`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Thursday, October 11, 2018 6:34 AM
`Arner, Erika; 'Kabakoff, Stephen'; kara.specht@finnegan.com; Kenneth Weatherwax;
`Edward Hsieh; Parham Hendifar; Modi, Naveen; Palys, Joseph E.;
`danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com; tlewry@brookskushman.com;
`sshah@brookskushman.com; jszuma@brookskushman.com
`Trials
`Google v. SEVEN IPRs - IPR2018-01047, 01048, 01049, 01101, 01102, 01051, 01052,
`01094, 01095, 01116, 01117
`
`Counsel,
`
`The panels in the subject Google v. SEVEN IPRs grant Patent Owner SEVEN Network’s
`(“SEVEN’s”) unopposed email request (October 9, 2018) to cite as evidence, in the sur-replies
`authorized in the Board’s Order (filed September 25, 2018), the discovery produced by
`Samsung in the Samsung v. SEVEN IPRs (IPR2018-
`01106/1108/1113/1114/1120/1122/1124/1125/1126/1127). The sur-replies must contain only
`rebuttal argument and no new evidence (apart from the discovery noted). Prior to filing the
`discovery here, SEVEN must obtain authorization from Samsung and reference the
`authorization in its sur-replies. SEVEN must file a motion to seal, a proposed protective order,
`and a redacted public version for any of that discovery for which Samsung requires
`protection. In addition to referring to the Order (filed September 25, 2018) in its sur-replies,
`SEVEN must refer to this email as authorizing its unopposed request and attach this email as
`exhibits to its sur-replies.
`
`Note: SEVEN’s email request (October 9, 2018) incorrectly lists the wrong case numbers in
`the subject line, and improperly introduces arguments. Accordingly, SEVEN shall not include
`SEVEN’s email request (October 9, 2018) as part of the record.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`SEVEN Networks, LLC Exhibit 2059
`IPR2018-01052, Google LLC v. SEVEN Networks, LLC
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
