effort has been directed towards
`gaining a better understanding of the structure and barrier
`properties of the stratum corneum. A recent review by
`Menon provides a valuable resource [11]. The stratum
`corneum consists of 10-15 layers of corneocytes and varies
`in thickness from approximately 10-15 µm in the dry state to
`40 µm when hydrated [12-14]. It comprises a multi-layered
`“brick and mortar” like structure of keratin-rich corneocytes
`(bricks)
`in an
`intercellular matrix (mortar) composed
`primarily of
`long chain ceramides, free fatty acids,
`triglycerides, cholesterol, cholesterol sulfate and sterol/wax
`esters [15]. However it is important to view this model in the
`context that the corneocytes are not brick shaped but are
`polygonal, elongated and flat (0.2-1.5 µm thick, 34-46 µm in
`diameter). The intercellular lipid matrix is generated by
`keratinocytes in the mid to upper part of the stratum
`granulosum discharging their lamellar contents into the
`intercellular space. In the initial layers of the stratum
`corneum this extruded material rearranges to form broad
`intercellular lipid lamellae [16], which then associate into
`lipid bilayers [17, 18], with the hydrocarbon chains aligned
`and polar head groups dissolved in an aqueous layer (Fig. 2).
`As a result of the stratum corneum lipid composition, the
`lipid phase behaviour is different from that of other
`biological membranes. The hydrocarbon chains are arranged
`into regions of crystalline, lamellar gel and lamellar liquid
`crystal phases thereby creating various domains within the
`lipid bilayers [19]. The presence of intrinsic and extrinsic
`proteins, such as enzymes, may also affect the lamellar
`structure of the stratum corneum. Water is an essential
`component of the stratum corneum, which acts as a
`plasticizer to prevent cracking of the stratum corneum and is
`also involved in the generation of natural moisturizing factor
`(NMF), which helps to maintain suppleness.
`
`the physicochemical
`to understand how
`In order
`properties of the diffusing drug and vehicle influence
`permeation across the stratum corneum and thereby optimise
`delivery, it is essential to determine the predominant route of
`drug permeation within the stratum corneum. Traditionally it
`was thought that hydrophilic chemicals diffuse within the
`aqueous regions near the outer surface of intracellular keratin
`filaments
`(intracellular or
`transcellular
`route) whilst
`lipophilic chemicals diffuse through the lipid matrix between
`the filaments (intercellular route) [9] (see Fig. 2). However,
`this is an oversimplification of the situation as each route
`cannot be viewed in isolation. A molecule traversing via the
`transcellular route must partition into and diffuse through the
`keratinocyte, but in order to move to the next keratinocyte,
`the molecule must partition into and diffuse through the
`estimated 4-20 lipid lamellae between each keratinocyte.
`This series of partitioning into and diffusing across multiple
`hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains is unfavourable for
`most drugs. Consequently, based on more recent data (for
`example [16, 20-23])
`the
`intercellular route
`is now
`considered to be the major pathway for permeation of most
`drugs across the stratum corneum. As a result, the majority
`of techniques to optimise permeation of drugs across the skin
`are directed towards manipulation of solubility in the lipid
`domain or alteration of the ordered structure of this region
`(Fig. 3).
`
`PENETRATION ENHANCEMENT THROUGH OPTI-
`MISATION OF DRUG AND VEHICLE PROPERTIES
`
`Drug permeation across the stratum corneum obeys
`Fick’s first law (equation 1) where steady-state flux (J) is
`related to the diffusion coefficient (D) of the drug in the
`stratum corneum over a diffusional path length or membrane
`thickness (h), the partition coefficient (P) between the
`
`

`

`Transdermal Drug Delivery
`
`Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1 25
`
`Fig. (2). Diagrammatic representation of the stratum corneum and the intercellular and transcellular routes of penetration (adapted from [3]).
`
`Fig. (3). Techniques to optimise drug permeation across the skin.
`
`stratum corneum and the vehicle, and the applied drug
`concentration (C0) which is assumed to be constant:
`
`and partition coefficient of a drug on diffusion across the
`stratum corneum has been extensively studied and an
`excellent review of the work was published by Katz and
`Poulsen [24]. Molecules showing intermediate partition
`coefficients (log Poctanol/water of 1-3) have adequate solubility
`within the lipid domains of the stratum corneum to permit
`diffusion through this domain whilst still having sufficient
`hydrophilic nature to allow partitioning into the viable
`tissues of
`the epidermis. For example a parabolic
`
`=
`
`J
`
`PDC
`dm
`0
`dt
`h
`Equation 1 aids in identifying the ideal parameters for
`drug diffusion across the skin. The influence of solubility
`
`=
`
` (1)
`
`

`

`26 Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1
`
`relationship was obtained between skin permeability and
`partition coefficient for a series of salicylates and non-
`steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [25]. The maximum
`permeability measurement being attained at log P value 2.5,
`which is typical of these types of experiments. Optimal
`permeability has been shown to be related to low molecular
`size [7] (ideally less than 500 Da [26]) as this affects
`diffusion coefficient, and low melting point which is related
`to
`solubility. When a drug possesses
`these
`ideal
`characteristics (as in the case of nicotine and nitroglycerin),
`transdermal delivery is feasible. However, where a drug does
`not possess ideal physicochemical properties, manipulation
`of the drug or vehicle to enhance diffusion, becomes
`necessary. The approaches that have been investigated are
`summarised in (Fig. 3) and discussed below.
`
`1. Prodrugs and Ion-Pairs
`
`The prodrug approach has been investigated to enhance
`dermal and transdermal delivery of drugs with unfavourable
`partition coefficients [27, 28]. The prodrug design strategy
`generally involves addition of a promoiety to increase
`partition coefficient and hence solubility and transport of the
`parent drug in the stratum corneum. Upon reaching the
`viable epidermis, esterases release the parent drug by
`hydrolysis thereby optimising solubility in the aqueous
`epidermis. The intrinsic poor permeability of the very polar
`6-mercaptopurine was increased up to 240 times using S6-
`acyloxymethyl and 9-dialkylaminomethyl promoieties [29]
`and that of 5-fluorouracil, a polar drug with reasonable skin
`permeability was increased up to 25 times by forming N-acyl
`derivatives [30-34]. The prodrug approach has also been
`investigated for increasing skin permeability of non-steroidal
`anti-inflammatory
`drugs
`[35-39],
`naltrexone
`[40],
`nalbuphine [41, 42], buprenorphine [43, 44], b -blockers [45]
`and other drugs
`[27]. Well established commercial
`preparations using this approach include steroid esters (e.g.
`betamethasone-17-valerate), which provide greater topical
`anti-inflammatory activity than the parent steroids.
`Charged drug molecules do not readily partition into or
`permeate through human skin. Formation of lipophilic ion-
`pairs has been investigated to increase stratum corneum
`penetration of charged species. This strategy involves adding
`an oppositely charged species to the charged drug, forming
`an ion-pair in which the charges are neutralised so that the
`complex can partition into and permeate through the stratum
`corneum. The ion-pair then dissociates in the aqueous viable
`epidermis releasing the parent charged drug which can
`diffuse within the epidermal and dermal tissues [46-48]. In
`general permeability increases of only two to three-fold have
`been obtained although Sarveiya et al. [49] recently reported
`a 16-fold increase in the steady-state flux of ibuprofen ion-
`pairs across a lipophilic membrane.
`
`2. Chemical Potential of Drug in Vehicle – Saturated and
`Supersaturated Solutions
`
`The maximum skin penetration rate is obtained when a
`drug is at its highest thermodynamic activity as is the case in
`a supersaturated solution. This can be demonstrated based on
`Equation 1 rewritten in terms of thermodynamic activities
`[50]:
`
`Heather A. E. Benson
`
` (2)
`
`=
`
`dm
`dt
`
`aD
`h
`
`Where a
` is the thermodynamic activity of the permeant
`in its vehicle and g is the effective activity coefficient in the
`membrane. This dependence on thermodynamic activity
`rather than concentration was elegantly demonstrated by
`Twist and Zatz [51]. The diffusion through a silicone
`membrane of saturated solutions of parabens in eleven
`different solvents was determined. Due to the different
`solubility of the parabens in the various solvents, the
`concentration varied over
`two orders of magnitude.
`However, paraben flux was the same from all solvents, as the
`thermodynamic activity remained constant because saturated
`conditions were maintained throughout the experiment.
`Supersaturated solutions can occur due to evaporation of
`solvent or by mixing of cosolvents. Clinically, the most
`common mechanism is evaporation of solvent from the
`warm skin surface which probably occurs in many topically
`applied formulations. In addition, if water is imbibed from
`the skin into the vehicle and acts as an antisolvent, the
`thermodynamic activity of the permeant would increase [52].
`Increases in drug flux of five- to ten-fold have been reported
`from supersaturated solutions of a number of drugs [52-58].
`These systems are inherently unstable and require the
`incorporation of antinucleating agents to improve stability.
`Magreb et al [59] reported that the flux of oestradiol from an
`18-times saturation system was increased 18-fold across
`human membrane but only 13-fold in silastic membrane.
`They suggested that the complex mixture of fatty acids,
`cholesterol, ceramides, etc. in the stratum corneum may
`provide an antinucleating effect thereby stabilizing the
`supersaturated system.
`
`3. Eutectic Systems
`As previously described, the melting point of a drug
`influences solubility and hence skin penetration. According
`to regular solution theory, the lower the melting point, the
`greater the solubility of a material in a given solvent,
`including skin lipids. The melting point of a drug delivery
`system can be lowered by formation of a eutectic mixture: a
`mixture of two components which, at a certain ratio, inhibit
`the crystalline process of each other, such that the melting
`point of the two components in the mixture is less than that
`of each component alone. EMLA cream, a formulation
`consisting of a eutectic mixture of lignocaine and prilocaine
`applied under an occlusive film, provides effective local
`anaesthesia for pain-free venepuncture and other procedures
`[60]. The 1:1 eutectic mixture (m.p. 18°C) is an oil which is
`formulated as an oil-in-water emulsion thereby maximizing
`the thermodynamic activity of the local anaesthetics. A
`number of eutectic systems containing a penetration
`enhancer as the second component have been reported, for
`example: ibuprofen with terpenes [61], menthol [62] and
`methyl nicotinate [63]; propranolol with fatty acids [64]; and
`lignocaine with menthol [65]. In all cases, the melting point
`of the drug was depressed to around or below skin
`temperature thereby enhancing drug solubility. However, it
`is also likely that the interaction of the penetration enhancer
`with stratum corneum lipids also contributed to the increased
`drug flux.
`
`g
`

`

`Transdermal Drug Delivery
`
`4. Complexes
`
`Complexation of drugs with cyclodextrins has been used
`to enhance aqueous
`solubility and drug
`stability.
`Cyclodextrins of pharmaceutical relevance contain 6, 7 or 8
`dextrose molecules (a -, b -, g -cyclodextrin) bound in a 1,4-
`configuration to form rings of various diameters. The ring
`has a hydrophilic exterior and lipophilic core in which
`appropriately sized organic molecules can form non-covalent
`inclusion complexes resulting in increased aqueous solubility
`and chemical stability [66]. Derivatives of b -cyclodextrin
`increased water solubility (e.g. hydroxypropyl-b -
`with
`cyclodextrin HP-b -CD) are most commonly used
`in
`pharmaceutical formulation. Cyclodextrin complexes have
`been shown to increase the stability, wettability and
`dissolution of the lipophilic insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-
`toluamide (DEET) [67] and the stability and photostability of
`sunscreens [68, 69]. Cyclodextrins are large molecules, with
`molecular weights greater than 1000 Da, therefore it would
`be expected that they would not readily permeate the skin.
`Complexation with cyclodextrins has been variously
`reported to both increase [70, 71] and decrease skin
`penetration [66, 72-74]. In a recent review of the available
`data, Loftsson and Masson concluded that the effect on skin
`penetration may be related to cyclodextrin concentration,
`with reduced flux generally observed at relatively high
`cyclodextrin concentrations, whilst
`low cyclodextrin
`concentrations resulting in increased flux [75]. As flux is
`proportional to the free drug concentration, where the
`cyclodextrin concentration is sufficient to complex only the
`drug which is in excess of its solubility, an increase in flux
`might be expected. However, at higher cyclodextrin
`concentrations, the excess cyclodextrin would be expected to
`complex free drug and hence reduce flux. Skin penetration
`enhancement has also been attributed to extraction of stratum
`corneum lipids by cyclodextrins [76]. Given that most
`experiments that have reported cyclodextrin mediated flux
`enhancement have used rodent model membranes in which
`lipid extraction is considerably easier than human skin [77],
`the penetration enhancement of cyclodextrin complexation
`may be an overestimate. Shaker and colleagues recently
`concluded that complexation with HP-b -CD had no effect on
`the flux of cortisone through hairless mouse skin by either of
`the proposed mechanisms [78]. This remains a controversial
`area.
`
`5. Liposomes and Vesicles
`
`There are many examples of cosmetic products in which
`the active ingredients are encapsulated in vesicles. These
`include humectants such as glycerol and urea, sunscreening
`and tanning agents, enzymes, etc. Although there are few
`commercial topical products containing encapsulated drugs,
`there is a considerable body of research in the topic. A
`variety of encapsulating systems have been evaluated
`including liposomes, deformable liposomes or transfer-
`somes, ethosomes and niosomes.
`Liposomes are colloidal particles formed as concentric
`biomolecular layers that are capable of encapsulating drugs.
`Their potential for delivering drugs to the skin was first
`reported by Mezei and Gulasekharam in 1980 who showed
`that the skin delivery of triamcinolone acetonide was four to
`
`Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1 27
`
`five times greater from a liposomal lotion than an ointment
`containing
`the
`same
`drug
`concentration
`[79].
`Phosphatidylcholine from soybean or egg yolk is the most
`common composition although many other potential
`ingredients have been evaluated [80]. Cholesterol added to
`the composition tends to stabilize the structure thereby
`generating more rigid liposomes. Recent studies have tended
`to be focused on delivery of macromolecules such as
`interferon [81], gene delivery [82] and cutaneous vaccination
`[83], in some cases combining the liposomal delivery system
`with other physical enhancement
`techniques such as
`electroporation [84]. Their delivery mechanism is reported to
`be associated with accumulation of the liposomes and
`associated drug in the stratum corneum and upper skin
`layers, with minimal drug penetrating to the deeper tissues
`and systemic circulation (eg. [79, 85-88]. The mechanism of
`enhanced drug uptake into the stratum corneum is unclear. It
`is possible that the liposomes either penetrate the stratum
`corneum to some extent then interact with the skin lipids to
`release their drug or that only their components enter the
`stratum corneum. It is interesting that the most effective
`liposomes are reported to be those composed of lipids
`similar to stratum corneum lipids [81], which are likely to
`most readily enter stratum corneum lipid lamellae and fuse
`with endogenous lipids.
`Transfersomes are vesicles composed of phospholipids as
`their main ingredient with 10-25% surfactant (such as
`sodium cholate) and 3-10% ethanol. The surfactant
`molecules
`act
`as
`“edge
`activators”,
`conferring
`ultradeformability on the transfersomes, which reportedly
`allows them to squeeze through channels in the stratum
`corneum that are less than one-tenth the diameter of the
`transfersome [89]. According to their inventors, where
`liposomes are too large to pass through pores of less than 50
`nm in size, transfersomes up to 500 nm can squeeze through
`to penetrate the stratum corneum barrier spontaneously [90-
`93]. They suggest that the driving force for penetration into
`the skin is the “transdermal gradient” caused by the
`difference in water content between the relatively dehydrated
`skin surface (approximately 20% water) and the aqueous
`viable epidermis (close to 100%). A lipid suspension placed
`on a non-occluded skin surface is subject to evaporation, and
`to avoid dehydration transfersomes must penetrate to deeper
`tissues. Conventional liposomes remain near the skin
`surface, dehydrate and fuse, whilst deformable transfersomes
`penetrate via the pores in the stratum corneum and follow the
`hydration gradient. Extraordinary claims are made for the
`penetration enhancement ability of transfersomes, such as
`skin
`transport of 50-80% of
`the applied dose of
`transferosome-associated insulin [94]. More recently Guo et
`al. also demonstrated
`that flexible
`lecithin
`liposomes
`containing
`insulin
`applied
`to mouse
`skin
`caused
`hypoglycaemia, whilst conventional liposomes and insulin
`solution had no hypoglycaemic effect [95]. Other researchers
`who have evaluated transfersomes have also shown that
`ultradeformable liposomes are superior to rigid liposomes.
`For example, in a series of studies the skin penetration of
`estradiol was enhanced more by ultradeformable liposomal
`formulation (17-fold) than by traditional liposomes (9-fold)
`[96-98, 99]. Pretreatment of the skin membranes with empty
`vesicles had minimal effect on drug flux and the size of the
`
`

`

`28 Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1
`
`Heather A. E. Benson
`
`vesicles did not influence the enhancement effect. This group
`also confirmed that hydration gradient was the main driving
`force for transport of highly deformable liposomes as the 17-
`fold increase in oestradiol flux reduced to a six to nine-fold
`increase under occlusion [99]. Evidence of vesicles between
`the corneocytes in the outer layers of the stratum corneum
`has been demonstrated by electron and fluorescence
`microscopy [100]. Whilst the mechanism and degree of
`enhancement of deformable liposomes remains controversial
`it is likely that this formulation approach will receive further
`attention.
`Ethosomes are liposomes with a high alcohol content
`capable of enhancing penetration to deep tissues and the
`systemic circulation [101-104]. It is proposed that the
`alcohol fluidises the ethosomal lipids and stratum corneum
`bilayer lipids thus allowing the soft, malleable ethosomes to
`penetrate. Niosomes are vesicles composed of nonionic
`surfactants that have been evaluated as carriers for a number
`of drug and cosmetic applications [105-110]. This area
`continues to develop with further evaluation of current
`formulations and reports of other vesicle forming materials.
`
`6. Solid lipid Nanoparticles
`
`Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have recently been
`investigated as carriers for enhanced skin delivery of
`sunscreens, vitamins A and E, triptolide and glucocorticoids
`[111-118]. It is thought their enhanced skin penetration is
`primarily due to an increase in skin hydration caused by the
`occlusive film formed on the skin surface by the SLN. A
`31% increase in skin hydration has been reported following
`4 weeks application of SLN-enriched cream [119].
`
`PENETRATION ENHANCEMENT BY STRATUM
`CORNEUM MODIFICATION
`There is extensive literature, including many excellent
`reviews (e.g. [3, 120-122]), describing chemicals and
`methods to reduce the barrier capability of the stratum
`corneum in order to promote skin penetration. The enhancer
`activity of many classes of chemicals has been tested
`including water, surfactants, essential oils and terpenes,
`alcohols, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Azone analogues. In
`addition some chemicals have been identified as penetration
`retarders. The activity of penetration enhancers may be
`expressed in terms of an enhancement ratio (ER):
`
`ER = Drug permeability coefficient after enhancer treatment
`Drug permeability coefficient before enhancer treatment
`
`Barry and coworkers [123-125] devised the lipid-protein-
`partitioning (LPP) theory to describe the mechanisms by
`which enhancers effect skin permeability:
`• Disruption of the intercellular bilayer lipid structure
`•
`Interaction with the intracellular proteins of the stratum
`corneum
`Improvement of partitioning of a drug, coenhancer, or
`cosolvent into the stratum corneum
`
`•
`
`1. Hydration
`Water is the most widely used and safest method to
`increase skin penetration of both hydrophilic [126] and
`
`lipophilic permeants [127]. The water content of the stratum
`corneum is around 15 to 20% of the dry weight but can vary
`according
`to humidity of
`the external environment.
`Additional water within the stratum corneum could alter
`permeant solubility and thereby modify partitioning from the
`vehicle into the membrane. In addition, increased skin
`hydration may swell and open the structure of the stratum
`corneum leading to an increase in penetration, although this
`has yet to be demonstrated experimentally. For example,
`Scheuplein and Blank showed that the diffusion coefficients
`of alcohols in hydrated skin were ten times that observed in
`dry skin [9, 128]. Hydration can be increased by occlusion
`with plastic films; paraffins, oils, waxes as components of
`ointments
`and water-in-oil
`emulsions
`that prevent
`transepidermal water loss; and oil-in-water emulsions that
`donate water. Of these, occlusive films of plastic or oily
`vehicle have the most profound effect on hydration and
`penetration rate [129, 130]. A commercial example of this is
`the use of an occlusive dressing to enhance skin penetration
`of lignocaine and prilocane from EMLA cream in order to
`provide sufficient local anaesthesia within about 1 hour.
`Also drug delivery from many transdermal patches benefits
`from occlusion.
`
`2. Lipid Disruption/Fluidisation by Chemical Penetration
`Enhancers
`
`Many enhancers, such as Azone, DMSO, alcohols, fatty
`acids and terpenes, have been shown to increase permeability
`by disordering or ‘fluidising’ the lipid structure of the
`stratum corneum. The diffusion coefficient (D in Eq. 1) of a
`drug
`is
`increased as
`the enhancer molecules
`form
`microcavities within the lipid bilayers hence increasing the
`free volume fraction. In some cases the enhancers penetrate
`into and mix homogeneously with the lipids. However,
`others such as oleic acid and terpenes, particularly at high
`concentration, pool within the lipid domains to create
`permeable ‘pores’ that provide less resistance for polar
`molecules. These effects have been demonstrated using
`differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to measure the phase
`transition temperature [131-133], electron spin resonance
`(ESR) studies [134, 135], fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
`[136], Raman spectroscopy [137] and x-ray diffractometry
`[19]. These enhancer compounds consist of a polar head
`group with a long alkyl chain [138] and are more effective
`for hydrophilic permeants, although increased delivery of
`lipophilic permeants has also been reported.
`It has been hypothesised that the enhancement effect of
`Azone is related to its ability to exist in a ‘bent spoon’
`conformation with
`the ring at a right angle
`to
`the
`hydrocarbon chain [139, 140]. Permeability enhancement
`would result from its ability to intercalate between stratum
`corneum ceramides to create spatial disruption. However,
`Hadgraft and coworkers [141] suggested that intercalation
`into a lipid bilayer structure of packed ceramides would
`provide additional resistance to the existence of this high
`energy ‘bent spoon’ conformation. They suggested an
`alternative mechanism based on hydrogen bonding from data
`obtained
`from
`their examination of
`the effect on
`metronidazole permeation across excised human stratum
`corneum and the mechanism of action of Azone and five
`analogues (Table 1). The sulphur analogue (N-0721) had a
`
`

`

`Transdermal Drug Delivery
`
`Current Drug Delivery, 2005, Vol. 2, No. 1 29
`
`have been considered (eg. [138, 143-145]). Optimal
`penetration enhancement was obtained with saturated alkyl
`chain lengths of C 10 to C 12 attached to a polar head group, or
`C18 for unsaturated alkyl chains [138, 143].
`Some solvents, such as DMSO and alcohols, may also
`extract lipids thereby forming aqueous channels within the
`stratum
`corneum
`that
`increase permeability
`[146].
`Unfortunately many of the skin penetration enhancers that
`act on lipid bilayers also cause skin irritation thereby
`limiting their clinical application [147].
`
`3. Interaction with Keratin
`
`In addition to their effect on stratum corneum lipids,
`chemicals such as DMSO, decylmethylsulphoxide, urea and
`surfactants also interact with keratin in the corneocytes
`[148]. It has been suggested that penetration of a surfactant
`into the intracellular matrix of the stratum corneum,
`followed by interaction and binding with the keratin
`filaments, may result in a disruption of order within the
`corneocyte. This causes an increase in diffusion coefficient,
`and hence increases permeability. However in many studies
`of surfactants, a close relationship between permeation
`enhancement and lipid bilayer fluidisation has been observed
`suggesting that the lipid lamellae of the stratum corneum
`rather than the keratin of the corneocytes is the main site of
`action (eg. [149]). Barry [124] suggested
`that
`these
`molecules may also modify peptide/protein material in the
`lipid bilayer domain to enhance permeability. Again, there
`are problems with skin irritancy associated with many of
`these chemicals.
`
`4. Increased Partitioning and Solubility in Stratum
`Corneum
`
`A number of solvents (such as ethanol, propylene glycol,
`Transcutol(cid:210) and N-methyl pyrrolidone) increase permeant
`partitioning into and solubility within the stratum corneum,
`hence increasing P in Fick’s equation (Eqn. 1). Indeed,
`ethanol was
`the
`first penetration enhancer-cosolvent
`incorporated into transdermal systems [150]. It has been
`shown that a solvent capable of shifting the solubility
`parameter (d ) of the skin closer to that of the permeant will
`increase permeant solubility in the stratum corneum and
`hence flux [151]. The inherent solubility parameter of skin
`lipids (d
`s) is about 10 (cal/cm3)1/2 [152] therefore if a
`permeant has a solubility parameter (d
`i) signi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket