throbber
ee - aac) PeeCRC
`
`GE 2016
`Vestas v. GE
`IPR2018-01015
`
`i
`
`

`

`Copyright 1964
`by Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Hast Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
`Fourth Edition: Fourth Printing
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`ii
`
`

`

`::
`
`C
`
`y
`g
`;]
`
`|
`|
`
`
`eeee
`iaud
`
`
`
`
`PECENTAGE
`DIFFERENTIAL
`RELAY
`
`RESTRAINING
`WINDINGS
`
`:
`tagedill
`
`EI cos (0-+20 degrees) is used to re-
`7? operating against
`ea to assist other relays in differenti-
`strict the tripping ar
`A reactance element,
`ating heavy load swings from faults.
`shift devices ar-
`(x), 18 obtained similarly with the phase-
`s along the #
`ranged so that the maximum-torque line i
`(reactance) axis.
`Inductor-Loop Element—The inductor loop, (h), pro-
`vides a very high speed and very reliable directional ele-
`ment which has been used for many years now in high-
`speed distance measuring relays.
`basic pbalance-beam im-
`Balance-Beam Element—The
`pedance element is shown in (4), a balance occurring for
`E/I=Z. For higher impedances than Zo (current rela-
`tively lower) the contacts remain open, whereas for lower
`impedances (relatively higher currents) they close quickly.
`Since the balance is mechanical, the phase angle between
`voltage and current qs of minor consequence, and the trip-
`ping characteristic, plotted on an R and X diagram is
`substantially a circle.
`Modified-Impedance Characteristic—The circu-
`lar characteristic may be shifted by some circuits auxiliary
`to the element as shown in (i), in order to provide better
`discrimination between. fault currents and load and swing
`currents on long, heavily-loaded transmission lines. The
`shifting imparts a directional characteristic to the relay in
`addition to narrowing its tripping region to more nearly
`just that required for faults.
`Circuits—It may be
`Networks and Ausxiliary
`noted that in discussing fundamental relay elements cer-
`tain auxiliary circuits external to the mechanical relay
`have been imtroduced:in (g), the phaseshifter; in (7), the
`Rectox; and in (fk), a full fledged networkto producein the
`relay element proper, the desired currents. This is a trend
`of which we shall certainly see more as time goes on, as
`static circuits are devised to produce a simple current out-
`put proportional to the desired function of the various line
`currents and voltages.
`gating Networks, L.4Ki,—tThe
`Sequence-Segre
`method of symmetrical components has been the key
`that has unlocked the door to a number of the aforemen-
`tioned possibilities, some of which are illustrated in (7),
`(s), and (é). The positive- and gero-sequence network in
`(r)
`is commonly used in pilot-wire relaying, where it is
`desired to compare over the wires only one quantity, which
`d measure of the fault current irrespective of what
`kind of fault it may be, that is A-B, A-Grd, ABC. The
`relay can be given almost independent and widely different
`settings for phase faults and ground faults, using the single
`example, 1t may be set for one ampere
`relay element. Yor
`of ground fault to provide the requisite sensitivity, but for
`ten amperes of 3-phase current to avoid operation onloads.
`A negative-sequence directional element is shownin (s).
`It is an adequate directional element for ground faults on
`reasonably well-grounded systems, and requires only two
`potential transformers rather than three as with usual
`residual-directional relays.
`is the phase-selector re-
`Another novel application,
`(E),
`d. This information
`lay to determine which phase is faulte
`is necessary in single-pole tripping and reclosing schemes.
`It is predicated on the knowledge, from symmetrical-
`components theory, that the negative-sequence current in
`
`is a Zoo
`
`348
`
`Chapter 11
`
`Relay and Circuit-Breaker Application
`the faulted phase only is in phase with the zero-sequence
`current.
`Individual overcurrent elements in the three
`phases could not be used for this selection as all three
`would pick up for a single line-to-ground fault on many
`golidly-grounded systems.
`Il. PROTECTIVE SCHEMES
`Protective schemes may be conveniently classified as
`
`follows:
`1. Apparatus Protection
`2. Bus Protection
`3, Line Protection
`in Fig. 1, generator and transformer protection
`Thus,
`atus” classification, generator
`come under the “Appar
`buses, high-voltage buses, and substation buses, under the
`second classification; and high-voltage transmission lines
`and feeders under “Line Protection.”
`The relay application chart, Table 2, has been included
`for ready reference in determining the operating principles
`and application of various specific relay types referred to
`throughout this chapter.
`3. A-C Generators
`erators above 1000 kva and many smaller
`Most a-c gen
`d with differential protection ar
`machines are equippe
`3 at the two ends of each phase
`ranged to trip if the current:
`winding differ. This scheme is shown in Fig. 3.
`Smaller machines are sometimes operated without dif -
`ferential protection, but if paralleled with larger machines -
`
`
`
`
`
`THREE PHASE A-C
`
`GENERATOR
`TYPICAL PHASE ONLY SHOWN
`ctions for one phase using the percen
`Fig. 3—Conne
`elay for generator protection.
`ential r
`
`they may be arranged to trip of ©
`or with a system,
`
`ower into the machine.
`protection the Type CA normals?
`reversed flow of p
`For differential
`sed in the large
`induction, ratio-type relays are U
`1 second relay tw
`
`jority of cases, their speed (about 0.
`severe faults) being adequate to prevent geriouspu?
`the iron in nearly all cases. However, @ high-speet.
`
`erator-differential relay, Type HA™,is available pr"
`
`
`CURRENT TRANSFORMER
`
`
`
`OPERATING
`WINDING
`
`
`
`

`

`Relay and Circutt-Breaker Application
`
`849
`
`
`-eycle protection and is being used with 100 per cent suc-
`
`egg in a number of important applications.
`
`“The relay is usually arranged to trip the generator, field
`
`srcuit, and neutral circuit breakers Gf any) simultaneously
`
`ya manually-reset lockout relay in new installations.
`
`Frequently the relay also trips the throttle and admits
`
`CO;for fire prevention. For example it may be required to
`
`oordinate with other high speed relays or to reduce the
`
`hock to the systems.
`
`Jf a single-winding generator (or equivalent) is con-
`
`ected to a double bus through two breakers, a current
`
`ransformer matching problem is imtroduced. The cur-
`
`ent transformers in the connections to the busses may
`
`arry large currents from one bus to the other in addition
`
`o the generator current. Thus, matching is not assured
`
`Me identical current transformers as in the simpler case of
`
`Fig. 3, and consequently,
`the Type HA relay is pre-
`
`erred for this case because of its superior discriminating
`
`qualities.
`
`‘The Type COrelay is also used for generator differential
`
`rotection. It provides straight differential protection, as
`
`entrasted with percentage differential, the diagram being
`
`he same as Fig. 3 without the restrainingcoils. Its setting
`
`must be considerably coarser than that of the CA relay be-
`
`sause there are no restraining coils to desensitize it when
`
`nighthrough-fault currents are flowing.
`
`_Double-Winding and Multiple-Winding Gener-
`
`ators—The differential protection schemeof Fig. 3 does
`
`not detect turn-to-turn short circuits within the winding
`
`because the entering and leaving currents of a phase re-
`
`main equal. Double and multiple winding machines pro-
`
`
`vide a means for obtaining such protection in the larger,
`
`more important generators. The currents in the parallel
`
`branches, become unequal when turns are short circuited
`
`none branch. The differential relays, Type CA or HA,
`
`can be arranged to detect shorted turns, grounds* or
`
`phase-to-phase faults, by placing one current transformer
`
`in the neutral end of one of the parallel windings, and one
`
`of double ratio at the line end in the combinedcircuit. The
`
`choice of schemes depends somewhat on the facility with
`
`which leads can be brought out and the necessity of over-
`
`ping the generator breaker. With hydrogen cooling
`additional leads can be brought out through the necessary
`as-tight bushings only with considerable difficulty, and
`
`ally there is no space for transformers inside the hydro-
`
`gen compartment.
`Effect of the Method of Grounding—The method
`
`grounding the generator neutral affects the protection
`orded by differential relays. For example, if sufficient
`unding impedanceis used so that a ground fault at the
`
`nerator terminals draws full load current, then for a
`li at the midpoint of the winding, where the normal
`
`tage to groundis half as great, the fault current will be
`
`proximately one-half the full load current. When a
`und fault occurs 10 percent from the neutral end of the
`
`ding, the fault current, being limited largely by the
`
`Uutral impedance, is about 10 percent of full load current.
`
`1S corresponds to the sensitivity of a 10 percent differ-
`tial relay and, therefore, represents the limit of protec-
`1 for phase to ground faults with such a relay. For
`With the same limitations as for a single. winding generator.
`
`
`lower impedance grounding the differential relay protects
`closer to the neutral. With higher impedance grounding,
`the limit of protection for ground faults is farther from
`the neutral end, and for an ungrounded machine,
`the
`differential protection is ineffective against ground faults.
`The protection afforded for phase-to-phase, double-phase-
`to-ground, or three-phase faults is relatively unaffected by
`the method of grounding. A complete discussion of the
`methodsof groundingis given in Chap. 19.
`Solidly Grounded and Low Resistance or React-
`ance Grounded Machine—If the generator is solidly
`grounded, or grounded through a reactor or resistor, draw-
`ing at least full-load current for a ground fault at a line
`terminal, the usual 10 percent differential relay operates
`for practically any short circuit within the machine and
`for grounds to within 10 percent of the neutral, or closer
`if the ground current is higher.
`Ungrounded, and Potential-Transformer-
`Grounded Generators—arethosegrounded onlythrough
`the natural capacitance from the metallically connected
`windings, buswork, and cables to ground. The potential
`transformer from neutral to ground, if properly appliedf,
`serves as a measuring device only. To insure that this is
`so, it must be liberally designed so that under no condition
`will its exciting current become appreciable compared with
`the charging current to ground. Otherwise, ferro-reso-
`nance may occur. Usually a full line-to-line rated trans-
`former will suffice. The potential transformer and a volt-
`age relay such as the SV (instantaneous) or CV (inverse
`time) may be used to initiate an alarm or optionally to
`trip. Or, on lower voltages, a static voltage unbalance
`indicator may be used connected directly to the primary
`circuit. Such an instrument is the Type G. These devices
`supplement the generator differential protection to provide
`indication or tripping for ground faults. Light resistance
`grounding as covered in the next section is generally pre-
`ferred to ungrounded operation.
`Light-Resistance-Grounded Generators — This
`scheme and an associated protective arrangement is il-
`lustrated in Fig. 29 of Chap. 19.
`Indication from a volt-
`age relay, connected in parallel with the resistor as shown,
`or from a current relay, such as the Type BG, connected
`in series with the resistor, may be used to sound an alarm
`or to trip, depending on the application. Combinations
`of sensitive alarm and coarsertrip, or of alarm and time-
`delay trip, have also been used. The latter gives time
`to transfer the load to another machine at the hazard of
`operating with a fault on one phase.
`This scheme was designed primarily for the unit station
`arrangement in which a generator and step-up transformer
`are operated as a unit without an intervening bus. How-
`ever, it can also be used where an intervening bus carries
`the station service transformer and oneor two short feeder
`cables. A limited amountofselectivity is possible by the
`use of a polarized relay, such as the CWP-1, which obtains
`most of its energy from a potential coil in parallel with the
`groundingresistor. Such a relay used in the station-service
`feed, for example, can detect a ground on that circuit.
`Field Protection—While a large number of machines
`still operate without any protective relays to function on
`{See also Light-Resistance-Grounded Generators.
`
`

`

`358
`
`Relay and Circuit-Breaker Application
`
`Chapter 14
`
`notations as to relay types and settings, these symbols
`compress the otherwise complicated picture of complete
`system protection into a form that can be readily visual-
`ized. The standard symbols are given in Table 3. Their
`use has been illustrated in Fig. 12.
`
`TABLE 8— RELAY SYMBOLS
`
`(0) SYMBOLS FROM THE ASA STANDARDS.
