`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 1 of 2
`
`ZONES
`NPE (/NPE/)
`SEP (/SEP/)
`TOOLS
`ISIX . BEST LAW FIRMS (/ISIX/)
`PATROLL (/PATROLL/)
`PRIOR ART DATABASE (/PRIORART/)
`OPAL - LANDSCAPE (/OPAL/)
`ASSURE - STANDARDS REPO (/ASSURE/)
`NEWS (/NEWS/)
`DATA
`ANNUAL REPORT (HTTPS://PORTAL. UNIFIEDPATENTS. COM/PTAB/AN NUAL-REPORT)
`PTAB (HTTPS://PORTAL.UNIFIEDPATENTS.COM/PTAB/CASELIST?SORT=-FILING_DATE)
`PATENTS (HTTPS://PORTAL.UNIFIEDPATENTS.COM/PATENTS/SEARCH)
`LITIGATION (HTTPS://PORTAL.UNIFIEDPATENTS.COM/LITIGATION/CASELIST)
`EXAMINER (HTTPS://PORTAL.UNIFIEDPATENTS.COM/PATENTS/EXAMINER)
`ABOUT
`FAQ (/FAQ/)
`TEAM (/TEAM/)
`EVENTS (/EVENTS/)
`OFFICES (/OFFICES/)
`JOBS (/JOBS/)
`JOIN (/JOIN/)
`July 5, 2017 (/news/2017/7/5/according-to-rpx-data-unified-has-challenged-almost-all-
`of-2017s-most-prolific-npes)
`Unified has challenged almost all
`of 2017's most prolific NPEs
`(/news/2017/7/5/according-to-
`rpx-data-unified-has-challenged-
`almost-all-of-2017s-most-prolific-
`npes)
`Unified Patents has challenged 9 of RPX's 2017 "Top 10" most prolific Non-
`Practicing Entities
`RPX recently released data for the 1st half of 2017 showing the Top 10 NPEs of 2017
`Search
`Archive
`Einail Addr&ss
`J
`SUBSCRIBE
`Or Subscribe to Our RSS
`!Thtto://www.unmedBate nts. com/news?
`format=rs^
`IP &ige
`Leigh M. RothschHd
`Monument Patent Holdings
`Hybrid Audio
`Sportfaram Holdings
`Eqitobte IP
`IP Valuation fartners
`Unitoc
`Brian Yates
`Bradtey D. Uddte
`163
`82
`49
`34
`EX^ ^
`pla etDe os, LLC
`
`
`Bradium Exhibit 2022
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Campaign Defendaits
`Campaigns
`http://www. rpxcorp. com/2017/06/29/rpx-data-update-new-filings-dip-after-tc-
`heartland/(http://www. rpxcorp. com/2017/06/29/rpx-data-update-new-filings-dip-
`after-tc-heartland/)
`Unified has independently challenged at least 1 patent owned by 9 of the top 10
`entities. (Unified filings (http://Portal. unifiedpatents. com)) Studies have found,
`consistent with Unified's experience and research, that prolific plaintiffs are very often
`NPEs asserting lower quality patents. RPX (http://www. rpxcorp. com/), another 3rd
`party, has independently challenged 3 of the top 10. (RPX filings
`(https://portal. unifiedpatents. com/ptab/caselist?
`petitioners=Rpx+Corporation&petitioners=Rpx%2C+lnc.&petitioners=Rpx+Corp.&petition
`ers=Rpx&sort=-filing_date))
`Unified's model is never to pay NPEs any money and challenge patents it believes are
`invalid.
`This has led to a decrease in NPE activity and purchasing in the areas Unified protects.
`And Unified did not pay any NPEs-paying incentivizes further invalid assertions.
`Unified has filed more IPRs and had more successes than all other 3rd party entities
`combined. You can see a comparison here:
`www.unifiedpatents.com/success (http://www. unifiedpatents.com/success)
`A full list of our filings can be found at:
`Portal. unifiedpatents.com (http://Portal. unifiedpatents.com)
`0 Likes < Share
`Newer Post
`SoftVault Systems patent challenged as
`likely invalid (/news/2017/7/18/softvault-
`systems-patent-challenged-as-likely-
`invalid)
`Older Post
`1st Half 2017: Patent Dispute Report
`(/news/2017/6/29/1st-half-2017-patent-
`dispute-report)
`HOME (/HOME)
`SOLUTION (/SOLUTION)
`NEWS (/NEWS)
`ABOUT (/ABOUT)
`JOIN (/JOIN)
`(650) 999-08S9
`INFO@UNIFIEDPATENTS. COM (MAILTO:INFO©UNIFIEDPATENTS. COM)
`Copyright © 2018 Unified Patents Inc. All rights reserved.
`Legal (/term-of-services) I Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy) I DMCA (http://unifiedpatents.com/dmca)
`ht4)s://www.unifiedpatents.com/news/2017/7/5/according-to-rpx-data-unifled-has-chaltenged-almost-all-of-2017s-most-prolific-npes
`212
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
