`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`Unified Patents Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Bradium LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2018-00952
`U.S. Patent 9,253,239
`
`____________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. SYLVIA D. HALL-ELLIS
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Dr. Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis, declare as follows:
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1. My name is Sylvia Hall-Ellis. I have been retained as an expert by
`
`Unified Patents Inc. in connection with its petition for inter partes review of
`
`United States Patent No. 9,253,239.
`
`2.
`
`I have written this report to provide my expert opinion regarding the
`
`public availability of certain publications. My report sets forth my opinions in
`
`detail and provides the basis for my opinions regarding the authenticity and public
`
`availability of these publications. If called to testify in the above-captioned matter,
`
`I will testify with regard to the opinions and bases set forth below.
`
`3.
`
`I reserve the right to supplement or amend my opinions, and bases for
`
`them, in response to any opinions expressed by patentee’s experts, or in light of
`
`any additional evidence, testimony, discovery, and/or argument advanced by
`
`patentee, and/or other additional information that may be provided to me after the
`
`date of this report. Additionally, I reserve the right to prepare any exhibits that will
`
`be used to summarize or support my opinions, including demonstrative exhibits. I
`
`reserve the right to create additional summaries, tutorials, demonstrations, charts,
`
`drawings, tables, and/or animations that may be appropriate to supplement and
`
`demonstrate my opinions.
`
`
`
`4.
`
`I am being compensated for my time spent working on this matter at
`
`my normal consulting rate of $300 per hour, plus reimbursement for any additional
`
`reasonable expenses. My compensation is not in any way tied to the content of this
`
`report, the substance of my opinions, or the outcome of the petition. I have no
`
`other interests in this matter with any of the parties.
`
`5.
`
`Aside from the documents and references mentioned below, these are
`
`the additional materials I have considered in forming the opinions expressed in this
`
`report:
`
`a. Webpages hosted at www.iec.ch;
`
`b. Wayback Machine archives for www.iec.ch and www.dnp.org;
`
`c. OCLC (www.worldcat.org);
`
`d. Online catalogs at academic libraries (San José State University; Cal
`Tech University; University of California – Berkeley; University of
`Washington; University of Michigan; Georgia Tech; University of
`Wisconsin – Madison; Carnegie Mellon University; Cornell University;
`Stanford University; and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
`
`II. QUALIFICATIONS
`
`6.
`
`I am currently an Adjunct Professor in the School of Information at
`
`San José State University. I obtained a Masters of Library Science from the
`
`University of North Texas in 1972 and a Ph.D. in Library Science from the
`
`University of Pittsburgh in 1985. Over the last forty-five years, I have held various
`
`positions in the field of library and information resources. I was first employed as
`
`
`
`
`
`a librarian in 1966, and have been involved in the field of library sciences since,
`
`holding numerous positions.
`
`7.
`
`I am a member of the American Library Association (ALA) and its
`
`Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (ALCTS) Division, and I
`
`served on the Committee on Cataloging: Resource and Description (which wrote
`
`the new cataloging rules) and as the chair of the Committee for Education and
`
`Training of Catalogers and the Competencies and Education for a Career in
`
`Cataloging Interest Group. I also served as the Chair of the ALCTS Division’s
`
`Task Force on Competencies and Education for a Career in Cataloging.
`
`Additionally, I have served as the Chair for the ALA Office of Diversity’s
`
`Committee on Diversity. Currently I serve as a member of the Editorial Board for
`
`the ALCTS premier cataloging journal, Library Resources and Technical Services.
`
`8.
`
`I have also given over one hundred presentations in the field,
`
`including several on library cataloging systems and Machine-Readable Cataloging
`
`(“MARC”) standards. My current research interests include library cataloging
`
`systems, metadata, and organization of electronic resources. My full curriculum
`
`vitae is attached hereto as Exhibit 1021. I have previously testified at deposition in
`
`five cases: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., 5:12-cv-630-LHK
`
`(N.D. Cal.), on behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. v.
`
`Top Victory Electronics Co., Ltd., 2:14-CV-1121 on behalf of Top Victory
`
`
`
`
`
`Electronics Co. Ltd.; Symantec, Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review of U. S. Patent No. 6,154,844, on behalf of Symantec Corp.; Intellectual
`
`Venture I LLC v. ATT Mobility LLC et al., C.A. No. 12-193 (D. Del.) and related
`
`cases, on behalf of AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC, T-Mobile USA,
`
`Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., and U.S. Cellular Corporation; and,
`
`Symantec, Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., 14:cv-2998 (N.D. Cal.), on behalf of Symantec
`
`Corp. I have never testified at trial as an expert.
`
`III. LIBRARY CATALOGING PRACTICES
`
`9.
`
`I am fully familiar with the library cataloging standard known as the
`
`MARC standard, which is an industry-wide standard method of storing and
`
`organizing library catalog information.1 MARC was first developed in the 1960’s
`
`by the Library of Congress. A MARC-compatible library is one that has a catalog
`
`consisting of individual MARC records for each of its items. Today, MARC is the
`
`primary communications protocol for the transfer and storage of bibliographic
`
`metadata in libraries.2
`
`
`
`1 The full text of the standard is available from the Library of Congress at
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/.
`
`2 Almost every major library in the world is MARC-compatible. See, e.g., MARC
`Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), LIBRARY OF CONGRESS,
`https://www.loc.gov/marc/faq.html (last visited March 10, 2018) (“MARC is the
`acronym for MAchine-Readable Cataloging. It defines a data format that emerged
`from a Library of Congress-led initiative that began nearly forty years ago. It
`provides the mechanism by which computers exchange, use, and interpret
`
`
`
`
`
`10. A MARC record comprises several fields, each of which contains
`
`specific data about the work. Each field is identified by a standardized, unique,
`
`three-digit code corresponding to the type of data that follow. For example, a
`
`work’s title is recorded in field 245, the primary author of the work is recorded in
`
`field 100, an item's International Standard Book Number (“ISBN”) is recorded in
`
`field 020, an item’s Library of Congress call number is recorded in field 050, and
`
`the publication date is recorded in field 260 under the subfield “c.” If a work is a
`
`periodical, then its publication frequency is recorded in field 310, and the
`
`publication dates (e.g., the first and last publication) are recorded in field 362,
`
`which is also referred to as the enumeration/chronology field.
`
`11. The library that created the record is recorded in field 040 in subfield
`
`“a” with a unique library code. When viewing the MARC record online via Online
`
`Computer Library Center’s (“OCLC”) Connexion database, hovering over this
`
`code with the mouse reveals the full name of the library. I used this method of
`
`“mousing over” the library codes in the OCLC database to identify the originating
`
`library for all of the MARC records discussed in this report. Where this “mouse
`
`over” option was not available, I consulted the Directory of OCLC Libraries in
`
`
`
`bibliographic information, and its data elements make up the foundation of most
`library catalogs used today.”). MARC is the ANSI/NISO Z39.2-1994 (reaffirmed
`2009) standard for Information Interchange Format.
`
`
`
`
`
`order to identify the institution that created the MARC record.3
`
`12. MARC records also include several fields that include subject matter
`
`classification information. An overview of MARC record fields is available
`
`through the Library of Congress at http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/. For
`
`example, 6XX fields are termed “Subject Access Fields.” See
`
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd6xx.html. Among these, for example, is
`
`the 650 field; this is the “Subject Added Entry – Topical Term” field. See
`
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd650.html. The 650 field is a “[s]ubject
`
`added entry in which the entry element is a topical term.” Id. These entries “are
`
`assigned to a bibliographic record to provide access according to generally
`
`accepted thesaurus-building rules (e.g., Library of Congress Subject Headings
`
`(LCSH), Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)).” Id. Further, MARC records
`
`include call numbers, which themselves include a classification number. For
`
`example, the 050 field is the “Library of Congress Call Number.” See
`
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd050.html. A defined portion of the
`
`Library of Congress Call Number is the classification number, and “source of the
`
`classification number is Library of Congress Classification and the LC
`
`Classification-Additions and Changes.” Id. Thus, included in the 050 field is a
`
`
`
`3 http://www.oclc.org/contacts/libraries.en.html.
`
`
`
`
`
`subject matter classification. Each item in a library has a single classification
`
`number. A library selects a classification scheme (e.g., the Library of Congress
`
`Classification scheme just described or a similar scheme such as the Dewey
`
`Decimal Classification scheme) and uses it consistently. When the Library of
`
`Congress assigns the classification number, it appears as part of the 050 field. If a
`
`local library assigns the classification number, it appears in a 090 field. In either
`
`scenario, the MARC record includes a classification number that represents a
`
`subject matter classification.
`
`13. The OCLC was created “to establish, maintain and operate a
`
`computerized library network and to promote the evolution of library use, of
`
`libraries themselves, and of librarianship, and to provide processes and products
`
`for the benefit of library users and libraries, including such objectives as increasing
`
`availability of library resources to individual library patrons and reducing the rate
`
`of rise of library per-unit costs, all for the fundamental public purpose of furthering
`
`ease of access to and use of the ever-expanding body of worldwide scientific,
`
`literary and educational knowledge and information.”4 Among other services,
`
`OCLC and its members are responsible for maintaining the WorldCat database
`
`
`
`4 Third Article, Amended Articles of Incorporation of OCLC Online Computer
`Library Center, Incorporated (available at http://www.oclc.org/en-
`US/councils/documents/amended_articles.html).
`
`
`
`
`
`(http://www.worldcat.org/), used by independent and institutional libraries
`
`throughout the world.
`
`14. OCLC also provides its members online access to MARC records
`
`through its OCLC Connexion database. When an OCLC member institution
`
`acquires a work, it creates a MARC record for this work in its computer catalog
`
`system in the ordinary course of its business. MARC records created at the Library
`
`of Congress are tape-loaded into the OCLC database through a subscription to
`
`MARC Distribution Services daily or weekly. Once the MARC record is created
`
`by a cataloger at an OCLC member institution or is tape-loaded from the Library
`
`of Congress, the MARC record is then made available to any other OCLC
`
`members online, and therefore made available to the public. Accordingly, once the
`
`MARC record is created by a cataloger at an OCLC member institution or is tape-
`
`loaded from the Library of Congress or another library anywhere in the world, any
`
`publication corresponding to the MARC record has been cataloged and indexed
`
`according to its subject matter such that a person interested in that subject matter
`
`could, with reasonable diligence, locate and access the publication through any
`
`library with access to the OCLC Connexion database or through the Library of
`
`Congress.
`
`15. When an OCLC member institution creates a new MARC record,
`
`OCLC automatically supplies the date of creation for that record in field 005. The
`
`
`
`
`
`MARC record creation date reflects the date on which, or shortly after which, the
`
`item was first acquired or cataloged. Initially, field 005 of the MARC record is
`
`automatically populated with the date the MARC record was created in year,
`
`month, day format (YYYYMMDD) (some of the newer library catalog systems
`
`also include hour, minute, second (HHMMSS)). Thereafter, the library’s computer
`
`system may automatically update the date in field 005 every time the library
`
`updates the MARC record (e.g., to reflect that an item has been moved to a
`
`different shelving location within the library). Field 005 is visible when viewing a
`
`MARC record via an appropriate computerized interface, but when a MARC
`
`record is printed to hardcopy, no “005” label appears. The initial field 005 date
`
`(i.e., the date the MARC record was created) does appear, however, next to the
`
`label “Entered.”5 The date upon which the most recent update to field 005
`
`occurred also appears, next to the label “Replaced.” Thus, when an item’s MARC
`
`record has been printed to hardcopy—as is the case with the exhibits to this
`
`report—the date reflected next to the label “Entered” is necessarily on or after the
`
`date the library first cataloged and indexed the underlying item.
`
`16. Once one library has cataloged and indexed a publication by creating
`
`a MARC record for that publication, other libraries that receive the publication do
`
`
`
`5 In this report, I sometimes refer to the “Entered” entry as field 008, characters
`00-05.
`
`
`
`
`
`not create additional MARC records—the other libraries instead rely on the
`
`original MARC record. They may update or revise the MARC record to ensure
`
`accuracy, but they do not replace or duplicate it. This practice does more than save
`
`libraries from duplicating labor. It also enhances the accuracy of MARC records.
`
`Further, it allows librarians around the world to know that a particular MARC
`
`record is authoritative (in contrast, a hypothetical system wherein duplicative
`
`records were created would result in confusion as to which record is authoritative).
`
`17. Catalogers can create MARC records for all types of print, online, and
`
`digital resources. For example, MARC records cover serial publications, including
`
`both serially-published monographs and journals. OCLC hosts MARC records for
`
`more than 320 million serial publications. Serial publications are those
`
`publications that have the same collective title but are intended to be continued
`
`indefinitely with enumeration such as a volume or issue number (e.g., magazines,
`
`journals, etc.). In the OCLC Connexion database, the first issue of the serial
`
`publication is typically cataloged (i.e., a corresponding MARC record is created),
`
`but the date is left open-ended with the use of a punctuation mark such as a dash.
`
`OCLC serial publication MARC records represent the entire run of the serial title.
`
`With knowledge of the first issue published, future issues can be predicted based
`
`on the information provided in the MARC record, for example in field 362. In my
`
`extensive professional experience, is it highly unusual for a library to stop
`
`
`
`
`
`collecting and shelving a serial publication prior to the end of its publication run.
`
`If a subscription to a serial publication ends its run or is cancelled before the end of
`
`its run, the library will denote that it has stopped receiving new volumes by filling
`
`in the end date in the MARC record.
`
`18. When individual issues of a serial publication are received by a
`
`library, the individual issue is indexed, added to library holdings records, and made
`
`available for library visitors. Typically, individual issues are available within a
`
`few days of receipt by the library—or at most a few weeks. Typically, academic
`
`libraries use property and date stamps to mark the receipt of a new journal issue.
`
`The issue is checked in and then processed so that it can be placed out in a public
`
`area for patrons. The foregoing process has been standard library practice longer
`
`than I have been working in the profession. I first learned the steps in the process
`
`in the late 1970s and later supervised it. Although the checking in process has
`
`become automated and now links electronically to holdings records for the MARC
`
`record for each serial title, the manual stamping and placing the issue in a public
`
`area has not changed for 50 years. Unless I note otherwise below in reference to a
`
`specific serial publication, it is my expert opinion that this standard protocol was
`
`followed for each of the serial publications discussed below.
`
`19. The handling of printed journal subscriptions is shown on the covers
`
`of individual issues. As typical practice among libraries, issues arrive at a central
`
`
`
`
`
`facility and are immediately received, verified as part of a subscription, checked in,
`
`and stamped with the institution’s name and date. Determining that the issue is
`
`part of the library subscription allows the library to ensure that the entire set of
`
`publications for the year has been received so that they can be professionally
`
`bound and retained. This process verifies that all published issues have arrived so
`
`that the library staff knows whether it must request or claim an issue that did not
`
`arrive as expected. In large public libraries with branches and multi-campus
`
`libraries within academic institutions, the journals are sorted and delivered to the
`
`subscribing unit. The issues are frequently stamped again to acknowledge receipt.
`
`The new issue is then placed in the public area; the older issue is stored so that it
`
`remains available. In my experience, this process occurs quickly. Not only is
`
`there a short window to notify a publisher of a defective issue or non-receipt, there
`
`are often patrons waiting for a new issue of a particular journal. A rule of thumb
`
`that I have used is to get the new issue processed and available in a public area
`
`within three days or sooner based on staffing and the volume of materials received.
`
`Unless I note otherwise below in reference to a specific serial publication, it is my
`
`expert opinion that this standard protocol was followed for each of the serial
`
`publications discussed below.
`
`20. Upwards of two-thirds to three-quarters of book sales to libraries
`
`come from a jobber or wholesaler for online and print resources. These resellers
`
`
`
`
`
`make it their business to provide books to their customers as fast as possible, often
`
`providing turnaround times of only a single day after publication. Libraries
`
`purchase a significant portion of the balance of their books directly from publishers
`
`themselves, which provide delivery on a similarly expedited schedule. In general,
`
`libraries make these purchases throughout the year as the books are published and
`
`shelve the books as soon thereafter as possible in order to make the books available
`
`to their patrons. Thus, books are generally available at libraries across the country
`
`within just a few days of publication.
`
`21.
`
`In preparing this report, I used authoritative databases, such as the
`
`OCLC Connexion database and the Library of Congress Online Catalog, to
`
`confirm citation details of the various publications discussed.
`
`IV. LEGAL STANDARDS
`
`22.
`
`I am not an attorney and will not offer opinions on the law. I do,
`
`however, have an understanding of several principles concerning the public
`
`accessibility of printed publications that have guided me in arriving at my stated
`
`conclusions in this report.
`
`23.
`
`I understand that a printed publication qualifies as “publicly
`
`accessible” as of the date it was disseminated or otherwise made available such
`
`that a person interested in and ordinarily skilled in the relevant subject matter could
`
`locate it through the exercise of ordinary diligence.
`
`
`
`
`
`24. While I understand that the determination of public accessibility under
`
`the foregoing standard rests on a case-by-case analysis of the facts particular to an
`
`individual publication, I also understand that a printed publication is rendered
`
`“publicly accessible” if it is cataloged and indexed by a library such that a person
`
`interested in the relevant subject matter could locate it (i.e., I understand that
`
`cataloging and indexing by a library is sufficient, though there are other ways that
`
`a printed publication may qualify as “publicly accessible”). One manner of
`
`sufficient indexing is indexing according to subject matter category. I understand
`
`that it is not necessary to prove someone actually looked at a printed publication in
`
`order to show it was publicly accessible by virtue of a library’s cataloging and
`
`indexing thereof. I understand that the cataloging and indexing by a single library
`
`of a single instance of a particular printed publication is sufficient, even if the
`
`single library is in a foreign country. I understand that, even if access to a library
`
`is restricted, a printed publication that has been cataloged and indexed therein is
`
`publicly accessible so long as a presumption is raised that the portion of the public
`
`concerned with the relevant subject matter would know of the printed publication.
`
`I also understand that the cataloging and indexing of information that would guide
`
`a person interested in the relevant subject matter to the printed publication, such as
`
`the cataloging and indexing of an abstract for the printed publication, is sufficient
`
`to render the printed publication publicly accessible.
`
`
`
`
`
`25.
`
`I understand that evidence showing the specific date when a printed
`
`publication became publicly accessible is not necessary. Rather, routine business
`
`practices, such as general library cataloging and indexing practices, can be used to
`
`establish an approximate date on which a printed publication became publicly
`
`accessible.
`
`V.
`
`IDENTIFIED PUBLICATION
`
`A. Exhibit 1004
`
`a.
`
`Exhibit 1004 is a copy of Volume 19, Number 2 of the IEEE
`
`Computer Graphics and Applications journal found in the Gemmill Library of
`
`Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at the University of Colorado – Boulder.
`
`The article “TerraVision II: Visualizing Massive Terrain Databases in VRML” by
`
`Martin Reddy, Yvan Leclerc, Lee Iverson, and Nat Bletter (hereinafter called
`
`“Reddy”) appears on pages 30-38 of this issue dated March/April 1999. The
`
`exhibit filed in this proceeding as Exhibit 1004 is a true and correct copy of the
`
`issue cover, table of contents, and the article. I obtained this copy of the article
`
`comprising Exhibit 1004 from the Gemmill Library of Engineering, Mathematics,
`
`and Physics at the University of Colorado – Boulder. Specifically, the text of the
`
`article is complete; no pages are missing, and the text on each page appears to flow
`
`seamlessly from one page to the next; further, there are no visible alterations to the
`
`document. Exhibit 1004 was found within the custody of a library – a place where,
`
`
`
`
`
`if authentic, a copy of this journal would likely be. Exhibit 1004 is a true and
`
`correct copy in a condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`b.
`
`Based on finding a print copy of Exhibit 1004 in the Gemmill Library
`
`of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at the University of Colorado – Boulder
`
`and a record in its online library catalog attached as Attachment 1a, it is my
`
`opinion that “TerraVision II: Visualizing Massive Terrain Databases in VRML” by
`
`Martin Reddy et. al. published in the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
`
`journal was available from the Gemmill Library of Engineering, Mathematics, and
`
`Physics at the University of Colorado – Boulder.
`
`c.
`
`Exhibit 1004 has a receipt label affixed to the issue cover at the
`
`Gemmill Library of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at the University of
`
`Colorado – Boulder which indicates that the March/April 1999, issue arrived on
`
`February 24, 1999. As noted in the 362 field, the Gemmill Library of Engineering,
`
`Mathematics, and Physics at the University of Colorado – Boulder received the
`
`print version of the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications journal from 1981
`
`until 2001, and continues to receive the journal digitally. In view of the MARC
`
`record for Exhibit 1004, the Reddy article was publicly available no later than
`
`February 24, 1999, because the serial title had been cataloged and indexed in the
`
`Gemmill Library of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at the University of
`
`Colorado – Boulder and made part of its online catalog database.
`
`
`
`
`
`d.
`
`Attached hereto as Attachment 1b is a true and correct copy of the
`
`MARC record for the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications journal obtained
`
`from the OCLC Connexion database. As previously noted, the library that created
`
`the record is recorded in field 040 with a unique library code. For Exhibit 1004,
`
`that library code is “NSD,” which means that the MARC record for this serial was
`
`cataloged as part of the National Serials Data Program at the Library of Congress.
`
`As can be seen in the “Entered” field in MARC record for this exhibit, a cataloger
`
`created OCLC record number 6794952 on October 6, 1980. The “BLvl” entry in
`
`Attachment 1b is “s,” which indicates that the IEEE Computer Graphics and
`
`Applications journal is a serial publication. Field 310 of Attachment 1b reads
`
`“Bimonthly, since 1989.” Accordingly, the MARC record for Exhibit 1004
`
`corresponds to those issues of the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications from
`
`1989 to the present day. Attachment 1b further includes an entry in field 050
`
`(“T385 ‡b .I18”)—as described above, this includes a subject matter classification
`
`number consistent with the Library of Congress classification system (analogous to
`
`the Dewey Decimal System). Attachment 1b further includes an entry in field 082
`
`(“001.6443”), a subject matter consistent with the Dewey Decimal System.
`
`Attachment 1b further includes an English language field 650 entry reading
`
`“Computer graphics ‡v Periodicals.” Thus, as of its cataloging, the publication
`
`corresponding to the MARC record attached hereto as Attachment 1b was indexed
`
`
`
`
`
`according to its subject matter by virtue of at least three independently sufficient
`
`classifications: the field 050 entry, the field 082 entry, and the field 650 entry.
`
`Further, as of October 6, 1980, the MARC record attached hereto as Attachment 1b
`
`was accessible through any library with access to the OCLC Connexion database
`
`or the online catalog at a library regularly subscribed to this serial, which means
`
`that the corresponding publication was publicly available on or before that same
`
`date through any library with access to the OCLC Connexion database or through
`
`an individual library.
`
`e.
`
`Attachment 1b indicates that the IEEE Computer Graphics and
`
`Applications journal as cataloged at the Library of Congress is currently available
`
`from 595 libraries. In view of Attachment 1b, this issue of the IEEE Computer
`
`Graphics and Applications journal was publicly available no later than February
`
`24, 1999, because by that date it had been cataloged and indexed at the Library of
`
`Congress, made part of the OCLC Connexion database, and received at the
`
`Gemmill Library of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at the University of
`
`Colorado – Boulder For these reasons, I find that Exhibit 1004 published and was
`
`accessible to the public no later than February 24, 1999.
`
`VI. CONCLUDING STATEMENTS
`
`72.
`
`In signing this declaration, I understand that the declaration will be
`
`filed as evidence in a contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of
`
`
`
`
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office. I acknowledge that I may be
`
`subject to cross-examination in this case and that cross-examination will take place
`
`at an agreed location within the United States. If cross-examination is required of
`
`me, I will appear for cross—examination at an agreed location within the United
`
`States during the time allotted for cross-examination.
`
`27.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true,
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and
`
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements
`
`and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section lOOl'of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
` DATED: April 18, 2018
`
`a D. Hall—Ellis
`
`By:
`
`.
`Dr. Syl
`
`
`
`001 6794952
`008 801006c19819999caubr p 0 a0eng d
`010 81645722 |zsn 80002340
`022 0 0272-1716
`040 NSD|cNSD|dm.c.|dNSD|dDLC|dNSD|dNST|dNSD|dDLC|dNST|dDLC
` |dOCL|dNSD|dNST|dOCL|dNSD|dNST|dOCL|dNSD|dNST|dAIP|dNST
` |dAIP|dNST|dIUL|dNST|dm/c|dNST|dIUL|dNST|dOCL|dCOD
`042 lc|ansdp
`049 DVDI
`090 T385|b.I2
`090 T385|b.I2
`210 0 IEEE comput. graph. appl
`222 0 IEEE computer graphics and applications
`229 0 Computer graphics and applications
`245 00 IEEE computer graphics and applications
`246 2 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
`computer
` graphics and applications
`246 10 Computer graphics and applications
`260 [Los Alamitos, CA] :|bIEEE Computer Society :|bNational
` Computer Graphics Association,|c[©1981-]
`300 volumes :|billustrations ;|c28 cm
`310 Bimonthly|b<, Jan. 1989->
`321 Quarterly
`321 Bimonthly|b<, Mar. 1982->
`321 Monthly|b<, June 1982->
`321 Monthly|b<, July 1983->
`336 text|btxt|2rdacontent
`337 unmediated|bn|2rdamedia
`338 volume|bnc|2rdacarrier
`362 0 Vol. 1, no. 1 (Jan. 1981)-
`500 Title from cover
`583 1 |3v. 1-21 (1981-2001)|acommitted to retain|c20160101
` |d20410101|5CoU|fAlliance Shared Trust|uhttps://
` www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies
`650 0 Computer graphics|vPeriodicals
`710 2 IEEE Computer Society
`710 2 National Computer Graphics Association (U.S.)
`907 .b15200371|b03-01-11|c11-21-94
`907 .b15200371|b07-31-08|c11-21-94
`944 RDA ENRICHED
`944 MARS
`947 rev cg 12/00 af www
`
`
`
`
`No holdings in XXX - 595 other holdings
`
`
` Entere
` Rec
`c
`d
`Stat
` ELvl
` Srce c
` Form
` Conf 0
` Orig
` EntW
` Cont
` SrTp p
`
`2018030607123
` Replace
`3.4
`d
`
` Lang eng __
` Ctrl
` MRec
` Ctry cau __
`
`
` Alph a __
` Dates 1981,9999
`
`__
`
` _
`_
`
`__
`
`1980100
`6
` GPub
` Freq b
` Regl r
` DtSt c
`
`__ OCLC 6794952
`
` _ _
`
`Continuing
`
`Resources
`__ Type a
`__ BLvl s
`__ S/L 0
`__ Desc a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 007 c ‡b r ‡d u ‡e n ‡f u
`
`
`
` 010 81645722 ‡z sn 80002340
`
`
`
` 040 NSD ‡b eng ‡c NSD ‡d NSD ‡d DLC ‡d NSD ‡d NST ‡d NSD ‡d DLC ‡d NST ‡
`
`d DLC ‡d OCL ‡d NSD ‡d NST ‡d OCL ‡d NSD ‡d NST ‡d OCL ‡d NSD ‡d NST ‡
`
`d AIP ‡d NST ‡d AIP ‡d NST‡d IUL ‡d NST ‡d IUL ‡d NST ‡d OCL ‡d NST ‡d MYG ‡
`
`d OCL ‡d MYG ‡d LYU ‡d IEEEX ‡d DLC ‡d OCLCQ ‡d NLM ‡d NSD ‡d NLGGC ‡
`
`d LVB ‡d CIT ‡d OCLCQ ‡d UKMGB ‡d OCLCQ ‡dOCLCF ‡d OCLCO ‡d OCLCQ ‡
`
`d OCLCO ‡d AVA ‡d OCLCO ‡d OCLCA
`
`
`
` 012 3 ‡b 3 ‡k 1 ‡l 1 ‡m 1
`
`
`
` 016 7_ 008203135 ‡2 Uk
`
`
`
` 016 7_ 9881869 ‡2 dnlm
`
`
`
` 019 185057941 ‡a 255620199 ‡a 1009024732 ‡a 1011807268
`
`
`
` 022 0_ 0272-1716 ‡l 0272-1716 ‡2 1
`
`
`
` 030 ICGADZ
`
`
`
` 032 574590 ‡b USPS
`
`
`
` 037 ‡b IEEE Computer Society, 10662 Los Vaqueros Circle, Los Alamitos, CA 90720-
`
`2578
`
`
`
` 042 pcc ‡a nsdp
`
`
`
` 050 00 T385 ‡b .I18
`
`
`
` 060 00 W1 ‡b IE44613
`
`
`
` 082 04 001.64/43
`
`
`
` 210 0_ IEEE comput. graph. appl.
`
`
`
` 210 10 IEEE Comput Graph Appl ‡2 dnlm
`
`
`
` 222 _0 IEEE computer graphics and applications
`
`
`
` 245 00 IEEE computer graphics and applications.
`
`
`
`
`
` 246
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