`OVERGURRENT
`<— DIRECTIONAL OVERGURRENT| ——»
`OVERVOLTAGE
`ye
`
`UNDERVOLTAGE
`
`Py
`
`DISTANGE
`
`<—Z- [DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE —z»
`
`POWER DIRECTIONAL
`
`iit
`
`BALANGED OR
`DIFFERENTIAL CURRENT] <—%—»
`
`OVER FREQUENCY
`
`UNDER FREQUENCY
`
`ote
`
`|e
`
`OVER TEMPERATURE
`
`|<+—t»
`
`+—g—= PHASE ROTATION
`PILOT WIRE (DIRECTIONAL
`+>, [COMPARISON)
`CARRIER PILOT
`Where the operation of a relay is conditional upon the flow of ground
`current (residual or zero sequence) this shall be indicated by prefixing
`the ground symbo!
`thus:-
`
`—fo
`
`Sy
`
`Ne
`BUS GROUND DIFFERENTIAL
`
`Relative Number of different kinds of faults—
`Therelative numbersof different types of faults vary wide.
`ly with such factors as relative insulation to ground ang
`between phases, circuit configuration, the use of ground
`wires, voltage class, method of grounding, speed of fay}
`clearing, isokeraunie level*, atmospheric conditions, qual.
`ity of construction and local conditions. Thus thefigures
`given below serve merely to indicate the order of preva,
`lence and emphasize that there are usually a great many
`more line-to-ground faults than faults of other types.
`Three-Phase Faults
`5 percent
`‘Two-Line-to-Ground Faults
`10 percent
`Line-to-Line Faults
`15 percent
`Line-to-Ground Faults
`70 percent
`Total
`100 percent
`
`10. Overcurrent Protection
`Thegeneralplan of coordination with overcurrentrelays
`on a radial system is shown in Fig. 18. The time shown in
`each case is the fastest operating timefor a fault at the lo.
`cation of the next device in sequence. At lighter generat-.
`ing capacity the fault currents are reduced andall operat
`
`alishisSeadCRUaRLaOruUeerGk
`
`|
`
`CO-0.5 Set.
`P
`CO-0.5 Sec. ait
`CO-1.0See.g,,
`
`So Load " c0-0.3 Sec. tho
`
`SC Inst.
`
`Fig. 13—Coordination of overcurrent protection on a radial
`power system,
`
`ing times increase, but because of the inverse time charac-
`teristics of the relay the margins between successiverelays _
`also increase.
`Relays used with feeder circuit breakers must be coor |
`dinated with fuses of distribution transformers and with
`the main and branch line sectionalizing fuses.® Several
`
`characteristic curve shapes are available in different de-
`
`signs of the induction-type overcurrent relays as illustrated.
`
`in Fig. 14. These provide latitude in selecting the relay _
`
`that coordinates best with the fuse curves at the current
`
`involved.
`
`The definite minimum time characteristic provides a
`ready meansfor coordinating several relays in series with
`
`_
`only an approximate knowledge of the maximum current,
`and results in relatively small increase in the relay time 4%
`
`the fault current is lowered. It is used in the majority, al
`
`overcurrent relay applications. The inverse and very =
`verse characteristics are sometimes more favorable where
`
`close coordination with fuses is required. They also make
`
`it possible to take advantageof the reduction of maximu®
`
`fault current as distance from the power source increase:
`
`Several relays in series can be set for the same time for
`
`*Numberof storm-days per year
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BALANCED PHASE
`PILOT WIRE (CURRENT
`DIFFERENTIAL)
`
`Residual Overcurrent «le——* Directional Residuat Overcurrent «t}-——o
`Other prefixes such os @) and ®) to indicate operation on positive
`or negative phase sequence quantities, and suffixes to indicate the
`relay types,
`inclusion of
`instantaneous trip attachments, etc. may be
`added at
`the discretion of
`the user.
`
`(b) FREQUENTLY USED VARIATIONS OF THE STANDARD SYMBOLS.
`OVERCURRENT GROUND WITH INSTANTANEOUS ATTACHMENT
`
`GROUND DIRECTIONAL WITH INSTANTANEOUS ATTACHMENT
`DIRECTIONALLY CONTROLLED
`
`POWER DIRECTIONAL WITH INSTANTANEOUS ATTACHMENT
`DIRECTIONALLY CONTROLLED
`
`BUS CURRENT DIFFERENTIAL
`
`9. Fault Frequency and Distribution
`About 300 disturbances (or one per ten miles) occurred
`per year in a typical system operating 3000 miles of 110-ky
`circuit. This system used mostly overcurrent and direc-
`tional relays, and in a 4-year period experienced 2800 relay
`operations of which
`92.2 percent were correct and desired
`5.3 percent were correct but undesired
`2.1 percent were wrong tripping operations
`0.4 percent were failure to trip
`The faults were as follows:
`56 percent
`Lightning
`Sleet, Wind, Jumping Conductors 11 percent
`Apparatus Failure
`11 percent
`Close-in on Fault
`11 percent
`Miscellaneous
`11 percent
`
`

`

`Chapter 11
`
`Relay and Circuit-Breaker Application
`
`359
`
`
`
`Pitte?tttttet
`NETtt
`
`
`
`PL)AAT|
`
`
`PIMAAEEEE
`P|NoiNNTPPte
`
`
`PNAOe
`Ft St —
`
`
`
`
`0
`_l
`
`1000
`
`1500
`
`2000
`
`
`
`12
`
`TimeinSeconds
`
`
`
`
`mmediately beyond the relay andstill provide the
`e 0.25 second or more margin for fault beyond the
`lay because of the lower current value for fault in-
`ation. For example the timing on curve (b), Fig.
`
`bles when the current is reduced from 700 percent
`
`ercent of pick-up value. Several settings of 0.3 sec-
`
`0 percent could be usedin series, whilestill having
`d margin between successive relays if the fault
`Spped iin the ratio 7 to 4 between successive loca-
`
`oice of relays iis also influenced in certain cases by
`burden of the “low energy” and “very inverse”
`
`al-Speed Impedance Relay*
`-distance tripping characteristic of the Type
`peed directional distance relayis illustrated in
`ch shows a numberof line sections in series.
`
`ually well be a loop, the two endsof the section
`at the same supply point. Thetripping time
`increases in direct proportion to the distance
`yto the fault, except that the minimum time
`
`cond for a fault at the relay. Hach relay is
`oward the high-speed impedancerelay described in
`intermediate voltage transmission lines.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 14—Characteristics of various induction type overcurrentrelays.
`
`Percent of Pick Up Current
`
`(a) Type COH.
`) Very inverse-low energy relay, Type CO.
`
`
`
`(c) Inverse-low energy relay, Type CO.
`(d) Standard, definite minimum time, Type COrelay.
`
`Trip Time for Bkr. #1
`
`
`Distance—»
`
`~+Time~
`
`Fig. 15—Time-distance curves of the Type CZ relay. The slope
`of the curve is changed by varying the resistance in series with
`the potential coil, The minimum operating time with zero
`voltage on the relay is about 14 sec.
`
`adjusted to trip in approximately 34 second for a fault at
`the next bus, except as will be noted.
`It is essential that for a fault near bus 4, breaker No. 3
`be tripped in preference to breaker No. 1. Thus the oper-
`ating time of relay No. 1 must exceed that of relay No. 3
`for fault at location No. 4 by one circuit breaker operating
`time plus margin. For 8-cycle breakers a reasonable break-
`er time plus margin is 0.4 second.
`
`

`

`CHAPTER 14
`
`POWER SYSTEM VOLTAGES AND CURRENTS DURING
`ABNORMAL CONDITIONS
`
`Revised by:
`
`R. L. Witzke
`
`3 PHASE FAULT
`(L-L-L OR 3L-G)
`
`SINGLE LINE-TO- GROUND
`FAULT (L-G}
`
`
`
`Original Author:
`R. L. Witzke
`
`P=:manyyearsitwascommonpracticetobasethe
`
`requirements of system apparatus on normal load
`conditions and on three-phase short circuits. More
`or less empirical multiplying factors were sometimes used
`to predict the probable ground-fault currents from the
`three-phase fault currents. However,
`this procedure is
`unsatisfactory because the relations between three-phase
`and ground-fault currents vary greatly between systems.
`In some systems the current for a single line-to-ground
`fault is less than normal load current, whereas, in other
`systems, or at other locations in the same systems, the
`current for a single line-to-ground fault is larger than the
`three-phase fault current. The analysis of power systems
`by symmetrical components! (see Chap. 2) has made pos-
`sible the accurate calculation of fault currents and voltages
`for unsymmetrical faults directly from system constants.
`Under many conditions the voltages present on a power
`system may be higher than those calculated for steady-
`state conditions. These higher voltages are usually of a
`transient nature and exist during the transition from one
`steady-state condition to another. Transient voltages can
`be produced by simple circuit changes such as the opening
`of a circuit breaker or the erounding of a conductor, or
`they can be produced by an intermittent arc in a circuit
`breaker or in a fault. Usually the higher voltages are
`associated with intermittent arcs rather than with simple
`circuit changes without arcing. Most transient voltages
`are not of large magnitude but may still be important
`because of
`their effect on the performance of circuit-
`interrupting equipment and protective devices. An appre-
`ciable number of these transient voltages are of sufficient
`magnitude to cause insulation breakdown.
`The various factors that determine the magnitudes of
`currents and voltages in power systems during abnormal
`conditions will be discussed in this chapter.
`I. STEADY-STATE VOLTAGES AND CURRENTS
`DURING FAULT CONDITIONS
`
`1. Assumptions
`Voltages and currents produced under fault conditions
`are a function of the type of fault and the ratios of the
`sequence impedances. The effeet of these factors on the
`voltages and currents produced can be shown by sets of
`curves as will be done here. The four types of faults il-
`lustrated in Fig. 1 will be considered. It is assumed that
`the network is symmetrical to the point of fault, F’, and.
`can be reduced to series impedances, Z1, Zo, and Zo for
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`LINE-TO-LINE FAULT.
`(L-t)
`
`DOUBLE LINE-TO- GROUND
`FAULT (2L-6)
`]
`Fig. 1—Types of faults on three-phase systems.
`
`
`the positive-, negative-, and zero-sequence networks, 1
`spectively. In the present analysis the faultresistance ©
`represented by R andis not included in Zo. Zo includes al
`zero-sequence resistance to the point of fault but doesnot
`include the fault resistance. It is further assume t al : ul
`
`the generated emfs can be reduced to a single posit a
`
`sequence emf, Ey.
`
`2. Formulas
`In Tables 1 and 2 are given the formulas* forcalet
`
`the line currents and line-to-ground voltages for the
`
`illustrated in Fig. 1. These formulas are complica
`such an extent that it is difficult to visualize re
`
`unde
`currents and voltages that can be produce
`conditions for ranges of system constants. For tn
`
`the currents and voltages have beencalculatedfo
`*Hormulas taken from pages 224 and 226 of referen®® :
`
`496
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Chapter 14
`
`Power System Voltages and Currents During Abnormal Conditions
`
`A497
`
`ratios of system constants and the results are presented as
`a series of curves.
`
`4. Fault Current and Voltage Curves
`Curves prepared in accordance with the preceding dis-
`cussion are plotted in Figs. 2 to 6 inclusive. In these figures
`the fault current is plotted as a ratio of the three-phase
`short-circuit, and the line-to-ground and line-to-line volt-
`ages are plotted as a ratio to their respective normal values.
`In Figs. 2, 3, and 4 all resistances are equal to zero.
`Figs. 2 and 3 show the ranges of line currents and line-to-
`
`20
`
`18
`
`i
`M4
`
`4.2
`
`=
`£ 10
`s
`208
`
`
`
`
`|
`|_|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`Coo
`
`
`|
`T
`ry
`I~
`I
`
`2L-G shorf-cireuitts 05
`|
`_
`t
`xX
`i
`I
`2L-G short-circuit orl
`
`ry
`
`=
`
`=
`
`2L-G short-circuit serls
`a
`a)
`1
`7
`L-G short-circuit als =05°107151
`\
`
`3
`Ratio Xq/X;
`
`5
`
`6&2
`
`i
`
`+
`
`1
`
`06
`04
`“
`02
`
`%
`
`
`
`3. Range of Sequence Impedances Considered
`
`The principal impedances that usually apply to tran-
`sient conditions are the positive-sequence impedance “i,
`
`the negative-sequence impedance Zs, and the zero-sequence
`impedance Zo, each consisting of a resistance and a react-
`
`ance component.
`In general, the positive-sequenceresist-
`ance Jt; and the negative-sequence resistance Ry are small
`
`in comparison to the positive- and negative-sequence re-
`actances. Consequently, the effect of these two resistances
`
`on the magnitudeof the voltages and currents during fault
`conditionsis small. For this reason and because of compli-
`
`cations introduced by considering positive- and negative-
`sequenceresistances, these factors will be neglected. Zero-
`
`sequence resistance 2) and zero-sequence reactance Xo can
`vary through wide ranges depending on the type of system
`grounding used, hence the curves are arranged to cover a
`wide range of zero-sequence resistance and zero-sequence
`
`reactance.
`The positive-sequence reactance that applies to tran-
`
`sient conditions may be either the sub-transient or the
`
`transient reactance depending on whetheror not theinitial
`
`high decrement componentof the current is to be consid-
`
`ered or neglected. The ratio of X», to X: for commercial
`
`machines usually lies between 0.5 and 1.5, although with
`special machines it is possible to exceed this range. The
`
`higher ratios of X, to Xi are in machines without dampers
`
`_whereas the lower ratios are in machines with dampers
`
`or their equivalent.
`In general calculations it is usually
`
`permissible to assumea ratio of X./X1 of unity especially
`
`if an appreciable percentage of the negative-sequence re-
`
`actance to the point of fault is in static apparatus or trans-
`mission lines. The general curves are limited to ratios
`of X. to X, within the range of 0.5 to 1.5 ; the formulas
`in Tables 1 and 2 can be used for ratios outside of this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Magnitudeof currents aeen
`Vector expression, effect of fault resistance included
`Type of fault
`=R,=R,=R=R,=
`
`=I=1.=
`ae
`Three-phase................
`Li
`Lp
`I, X
`I, ZAR
`pha;
`x
`_ —jV/3E.
`.
`Tya1,=oe
`ly=FATR
`e-to-line... 000.0... le,
`=
`Xi4+X,
`I,= —Iy
`
`
`
`gle line-to-ground........ Ta =,Me___= ee_
`ZotZ,+Z,+3R
`f
`fa Xo+Xi +X
`
`
`—V3E. v3.PILPL= . _
`
`
`
`
`TyNSEVBE+Rs) +4Qho+Zs+3Ri+6R)|
`[y=1-288 VPRO
`
`
`uble line-to-ground.......
`Tom Me |viz: Rr)
`~J2Zo4 Z,+3R,+6Re)|
`bey
`
`Fig. 2—Curves of fault currents vs. system reactances for
`single and double line-to-ground faults. Each curveis labeled
`to indicate the type of fault and the ratio of X,/X:. All cur-
`rents are expressed as a ratio to the three-phase short-circuit
`current. For these curves, all resistances are assumed equal
`to Zero!”
`
`ground voltages respectively for single and double line-to-
`ground faults for ratios of Xo/Xi from zero to six. The
`ranges of fault current and fault voltages for ratios of
`X2/X1 between 0.5 and 1.5 are shownin Fig. 4.
`.
`R
`The ranges of fault current for ratios of ¥ between zero
`1
`and six are given in Fig. 5. In this figure the ratio X./X1
`
`TABLE 1—FAULT CURRENTS
`
`—-V8E.
`
`.
`
`3H
`
`L,=Ih+I,=381
`
`—8E,
`= §(Z.+-Rx)
`Av=(Z1+Rr)(4.+R1) +(Z+2,+2R1)(Zo+Ri+3R,)
`Positive-sequence impedance to the point of fault
`
`:
`ative-sequence impedance to the point of fault
`2ero-seque
`nee impedance to the point of fault and does not include any fault resistance
`ee Fig. { for definitions of R, Ri and R,
`
`
`
`Am =XiX24X0(Xi+X.)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket