throbber

`
`
`
`Timothy Devlin (to be admitted pro hac vice)
`James Gorman III (to be admitted pro hac vice)
`Devlin Law Firm LLC
`1306 N. Broom Street, 1st Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`Email: tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
` jgorman@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`Seth W. Wiener, California State Bar No. 203747
`LAW OFFICES OF SETH W. WIENER
`609 Karina Court
`San Ramon, CA 94582
`Telephone: (925) 487-5607
`Email: seth@sethwienerlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FULFILLIUM, INC.
`
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`
`COUNTY OF ORANGE
`
`
`Case No.:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`[DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY]
`
`
`
`
`FULFILLIUM, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`RESHAPE MEDICAL LLC, SV HEALTH
`INVESTORS, LLC, AND INTERSECT
`PARTNERS, LLC, DOES 1 TO 100,
`INCLUSIVE;
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`Plaintiff Fulfillium, Inc. (“Fulfillium” or “Plaintiff”), for its Complaint against ReShape
`
`Medical LLC (“ReShape Medical LLC”), SV Health Investors, LLC (“SV Health”), Intersect
`
`Partners, LLC (“Intersect Partners”), and Does 1 to 100, inclusive (collectively “Defendants”) makes
`
`the allegations below.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for trade secret misappropriation arising under the Uniform Trade
`
`Secrets Act, California Civil Code §§ 3426 et seq.
`
`PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Fulfillium is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Delaware, with an address at 1136 Orchard Avenue, Napa, California 94558.
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, ReShape Medical LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at
`
`100 Calle Iglesia, San Clemente, California 92672. ReShape Medical LLC can be served via its
`
`registered agent The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street,
`
`Wilmington, Delaware, 19801. ReShape Medical LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of ReShape
`
`Lifesciences Inc. (“ReShape Lifesciences”) and the surviving entity of the merger of a subsidiary of
`
`ReShape Lifesciences and ReShape Medical, Inc.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, SV Health is a limited liability company organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at One Boston
`
`Place, 201 Washington Street, Suite 3900, Boston, Massachusetts 02108. SV Health Investors can be
`
`served via its registered agent The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209
`
`Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801. SV Health maintains a business in the State of
`
`California at 1700 Owens Street, Suite 585, San Francisco, CA 94158.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Intersect Partners is a limited liability company organized
`
`and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada with places of business in Nevada and Minnesota.
`
`Intersect Partners can be served via its registered agent Sierra Corporate Services – Reno, 100 West
`
`Liberty Street 10th Floor, Reno, NV 89501.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, ReShape Medical LLC’s predecessor, ReShape Medical,
`
`Inc., was founded, funded, owned and controlled in relevant respect through a joint venture between
`
`by SV Life Sciences, LLC, which has reorganized as SV Health Investors, LLC and Intersect
`
`22
`
`Partners.
`
`7.
`
`The website of SV Health Investors states that “SV Health Investors, formerly SV Life
`
`Sciences, is a leading healthcare and life sciences venture capital and growth equity firm.” SV
`
`Health Investors and its predecessor SV Life Sciences have at all relevant times held one or more
`
`seats on ReShape Medical, Inc.’s Board of Directors.
`
`8.
`
`The first heading of the About Us page of SV Health Investors’ website is “Hands-on
`
`business partners.” Exhibit 1. The page explains that SV Health Investors “work hands-on with our
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`portfolio companies as trusted advisers and partners from formation to exit. We help them develop
`
`business strategy, make connections within our networks, and guide them through both smooth and
`
`turbulent times toward a successful exit.” Id. According to the website, “[t]he SV team has more
`
`than 400 aggregate years of healthcare operating experience – which means we can work as true
`
`partners with our entrepreneurs, and develop strong relationships with them through the full life cycle
`
`of their ventures.” Id.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, SV Health and its predecessor SV Life Sciences along with
`
`Intersect Partners have directed, controlled, actively induced and/or conspired with ReShape Medical,
`
`Inc., and subsequently ReShape Medical LLC, to take the actions that form the basis for this
`
`10
`
`Complaint.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Intersect Partners and SV Health have jointly managed
`
`ReShape Medical since its inception.
`
`11.
`
`On October 2, 2017, EnteroMedics, Inc. acquired ReShape Medical, Inc. for cash and
`
`securities in the value of approximately $38 million. This acquisition and merger was announced on
`
`October 3, 2017. http://ir.enteromedics.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1042545. ReShape
`
`Medical LLC is an additional entity that resulted from this merger. On October 23, 2017,
`
`EnteroMedics, Inc. announced its name change to ReShape Lifesciences Inc.
`
`http://ir.enteromedics.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1044913.
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of the Defendants sued herein as
`
`Does 1 to 100, inclusive, and therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will
`
`amend this Complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained.
`
`13.
`
`At all times relevant herein, and at the time of the transactions complained of, each of
`
`the Defendants were the agent and employee of each of the remaining Defendants, and in doing the
`
`things hereinafter alleged, was acting within the scope of such agency.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`14.
`
`This court has jurisdiction over ReShape Medical LLC and SV Health because each is
`
`a resident of the State of California. This court has jurisdiction over ReShape Medical LLC, SV
`
`Health, and Intersect Partners because each conducts and solicits business within the State of
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`California and within this County. Each Defendant is subject to this Court’s general and specific
`
`personal jurisdiction because each Defendant has sufficient minimum contacts within the State of
`
`California and this County, pursuant to due process and/or the California Long Arm Statute,
`
`California Code of Civil Procedure § 410.10, because each Defendant purposefully availed itself of
`
`the privileges of conducting business in the State of California and in this County, because each
`
`Defendant regularly conducts and solicits business within the State of California and within this
`
`County, and because Fulfillium’s causes of action arise directly from each Defendant’s business
`
`contacts and other activities in the State of California and this County.
`
`VENUE
`
`15.
`
`Venue is proper in this County because some or all of the Defendants are resident in
`
`this County, each Defendant conducts business in this County, the claims alleged in this Complaint
`
`arise in this County, and acts of trade secret misappropriation have taken place and are continuing to
`
`take place in this County.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`16.
`
`Dr. Richard D. Y. Chen was born in Taiwan in 1958 and emigrated to the United
`
`States in 1972. Dr. Chen obtained an undergraduate degree in biochemistry and molecular biology
`
`from Harvard University in 1979. Dr. Chen next attended medical school at Northwestern University
`
`and obtained an M.D. in 1983. Dr. Chen performed his internship in general surgery and continued in
`
`his residency in neurosurgery at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in the 1980’s.
`
`17.
`
`Dr. Chen obtained a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Stanford
`
`University in 1990. Following matriculation, Dr. Chen began working in the investment banking
`
`department at Morgan Stanley & Company. Thereafter, Dr. Chen continued working in financial
`
`services making investments in and assisting start-up companies primarily in the technology sector.
`
`18.
`
`In 1999, Dr. Chen started conceiving innovative ideas of his own by combining his
`
`experiences at the crossroads of medicine and technology. After the tragic events of September 11,
`
`2001, prospects in the technology investment markets began to slow. Dr. Chen decided to focus on
`
`developing and commercializing these ideas into entrepreneurial ventures.
`
`19.
`
`Dr. Chen conceived of a bariatric medical device and procedure whereby a novel
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`balloon device is delivered endoscopically to reduce the interior volume of the stomach and impede
`
`the flow of ingested food and thereby effectively reduce the calories consumed. To mitigate
`
`potentially fatal consequences of premature rupture and migration, which were significant
`
`deficiencies in earlier devices within this class, safety was provided by two or more chambers filled
`
`with fluids.
`
`20.
`
`Because obesity is a complex, multifactorial disease, Dr. Chen invested at least two
`
`years’ time i) analyzing critically over a thousand scientific papers relating from the genetic basis of
`
`obesity to interventions in clinical therapy to the psychosocial impact of the disease, and ii) attending
`
`scientific research conferences on the basic underpinnings of the field and major medical conferences
`
`in the United States and overseas to learn about the state of the art in therapy and how the various
`
`medical specialties played their role in its treatment. Gaining insight from these activities, Dr. Chen
`
`further refined key elements of his idea and its implementation into everyday medical practice.
`
`21.
`
`Dr. Chen then presented his idea, on a confidential basis, to leading researchers and
`
`clinicians in the field, including the former presidents of the American Gastroenterology Association,
`
`the American Society of Bariatric Surgeons and its overseas counterpart, the International Federation
`
`for the Surgery of Obesity. Practically everyone he contacted responded favorably with the
`
`willingness to commit to participate further in developing the medical device and procedure. Each of
`
`these disclosures was subject to a mutual understanding and obligation of confidentiality. Only
`
`individuals who were under written obligations of confidentiality were provided information
`
`regarding Fulfillium’s trade secrets.
`
`22.
`
`Dr. Chen contributed funds and his intellectual property to form Fulfillium, Inc. in
`
`2004 and filed his first provisional patent application on May 3, 2004. Dr. Chen raised seed capital
`
`from friends and family to take the idea to the next stage of development. Dr. Chen attended trade
`
`shows in medical device manufacture. Dr. Chen engaged consultants including engineers to help
`
`develop the device and former regulators to explore the pathway for FDA approval. Prototypes were
`
`constructed and animal lab facilities were evaluated.
`
`23.
`
`Dr. Chen next embarked on raising venture capital to prove the concept. Given his
`
`past experience in the venture business, Dr. Chen adopted a set of practices for disclosure to protect
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the intellectual properties he developed. Under this set of practices, Dr. Chen did not disclose any
`
`trade secret information to anyone unless he had confirmed an agreement that it would be kept
`
`confidential. On January 25, 2005, Dr. Chen spoke with Dr. Samuel Wu, M.D. of SV Life Sciences
`
`(predecessor of SV Health) to discuss Fulfillium’s technology on a confidential basis. All parties
`
`confirmed that the conversations regarding Dr. Chen’s ideas were subject to an oral agreement of
`
`confidentiality. On February 10, 2005, Dr. Chen attended a meeting including the SV Life Sciences
`
`team in Boston led by partner David Milne via a videoconference call hosted at the SV Life Sciences
`
`offices at 950 Tower Lane, Ste. 1535, Foster City, California. Dr. Chen understood the meeting to be
`
`confidential and, consistent with that, Dr. Chen’s presentation slides were all marked “STRICTLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL.” All parties confirmed that the conversations surrounding this meeting were
`
`subject to an oral agreement of confidentiality.
`
`24.
`
`In addition, SV Life Sciences representatives had due diligence calls with various
`
`Fulfillium scientific advisors. These due diligence phone calls were for expert validation of
`
`Fulfillium’s therapeutic concept and did not include presentations of Fulfillium’s product
`
`development plans or trade secrets.
`
`25.
`
`Dr. Wu informed Dr. Chen that the due diligence was “looking good” and that SV Life
`
`Sciences was contemplating a term sheet. Dr. Wu noted that although he, in California, had taken a
`
`point person role in the development of the deal, SV Life Sciences’ medical device group was
`
`headquartered in Boston and he was not part of the group. Thus, going forward SV Life Sciences
`
`would prefer to partner with a venture capital firm in California who could more effectively monitor
`
`Fulfillium’s activities.
`
`26.
`
`Among other venture capital firms, Dr. Chen separately gave a confidential
`
`presentation to Sprout Partners. Dr. Chen delivered the presentation to Sprout partners Jeani
`
`Delagardelle at Sprout’s Menlo Park office and Andrew Firlik, M.D. via conference call on March 4,
`
`2005. Sprout and Fulfillium understood that the conversations surrounding this presentation were
`
`confidential because the parties previously signed and executed a written non-disclosure agreement.
`
`Ms. Delagardelle later invited Dr. Chen to attend as Sprout’s guest at the annual American Heart
`
`Association luncheon, a key event in the industry. Ms. Delagardelle took on a lead role by referring
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-6-
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`another venture capital firm as a potential co-investor. Dr. Chen eventually made an introduction
`
`between SV Life Sciences and Sprout.
`
`27.
`
`During the foregoing meetings and communications with SV Life Sciences and
`
`Sprout, Dr. Chen provided confidential and detailed disclosures of Fulfillium’s preferred clinical trial
`
`design and regulatory approval strategy. All of the relevant parties to the foregoing meetings and
`
`communications understood the conversations that occurred were subject to either oral or written
`
`agreements of confidentiality.
`
`28.
`
`On information and belief, neither SV Life Sciences nor Sprout had any substantial
`
`previous knowledge or experience with balloon treatments for obesity.
`
`29.
`
`On information and belief, all of SV Life Sciences’ and Sprout’s knowledge
`
`concerning Dr. Chen’s novel balloon designs for obesity as of the Spring of 2005 was supplied by Dr.
`
`12
`
`Chen.
`
`30.
`
`In the Spring of 2005, Ms. Delagardelle indicated that the due diligence process would
`
`be delayed somewhat due to the fact that the healthcare group principals of Sprout were forming a
`
`new firm, New Leaf Venture Partners. Ms. Delagardelle asked Dr. Chen if this would pose a
`
`problem. Dr. Chen responded that time was of the essence but a short delay under the circumstances
`
`would be manageable.
`
`31. Meanwhile, Dr. Chen continued to interface with SV Life Sciences. SV Life Sciences
`
`arranged for Dr. Chen to meet George Wallace (venture partner for SV Life Sciences) on May 16,
`
`2005 at a restaurant in Chicago. During the meeting Mr. Wallace proposed terms and conditions
`
`under which he would work with Fulfillium. In addition to other compensation, Mr. Wallace
`
`demanded greater than 25% stake in Fulfillium after the first round of financing by venture capital
`
`firms. Given the ownership dilution that typically occurs during the first round of financing, Mr.
`
`Wallace was effectively demanding majority ownership of Fulfillium. Dr. Chen noted that Mr.
`
`Wallace’s requested equity share was more than two to four times greater than that typically allotted
`
`to a CEO brought in to run a company at Fulfillium’s stage of development. Mr. Wallace offered no
`
`justification other than to say that he needed to compensate his business partner, a practicing
`
`radiologist in Minnesota, and would not proceed without including his business partner. Dr. Chen
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-7-
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`never disclosed the trade secrets to Mr. Wallace.
`
`32.
`
`Thereafter, no further discussion took place between Mr. Wallace and Dr. Chen.
`
`Instead, unbeknownst to Dr. Chen, decision makers in SV Life Sciences sought to launch a new
`
`company with Mr. Wallace as the CEO based on Fulfillium’s technology and trade secrets, which
`
`were misappropriated despite the repeated oral agreements of confidentiality with SV Life Sciences.
`
`In the early summer of 2005, Ms. Delagardelle of New Leaf sent a brief email to Dr. Chen advising
`
`that New Leaf was considering a deal that SV Life Sciences was proposing. Dr. Chen presumed that
`
`SV Life Sciences was proposing bringing to market an alternative solution that would be different
`
`from the technology developed and confidentially disclosed by Dr. Chen. Dr. Chen would later
`
`discover that SV Life Sciences’ venture headed by Mr. Wallace was premised not on some
`
`alternative solution but rather Fulfillium’s technology and trade secrets.
`
`33.
`
`On information and belief, Mr. Wallace’s new company, called Abdominis, Inc., was
`
`formed during the summer of 2005 and was funded by New Leaf, Intersect Partners, and SV Life
`
`Sciences. Upon information and belief, both SV Life Sciences, Intersect Partners, and New Leaf not
`
`only provided capital, but as typical early stage venture capital firms, provided direct guidance in the
`
`company’s development and controlled the operations of the company through their board
`
`17
`
`membership.
`
`34.
`
`Abdominis was subsequently renamed ReShape Medical, Inc. Hereafter, “Reshape
`
`Medical, Inc.” will refer to Abdominis, Inc. and its successor-in-interest Reshape Medical, Inc.
`
`35.
`
`As is typical for a medical start-up company, ReShape Medical, Inc. operated in
`
`“stealth mode” during development. ReShape Medical, Inc. started pivotal clinical trials in 2012 and
`
`applied for FDA approval in 2014. The FDA granted Pre-Marketing Approval to the ReShape
`
`Duo™ device and treatment method on July 28, 2015.
`
`36. When ReShape Medical, Inc. emerged from stealth mode and began commercial
`
`operations, Dr. Chen learned that ReShape Medical, Inc. had copied his trade secrets, including his
`
`entire clinical trial “playbook.” ReShape Medical, Inc. copied, among other things, Dr. Chen’s
`
`clinical trial design and his selection of the principal investigator.
`
`37.
`
`On information and belief, the board of directors and officers of ReShape Medical,
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-8-
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`Inc. knew or had reason to know of the foregoing facts and events at the time ReShape Medical, Inc.
`
`first submitted the ReShape Duo™ product for FDA approval in 2012.
`
`38.
`
`On October 2, 2017, EnteroMedics, Inc. acquired ReShape Medical, Inc. for cash and
`
`securities in the value of approximately $38 million. This acquisition and merger was announced on
`
`October 3, 2017. http://ir.enteromedics.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1042545. ReShape
`
`Medical LLC is an additional entity that resulted from this merger. On October 23, 2017,
`
`EnteroMedics, Inc. announced its name change to ReShape Lifesciences Inc.
`
`http://ir.enteromedics.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1044913.
`
`39.
`
`Upon information and belief, as a result of the aforementioned merger, ReShape
`
`Medical LLC and ReShape Lifesciences Inc. are the entities that now hold the liabilities of ReShape
`
`Medical, Inc. Fulfillium reserves the right to include additional entities if it later discovers that
`
`ReShape Medical, Inc.’s liabilities have been transferred elsewhere as a result of the aforementioned
`
`13
`
`merger.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`(Against All Defendants)
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint as
`
`though fully set forth herein.
`
`41.
`
`This claim is asserted against ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV
`
`Health for misappropriation of Fulfillium’s trade secrets and for conspiring to misappropriate such
`
`21
`
`trade secrets.
`
`42.
`
`The specific trade secrets that ReShape Medical, Inc., Intersect Partners, SV Health,
`
`and/or their agents misappropriated, despite the repeated oral and/or written agreements of
`
`confidentiality, include at least three aspects of Dr. Chen’s clinical trial “playbook.” Three key
`
`protocols in the playbook optimized the experimental rigor of the trial, especially in combination, in
`
`contrast to the typical product development approach to optimize the conditions for favorable
`
`outcomes. The first is the counterintuitive control arm that “stacked the deck” against the
`
`experimental arm. To tease out efficacy due to the device alone, the device therapy had to show
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-9-
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`statistically better results over the most efficacious non-interventional therapy available, namely diet
`
`and exercise counseling. The second is the trial primary and secondary endpoints that set high bars
`
`for not just efficacy but clinical efficacy. To gain acceptance in the bariatric scientific community,
`
`not only the results have to be statistically significant, but the difference between the two arms had to
`
`be wide enough to warrant an interventional device therapy. The third is the counterintuitive and
`
`gastric device-focused principal investigator selection premise. To provide even further confidence
`
`in the results to overcome the stigma of gastric balloons, the trial was to be conducted under the
`
`watchful eyes of investigators of consummate skill and reputation. All of the above were developed
`
`after Dr. Chen’s extensive study of the shortcomings of previous gastric devices.
`
`43.
`
`Upon information and belief, based on EnteroMedics’s acquisition of ReShape
`
`Medical, Inc. and the publically available regulatory documents relating to said merger, ReShape
`
`Medical LLC assumed all, or at least a portion of, the liabilities of ReShape Medical, Inc., including
`
`the present trade secret misappropriation claims. To the extent that ReShape Medical LLC has taken
`
`on the liability of ReShape Medical, Inc., it is liable for ReShape Medical, Inc.’s misappropriation;
`
`and/or to the extent ReShape Medical LLC continues to rely on and/or profit from ReShape Medical,
`
`Inc.’s misappropriation, it is liable for that continuing activity. Fulfillium reserves the right to assert
`
`this count against additional entities if it later discovers that ReShape Medical, Inc.’s liabilities have
`
`been transferred elsewhere as a result of the aforementioned merger.
`
`44.
`
`The disclosures of each of these three trade secrets were made pursuant to the
`
`aforementioned written and/or oral agreements of confidentiality to SV Life Sciences, Intersect
`
`Partners and New Leaf. On information and belief, these trade secrets were conveyed to Mr.
`
`Wallace, Intersect Partners, ReShape Medical LLC and SV Health who each used them for their own
`
`23
`
`benefit.
`
`45.
`
`A significant portion of the information used by ReShape Medical, Inc. to design its
`
`device and obtain FDA approval constitute Fulfillium trade secrets in that they: (a) constitute
`
`information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known to the public or
`
`to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) have been the
`
`subject of reasonable efforts to maintain their secrecy.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-10-
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`46.
`
`Through SV Life Sciences (SV Health) and Intersect Partners (and their
`
`misappropriation of Dr. Chen’s trade secrets, which were protected via repeated confidentiality
`
`agreements), Mr. Wallace, and Sprout, ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health
`
`acquired confidential, expert validated, trade secret information about all aspects of Fulfillium’s
`
`business, including clinical trial design and regulatory strategy. Specifically, ReShape Medical LLC,
`
`Intersect Partners, and SV Health misappropriated at least the three aforementioned aspects of Dr.
`
`Chen and Fulfillium’s clinical trial playbook.
`
`47.
`
`Upon information and belief, ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV
`
`Health have relied upon and used that trade secret information in some or all aspects of its business,
`
`including raising capital, product design, procedure design, and FDA clinical trial design.
`
`48.
`
`The actions alleged above constitute a wrongful misappropriation of Fulfillium’s trade
`
`secrets. They also constitute a wrongful conspiracy among the board directors and officers of and
`
`investors in ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health to misappropriate Fulfillium’s
`
`14
`
`trade secrets.
`
`49.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the actions alleged above, Fulfillium has been shut
`
`out of the market. By misappropriating Fulfillium’s technology and launching a competing company,
`
`ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health prevented Fulfillium from raising the funds
`
`required to bring its product to market.
`
`50.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the actions alleged above, ReShape Medical LLC,
`
`Intersect Partners, and SV Health have been unjustly enriched in an amount no less than the business
`
`opportunity deprived from Fulfillium.
`
`51.
`
`In doing the acts hereinabove alleged, each of ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect
`
`Partners, and SV Health and its investors have engaged in willful and malicious misappropriation by
`
`reason thereof, and Fulfillium is entitled, as against each of them, to twice the amount of its actual
`
`damages and/or the amounts by which ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health
`
`have been unjustly enriched as exemplary damages pursuant to Civil Code § 3426.3(c).
`
`52.
`
`By the aforesaid acts, ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health have
`
`irreparably injured Fulfillium and such injury will continue unless enjoined by this Court.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-11-
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`PRAYER
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants as set forth below:
`
`1.
`
`An adjudication that each of ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health
`
`has misappropriated and conspired to misappropriate Fulfillium’s trade secrets;
`
`2.
`
`An adjudication that Fulfillium have judgment against each of Defendants for
`
`compensatory damages and/or unjust enrichment in an amount not less than the sum of $50 million;
`
`3.
`
`An adjudication that Fulfillium have judgment against each of ReShape Medical LLC,
`
`Intersect Partners, and SV Health for exemplary damages under Civil Code § 3624.3(c) in the amount
`
`not less than twice the amount of Fulfillium’s actual damage or the amounts by which each of
`
`ReShape Medical LLC, Intersect Partners, and SV Health has been unjustly enriched;
`
`4.
`
`An adjudication that each of Defendants be ordered to deliver up to Fulfillium all
`
`documents, electronic and otherwise, containing Fulfillium trade secret information, and all products
`
`developed using such information;
`
`5.
`
`An adjudication that each of Defendants and their subsidiaries, affiliates, parents,
`
`successors, assigns, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting in concert
`
`or in participation with them, or any of them, be temporarily and preliminarily enjoined during the
`
`pendency of this action, and permanently enjoined thereafter, from further misappropriation,
`
`disclosure and/or use of any Fulfillium trade secret information.
`
`6.
`
`An award of Fulfillium’s reasonable costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, with
`
`20
`
`interest; and
`
`21
`
`7.
`
`An award to Fulfillium of such other and further relief as this Court deems just and
`
`22
`
`proper.
`
`Plaintiff Fulfillium, Inc. demands a trial by jury for all those issues so triable.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-12-
`
`
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 7, 2018
`
`
`
`LAW OFFICES OF SETH W. WIENER
`
`
`By: ________________________________________
`Seth W. Wiener
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Fulfillium, Inc.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR TRADE SECRET
`MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`-13-
`
`
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`RESHAPE1027
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`About SV – SV
`
`http://svhealthinvestors.com/about/
`
`mm
`
`T
`
`)
`
`V
`
`1
`
`-
`
`Hands-on
`business
`partners
`
`SV Health Investors, formerly SV Life Sciences,
`is a leading healthcare and life sciences
`venture capital and growth equity firm.
`
`Our goal is to transform healthcare - one investment at a time
`- by supporting the entrepreneurs who create and build
`breakthrough companies and treatments.
`
`With over $2 billion in capital under management in seven
`private healthcare funds, a 20-year track record in the US and
`Europe and offices in Boston, San Francisco and London, SV
`Health Investors drives game-changing innovation.
`
`Transforming
`healthcare
`
`We are more than investors - because
`healthcare entrepreneurs need more than
`money.
`
`1 of 4
`
`10/6/2017, 2:16 PM
`
`RESHAPE 1027
`
`

`

`About SV – SV
`
`http://svhealthinvestors.com/about/
`
`operating experience. We’ve faced and overcome the full
`range of industry challenges. We’ve walked in the
`entrepreneur’s shoes - we’ve founded and run businesses
`ourselves. As a result of our experience, we’re able to spot
`issues and opportunities.
`
`We don’t take a one-size-fits-all approach to investing. We are
`organized by sector, and we develop specific strategies for
`three healthcare segments: Biotechnology, Medical Devices,
`and Healthcare Services and Digital Health.
`
`Through our multi-sector domain expertise, extensive industry
`relationships and diverse, experienced team of exclusive
`venture partners who are proven company builders, we work
`hands-on with our portfolio companies as trusted advisers
`and partners from

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket