throbber

`
`(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0014979 Al
`Feb. 7, 2002
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Wilson
`
`111101111111111101110111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111 Il
`US 20020014979A1
`
`(54) METHOD FOR OBTAINING PRECISION
`ROAD MAPS
`
`(76)
`
`Inventor: Christopher K.H. Wilson, Redwood
`City, CA (US)
`
`Publication Classification
`
`(51) hit. C1.7 .....................................................GO1C 21/30
`(52) U.S. Cl . ........................... 340/995; 701/212; 340/990
`
`Correspondence Address:
`CR0 WELL & MORING LLP
`Intellectual Property Group
`P.O. Box 14300
`Washington, DC 20044-4300 (US)
`
`(21) Appi. No.:
`
`09/769,762
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Jan. 26, 2001
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(63) Non-provisional of provisional application No.
`60/178,199, filed on Jan. 26, 2000.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A highly precise digital road map and method of producing
`same are provided for vehicle applications. The method
`obtains a conventional digital map having traditional seg-
`ments and nodes, and reprcscnts a road network of the
`precision digital road map as a set of geometric shapes
`indexed to the traditional segments and nodes of the con-
`ventional digital map. Branch and merge points are identi-
`fied on the road network by divergences and convergences
`from ideal paths of the vehicles traveling thereon. These
`ideal paths are obtained by statistically combining the actual
`paths of the vehicles traveling between the same points.
`
`H
`F -
`
` .-°-s--.-° -
`
`BRANCH PT.
`
`MERGE Pt
`
`F—ø H
`
`
`
`-
`
`-----
`
`-o
`
`--
`
`rw: a
`
`Bradium Exhibit 2047
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 7, 2002
`
`US 2002/0014979 Al
`
`I]
`
`Bradium Exhibit 2047
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`US 2002/0014979 Al
`
`Feb. 7, 2002
`
`METHOD FOR OBTAINING PRECISION ROAD
`MAPS
`
`REFERENCE TO PROVISIONAL APPLICATION
`
`[0001] This application claims the benefit of prior filed
`copending provisional application Ser. No. 60/178,199, filed
`on Jan. 26, 2000, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e).
`
`BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`[0002] The invention relates to digital road maps and,
`more particularly, to a method for producing highly precise
`digital road maps for use with vehicle applications.
`
`[0003] The current generation of digital maps all use the
`so-called "segment and node" approach, wherein every road
`segment begins and ends at a node. Many attributes of the
`road can only be changed at the nodes, and all intersections
`are described as nodes. The nodes represent a physical
`reality, in other words, the place at which something in the
`road network actually changes. For example, nodes may be
`start points and end points of a bridge, while the segment is
`the actual distance traversed by the bridge. Current digital
`maps of this type are commercially available from compa-
`nies such as Navtech, TeleAtlas and ETAK.
`
`[0004]
`In real-life, however, roads themselves do not
`intersect at points. The center lines of the vehicle lanes in a
`road may intersect at a point, but using many nodes per
`intersection is inconsistent with current models, as well as
`being very complex.
`
`[0005] There is therefore needed a highly precise digital
`road map and method of producing same which can provide
`precise details of the lane positions and other attributes.
`Such highly precise road maps are necessary for the next
`generation of applications of these maps within the vehicle,
`such as control systems for the vehicle based on the maps.
`
`[0006] The present invention meets these needs by pro-
`viding digital maps produced by representing the road and
`lane network as a set of geometric shapes (such as lanes) that
`are associated with traditional nodes and segments for
`indexing purposes only. In this representation, the nodes and
`segments have no physical meaning with respect to the map.
`
`[0007] According to the present invention, the map rep-
`resentation uses segments and nodes merely as indexes into
`a more complex structure. Advantageously, branch and
`merge points of the road network are defined not by a
`physical structure but by the divergence of actual, statistical
`paths of vehicles. In this regard, Applicants advantageously
`define a path (segment) as the root of a group of people, all
`traveling from point A to point B, where point B is indicated
`not by a defined physical location, but rather by the driver's
`thought processes with respect to operation of the vehicle. In
`this manner, the respective points such as point B are
`reflected by the driver's driving behavior as measured via
`the driving dynamics and the vehicle location relative to
`fixed landmarks.
`
`[0008] Other objects, advantages and novel features of the
`present invention will become apparent from the following
`detailed description of the invention when considered in
`conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
`[0009] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the branch and
`merge points according to the present invention in conjunc-
`tion with a road intersection.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
`
`[0010]
`It is recognized that driving consists of several
`activities. At the highest level, a driver is involved in the
`route planning, while at some intermediate level the driver
`may adjust the vehicle speed to avoid other vehicles or to
`open or fill a gap in the traffic flow. In view of this, geometry
`refinement algorithms rely on the fact that at a lower level,
`drivers are conducting very basic tasks, such as lane fol-
`lowing or turning from one road to another in an intersec-
`tion. These tasks are generally independent of the environ-
`ment, i.e., the presence of other vehicles. It can therefore
`generally be hypothesized that all people are trying to follow
`a fixed, imaginary line on the road to within a personal
`tolerance when trying to follow a vehicle lane. This fixed,
`imaginary line can therefore be defined as the ideal path.
`Even when a driver is turning a corner, there is some ideal
`path that represents a transition from a given lane on a given
`road, to a given lane on another road.
`[0011]
`In general, a driver always faces the low level
`problem of getting from point A to point B, where B is only
`a few tens of meters ahead. There are many drivers who pass
`through point A, e.g., the center of a lane, and want to get
`to point B, e.g., the lane center 40 meters down the road.
`These drivers can all be hypothesized to be following the
`same ideal path. The geometry refinement algorithms there-
`fore attempt to find that same ideal path by statistically
`combining the paths of all drivers going from point A to
`point B.
`[0012] With this approach according to the invention, the
`geometry refinement problem becomes one of identifying all
`drivers going from point A to point B, versus those going
`from, say, point A to point C. Once this is done, a common
`statistical algorithm can be used. The following map
`description is designed to reflect this approach.
`[0013] As an example of this referring to FIG. 1, assume
`two drivers H and F are driving down a long road approach-
`ing an intersection where H will go straight, and F will turn
`left. When they are 1,000 meters from the intersection, both
`H and F are focused on getting to the center of the lane,
`perhaps 40 meters ahead. At some point, however, their tasks
`diverge. Fl is still concentrating on a point 40 meters ahead,
`but F is working on getting onto the intersecting road. At this
`point their two paths have diverged, at what is called a
`branch point, and they should no longer be combined for
`geometry refinement. Conversely, after passing through the
`intersection, F's task, and current position will be identical
`with another driver E who had passed straight through the
`intersection in the opposite way. This therefore becomes a
`merge point and the paths can now be combined.
`[0014]
`[here are, however, some driving tasks that do not
`lend themselves to groupings. The task of changing lanes
`can occur at any point along a road. If A is the starting place
`(the center of lane 1) and B the destination (the center of lane
`2, 30 meters down the road) there will be very few drivers
`with the same A to B task, each driver will have a different
`A or B. The geometry refinement task excludes these unique
`
`Bradium Exhibit 2047
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`US 2002/0014979 Al
`
`Feb. 7, 2002
`
`2
`
`tasks, and merely notes that a lane change is possible in the
`approximate area of the observed lane exchange.
`
`In order to simplify the geometry representation
`[0015]
`task, less accurate digital maps, such as those provided by
`Navtech, are used for identifiers and network information.
`All paths are referenced by the Navtech segment ID's. The
`Navtech utilities thus provide a method for quickly identi-
`fying paths in a given area, and for doing high level routing.
`However, beyond a fairly rough index into the refined path
`geometry (based on segment and node ID's), the Navtech
`map is not used as a reference.
`In order to subdivide paths into reasonable seg-
`[0016]
`ments, paths are cut arbitrarily at their point of closest
`approach to a Navtech node. In addition, there are many
`paths that exist only within an intersection (e.g. turning
`paths) that may be associated with a Navtech node, and not
`with a Navtech segment. The assignment of paths to seg-
`ments or nodes is somewhat arbitrary. While branch and
`merge points do not necessarily have any connection with a
`Navtech node, each branch and merge point according to the
`invention is associated with a nearby node that contains
`structures for determining branching probabilities. There-
`fore, when modeling the complete path network in an area,
`all nearby segments and nodes must be queried for relevant
`information. This approach, of using as little of the Navtech
`map information as possible, advantageously dc-couples the
`refined map database from any existing geometry errors in
`the Navtech database.
`[0017] Maps of this type using branch and merge points
`that are associated with traditional nodes and segments for
`indexing purposes only will enable many new vehicle safety
`and convenience applications over the next 20 years.
`
`[0018] The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely
`to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting.
`Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorpo-
`rating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to
`persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed
`to include everything within the scope of the appended
`claims and equivalents thereof.
`
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method for producing a precision digital road map for
`vehicle applications, the method comprising the acts of:
`
`obtaining a conventional digital map having traditional
`segments and nodes; and
`
`representing a road network of the precision digital road
`map as a set of geometric shapes indexed to the
`traditional segments and nodes.
`2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the act of
`representing comprises the act of identifying branch and
`merge points of the road network by divergences and
`convergences, respectively, from ideal paths of vehicles.
`3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the ideals
`paths are obtained by statistically combining the actual paths
`of vehicles traveling between the same points.
`4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the act of
`statistically combining uses a geometry refinement algo-
`rithm.
`5. The method according to claim 3, wherein each iden-
`tified branch and merge point is associated with a nearby one
`of the traditional nodes of the conventional digital map
`containing attribute information.
`6. The method according to claim 2, wherein an ideal path
`is defined as a root of a group of drivers, all traveling
`between point one and point two, where point two represents
`a driver's perceived destination while driving.
`7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the geomet-
`ric shapes comprise road lanes traveled by the vehicles.
`8. A precision digital road map, comprising:
`a road network represented as a set of geometric shapes
`indexed to traditional segments and nodes of a conven-
`tional digital map;
`
`wherein branch and merge points of the road network are
`identified by divergences and convergences, respec-
`tively, from ideal paths of vehicles, said ideal paths
`being statistical combinations of actual paths of
`vehicles traveling between the same points.
`9. The precision digital road map according to claim 8,
`wherein each identified branch and merge point is associated
`with a nearby one of the traditional nodes of the conven-
`tional digital map containing attribute information.
`10. The precision digital road map according to claim 8,
`wherein an ideal path is defined as a root of a group of
`drivers, all traveling between point one and point two, where
`point two represents a driver's perceived destination while
`driving.
`11. The precision digital road map according to claim 8,
`wherein the geometric shapes comprise road lanes traveled
`by the vehicles.
`
`Bradium Exhibit 2047
`Unified Patents Inc. v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`IPR2018-00952
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket