throbber
Application Data Sheet
`
`Application Information
`
`Application number::
`
`Not yet assigned
`
`Herewith
`
`Provisional
`
`Utility
`
`Filing Date::
`
`Application Type::
`
`Subject Matter::
`
`Suggested classification::
`
`Suggested Group Art Unit::
`
`CD-ROM or CD-R??::
`
`Number of CD disks::
`
`Number of copies of COs::
`
`Sequence Submission::
`
`Computer Readable Form (CRF)?::
`
`Number of copies of CRF::
`
`Title::
`
`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO
`
`Attorney Docket Number::
`
`028482-004500US
`
`CLIENT
`
`Request for Early Publication::
`
`Request for Non-Publication::
`
`Suggested Drawing Figure::
`
`Total Drawing Sheets::
`
`Small Entity?::
`
`Latin name::
`
`Variety denomination name::
`
`Petition included?::
`
`Petition Type::
`
`Licensed US Govt. Agency::
`
`Contract or Grant Numbers One::
`
`No
`
`No
`
`1
`4
`
`No
`
`Secrecy Order in Parent Appl.::
`
`No
`
`Page 1
`
`Initial 11/22/1 0
`
`Page 1 of 49
`
`GOOGLE EXHIBIT 1016
`
`

`

`Applicant Information
`
`Applicant Authority Type::
`
`Primary Citizenship Country::
`Status::
`
`Given Name::
`Middle Name::
`
`Family Name::
`
`Name Suffix::
`
`Inventor
`us
`Full Capacity
`
`Mikko
`
`Tervahauta
`
`City of Residence::
`
`State or Province of Residence::
`
`Country of Residence::
`Street of Mailing Address::
`
`San Francisco
`
`CA
`us
`2015 Castro St.
`
`City of Mailing Address::
`State or Province of mailing address:: CA
`
`San Francisco
`
`Country of mailing address::
`
`US
`
`Postal or Zip Code of mailing address:: 94131
`
`Correspondence Information
`
`Correspondence Customer Number::
`
`20350
`
`Representative Information
`
`Representative Customer Number::
`
`20350
`
`Representative Designation::
`
`Representative Number::
`
`Representative. Name::
`
`Domestic Priority Information
`
`Application::
`
`Continuity Type::
`
`Parent Application:: Parent Filing Date::
`
`Page2
`
`lnitial11/22/10
`
`Page 2 of 49
`
`

`

`Foreign Priority Information
`
`Country::
`
`Application number::
`
`Filing Date::
`
`Assignee Information
`
`Assignee Name::
`
`Street of mailing address::
`
`City of mailing address::
`
`State or Province of mailing address::
`
`Country of mailing address::
`
`Postal or Zip Code of mailing address::
`
`Submitted by:
`
`Signature
`
`/Alan D. Minsk/
`-------------------------------
`Printed Name
`Alan D. Minsk
`--------~~~~~~--------
`
`Date November 22, 2010
`
`Registration Number ____ ____:.3..;;_5.:..;.,9...;;.5_6 ____ _
`
`Page 3
`
`Initial 11/22/10
`
`Page 3 of 49
`
`

`

`Attorney Docket No.: 028482-004500US
`
`PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION
`
`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO CLIENT
`
`Inventor:
`
`Mikko Tervahauta, a citizen of Finland,
`
`residing at San Francisco, CA, 94131
`
`Assignee:
`
`Seven Networks, Inc.
`
`Entity:
`
`Small
`
`TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-3834
`Tel: 415-576-0200
`
`Page 4 of 49
`
`

`

`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO CLIENT
`
`In the art today there are performance enhancing proxies and general standards for
`
`improvements of TCP performance in wired and wireless networks. Some of these techniques
`
`use clients and some are clientless. Some can look at network performance to enhance the
`
`optimization they provide. As noted, some may utilize a client and some may operate clientless.
`
`Almost all, if not all, are focused on optimization based on only a one-sided view of the
`
`networks connected to such a platform- either outbound wired, inbound/outbound wireless, or
`
`based solely on the cooperation with a client.
`
`In some cases, a mobile client may be receiving data from multiple sources (e.g., servers,
`
`web-sites, nodes of a network, etc.) in the service network. The router/communication network
`
`between the services and the client ensures that all services can communicate changes to the
`
`client over a single physical connection. However, a problem that may occur is that different
`
`services (without knowing of each other's actions) trigger the client to create that connection at
`
`different times, and there may be a lack of an efficient or optimal alignment of data transfer from
`
`the services to the client. Hence efficient utilization of the shared connection. is lacking (or at
`
`least minimal or sub-optimal) and at times the single connection may in reality only provide an
`
`adequate or a realistic level of service for a single service or source of data. As recognized by
`
`the present inventor, to make the alignment of data bursts (and hence the transfer of data from
`
`multiple sources) more efficient, embodiments of the invention should align the data transfer
`
`process(es) to be closer (in a temporal or other relevant sense) to the source(s) of data. In other
`
`words, in one embodiment, rather than fetching the data at random times and buffering it, the
`
`system should attempt to align all services to fetch the data at aligned intervals so that minimal
`
`in-memory buffering is required.
`
`Page 5 of 49
`
`

`

`Description of One or More Embodiments of the Invention
`
`Embodiments of the present invention provide a system that optimizes multiple aspects of
`
`the connection with wired and wireless networks and devices through a complete view of activity
`
`including: loading, current application needs on a client, controlling the type of access (push vs.
`
`pull or hybrid), location, concentration of users in a single area, time of day, how often the user
`
`interacts with the application, content or device, and using this information to shape traffic to a
`
`cooperative client/server or simultaneously mobile devices without a cooperative client. Because
`
`the inventive server is not tied to any specific network provider it has visibility into the network
`
`performance across all service providers. This enables optimizations to be applied to devices
`
`regardless of the operator or service provider, thereby enhancing the user experience and
`
`managing network utilization while roaming. Bandwidth has been considered the major issue in
`
`wireless networks today. More and more research has been done related to the need for
`
`additional bandwidth to solve access problems- many of the performance enhancing solutions
`
`and next generation standards, such as L TE and WiMAX are focused on providing increased
`
`bandwidth. However, history has shown that this simply doesn't solve all the problems. A key
`
`problem is lack of bandwidth on the signaling channel more so than the data channel.
`
`Embodiments of the present invention align requests from multiple applications to
`
`minimize the need for several polling requests; leverage specific content types to determine how
`
`to proxy/manage a connection/content; and apply specific heuristics associated with device, user
`
`behavioral patterns (how often they interact with the device/application) and network parameters.
`
`Embodiments of the present invention move recurring http polls done by various widgets,
`
`RSS readers etc. to a fixed internet (NOC), thus considerably lowering device battery/power
`
`consumption, radio channel signaling, and bandwidth usage. Additionally, embodiments ofthe
`
`present invention do this transparently so that existing applications do not need to be changed. In
`
`some embodiments, this can be done by implementing a local proxy on the device which
`
`Page 6 of 49
`
`

`

`automatically detects recurring requests for the same content (RSS feed, Widget data set) that
`
`matches a specific rule (e.g. happens every 15 minutes) and automatically caches the content on
`
`the client while delegating the polling to the server (e.g., to a proxy or virtual proxy operated as
`
`an element of a communications network). The server would then notify the mobile/client proxy
`
`if the content changes, and if content has not changed (or not changed sufficiently, or in an
`
`identified manner or amount) the mobile proxy provides the latest version in its cache to the user
`
`(without need to utilize the radio at all). This way the mobile device (e.g., a handset) does not
`
`need to open up or use a data connection if the request is for content that is monitored and that
`
`has been not flagged as new/changed.
`
`The logic for automatically adding URLs/content to be monitored can check for various
`
`factors like how often the content is the same, how often the same request is made (is there a
`
`fixed interval/pattern?), which application is requesting the data, etc. Similar rules to skip using
`
`the cache and request the data from the original source may also be used. For example, when the
`
`request comes at an unscheduled/unexpected time (user initiated check), or after every (n)
`
`consecutive times the response has been provided from the cache, etc., or if the application is
`
`running in the background vs. in a more interactive mode of the foreground. As more and more
`
`mobile applications base their features on resources available in the network, this becomes
`
`increasingly important. Embodiments of the present invention also remove unnecessary chatter
`
`from the network, benefiting the operators trying to optimize the wireless spectrum usage.
`
`In some embodiments, the present invention includes a distributed proxy for network
`
`traffic optimization, as shown in Figure 1. The main components include a proxy client running
`
`on a device [105], a proxy server running in the network [102], and an internal protocol between
`
`the proxy client and the proxy server [109, 110]. Typically, the proxy client and proxy server
`
`would be implemented as a set ofinstructions executed by a·(micro) processor, although other
`
`implementations are possible (firmware, etc.). The proxy client, shown in Figure 2,includes
`
`connection management functionality [206], application protocol logic modules [213], a local
`
`cache [203], and an interface to retrieve information on device properties (e.g., information on
`
`device battery level, whether the device is being actively used or not, and the registered network)
`
`Page 7 of 49
`
`

`

`[210]. The proxy server, shown in Figure 3, includes connection management functionality
`
`[302], application protocol logic modules [31 0], a connection and content metadata database
`
`[303], and a device information database [304].
`
`In general operation, the proxy client [202] is an application independent proxy that
`
`mobile applications [200] can use to open any TCP connection to any host. The proxy client will
`
`detect the type of traffic and utilize an appropriate application protocol module [213] to process
`
`the traffic. With the chosen protocol/logic module, the proxy client may process the data locally
`
`and generate necessary talkback communication using its local cache, communicate the
`
`processed data along with device properties to the proxy server using the internal protocol [11 0],
`
`modify or delay any data before sending it to the proxy server, detect usage patterns between
`
`similar connections and provide this to the proxy server as connection metadata, or any
`
`combination of the above.
`
`If the proxy server is contacted regarding processing the original connection, the proxy
`
`server will utilize an appropriate application protocol module [31 0] to process the traffic. With
`
`the chosen protocol/logic module, the proxy server may contact the intended target of the
`
`connection and route the data from the proxy client to the target, generate talkback
`
`communication using its local cache, modify or delay any talkback communication data based on
`
`the device properties, and based on the connection metadata, start background processing to
`
`gather data for later use with similar connections, as well as any combination of the above.
`
`Both the proxy client and the proxy server will, where applicable continue to observe and
`
`process the data using the application protocol modules for the entire duration of the connection.
`
`After the original connection no longer exists, the proxy client and proxy server may still share
`
`information about the ceased connection and its properties for later use with similar connections.
`
`In this mode of operation, the proxy server may signal the proxy client that some data in its local
`
`cache is no longer up to date (and hence is stale), or alternatively pre-load the client cache with
`
`Page 8 of 49
`
`

`

`the fresh data. This can be done in bulk to avoid multiple radio requests, or on an application by
`
`application basis.
`
`From a mobile application's [200] point of view, the proxy is transparent and no
`
`modifications are needed in the way the application uses the connections. Proxy-aware mobile
`
`applications [212] may also be implemented, and can provide additional information about the
`
`connection characteristics to the proxy client.
`
`In some embodiments, the present invention offers benefits with respect to network
`
`usage, in that by serving requests from the local cache, the proxy client reduces the number of
`
`requests that are done over the wireless network. Further, the proxy client and the proxy server
`
`may filter irrelevant data from the communicated data. The proxy client and the proxy server
`
`may also accumulate low priority data and send it in batches to avoid the protocol overhead of
`
`sending individual data fragments. The proxy client and the proxy server may compress or
`
`transcode the traffic, reducing the amount of data sent over a wireless network. The signaling
`
`traffic in a wireless network is reduced, as the wireless network is used less often by optimizing
`
`small bursts away and the network traffic can be synchronized among individual applications.
`
`With respect to the battery life of a mobile device, by serving requests from the local
`
`cache, the proxy client reduces the number of times the radio module is powered up. The proxy
`
`client and the proxy server may accumulate low priority data and send it in batches to reduce the
`
`number of times and/or amount of time when the radio is powered up. The proxy client may
`
`synchronize the network usage by performing the hatched data transfer for all connections
`
`simultaneously.
`
`In some embodiments, the present invention may be used in the case of home screen
`
`widget polling for data using HTTP, as shown in Figure 4. In the normal flow of operation, the
`
`widget per~orms a HTTP request to the data provider server [405, 406]. Ifthe data has been
`
`updated, the widget refreshes itself. The widget waits for a small period of time and starts over at
`
`Page 9 of 49
`
`

`

`the initial step. With respect to using a distributed proxy, the widget performs a HTTP request
`
`via the proxy client [ 407, 408]. The proxy client detects the connection type to be a HTTP GET
`
`request. The proxy client checks the local cache for any previous information about the request.
`
`If the locally stored response is not available, the client updates all information about the
`
`request and the time it was made for later use. The client sends the request to the proxy server
`
`and the server performs the request and returns the results. The client stores information about
`
`the result and returns the result to the requestor. If the same request has occurred multiple times
`
`(within a certain time period) and it has often yielded same results, the client notifies the proxy
`
`server that the request should be monitored for result changes [ 409]. If the request was marked
`
`for monitoring, the client will store the results into its local cache. If the locally stored response
`
`is available, the client will return the response from the local cache without performing
`
`communication over the wireless network [413].
`
`Independently of the widget or client operation, the server proxy will perform the
`
`requests marked for monitoring to see whether the response has changed [410]. Whenever an
`
`unexpected response is received for some request, the server will notify the client that the
`
`response has changed and that the locally stored response on the client should be erased or
`
`replaced with a new response [416]. A subsequent data request by theclient results in the data
`
`being returned from the proxy server [417, 418]. A benefit ofusing the distributed proxy in this
`
`case is that the wireless network is only used whenever the content for the widget has actually
`
`changed; the traffic required to check for the changes is not done over the wireless network. This
`
`reduces the amount of generated network traffic and shortens the total time and the number of
`
`times the radio module is powered up on the mobile device, thus reducing battery consumption.
`
`With respect to polling for changes in a mailbox, in the normal flow of operation, the
`
`mail client opens a connection to the mail server, the mail client authenticates with the server and
`
`queries for new email, and if new mail has arrived, a notification is shown. The mail client then
`
`Page 10 of 49
`
`

`

`closes the connection. The mail client waits for a period of time and starts over. A variation is to
`
`leave the connection open and start over at the second step after a predetermined period of time.
`
`In the context of a distributed proxy, the mail client opens a connection to the mail server
`
`via the proxy client, the proxy client detects the traffic type and the chosen application logic
`
`module simulates a mail server authentication, and the proxy client looks up from the local
`
`database whether information about the particular mail connection is available. If the information
`
`is not available, the connection is routed to the proxy server, the proxy server establishes a
`
`connection to the mail server and performs authentication using the data from the mail client, the
`
`data between the mail client and the mail server is directly routed through the proxy connection,
`
`and when the mail client closes the connection, the proxy client may choose to leave the actual
`
`connection to the backend open and store information about the connection into the local
`
`database for later use if the same mail connection has been used frequently. If the information is
`
`available, the client proxy will continue to simulate mail server responses for the mail client for
`
`all queries for which it has the data available. If the mail client performs an operation that cannot
`
`be simulated by the proxy client, the proxy client will route the data to the proxy server and the
`
`proxy server will pass the data to the mail server and route the data between the two. The proxy
`
`server may need to re-establish the connection to the mail server at this point. When the mail
`
`client closes the connection, the proxy client. may choose to continue to store information about
`
`the connection for later use or it may request the proxy server to terminate the mail server
`
`connection and remove any information about the connection from the database.
`
`Independently of the mail client or the proxy client, the proxy server will query the mail
`
`server for any changes that the mail client has previously queried. If any information in the mail
`
`server has changed, the proxy server will notify the proxy client to stop simulating any responses
`
`based on locally cached data in order to let the mail client receive the changed data from the mail
`
`server.
`
`Page 11 of 49
`
`

`

`Embodiments of the present invention mitigate application protocol keep-alive traffic.
`
`Existing application protocols may provide long lived connections that allow servers to push
`
`updated data to the client without the need of the client to periodically re-establish the
`
`connection or to periodically query for changes. However, the client needs to be sure that the
`
`connection remains usable by periodically sending some data, often called a keep-alive message,
`
`to the server and making sure the server is receiving this data. While the amount of data sent for
`
`a single keep alive message is not significant and the keep-alive interval for an individual
`
`application is not too short, the cumulative effect of multiple applications performing this
`
`operation individually will amount to small pieces of data being sent very frequently. Frequently
`
`sending bursts of data in a wireless network results in high battery consumption by a mobile
`
`device due to the constant need of powering the radio module. Each burst will also require a
`
`significant amount of signaling traffic in a wireless network compared to the actual data being
`
`sent. By using the inventive distributed proxy model, the proxy client can prevent the keep-alive
`
`messages (or at least many ofthem) from being sent over the network and the proxy server can
`
`independently generate the required keep-alive messages to maintain the actual backend
`
`connection.
`
`In alternative embodiments, the proxy client can be implemented directly into the TCPIIP
`
`stack of the device operating system. The proxy client can be bundled into a wireless modem to
`
`provide transparent use for the device operating system. The proxy client can also be bundled
`
`into a firewall or a router to provide transparent use for the device operating system.
`
`Alternative embodiments apply similar techniques for a variety of protocols including
`
`HTTP, HTTPS, IMAP, POP, SMTP and ActiveSync. Use of application specific protocol
`
`handlers allows for optimization of any protocol that can be port mapped to a hander in the
`
`distributed proxy.
`
`Page 12 of 49
`
`

`

`Aligning Data Bursts From Server To Client
`
`In some cases, a mobile client may be receiving data from multiple sources (e.g., servers,
`
`web-sites, nodes of a network, etc.) in the service network. The router/communication network
`
`between the services and the client ensures that all services can communicate changes to the
`
`client over a single physical connection. However, a problem that may occur is that different
`
`services (without knowing of each other's actions) trigger the client to create that connection at
`
`different times, and there may be a lack of an efficient or optimal alignment of data transfer from
`
`the services to the client. Hence efficient utilization of the shared connection is lacking (or at
`
`least minimal or _sub-optimal) and at times the single connection may in reality only provide an
`
`adequate or a realistic level of service for a single service or source of data. As recognized by
`
`the present inventor, to make the alignment of data bursts (and hence the transfer of data from
`
`multiple sources) more efficient, embodiments of the invention should align the data transfer
`
`process(es) to be closer (in a temporal or other relevant sense) to the source(s) of data. In other
`
`words, in one embodiment, rather than fetching the data at random times and buffering it, the
`
`system should attempt to align all services to fetch the data at aligned intervals so that minimal
`
`in-memory buffering is required.
`
`Background Polling
`
`As noted, to make the alignment of data bursts (and hence the transfer of data from
`
`multiple sources) more efficient, embodiments of the invention act to align the data transfer
`
`process(es) to be closer (in a temporal or other relevant sense) to the source(s) of data. In other
`
`words, in one embodiment, rather than fetching the data at random times and buffering it, the
`
`system should attempt to align all services to fetch the data at aligned intervals so that minimal
`
`in-memory buffering is required.
`
`In this regard, consider an example where client has subscribed to, or otherwise
`
`registered for the following services:
`
`Email from Yahoo!: service polls in the background every 3 0 minutes and when new
`
`notification is received;
`
`Email from generic IMAP: service every 13 minutes, no notifications are available;
`
`Page 13 of 49
`
`

`

`Smart proxying for Twitter: service polls every 4 minutes;
`
`Smart proxying for RSS client: service polls every 10 minutes; and
`
`Smart proxying for ESPN sports feed: service polls every 3 minutes.
`
`If all of these services are initialized at random times with their original polling intervals,
`
`they will spread fairly evenly across every hour. As these services do not necessarily know of
`
`each other on the server side (and such dependencies should not/would not be built between
`
`them), as recognized by the inventor, the client may be able to play a role in aligning these
`
`efforts and hence in better optimizing the data transfer(s).
`
`In some embodiments, the client needs to drive alignment across these intervals. The
`
`client knows it is relying on the server-side service to poll. When all services communicate the
`
`polling interval to the client (not to each other) the client will see the overall picture. The client
`
`needs to adjust the polling intervals in a favorable way. To make these times coincide regularly,
`
`one approach is to cause the times to be a multiple of a common factor or denominator. In the
`
`context of the above example, this denominator could be 3 minutes and adjusting the polling
`
`intervals where needed, would then yield:
`
`Yahoo!: 30=>30
`
`IMAP: 13=>15
`
`Twitter: 4=>6
`
`RSS: 10=>12
`
`ESPN: 3=>3
`
`Note that the client knows the urgency-of each service and can make a decision between
`
`rounding 4 minutes up to 6 for Twitter or compressing it down to 3 to guarantee delivery time. It
`
`can also make sure that the common intervals are based on, not necessarily the smallest interval
`
`(here 3 minutes), but on the smallest hard interval (meaning the smallest interval that cannot be
`
`extended). In this example, the delivery time requirement on Twitter could make the client base
`
`Page 14 of 49
`
`

`

`all intervals on 4 minutes to ensure the Twitter requirement is met while other intervals are
`
`rounded up rather than down.
`
`Next, the client needs to come up with a value for (to), a mutual starting point for each
`
`poll. When the client communicates this data back to the services, there may be significant
`
`delays in that data arriving, so to stay synchronized, the client cannot just say to is the present
`
`time. The start time needs to be anchored to the same absolute point in time across the services.
`
`·The servers are typically in UTC and are using NTP to stay at the same time, which provides one
`
`way of solving this problem. The client can pick a minute mark and communicate this to the
`
`server. This minute mark can be random, and the point is that all the services will base to on the
`
`next occurrence ofthis minute mark (say :13). The minute mark could be up to 59 minutes away
`
`in the future, and to avoid the delay or inefficiency of not polling for 59 minutes, the services
`
`may calculate any necessary polling intervals back from to as well.
`
`Now that the client has communicated the data burst schedule to the services, it is up to
`
`the services to make sure that they are ready to send data at specified intervals, not just starting
`
`the poll at specified intervals. The service can use average polling times from the past to make
`sure it is ready to send data in the aligned burst most of the time - although sometimes the poll is
`
`delayed and the service will inevitably miss the mark. The logic described above does not
`
`guarantee 100% alignment on all data bursts, but is expected to significantly improve the
`
`probability of multiple services aligning their communication to the client in cases where they
`
`. find new data to send to a client within a poll.
`
`Other Issues/Embodiments
`
`How to make sure client is connected at these marks in case there are changes. The above
`
`solution works pretty well for always-on clients, but may need adjustment for triggered
`
`clients;
`
`Notification based services: Yahoo! may receive a notification at any point in time. There
`
`are at least two options here:
`
`Page 15 of 49
`
`

`

`o Yahoo! poller polls and sends data immediately, aligns next background poll
`
`according to original plan
`
`o Client tells all services the common basis of the intervals (in the above example, 3
`
`minutes): Yahoo! poller schedules pulling the new email and sending it to the
`
`client at the earliest shared interval (this can be calculated by going back from
`
`Yahoo!s own polling interval one 3 minute step at a time)
`
`Page 16 of 49
`
`

`

`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO CLIENT
`
`What is claimed is:
`
`1.
`
`A method of transferring data from a plurality of sources across a network,
`
`comprising:
`
`determining a polling interval for each of the plurality of data sources;
`
`determining a revised value for the polling intervals for each of the plurality of
`
`data sources, the revised value being a multiple of a number representing the smallest of the
`
`determined polling intervals;
`
`determining a start time to initiate polling for each of the plurality of data sources;
`
`and
`
`communicating the start time and revised polling interval to each of the plurality
`
`of data sources.
`
`Page 17 of 49
`
`

`

`Internet [10£1
`
`~
`~~. --.......,..__.-·
`
`[106]
`
`Caching Web
`Proxy [101]
`
`[108]
`
`SEVEN
`N,etwork H:armoni:zer
`Server [102)
`
`[110]
`
`SMSC[109]
`
`[109]
`
`)...-.---.___ ___ _..
`
`~109)
`
`Mobile Clients - _
`[105]
`
`I
`
`I
`Figure 1 SEVEN Network Harmonizer System Architecture
`
`Page 18 of 49
`
`

`

`Proxy-Un a-war.e
`Mobile
`Appl icatioo·
`[200]
`
`Proxy-Awa reMobile
`Appl icatioo:
`[2.12]
`
`·~"'
`
`;:)
`
`Cac:hin·="
`Policy
`[204)
`
`.App.
`Protocols
`[21.3]
`
`Client-Side-Pr~ [202.)
`
`I
`
`I Cl ient-Sid;.e Prmy API [20fJ
`-
`
`,..,.
`t"......
`
`""""'
`
`Cache
`[203]
`---
`
`Traffic
`Shaping
`[2.05]
`
`Connect on
`Management
`[206]
`
`Oevic.e Operating System
`[211.]
`
`!lev ice Conte:«: Ji,PI
`[210]
`
`SMSI/F
`[207)
`
`YliFi 1/F
`[208)
`
`3G/4G 1/F
`[209]
`
`Figu re.2. SEVEN Network Harmonizer Client Arch it:ecture
`
`Page 19 of 49
`
`

`

`Web
`.Acce:ss
`[309]
`
`Caching
`Pol icy [3001
`
`.A.ppl icatioo
`Protocols
`[310]
`
`Proxy Control
`Protocol
`[306]
`
`Hybrid Control
`Protocol
`[300]
`
`Control
`Protocol
`[307]
`
`SMSC..ontrol
`P'rotocol
`[305]
`
`Traffic Shaping
`[301]
`
`Connection
`M.a nag.ement
`[302]
`
`Conne<ction and
`Content Metadata
`OB [303]
`
`o.evice Information
`OB [304]
`
`F ig·u re 3 SEVEN Network H armoniler Server Architecture
`
`Page 20 of 49
`
`

`

`I Home Screen I
`
`Widget [400]
`
`I Client-Side I
`
`Proxy [401)
`
`I Caching Web I
`
`Proxy [402]
`
`I Traffic Harmonizer I
`
`Server[403j
`
`I Data Provider Server I
`
`[404]
`
`Data Request [405]
`
`Data Response [406]
`
`Proxied Data Request [4C ]
`
`roxied Data Response [4 8}
`
`i'
`
`M£ rltor Data Request [409j
`
`Proxied Data Request~ 12j
`
`., Request Satisfied From ocal Cache [413]
`'
`
`Invalidate Notificatlor [416]
`
`,_,.
`>
`
`Proxied Data Request~ 17!
`
`/ Request Satisfied From piching Web Proxy {418J
`"
`
`Monitor Data [410j
`
`Same Response [411}
`
`Monitor Data [414]
`
`Changed Response [415j
`
`Figure 4 SEVEN Network Harmonizer Distributed Proxy Polling
`
`Page 21 of 49
`
`

`

`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO CLIENT
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Mikko Tervahauta
`
`Filer:
`
`Alan D. Minsk/Stacy Villa rose
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`028482-004500US
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`Provisional Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`Provisional Application filing fee
`
`2005
`
`1
`
`110
`
`110
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Petition:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-Interference:
`
`Post-Allowance-and-Post-Issuance:
`
`Extension-of-Time:
`
`Page 22 of 49
`
`

`

`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Total in USD ($)
`
`110
`
`Page 23 of 49
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`EFSID:
`
`Application Number:
`
`8888201
`
`61416020
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`9767
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`ALIGNING DATA BURSTS FROM SERVER TO CLIENT
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Mikko Tervahauta
`
`Customer Number:
`
`20350
`
`Filer:
`
`Alan D. Minsk/Stacy Villa rose
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Alan D. Minsk
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`028482-004500US
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`22-NOV-201 0
`
`Filing Date:
`
`TimeStamp:
`
`Application Type:
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Payment Type
`
`Payment was successfully received in RAM
`
`RAM confirmation Number
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Authorized User
`
`14:54:22
`
`Provisional
`
`yes
`
`Deposit Account
`
`$110
`
`1433
`
`201430
`
`The Director of the USPTO is hereby authorized to charge indicated fees and credit any overpayment as follows:
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.16 (National application filing, search, and examination fees)
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.17 (Patent application and reexamination processing fees)
`
`Page 24 of 49
`
`

`

`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.19 (Document supply fees)
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.20

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket