throbber
United States Patent m
`Hevan et al.
`
`[54] TRANSDERMAL SYSTEM FOR
`SIMULTANEOUS DELIVERY OF A NUMBER
`OF ACTIVE PRINCIPLES
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Kruno Hevan, Chevigny Saint Sauveur;
`Cecile Aillaud, Dijon, both of France
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`I bora to ires 1)'Hygiene et de
`Uittetiijue, Paris, France
`08/849,688
`[21] Appl, No,:
`Tfci^ 9,1995
`[22] POT Filed;
`PCTfFR95/01696
`[86] PCT No.:
`Jun. U, 1997
`§371 Date:
`§ i02(c) Date: Jun. U, 1!)97
`[87] PCT Pub, No,: WO96/19203
`PCT Pub. Date: Jun. 27, 199fi
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`130]
`Dec, 2i. f994
`France
`[FRJ
`[51] Int. CI/
`[52] U.S. CI
`[58] Field of Search
`
`94 15416
`A61F 13/02
`424/448; 424/44^
`424/449, 448
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli
`5,919,477
`Jul. 6,1999
`
`US0059194T7A
`[ii] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`4,911,707
`5.U64,422
`5,071,656
`.VI ?H, 1.17
`S3Sri,5Kl
`5,538,736
`
`3/1990 Heiber
`J1/1W1 Wick
`12/1991 Lee
`7/1997 Vlulkr ....
`9/1991 Kochinke
`7/1996 Hoffmann
`POREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`424/449
`.. 604/307
`.. 424/448
`.. 47.4/449
`.. 424/443
`424/448
`
`9406383 6/1990 WIPO.
`9006736
`3/1994 WIPO .
`
`Primary Examiner—D. Gabrielle Brouilietle
`Allorney, Agent, or Firm—Carmen Pili Curtis
`ABSTRACT
`157]
`A novel system for percutancoitsly delivering at least two
`active principles, consisting of at least two juxtaposed
`devices. The system includes (i) a first device containing a
`mixture of all the active principles in which at least one first
`active principle (A) is present in an amount enabling the
`effective therapeutic dose to be delivered, and at least one
`second active principle (B) is present in an amount smaller
`than the amount needed to deliver the ett'cctivc therapeutic
`dose; and(ii) one or more additional devices each containing
`a single active principle (B) selected from those in the first
`device and provided in an amount smaller than the amount
`needed to deliver the effective therapeutic dose, said addi­
`tional device(s) being designed to top up Ihe amount of each
`of the active principles (B) in ihe system until the effective
`therapeutic dose is achieved.
`
`4,666,441
`
`5/1987 Andriola
`
`604/897
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
`  
`
`
  
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1013
`
`

`

`5,919,477
`
`1
`TRANSDKRMAL SYSTKM FOR
`SIMULTANEOUS DELIVERY OKA NUMBER
`OK ACTIVE PRINCIPLES
`
`This Application is a 371 of PCT/FR95/01696, filed Dec. 5
`9, 1995.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to systems for the transder­
`mal delivery of a number of active principles 10
`simultaneously, said systems being designed so as to facili­
`tate adjustment of the delivered doses of one or more active
`principles and reduce the surface area of such systems in
`order to improve safety and comfort when used by the
`patient.
`
`2
`Similarly, il is also common for one and ihe same system
`for Ihe Iransdermal delivery of a number of active principles
`to be used for delivering several dosages of these active
`principles according to the patients or pathological condi-
`tions treated.
`This will be done by choosing different surface areas of
`said system on account of the fact that the dose of active
`principle delivered will be proportional to the surface area
`applied to the skin.
`In the case of such a system for the delivery of a number
`of active principles where different posologies arc required,
`if at least two active principles do not remain in the same
`dose ratio for all the chosen posologies, or if one active
`principle is delivered at a fixed dose, it will be impossible to
`obtain the different desired posologies by varying the sur­
`face area of the device, since in this case the doses of each
`PRIOR ART
`active principle vary simultaneously as a function of the
`surface area and in constant dose ratios.
`llicrc arc numerous devices currently in existence for the
`In both the above cases, therefore, the benefit of the work
`transdermal delivery of an active principle.
`already put in is lost and comfortable systems with good
`llic composition of these devices is defined for the
`fluxes and good physical properties are forsaken.
`purpose of (i) ensuring a good physicochemical stability of
`Now, the choice of components forming part of the
`the active principle over time, and (ii) obtaining an optimal
`formulation of the device becomes very rapidly restricted as
`transdermal absorption llux per unit surface area. Thus the
`dose of active principle delivered in the course of a treatment 25 lhe number of active principles increases, the latter often
`imposing conflicting constraints.
`is mainly determined by the surface area of the device
`applied to the skin.
`In fact, the active principles may be partially or totally
`incompatible with certain constituents of the formulation
`Now, this surface area must not be so large as to cause
`(resins, solvents, plasticizers, polymers, skin absorption
`physical discomfort when the device is used and produce a
`device whose size and esthetic appearance would rule out its 30 promoters, etc.). They may have different solubilities and
`stability temperatures and some of them recrystallize over
`use altogether. The device must also have good adhesion and
`time, degrade when applied or can only be used in the
`cohesion properties, making it easy, pleasant and discreet to
`composition at concentrations which are too low to obtain
`apply when used.
`the intended therapeutic dosage. Likewise, there is no uni-
`Thus devices containing a single active principle are
`produced at the present time and satisfy these demands, i.e. -,5 vcrsal skin absorption promoter for all active principles in
`order to increase their transdermal fluxes. Therefore, to
`they arc effective, small and comfortable and neither creep
`administer different active principles, it is often necessary to
`nor become detached during use.
`use several promoters or solvents. Now, the introduction of
`On the other hand, the production of such ellicient sys­
`any new substance may cause or raise problems of irritation
`tems for the delivery of two active principles, or even more
`40 and the system's cohesion or adhesion.
`than two active principles, still presents numerous problems
`By the same token, this set of constraints (compatibility,
`which become increasingly difficult to solve as the number
`solubility, etc.) also affects the different constituents of the
`of active principles to be delivered increases.
`formulation other than the active principles, thereby exac­
`Afirst known technical solution among those envisaged in
`erbating the difficulties of optimizing their role in the
`the prior art involves transdermal systems which consist of
`45 formulation and benefiting from the specific advantages they
`a single device containing all the active principles mixed
`can bring.
`together. Such systems are described for example in patent
`In practice, this first technical solution is not workable and
`documents EP-A-0 285 563, WO-A-92/07589, WO-A-92/
`leads to an impasse or, at best, to devices hampered by
`07590 and WO-A-94/06383. Although these systems have
`obvious disadvantages for the use of this type of pharma­
`the advantage of being small, they prove generally very
`ceutical form.
`complex, if not impossible, to perfect.
`A second known solution for the simultaneous delivery of
`In fact, by virtue of their nature and their physicochemical
`a number of active principles consists in producing a system
`properties, the active principles behave in different ways
`formed of several transdermal devices applied to the skin,
`towards the corneal layer and often have important influ­
`each device containing a single active principle. Such sys­
`ences on the composition of the device.
`tems are described for example in patent documents WO-A-
`Because the skin has different permeabilities to the active
`94/06383, WO-A-90/06736 and WO-A-94/13354.
`principles, each active principle has a different absorption
`This avoids the above problems of compatibility, stability
`flux. It therefore proves virtually impossible to obtain the
`and adjustment of the desired dosage. Attainment of the
`desired therapeutic dose of each active principle to be
`delivered by simultaneously using the same absorption area 60 desired dose of each active principle is then defined by the
`surface area of each device.
`and the same formulation.
`It is this which constitutes the main disadvantage of this
`Furthermore, if it is necessary to readjust the delivered
`solution, because such a system generally has a large overall
`dose of at least one of the active principles during clinical
`surface area, its size increasing with the number of active
`development, it is impossible to modify the delivered dose
`of this active principle independently of those of the other 65 principles,
`Now, in general, the larger a transdermal system is, the
`active principles without having to change Ihe tbrmulalion
`more difficult it is to use. This is because it becomes harder
`of the other components.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`

`5,919,477
`
`i|)
`
`4
`is present in an amount which enables the effective
`therapeutic dose to be delivered, and at least one second
`active principle (B) is present in an amount which is
`less than that required to deliver the effective therapeu­
`tic dose, and
`(ii) one or more additional devices each containing a
`single active principle (B) selected from those present
`in the first device and provided in an amount which is
`less than that required to deliver the effective therapeu­
`tic dose, said additional device or devices making up
`the amount of each of the active principles (B) present
`in the system until the effective therapeutic dose is
`obtained.
`
`3
`to optimize its adhesion and cohesion properties over the
`whole of the surface area which is to come into contact with
`the skin.
`Ilius, the larger the system is, the greater will be the risk
`of increasing the likelihood of creep of the adhesive mass 5
`and hence soiling of the clothes, sensations of pulling,
`discomfort or even irritation of the skin or cohesive rupture
`when the system is removed, making the system less man­
`ageable and acceptable.
`Furthermore, as the dose delivered over lime is deter- 10
`mined by the surface area of the device applied to the skin,
`any increase in surface area increases the risk of partial or
`total detachment of the system or puckering, which can
`result in a loss of activity because of non-uniform contact
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`with the skin, particularly over curved parts of the body or "
`INVLNTION
`parts which frequently move.
`Similarly, in the case of a reservoir, an inhomogeneous
`The expression "transdermal system" in the present
`invention denotes the association of at least two devices for
`distribution over the whole of the surface area which is to
`the purpose of simultaneously delivering all the active
`come into contact with the skin necessarily modifies the
`dose released and does not allow the desired therapeutic " principles by application to the skin,
`activity to be achieved. Thus, in the case of an excessively
`"Device" is understood here as meaning any system used
`large reservoir system, where the liquid or semiliquid
`to deliver at least one active principle transdermally. Such
`(solution or gel) containing the active principle tends to
`devices are generally classed in two major categories:
`stagnate in the lower part of the reservoir under the action of
`reservoir devices, in which the active principle or prin­
`gravity, the surface area utilized will be reduced and the "5
`ciples arc dissolved in a solvent acting as a vector for
`system will ultimately be less effective.
`transporting the active principle across an adhesive or
`Another disadvantage of a large system, whatever its
`non-adhesive microporous membrane; and
`nature may be, is the risk that it will be poorly accepted by
`matrix devices, in which the active principle or principles
`the patient because it is too visible and therefore difiicult to
`are dissolved or dispersed in a polymer network form­
`conceal.
`ing the matrix, which can be self-adhesive or non-
`ITie esthetic appearance and the discreetness of the trans­
`adhesive.
`dermal system, possibly combined with a sensation of
`These devices can be monolayer or multilayer (also called
`physical discomfort, are actually important parameters for
`lamellar), i.e. formed by the superposition of several matri-
`the acceptability of the product and the patient's compliance
`35 ces or reservoirs which may or may not contain one or more
`with the therapeutic treatment.
`active principles, said matrices or reservoirs optionally
`All these problems therefore detract from the comfort of
`being separated by microporous membranes.
`the system when in use or, even worse, from its therapeutic
`The association of at least two devices according to the
`efficacy when used by the patient.
`invention can be carried out by techniques known to those
`The solutions of the prior art are therefore unsatisfactory 40 skilled in the art, for example by sticking onto a support
`because they do not succeed in reconciling the possibility of
`coated with adhesive, juxtaposed double coaling or heat
`sealing onto a single support. The devices will have a single
`simply adapting the delivered doses of each of the active
`support in the above cases, but it is also possible to manu­
`principles with the production of a system of small overall
`facture a system in which each device has an identical or
`surface area, allowing safer and more comfortable use when
`45 different independent support, association being effected by
`the system is applied to the skin.
`juxtaposition of the devices, for example by heat sealing, or
`OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
`by associating the devices on an additional support, always
`In the field of the simultaneous transdermal delivery of a
`by the same techniques.
`The support used may be any support generally employed
`number of active principles, it would therefore be desirable
`to provide a novel technical solution which enables the 50 in occlusive or non-occlusive transdermal systems, of vari-
`desircd compromise to be reached without the above-
`able thickness, which is impermeable to the constituents of
`mentioned disadvantages.
`the devices.
`Preferred supports will be for example in the form of a
`It is this object which the present invention proposes to
`polyethylene, polypropylene or polyester film, a composite
`achieve through the production of a system for the simul­
`taneous transdermal delivery of at least two active principles 55 consisting of polyethylene and a vinyl acetate/ethylcne
`copolymer, an aluminized film or else a foam.
`which makes it possible simply to adjust the dose of each
`In practical terms, the whole of the system or each of the
`active principle to be delivered, while at the same time
`devices may be covered with a protective layer or film which
`having a reduced total surface area.
`can be peeled off before the system is used, it being possible
`SUBJECT OF THE INVENTION
`60 for said system itself to be packaged in a leaktight protection
`ITie above-mentioned object is achieved through the
`such as, for example, a polyethylene/aluminum composite.
`production, as a novel industrial product, of a novel system
`A device according to the present invention can be made
`for the transdermal delivery of at least two active principles
`of the materials familiar to those skilled in the art, for
`which consists of at least two juxtaposed (or associated)
`example natural or synthetic polymers (such as acrylics or
`devices, said system being characterized in that it comprises 05 derivatives thereof, silicones, block copolymers, vinyl
`(i) a first device containing a mixture of all the active
`acetate/ethylene copolymers, rubbers and derivatives
`principles in which at least one first active principle (A)
`thereof, etc.), according to the properties of the active
`
`

`

`5,919,477
`
`5
`
`! _
`
`,0
`
`6
`amoxycillin in association with clavulanic acid, sul-
`fametoxazole in association with trimethoprim, eryth­
`romycin in association with acctylsnlfafiirazole or
`erythromycin in association with tetracycline.
`Advantageously, a system in which the active principles
`to be delivered simultaneously are chosen on the one hand
`from estrogen compounds and on the other hand from
`progestin compounds is particularly recommended.
`
`5
`principles to be delivered. Other appropriate known prod­
`ucts generally used by those skilled in the art may be
`associated with said active principles, examples being solu-
`bili/ing agents, plasticizers, resins, stabilizers, bulking
`agents or skin permeation promoters.
`l ikewise, the membranes which may be employed are
`those generally used in the art in the field of transdermal
`systems, examples being a film of ethylene/vinyl acetate
`copolymer.
`BEST MODE
`In the case where one or more matrix devices arc used in 10
`the system according to the present invention, said matrix
`The best mode of carrying out the invention consists in
`devices arc manufactured by the coating techniques gener­
`using a system for the transdermal delivery of two active
`ally known in the art, either in a solvent phase or by the
`principles (A and B), characterized in that it comprises
`so-called hot melt technique (i.e. in the absence of a
`(i) a first matrix device which is a matrix containing in its
`solvent).
`bulk the active principle A in an amount which enables
`Likewise, in the case where devices of the reservoir type
`the effective therapeutic dose to be delivered, and the
`arc used, said devices arc manufactured by the techniques
`active principle B in an amount which is less than that
`known in the art, an example being creation of the reservoir
`necessary to deliver the effective therapeutic dose, and
`by heat-sealing the support onto a membrane and simulta­
`(ii) a second matrix device which is a matrix containing
`neously or non-simultaneously filling the reservoir.
`in its bulk the active principle B in an amount which
`In both cases, in the context of industrial production, the
`makes up the amount present in said first matrix device
`size of the devices is set to the appropriate dimensions,
`until its effective therapeutic dose is obtained.
`according to the amount of active principle or principles
`In other words, a system is recommended which consists
`present per unit surface area, to give the chosen doses of
`active principles to be delivered by the system over a given 25 0'two juxtaposed (or associated) matrices, this system being
`timc.
`such that a first matrix which contains a mixture of the two
`active principles, where one of the two is delivered at a dose
`llic transdermal system according to the invention can
`which is less than its effective therapeutic dose, is combined
`have any geometric shape: square, rectangular, circular or
`with a second matrix which contains this same active
`oval. The different devices can be arranged either side-by-
`30 principle and which enables its effective therapeutic dose to
`side or concentrically, each device then completely sur­
`be delivered.
`rounding the previous one, or any other geometric construc­
`This system is very useful for the simultaneous delivery
`tion can be used. The devices can optionally be separated or
`of an estrogen and a progestin, in particular for the simul­
`surrounded by one or more additional layers, which can be
`taneous delivery of different doses of 17-(3-estradiol,
`adhesive in order to help hold the unit together if necessary.
`Any combination of active principles capable of being 35 between 25 and 100/(g per 24 hours, and different doses of
`norethisterone acetate, between 100 and 800 /ig per 24
`applied transdcrmally and exerting cither a topical or a
`hours, in 17-p-estradiol/norethisterone acetate dose ratios of
`systemic action can be used within the framework of the
`'/i to Vs respectively, said doses being therapeutically effec­
`present invention.
`tive in the treatment of the symptoms of menopause and the
`The following possible associations may be mentioned
`41) resulting cardiovascular risks.
`among these combinations:
`The advantages and characteristics of the invention will
`(a) one or more estrogens with one or more progestins,
`be understood more clearly from the following description
`natural or synthetic, for contraceptive purposes or in
`of Examples of systems produced according to the invention
`the treatment of the symptoms of menopause, for
`and experiments comparing them with systems described in
`example estradiol, ethynylestradiol, estriol and deriva­
`45 the prior art. Of course, these details taken as a whole do not
`tives thereof in association with uorethisteroiic acetate,
`in any way imply a limitation but are given by way of
`norgestrel, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, norgestimate,
`illustration. The systems according to the invention and the
`lynestrenol, gestodene, nomegestrol acetate or
`comparative systems are produced by different combina­
`dienogest;
`tions of the matrix devices described below.
`(b) p-blocker and diuretic compounds useful especially in
`cardiovascular diseases, for example timolol, pindolol,
`EXAMPLE 1 (device 1)
`bufradol, indenolol or nipradinol in association with
`47.8 g of LEVAPREN® 450P (an ethylene/vinyl acetate
`amilonide or hydrochlothiazide;
`copolymer (abbreviated to EVA below) marketed by
`BAYER), 48 g of crotamiton [N-eIhyl-2-N-(2-
`(c) corticoid and antihistamine compounds useful espe-
`cially in the treatment of a lergies, for example 55 mchyiphcnyn^-butcnamide] (marketed' by BOE-
`HRINGER INGELHEIM), 0.2 g of IRGANOX® B215 (an
`methylprednisolone, prednisolone, hydrocortisone,
`antioxidanl MARKCICD B CIBA-GEIGY) and 115.53 g of
`beclomcthazone or triamcinolone in association with
`astcmizolc, dcxch orpheniraminc, cctinzme, diphenyl-
`ethyl ace|a|e are laced jn a vessel The mixIure is heated for
`hydromine chloride or chloro-phemramine;
`5 hours unli| lhc EVA has complelely dissolved. It is stirred
`(d) analgesic and anti-inflammatory compounds useful 60 a, room icmperature for 1 hour and 4 g of norethisterone
`especially in the treatment of pain, for example acetyl-
`acetate (abbreviated to NETA below), previously dissolved
`20 g of tetrahydrofuran, are then added. The mixture
`salicylic acid, paracetamol or noramidopyrine in asso-
`obtained is stirred for about 30 minutes until it is completely
`ciation with mefenamic acid, llufenamic acid,
`diclofenac, oxyphen-butazone, ibuprofen, naxoprene or
`homogeneous; it is then left to stand until the bubbles have
`fenbufene; and
`(,5 totally disappeared. The mass obtained is coated onto a
`siliconized polyester film at room temperature (15-25° C.)
`(e) antibacterial and antibiotic compounds useful espe­
`to give a deposit of material of (100±10) g/m". The unit
`cially in the treatment of infections, for example
`
`

`

`5,919,477
`
`7
`obtained is heated at 70° C. for 30 minutes and then
`transferred to a polyethylene support. The resulting product
`is then cut to appropriate dimensions. If necessary, the cut
`products are packaged in sachets, envelopes or leaklight
`enclosures.
`
`5
`
`EXAMPLE 2 (device 2)
`The procedure is analogous to Example 1 above using
`49.8 g of LEVAPREN® 450P, 44 g of crotamiton, 0.2 g of
`IRGANOX® B215, 116.2 g of ethyl acetate, 2 g of 17-|5- 10
`estradiol and 4 g of norethisterone acetate (added at the same
`lime as the 17-p-eslradiol), these two hormones being dis­
`solved together in 30 g of tctrahydrofuran.
`
`8
`obtained is coated onto a siliconized polyester film at a rate
`of (1()(1±10) g/m: at room temperature (15-25° C). After
`heating at 70° C. for 0.5 hour, the matrix obtained is
`transferred to a polyethylene support. The product is then cut
`to appropriate dimensions and packaged in sachets if nec­
`essary.
`
`EXAMPLE 7 (device 7)
`
`EXAMPLE 4 (device 4)
`Ihc procedure is identical lo Example 3 except that II g
`of ELVAX® 46L, 11 g of ELVAX® 46,5 g of ETHOCEL®,
`15 g of EUTANOL® G, 5 g of SURFADONE® LP300, I g
`of I7-|5-estradiol and 2 g of norethisterone acetate are used
`in this case.
`
`13.8 g of VECTOR® 4211D [a poly(slyrcne/isoprcne/
`styrene) three-block copolymer marketed by EXXON
`CHEMICAL], 23.85 g of ECR® 385 (a tackifying resin
`marketed by EXXON CHEMICAL), 0.1 g of IRGANOX®
`!, 565 (an antioxidant marketed by CIBA-GEIGY), 3.5 g of
`EXAMPLE 3 (device 3)
`" SURFADONE® LP300 (N-dodecyl-2-pyrrolidone mar­
`keted by BOEHRINGER 1NGELHEIM), 7.5 g of LAURO-
`20.7 g of EI VAX® 46L and 6.9 g of ELVAX® 46
`GLYCOL® (a mixture of the monoester and diester of
`(ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers marketed by DU PONT)
`propylene glycol and lauric acid, marketed by
`and 6 g of ETHOCEL® (ethyl cellulose marketed by DOW
`CHEMICAL) are placed in a vessel, with stirring, and 20 GATTEFOSSE) and 19.8 g of ethyl acetate are placed in a
`heated to about 130° C. 1.2 g of 17-fi-estradiol and 18.9 g
`250 ml beaker. This mixture is stirred, while being healed at
`of EUTANOL® G (2-octyldodecanol marketed by
`60° C., until the compounds have completely dissolved. A
`HENKEL) are then incorporated gradually at 130° C., with
`solution of 1.25 g of norethisterone acetate, previously
`continued stirring, and the mixture is stirred until it is
`dissolved in 6.25 g of tetrahydrofuran, is then added. ITie
`completely homogeneous. 6.3 g ol SURFADONE® LP300 25 resulting mixture is stirred for about 30 minutes until it is
`(N-dodecyl-2-pyrrolidone marketed by GAP
`complelely homogeneous. It is left lo cool until the bubbles
`CORPORATION) are then added al a temperature of the
`have totally disappeared. The resulting mass is coated onto
`order of 100 to 110° C. and stirring is continued until the
`a siliconized polyester film at a rate of (11()±10) g/m" al
`mixture is perfectly homogeneous. The mixture obtained is
`room temperature (15-20° C). The coaling produced is
`coated, al a temperature between 100 and 140° C., onto an 30
`heated at 50° C. for at leasl 30 minutes and then transferred
`anliadhesive temporary intermediate support, especially a
`to a polyethylene support. The product is cut into shapes of
`siliconized polyester film, at a rate of (I00±10) g/m2. 'ITie
`the desired dimensions.
`matrix obtained is transferred to a polyethylene support.
`The advantages of the present invention were illustrated
`35 by carrying out ex vivo permeation tests on the abdominal
`skin of male nude mice according to the following protocol:
`The amounts of hormones (i.e. steroids) released by a
`transdermal device with a surface area of 2.54 cm2, previ­
`ously cut out with a hollow punch and deposited on a 3.14
`cm2 disk of abdominal skin of a male nude mouse, are
`measured in a static glass cell, thermoslated al 37° C., which
`has a receiving comparlment wilh a volume of 11.5 ml
`containing a receiving phase made up of an isotonic
`mixture (75/25; v/v).
`solution/PEG
`•100
`Samples of the receiving solutions are taken al 2, 4, 6, 8,
`12, 16, 20 and 24 hours and assayed by liquid chromatog­
`raphy. To allow for the variability of the resulls associated
`with the intrinsic permeability of the skin samples, each
`EXAMPLE 6 (device 6)
`50 permeation experimeni for a sample of transdermal device is
`performed on a minimum of 3 lo 5 skin samples. The result
`13.35 g of KRATON G® 1657 (a poly(styrene/ethylene/
`given is the mean obtained for each device from these
`bulylene/slyrene) three-block copolymer marketed by
`experiments.
`SHELL), 0.1 g of IRGANOX® 565 (an antioxidant mar­
`keted by CIBA-GEIGY), 12.5 g of ZONATAC® 105L (a
`The following mean skin absorption fluxes were thus
`tackifying resin marketed by ARIZONA CHEMICAL), 55 obtained for 17-p-eslradiol (F, ,) and/or norethisterone
`10.25 g of PARAPOL® 9.10 (an n-butene/isobutylene
`acetate (F,VA,,) in the case of devices 1 lo 7:
`copolymer marketed by EXXON CHEMICAL), 10.25 g of
`Device 1: FA,£X.1=0.35±0.16//g/cm2/h
`EU TANOL® G (2-octyldodecanol marketed by HENKEL),
`=0.3940.1
`Device 2: F£S=0.2=0.07 /<g/cnr/h F
`3 g of SURFADONE® LP300 (N-dodccyl-2-pyrrolidonc
`A/ETA
`marketed by GAF CORPORATION) and 25.6 g of cyclo- 60
`iig/cm'/h
`hexane are placed in a 250 ml beaker. The mixture is stirred
`Device 3: F/;s=0.61±0.08 Hg/cm2/h
`for 6 hours, while being heated at 60° C., until the constilu-
`=0.57±0.17
`Device 4: F, .J=0.57±0.13 //g/cm2/h F
`enls have completely dissolved. 0.55 g of norethisterone
`NETA
`/ig/cm2/h
`acetate, previously dissolved in 2.75 g of tetrahydrofuran, is
`Device 5: F,v/. „=(l.5i().03 /(g/enr/h
`then added. The mixture obtained is stirred for 30 minutes 65
`Device 6: FA,CM=0.47±0.05 Hg/cnr/h
`until it is completely homogeneous, and then left to stand
`Device 7: FA,EZ1=0.89±0.12/(g/cm2/h
`until the bubbles have totally disappeared. The mixture
`
`EXAMPLE 5 (device 5)
`Ilie procedure is identical lo Example 3 except thai 33.75
`g of ELVAX® 46L, 11.25 g of ELVAX® 46, 10 g of 45
`El l IOCEL®, 30.5 g of EU TANOL® G, 4 g of norethister-
`one acetate and 10.5 g of SURFADONE® LP300 are used
`in this case.
`
`

`

`5,919,477
`
`10
`
`TABLE IV
`
`SD,
`
`3.4
`3.6
`
`SI),
`
`22.2
`17.7
`
`TABLE V
`
`G
`
`16.8
`
`25.6
`21.3
`
`Comparative system Va
`System V
`
`SD,
`
`3.4
`3.6
`
`SD,
`
`11.7
`9.4
`
`S
`
`15.1
`13
`
`G
`
`13.9
`
`to
`
`Comparative system IVi
`System IV
`
`9
`Tables I to V illustrate the reduction in surface area
`obtained by the systems according to the invention, relative
`to a comparative system formed of two juxtaposed devices
`each containing a single active principle, in the case of the
`simultaneous transdermal delivery of 17-p-cstradiol and
`norethisterone acetate.
`Ihus Table I compares a system I according to the
`invention, consisting of devices 4 and 5, with a comparative
`system la. consisting of devices 3 and 5.
`Table II compares a system II according to the invention,
`consisting of devices 2 and 1, with a comparative system Ha.
`consisting of devices 3 and 1.
`Table 111 compares a system III according to the
`invention, consisting of devices 4 and 1, with a comparative "
`In the present case it is desired to deliver the following
`system Ilia, consisting of devices 3 and 1.
`therapeutically effective doses:
`Table IV compares a system IV according to the
`50 f i g of 17-P-estradiol per 24 hours, and
`invention, consisting of devices 4 and 6, with a comparative
`250 /<g of Doreihistcrone acetate per 24 hours,
`_
`system IVa, consisting of devices 3 and 6.
`If it is desired simultaneously to deliver these two hor-
`'Table V compares a system V according to the invention, 'l) mones contained in a single device, the difference in skin
`permeability, i.e. skin absorption flux, between the norethis­
`consisting of devices 4 and 7, with a comparative system Va,
`terone acetate and the 17-(!-estradiol must be 5. Now, in
`consisting of devices 3 and 7.
`practice, such a difference, which is theoretically obtainable
`'The abbreviations used in these Tables have the following
`although already difficult to achieve as such, proves impos­
`meanings:
`es sible to obtain if allowance is made for the constraints of
`SDj represents the surface area of the first device,
`stability, comfort and adhesive and cohesive properties
`expressed in cm2.
`required by the marketing of such a device.
`Thus devices 2 and 4, which have these good physico-
`SI), represents the surface area of the second device,
`chemical properties and offer a good level of comfort, do not
`expressed in car.
`30 make it possible to achieve adjustment of the desired doses.
`S represents the total surface area of the system formed by
`It is impossible to obtain the desired effective dose of
`the juxtaposition of both devices, expressed in cm2.
`norethisterone acetate without a 2.5-fold and 5-fold increase,
`respectively, in the doses of 17-|5-estradiol delivered. The
`(i represents the reduction in surface area, expressed as a
`alternative solution, which uses a system formed of 2
`percentage, for the systems according to the invention
`(represented by the second line of the Tables) relative 35 juxtaposed matrix devices, one containing the 17-|i-estradiol
`and the other containing the norethisterone acetate, is less
`to systems formed by the juxtaposition of two devices
`efficient than the solution according to the invention, which
`each containing a single active principle (represented
`affords a reduction in surface area relative to the former by
`by the first line of the Tables).
`virtue of associating a first matrix device containing a
`The first device contains a mixture of 17-(}-esiradiol and
`mixture of the two hormones, in which the concentration of
`nore

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket