throbber
Bradium Exhibit 2019
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 1 of 2
`
`9/8/2018
`DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY v
`UIA 25916. 54 -03\% T
`S&P500 2871. 68 -0. 22% T
`New Venture Enters Patent Fray - WSJ
`Nasdaq 7902. 54 -0. 25% V
`U. S. IOYr-17/32 Yield 2-941% T
`Crude Oil 6786 01;-;,l
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit
`rittp^/www-djreprints.
`com.
`https:/<www. wsJ. com/artlcles/SB100014241278B7323820304578408790085259404
`LAW
`New Venture Enters Patent Fray
`San Francisco Startup Plans to Recruit Companies to Deter Legal Threats Against Its Members
`By Don dark
`Updated April 7, 2013 844 p. m. ET
`Firms that buy and enforce patents make life hard for technology companies. A new San
`Francisco startup hopes to turn the tables.
`Unified Patents Inc. plans to recruit companies for a collective effort to deter patent lawsuits or
`legal threats against its members.
`fatmtT^
`enforcement firms in U.S. courts
`3,500
`2012:2, 942'
`3W
`2/500
`2, ( 0
`1300
`MOO
`%0
`0
`The first to join Unified are
`Internet giant Google Inc. and
`NetAppInc., NTAP-o.36%v
`which makes data-storage
`hardware. But the venture plans
`to set itself apart by also
`recrmting smaU tech companies,
`which often have trouble
`defending themselves.
`"What we end up doing is
`making a group of small
`companies no longer look like an
`easy target, " said Kevin Jakel,
`Unified's chief executive.
`Unified's plan is one of many
`responses to the rise of
`companies that specialize in
`making money from patents,
`often while doing little in the
`way of invention or selling
`products. That distinction is
`important because such
`companies-often called NPEs,
`for "nonpracticing entities, " or,
`more derisively, "patent trolls"-
`don't operate businesses that
`can be countersued, a common
`patent defense.
`'10 '11^ 'Us
`.
`' Adjusted to exclude one-time mcrwse
`dye to change in U.S. pstwA law.
`Smrc&t Patenffreedom
`TbeWaUStreeUoymal
`PatentFreedom, an organization
`that tracks such firms, said the
`number of operating companies named in lawsuits involving NPEs more than tripled between
`2008 and 2012, even after adjusting to exclude a recent surge in suits caused by a change in U. S.
`patent laws.
`EXHIBIT,
`Of
`Planet Depos, LLC
`https://www.wsj. com/articles/SB10001424127887323820304578408790085259404
`1/2
`

`

`Bradium Exhibit 2019
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 2 of 2
`
`9/8/2018
`New Venture Enters Patent Fray - WSJ
`Firms such as RPX Corp. and Allied Security Trust, or AST, were formed in recent years to help
`patent defendants, largely by buying up patents to keep them out of the hands ofNPEs. But the
`amount of litigation keeps rising, Mr. Jakel said, with small companies increasingly bearing the
`brunt of the lawsuits.
`Colleen Chien, an assistant professor at Santa Clara University Law School, estimates that
`companies with $10 million or less in revenue account for 55% of the defendants targeted by
`entities that specialize in asserting patents.
`Such plaintiffs use a variety of techniques to make it more economical to assert patents, she
`said. In some cases, firms send letters threatening patent suits to many small companies at
`once in the hopes that a sizable number will pay for licenses rather than taking the risks of
`fighting patent cases in court. Money earned from that practice can help fund further attacks
`on small or large companies.
`Unified plans to use a variety of techniques to make such tactics more expensive and more risky.
`The firm was founded by Mr. Jakel, who previously served as head of intellectual property
`litigation
`at Intuit Inc., and Brian Hinman, a former chief executive of AST who most recently
`served as a vice president at InterDigital Communications Inc.
`One key strategy is defining specific technology fields to defend, making it easier to identify and
`track a limited number of relevant patents. Unified intends to start with two such "micro-
`pools. " One focuses on technologies for managing payments on mobile devices, and the other
`focuses on Web-powered services known as "cloud storage."
`In another approach. Unified plans to use small-company members as a kind of early warning
`system-both when NPEs approach them about potentially purchasing their patents and when
`they are threatened with litigation by the NPEs.
`Once alerted. Unified will be able to spread the word to other members and pursue
`countermoves, such as oflfering to buy the small-company patents itself, Messrs. Jakel and
`Hinman said. They also expect to ask the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office to re-examine the
`patents wielded by the NPEs, increasing the risk that they will be declared invalid.
`While defendants frequently use the latter tactic after they are sued, starting the process
`earlier can raise the costs for NPEs and make enforcing particular patents less attractive, Mr.
`Jakel said.
`But Paul Ryan, CEO of Acacia Research Corp., one of the best-known firms that buys and
`licenses patents, said re-examinations aren't a decisive defense if the patents involved are
`valid. "We are very selective, " Mr. Ryan said of the patents Acacia buys. "We reject a lot of
`patents for various reasons."
`Unified isn't disclosing how much it will charge members, but it plans to bill large companies
`higher fees than smaller ones. Douglas Luftman, NetApp's chief intellectual property counsel,
`said in a statement that Unified's business model represents a "cost-effective" way to challenge
`"dubious" patents.
`The venture also is likely to face competition from RPX, AST and others. But Daniel McCurdy,
`AST'S chief executive, thinks the efforts to help defendants maybe complementary. "The more
`the merrier, " he said.
`Corrections & Amplifications
`Unified Patents Inc. was incorrectly referred to as United in second references in some editions
`of this article.
`Write to Don dark at don. clark@wsj.com
`Copyright &copy;2017 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc. All Rights Resen/ad
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use oniy. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit
`http://www.djreprints. com.
`https://www.wsj. com/articles/SB10001424127887323820304578408790085259404
`2/2
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket