`
`
`
`
`
`Google LLC
`Petitioner
`v.
`AGIS Software Development, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`IPR2018-01079 (Patent No. 8,213,970)
`
`
`September 5, 2019
`
`1
`
`Google EX1026
`Google v. AGIS
`IPR2018-01079
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds
`
`Patent
`
`Instituted
`Grounds
`
`Claims
`
`Reference(s)
`
`’970
`
`Ground 1
`
`Ground 2
`
`Ground 3
`
`1 and 3-9
`
`1 and 3-9
`
`1 and 3-9
`
`Kubala and Hammond
`Hammond, Johnson, and
`Pepe
`Hammond, Johnson, Pepe,
`and Banerjee
`
`2
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`Whether the prior art teaches or suggests:
`
`
`POR, 14-28.
`
`• “forced message alert”
`
`• “forced message alert software packet”
`
`• “in order to clear recipient’s response list”
`
`• “displaying a listing”
`
`POR, 28-31.
`
`POR, 22.
`
`POR, 22-27.
`
`3
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert”
`
`Kubala teaches a “forced message alert”
`
`EX1005, Kubala, FIG. 2; see also Pet., 26-32.
`
`4
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert”
`
`AGIS says:
`
`1. Reads limitations into “forced”
`
`2. Prior art teaches “forced”
`
`POR, 15.
`
`5
`
`
`
`1. AGIS’s Argument Reads Limitations into “Forced”
`
`Claim language:
`
`EX1001, ’970 Patent, 9:14-23; see also Pet. Reply, 3-6 .
`
`6
`
`
`
`1. AGIS’s Argument Reads Limitations into “Forced”
`
`Structure in specification:
`
`EX1001, ’970 Patent, 8:37-44;
`see also POR, 17; Pet. Reply, 4-6.
`
`7
`
`
`
`2. Kubala teaches the claimed “forced” message
`
`Kubala’s ¶[0009]:
`
`EX1005, Kubala, ¶[0009]; see also Pet., 30-32.
`
`8
`
`
`
`2. Kubala teaches the claimed “forced” message
`
`Kubala’s ¶[0054]:
`
`EX1005, Kubala, ¶[0054]; see also Pet. 30-32.
`
`9
`
`
`
`2. Kubala teaches the claimed “forced” message
`
`Kubala’s ¶[0055]:
`
`Ex. 1005, Kubala, ¶[0055]; see also Pet. 30-32.
`
`10
`
`
`
`2. Kubala teaches the claimed “forced” message
`
`Kubala’s ¶[0059]:
`
`EX1005, Kubala, ¶[0059]; see also Pet., 30-32.
`
`11
`
`
`
`2. Kubala teaches the claimed “forced” message
`
`Hammond:
`
`EX1006, Hammond, Abstract; see also Pet., 58-59.
`
`12
`
`
`
`2. Johnson also teaches a “forced” message
`
`Johnson:
`
`EX1007, Johnson, 4:3-17; see also Pet., 60.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`Whether the prior art teaches or suggests:
`
`
`POR, pp. 14-28.
`
`• “forced message alert”
`
`• “forced message alert software packet”
`
`• “in order to clear recipient’s response list”
`
`• “displaying a listing”
`
`POR, pp. 28-31.
`
`POR, p. 22.
`
`POR, pp. 22-27.
`
`14
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert Software Packet”
`
`Petition
`
`Pet., 60.
`
`15
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert Software Packet”
`
`Institution Decision
`
`Institution Decision, 30.
`
`Institution Decision, 36.
`
`16
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert Software Packet”
`
`Petitioner’s Reply:
` construed the term
`
`Pet. Reply, 1.
`
`17
`
`
`
`“Forced Message Alert Software Packet”
`
`Petitioner’s Reply:
`mapped construction to prior art
`
`Pet. Reply, 1-2.
`
`18
`
`
`
`Hammond teaches a “forced message alert software packet”
`
`Hammond’s message delivery
`information is the claimed “packet”
`
`EX1006, Hammond, 3:31-43; see also Pet., 60; Pet. Reply, 19.
`
`19
`
`
`
`Johnson teaches a “forced message alert software packet”
`
`Johnson’s persistent reply attributes
`are the claimed “packet”
`
`EX1007, Johnson, 4:3-6; see also Pet., 60; Pet. Reply, 19.
`
`EX1007, Johnson, 4:25-32; see also Pet., 60; Pet. Reply, 19.
`
`20
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`Whether the prior art teaches or suggests:
`
`
`POR, pp. 14-28.
`
`• “forced message alert”
`
`• “forced message alert software packet”
`
`• “in order to clear recipient’s response list”
`
`• “displaying a listing”
`
`POR, pp. 28-31.
`
`POR, p. 22.
`
`POR, pp. 22-27.
`
`21
`
`
`
`“In Order to Clear Recipient’s Response List”
`
`Petition
`
`Pet., 31.
`
`Pet., 32.
`
`22
`
`
`
`“In Order to Clear Recipient’s Response List”
`
`AGIS argues:
`
`POR, 22.
`
`23
`
`
`
`“In Order to Clear Recipient’s Response List”
`
`Cited portion of
`Williams Declaration:
`
`EX1003, Williams Decl., ¶109; see also Pet. Reply, 11-12.
`
`24
`
`
`
`Agenda
`
`Whether the prior art teaches or suggests:
`
`
`POR, pp. 14-28.
`
`• “forced message alert”
`
`• “forced message alert software packet”
`
`• “in order to clear recipient’s response list”
`
`• “displaying a listing”
`
`POR, pp. 28-31.
`
`POR, p. 22.
`
`POR, pp. 22-27.
`
`25
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`Petition relies on Kubala
`
`Pet., 32-33 (discussing limitation 1.7);
`see also Pet., 44 (discussing limitation 6.5).
`
`26
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`Petition also relies on Hammond
`
`Pet., 32-33.
`
`27
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`AGIS argues:
`
`
`
`POR, 23.
`
`28
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`AGIS’s expert admits this argument
`relies on wrong section of petition
`
`EX1022, Carbonell Tr., 57:16-25; see also Pet. Reply, 13-14.
`
`29
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`AGIS also argues that Hammond
`does not teach this limitation:
`
`
`
`POR, 24; see also Pet. Reply, 15-16.
`
`30
`
`
`
`“Displaying a Listing”
`
`Williams Supplemental Declaration
`
`EX1023, Williams Suppl. Decl., ¶12; see also Pet. Reply, 15-16.
`
`31
`
`