throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SEVEN Networks, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2018-011(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:3)
`Patent No. (cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:27)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:15)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:21)
`_________________
`
`Declaration of Joseph Shear
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 104(cid:19)
`Google LLC v. Seven Networks, LLC
`IPR2018-011(cid:19)(cid:21)
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 1030
`Samsung v. Seven Networks
`Proceeding No. IPR2018-01106
`
`

`

`I, Joseph Shear, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney for Google LLC (“Google”). I provide this
`
`Declaration in connection with the above-identified Inter Partes Review (“IPR”)
`
`proceeding. Unless otherwise stated, the facts stated in this Declaration are based
`
`on my personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member of Google’s Patent Litigation legal team and an
`
`employee of Google (and not Alphabet Inc. or XXVI Holdings Inc.).
`
`3.
`
`At Google, my work has involved managing patent litigation in
`
`federal court and supervising related proceedings before the USPTO at the time the
`
`petition was prepared and filed.
`
`Background
`
`4.
`
`Google is a Delaware limited liability company, having its principal
`
`place of business in California. Google is a wholly owned subsidiary of XXVI
`
`Holdings Inc. (“XXVI”).
`
`5.
`
`XXVI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. (“Alphabet”)
`
`that holds the equity of Alphabet’s subsidiaries, including Google.
`
`6.
`
`Alphabet is a publicly traded company. It is a holding company that
`
`owns a collection of subsidiary companies known as “Bets”.
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`

`

`7.
`
`8.
`
`only named defendant in that district court proceeding; neither Alphabet nor XXVI
`
`are parties to that district court proceeding. Ex.1041; Ex. 1052.
`
`. Google is the
`
`9.
`
`This Underlying Litigation
`
`10.
`
` SEVEN Networks filed a Complaint on May 17, 2017, against
`
`Google Inc. in E.D. Texas. See Ex. 1041.
`
`11.
`
` At the time the complaint was filed (May 17, 2017), Google Inc. had
`
`already become a subsidiary of Alphabet. Neither Alphabet nor XXVI was named
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`2
`
`3
`
`

`

`in SEVEN Network’s Complaint, or in its First Amended Complaint filed on
`
`August 22, 2017. See Ex. 1041; Ex. 1052.
`
`12.
`
` In August 2017, in the district court, Google filed its Rule 7.1.
`
`Corporate disclosure statement to indicate that “Google Inc. [was] a wholly owned
`
`subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., a publicly held corporation.” Ex. 1053.
`
`13.
`
` On October 5, 2017, Google submitted an unopposed Motion to the
`
`District Court to reflect the corporate name change from Google Inc. to Google
`
`LLC (see Ex. 1054), and a new corporate disclosure statement to state that “Google
`
`LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of XXVI Holdings Inc., which is a wholly
`
`owned subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company” (Ex. 1055).
`
`14.
`
` Neither Alphabet nor XXVI have agreed
`
`15. Google, and not Alphabet or XXVI, controls the underlying litigation
`
`strategy.
`
`This IPR Proceeding
`
`16.
`
`This IPR petition was filed only on behalf of Google—not on behalf
`
`of Alphabet or XXVI.
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`3
`
`4
`
`

`

`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`17. No individual or representative for Alphabet or XXVI has directed or
`
`informed the strategy for the SEVEN Networks litigation, or this IPR proceeding.
`
`Alphabet’s Board (Ex. 1046) has not directed, controlled, or funded this IPR
`
`proceeding.
`
`XXVI officer, director, or employee was consulted regarding the preparation of
`
`this IPR petition or the decision to file this IPR petition.
`
`. No Alphabet or
`
`18.
`
`
`
`Samsung’s Non-Participation in This Proceeding
`
`19.
`
`Seven also filed a district court litigation against Samsung. See
`
`SEVEN Networks, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-
`
`00441 (E.D. Tex. 2017)). The cases have been consolidated for pretrial
`
`proceedings. As a result, Google has jointly filed certain papers with Samsung in
`
`the consolidated cases (e.g., claim construction briefing and invalidity
`
`contentions). The jointly-filed papers and coordination in district court were made
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`4
`
`5
`
`

`

`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1048 at 1. Google has reiterated this in correspondence stating that
`
`20.
`
`Samsung has not played a role in this IPR proceeding. I know that
`
`because I directed the preparation and filing of this IPR petition.
`
`
`
` Ex. 1047 at 4.
`
`However, Google
`
`selected the prior art for this IPR petition, determined the grounds for this IPR
`
`petition, developed the positions for this IPR petition, and financed this IPR
`
`petition. Google did not inform Samsung of the specific patent(s) for which Google
`
`would file petition(s), the art or grounds for the petition(s), and did not provide
`
`Samsung with drafts of this IPR. Samsung did not provide input into this IPR and
`
`did not and does not have any control over this IPR and did not fund this IPR.
`
`21.
`
`I understand that SEVEN suggests that Google and Samsung are
`
`coordinating because Google and Samsung filed their IPRs “[i]n a period of four
`
`business days.” The timing of Google’s filing of this IPR was simply a
`
`consequence of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). Specifically, Google filed an IPR petition
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`5
`
`6
`
`

`

`within one year after it was “served with a complaint alleging infringement of the
`
`patent.” 35 use. § 315(b).
`
`“NW-—
`_ Ex- 1047
`
`(discussing, inter alia, Section 11.1.3 ofEx. 1051).
`
`Jurat
`
`23.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true, and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true,
`
`and that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 oflhe United States Code.
`
`Dated: October 5,2018
`
`i
`
`/L{_ ,,,
`
`Jo
`
`ph Shear
`
`Page 7 or 7
`Page 7 or 7
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket