throbber
Br. J. clin. Pharmac. (1983), 16,271-280
`
`EFFECTS OF TOBACCO SMOKING AND ORAL
`CONTRACEPTIVE USE ON THEOPHYLLINE DISPOSITION
`
`M.J. GARDNER, K.M. TORNATORE & W.J. JUSKO
`Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, State University of New York at Buffalo,
`New York 14260, USA
`R. KANARKOWSKI
`Department of Biopharmaceutics, Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Faculty of Pharmacy,
`Bydgoszcz, Poland
`
`1 The independent as well as interactive effects of chronic (> 6 months) oral contraceptive (OC) use
`and cigarette smoking on single-dose (4 mg/kg) theophylline disposition were assessed in 49 young,
`healthy women.
`Significant elevations (40%) in theophylline plasma clearance were found in women who smoked.
`2
`OC use resulted in decreases in clearance of a similar magnitude (28%). These factors do not appear
`to interact with respect to theophylline disposition. The combination of main effects tended to cancel
`one another (clearance of49.1 ml h-I kg-'ideal body weight for OC non-user, non-smoker, vs 49.7 ml
`h-' kg-'for OC user-smoker).
`Single dose exposure to OC in non-users did not significantly alter theophylline pharmacokinetics
`3
`for the group as a whole. However, in the subgroup of smoking subjects, significant decreases in
`clearance were evident (P < 0.05). Analogous results were found for half-life. Volume of distribution
`was slightly diminished in smokers, but was unaffected in OC users.
`Areas under the serum concentration-time (AUC) profiles of norgestrel and ethinyloestradiol
`4
`were examined in 27 women as indices of OC exposure. The smallest values of theophylline clearance
`were found in the subjects with largest AUC of both OC steroids.
`Appropriate statistical analyses of data which are influenced by multiple factors are discussed.
`5
`Special concern is needed when the factor partitioning process yields subgroups of unequal sizes.
`Keywords smoking theophylline
`oral contraceptives
`
`Introduction
`
`Oral contraceptives (OC) are likely to alter drug dis-
`position and clinical effects because of their frequent
`and protracted use and known capability to affect
`biotransformation rates. Many oxidative pathways
`such as for antipyrine (Carter et al., 1974; Teunissen
`et al., 1982), and theophylline (Tornatore et al., 1982)
`and reductive processes such as for nitrazepam
`(Jochemsen et al., 1982) exhibit decreased metabo-
`lism rates. On the other hand, the conjugation of
`lorazepam and oxazepam is increased in OC users
`(Patwardhan et al., 1981).
`Another ubiquitous source of altered drug elimina-
`tion is tobacco smoking which seems to cause selec-
`tive enzyme induction and increased biotransforma-
`tion rates of some drugs (Jusko, 1978). Marked
`increases in theophylline clearances are exhibited in
`some smokers (Jusko et al., 1978).
`
`The dual effects of smoking and oral contraceptive
`use are of special interest. The combined use of
`tobacco and OC is now well recognized as contribu-
`tary to increased risk of cardiovascular disease and
`mortality (Beral & Kay, 1977; Stadel, 1981). The
`nature of any combined effects of these factors on
`hepatic function and drug metabolism has not been
`elucidated.
`Theophylline has a low therapeutic index and is
`subject to extensive hepatic metabolism (Cornish &
`Christman, 1957), the rate of which is sensitive
`to numerous drug/disease/physiologic/environmental
`factors (Jusko et al., 1979). With OC and tobacco use
`causing opposite effects on theophylline clearances in
`man, it is of clinical and pharmacological interest to
`examine the net effects of these factors. Another
`purpose of this report is to consider the appropriate
`
`271
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`272
`
`M.J. GARDNER ETAL.
`
`statistical methods used in assessing the influences of
`both independent and interactive factors on drug dis-
`position.
`
`Methods
`
`Subjects
`
`The data collected from 49 young, healthy women
`who had been studied at the Millard Fillmore Hos-
`pital of Buffalo were employed in this analysis. A
`portion of these data (22 subjects) was extracted from
`a data base constructed between 1975-1979 whereas
`the remainder was collected subsequently through
`1981. These were essentially part of continuous studies
`of factors affecting theophylline disposition in man
`and identical drug, clinical, record, assay, and phar-
`macokinetic procedures were involved. Protocols
`were approved by university and hospital Human
`Investigation Committees and all subjects provided
`informed consent in participating.
`The ages of the subjects ranged from 19 to 30 years.
`None of the women examined were considered to be
`obese (i.e., total body weight did not exceed esti-
`mated ideal body weight (Diem & Lentner, 1970) by
`more than 15%), abusers of alcohol, excessively
`habituated to caffeine, or suffering from any under-
`lying hepatic/renal disease. Sixteen of the subjects
`admitted to smoking marihuana in the months prior
`to participation. In such instances, however, the
`amount of the substance smoked did not exceed that
`normally associated with social use (i.e., less than one
`joint per week). Twenty-two subjects used OC on a
`chronic basis (i.e., longer than 6 months). Of these,
`14 were using Ovral (Wyeth Laboratories: 0.05 mg of
`ethinyloestradiol/0.50 mg norgestrel) at the time
`of study, while two were using Ovulen (Searle Co.:
`0.10 mg mestranol/1.0 mg ethynodiol diacetate). Six
`subjects in the former group had been taking this
`product routinely, whereas eight were using various
`other commercially available combinations and
`switched to Ovral only for the monthly cycle prior to
`study. Information concerning the OC type used by
`the remaining six subjects was not available.
`Twenty-seven subjects used tobacco daily. The
`average daily use exceeded 20 cigarettes per day,
`while the duration of use spanned a period in excess
`of 7 years.
`Table 1 presents the demographic data for the sub-
`jects considered. The group has been partitioned into
`four disjoint subgroups based upon tobacco and OC
`use.
`
`Posology and assays
`
`Subjects were requested to fast overnight prior to
`participation in the investigation. In addition, all
`
`xanthine containing foods/beverages were deleted
`from their normal diets both during the study day and
`for the 24 h period preceding examination. In the
`morning of the study day, theophylline was adminis-
`tered orally as an aqueous solution of its ethylene-
`diamine salt, aminophylline. A weight adjusted dose
`(4 mg'kg) of this salt was placed in 200 ml of orange
`juice, which was then consumed by the subject.
`Venous blood samples (7 ml) were serially collected
`from an indwelling catheter at times: 0 (just before
`administration of the drug), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 and
`23 h after the dose was given. The patency of this
`catheter was maintained using a 20 unit/ml solution of
`heparin in normal saline. When slight deviations from
`this sampling protocol occurred, such sampling times
`provided for adequate estimations of both area under
`the serum concentration versus time profile and the
`slope of the terminal disposition phase. The samples
`were allowed to clot and then were centrifuged.
`Serum was harvested and frozen pending analysis via
`high performance liquid chromatography (Jusko &
`Poliszczuk, 1976). For 27 subjects, a single Ovral
`tablet was ingested 60 min before the test dose of
`aminophylline. For 11 of these women who were
`using OC as a method of birth control, this tablet was
`their routine daily intake of contraceptive steroids.
`For the remaining 16, such treatment represented
`single dose exposure. In these cases, two additional
`blood samples were collected, corresponding to the
`zero time with respect to OC administration and 0.5 h
`post-administration. For these 27 subjects, all serum
`samples were assayed for both ethinyloestradiol and
`norgestrel (Cook et al., 1974; Stanczyk et al., 1975).
`Appropriate time corrections were implemented
`where necessary. Contraceptive steroid serum con-
`centrations were not measured for the remaining 22
`subjects.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Area under the serum concentration vs time curve
`(AUC) was estimated either by numerical inte-
`gration using the trapezoidal rule or via mathematical
`integration of fitted interpolating polynomials (Yeh
`& Kwan, 1978) in combination with log-trapezoidal
`approximation. Both approaches provided for inclu-
`sion of the terminal area extrapolated to infinite time.
`Plasma clearance was obtained from the relationship,
`CL = Dose/AUC. Since it has been shown that theo-
`phylline in solution is completely absorbed from the
`gastrointestinal tract following oral administration
`(Hendeles et al., 1977), bioavailability was assumed
`to be unity. Clearance was normalized for both total
`body weight (TBW) and ideal body weight (IBW),
`the latter estimated from body frame size and height
`(Diem & Lentner, 1970). The slope of the post-
`absorptive decline of serum concentrations (A) was
`obtained via log-linear least-squares regression analy-
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`SMOKING AND OC STEROIDS AFFECT THEOPHYLLINE CLEARANCE
`
`273
`
`Table I
`
`Characteristics of subjects
`
`Characteristics
`
`Group:
`
`Non-smokers
`I
`Non-users
`
`II
`OC users
`
`Smokers
`
`III
`Non-users
`
`IV
`OC users
`
`15
`19-30
`24.1
`(3.3)
`59.9
`(7.9)
`0
`
`1.2
`(0.4)
`7.5
`(3.6;15)
`0.47
`0.93
`4.8
`(2.4)
`0.49
`(O. 19;15)
`14.1
`(6.0;14)
`20.7
`(7.5;15)
`58.7
`(15.6;15)
`
`12
`21-29
`24.7
`(2.5)
`55.7
`(6.9)
`6.8
`(2.8;3)
`1.1
`(0.4)
`5.9
`(3.2;10)
`0.50
`0.92
`2.0
`(0.1)
`0.45
`(0. 18;11)
`11.9
`(9.4;8)
`23.3
`(9.8;11)
`50.3
`(12.2;11)
`
`10
`19-28
`24.2
`(2.6)
`59.3
`(8.2)
`4.5
`(2.5;8)
`
`0 0
`
`0.20
`1.0
`2.1
`(1.3)
`0.42
`(0.23;10)
`19.0
`(9.3;9)
`21.6
`(12.9;10)
`47.7
`(15.0;10)
`
`Number of subjects
`Age range (years)
`Mean age (years)
`(s.d.)a
`Total body weight (kg)
`(s.d)
`Duration of OC use (years)
`(s.d. ;n)b
`Tobacco use (pk day)
`(s.d.)
`Duration of tobacco use (years)
`(s.d. ;n)
`Marihuana usec
`Alcohol usec
`Caffeine used
`(s.d.)
`Bilirubin (0.1-1.1 mg%)e
`(s.d. ;n)
`SGPT (0-43 u,l)e
`(s.d. ;n)
`SGOT (11-46 u,I)e
`(s.d. ;n)
`Alkaline phosphatase (34-133 ul)e
`(s.d. ;n)
`a Standard deviation
`b Standard deviation; number of subjects
`c Coded as 0 = none, 1 = social, 2 = daily use
`d Number of cups of coffee or tea per day
`e Normal range in parentheses
`
`12
`22-28
`24.4
`(2.3)
`54.5
`(4.7)
`
`0 0 0
`
`0.17
`1.0
`2.0
`(1.8)
`0.71
`(0.20;12)
`17.8
`(7.3;12)
`18.3
`(5.6;12)
`53.7
`(16.7;12)
`
`sis. The apparent volume of distribution (VD) was
`then generated as VD = CLA and subsequently
`normalized for TBW.
`
`Statistics
`
`The disparate backgrounds of the subjects with re-
`spect to factors known to affect theophylline disposi-
`tion such as caffeine (Mitoma et al., 1969) and
`marihuana (Jusko et al., 1978) precluded a direct
`assessment of OC and smoking effects on theophyl-
`line disposition via a two-way analysis of variance. An
`additional factor lacking adequate control was re-
`lated to the fact that 16 of the subjects examined were
`not chronic users of OC, yet were exposed to a single
`OC dose shortly before aminophylline administra-
`tion. Consequently, a four-way analysis of covariance
`was deemed the most appropriate statistical approach
`to pursue. The main effects were defined as cigarette
`smoking, OC use, marihuana use, and acute ex-
`
`posure to contraceptive steroids. Daily caffeine
`intake served as the covariate. This method of analysis
`was chosen over a two factor approach (cigarettes and
`OC) with a more stringent subject selection process,
`since the technique of subject matching is not always
`optimal and often results in a dramatic reduction in
`the number of data available for consideration
`(McKinlay, 1977). In addition, confirmation of
`various factor effects on theophylline disposition
`tends to enhance the credibility of the particular an-
`alysis conducted.
`Since the four-factor partitioning process resulted
`in subgroups of unequal sizes, the main effects were
`rendered dependent upon one another. As a conse-
`quence, additivity of individually determined sums of
`squares did not hold. This necessitated pursuing a
`hierarchial approach, whereby all main effects were
`assigned status values relative to one another. With
`this form of analysis, sums of squares were adjusted
`only for factors possessing higher priorities, those
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`sidered are presented in Figure 1. In each instance,
`absorption is rapid, peak concentrations being attained
`within 2 h following administration of the dose. Post-
`absorptive declines of serum concentration reflected
`apparent first order processes.
`
`Non-smoker
`Non-OC user O
`OC user o
`1
`
`Smoker
`8
`
`10 _
`
`5
`
`2X
`0
`
`0.2
`
`E 0
`
`.
`
`5
`
`0.11
`0
`
`III
`10
`15
`25
`20
`Time (h)
`Figure 1
`Representative serum concentration vs time
`profiles of theophylline for subjects in each of the four
`groups examined. The symbols are defined in the key.
`Solid lines are the results of least-squares fittings of data
`in terminal phases.
`
`The results of the statistical analysis, conducted
`with theophylline plasma clearance normalized for
`IBW as the dependent variable, are exhibited in
`Table 3. The same type of analysis, performed with
`clearance values adjusted for TBW, resulted in quali-
`tatively similar conclusions (i.e., the rank order of
`significant main effects was maintained but the levels
`of significance were found to be somewhat lower). As
`indicated in Table 3, cigarette smoking, chronic OC
`ingestion, and daily caffeine intake all significantly
`alter theophylline clearing processes in the subjects
`examined. On the other hand, the social use of canna-
`bis and acute exposure to contraceptive steroids both
`failed to induce remarkable changes in this para-
`meter. The latter finding suggests.,at aktheclearance
`data presented for smoking and nonsmoking groups
`of non-OC users (groups 1 and 3) have not been
`rendered misrepresentative as a consequence of the
`data blending process.
`Figure 2 illustrates the effects that cigarette
`smoking and OC use have upon theophylline clear-
`
`274
`
`M.J. GARDNER ETAL.
`
`with lower statuses having no effect (Overall &
`Spiegel, 1969). Cigarette smoking was given the
`highest priority due to its well documented effect on
`theophylline disposition (Hunt et al., 1976; Grygiel &
`Birkett, 1981). This was followed by daily caffeine
`intake, OC use, use of cannabis, and acute exposure
`to contraceptive steroids. This ordering of main
`effects reflects our suspicions with regard to the abili-
`ties of these factors to alter theophylline disposition.
`Although the net effect of acute contraceptive steroid
`exposure was unknown, its effect, if any, was not
`anticipated to be as dramatic as those induced by the
`other factors, and consequently was assigned the
`lowest priority. The covariate, caffeine use, was
`introduced into the analysis at the second stage. This
`provided for the removal of extraneous caffeine re-
`lated influences prior to making assessments regard-
`ing the contributions of OC use, marihuana smoking,
`and acute exposure to OC. Such an ordering did
`permit caffeine effects to confound the analysis of
`tobacco related influences. It was felt, however, that
`tobacco effects would be considerably stronger than
`those of caffeine and hence any contamination of this
`nature would be minimal. Generally, it is desirable to
`feather out any covariate influences prior to assess-
`ment of all main effects. However, interchanging the
`positions of tobacco use and caffeine intake in the
`analysis could result in an exaggerated estimate of
`caffeine effect, since it would be entered into the
`analysis first and was shown to be significantly cor-
`related with the magnitude of the subject's tobacco
`habit.
`All two-way interactions were evaluated. Each re-
`spective sum of squares was corrected for the in-
`fluences of all main effects and all other two-way
`interactions. The question regarding higher order in-
`teractions was not addressed.
`Since a pre-written digital computer program
`capable of performing the type of analysis desired was
`unavailable,
`appropriate sums of squares were
`generated following the fitting of coded data to
`various linear regression models (Kim & Kohout,
`1975).
`This approach to data analysis was employed in
`order to assess the effects of these factors on theo-
`phylline clearance, volume of distribution, and half-
`life (tJ2).
`Least-squares fitting of serum concentration-time
`data was conducted employing conventional log-
`linear regression theory (Yeh & Kwan, 1978). All
`other bivariate regression analyses were performed
`recognizing the fact that both variables involved were
`subject to random error (Riggs et al., 1978).
`
`Results
`Serum concentration vs time profiles for individual
`subjects representing each of the four groups con-
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`SMOKING AND OC STEROIDS AFFECT THEOPHYLLINE CLEARANCE
`
`275
`
`Table 2 Summary of theophylline pharmacokinetics in smoking and non-smoking
`female subjects who were users/non-users of oral contraceptives
`
`Parameter
`(s.d.)
`
`Grc
`oup:
`
`Non-smokers
`I
`Non-users
`
`II
`OC users
`
`Smokers
`
`III
`Non-users
`
`IV
`OC users
`
`9.57
`(1.34)
`0.55
`(0.13)
`39.4
`(10. 1)
`37.2
`(11.8)
`
`5.13
`(1.09)
`0.51
`(0.06)
`74.3
`(17.6)
`68.7
`(17.8)
`
`6.22
`(1.53)
`0.46
`(0.10)
`49.7
`(22.3)
`54.0
`(21.8)
`
`vations were confirmed statistically. In addition,
`visual inspection of the data in this figure suggests that
`perhaps a slight interactive effect occurs between
`cigarette smoking and OC use. The average clearance
`of group 4 (smokers, OC users) approaches control
`values (49.7 ml/h/kg IBW vs 49.1 ml/h/kg IBW) in
`spite of the apparent differences in the magnitudes of
`the individual main effects. However, when the
`underlying effects of caffeine and other factors were
`removed, this interaction was shown not to attain
`statistical significance (P > 0.3). This suggestion of
`
`0 S 00
`
`0
`
`a U *
`
`.a
`
`U U
`
`U
`
`U U
`
`000
`
`000
`
`0 00
`
`0 0
`
`0 0 o
`
`n
`
`0
`
`b
`
`_
`
`t112 (h)
`VD (I/kg TBWa)
`CL (ml h-' kg- IBWb)
`
`7.76
`(2.39)
`0.55
`(0.09)
`49.1
`(14.3)
`51.0
`(12.7)
`a Normalized for total body weight
`b Normalized for ideal body weight
`
`CL (ml h-' kg-' TBWa)
`
`ance in the entire group of subjects. These data have
`been normalized for both TBW and IBW and are
`slightly contaminated by the disparate use of caffeine.
`Regardless of the normalization approach, the data
`suggest that OC use exerts a significant inhibitory
`effect on theophylline clearance, whereas cigarette
`smoke exposure markedly enhances theophylline's
`hepatic metabolism. The effect of tobacco use
`appears. to be more pronounced than that of OC
`exposure when clearance values are normalized for
`IBW vs TBW. As indicated previously, these obser-
`a120r
`
`0
`
`0
`-A0-
`0
`
`0
`
`a
`
`an
`
`U U
`
`I U1
`
`mu
`
`U
`
`o
`
`00
`
`0
`
`0
`
`00 0
`
`OC
`00
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60 -
`
`40 -
`
`20-
`
`CD
`
`_
`
`- 0
`
`c
`)
`C.)
`a
`
`0.
`
`c 0-
`
`c
`I-
`
`olI
`OC: NU
`Smoking:
`S
`NS
`NS
`S
`Plasma clearances of theophylline in the four designated subject groups. Clearances were normalized for
`Figure 2
`a) total body weight and b) ideal body weight. Horizontal lines denote mean values for each group. U user, NU
`non-user, S smoker and NS non-smoker.
`
`U
`
`NU
`
`I
`U
`
`I
`
`NU
`
`I
`U
`
`NU
`
`I
`U
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`0 0 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`ocgOCP0
`t~~~
`*
`-
`0~~~~~~~~00
`:S
`oa
`es
`
`0
`
`0
`
`NU
`
`U
`
`NU
`
`U
`
`NS
`
`S
`
`276
`
`M.J. GARDNER ETAL.
`
`14r
`
`121-
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`_)
`1-
`
`I
`
`0
`
`I
`
`U
`
`0
`
`8
`
`0
`
`a
`
`*
`
`*
`*
`
`0
`
`0 o
`
`u 0%
`
`0
`
`0,
`
`0
`
`.0
`
`in
`4-
`
`._
`
`1.0r
`
`0.81-
`
`0.61
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`I
`OC: NU
`Smoking:
`
`U
`
`NS
`
`I
`
`NU
`
`S
`
`Figure 3 Volume of distribution and half-life of theophylline in the four subject groups. Horizontal lines denote
`mean values. U user, NU non-user, S smoker and NS non-smoker.
`
`potential interaction is not as evident when normal-
`ization is conducted using TBW. In this case, the
`main effects of OC and tobacco use are significant but
`appear to be simply additive.
`The apparent volume of distribution of theophyl-
`line was unaffected by chronic OC exposure (Figure
`3). However, a small but significant reduction in this
`parameter was detected in the cigarette smoking
`group (P < 0.05). This was the only factor considered
`in the model which exerted such an effect on the
`distributional space. Figure 3 also presents the effect
`of these two main factors on theophylline half-life.
`As with plasma clearance, both cigarette smoking
`(shorter t112) and OC (longer t%) effects were deter-
`mined to be significant. The effect induced by
`cigarette use on t12 is the combined result of both
`increased clearance and reduction of distribution
`volume, whereas the OC effect is primarily mediated
`via inhibition of theophylline elimination. In parallel
`with the results of the clearance data analysis, both
`caffeine intake and the interaction between cigarettes
`and acute exposure to OC were shown to have signifi-
`cant effects. A summary of the pharmacokinetic
`parameters for each group is contained in Table 2.
`The effects of OC components on theophylline
`clearance is displayed in an exposure-response format
`in Figure 4. Areas under the serum concentration-
`time profiles were employed as indices of OC ex-
`posure. The smallest values of theophylline clearance
`were noted in the subjects with largest AUC of both
`norgestrel and ethinylestradiol.
`
`Discussion
`
`The present investigation assessed the independent
`effects of daily OC ingestion and cigarette smoking as
`well as the potential interactive effect of these and
`other factors on theophylline disposition in young
`women. Both cigarette smoke exposure and daily OC
`intake significantly alter theophylline disposition. In
`particular, tobacco use enhances the metabolism of
`theophylline, while chronic OC exposure inhibits the
`clearance of this bronchodilator. Together, the two
`factors offset each other.
`
`Primary smoking and OC effects
`
`The marked enhancement of theophylline clearance
`associated with cigarette use confirms the original
`findings of Jenne et al. (1975) and Hunt and co-
`workers (1976). Although this increase in metabolic
`activity is evident regardless of the normalization
`approach taken (IBW vs TBW), Gal and associates
`(1978) found the use of the subject's IBW more
`appropriate. Examination of the clearance data
`revealed that an increase of roughly 40% was
`characteristic of the cigarette smoking group. These
`values are in reasonable agreement with those pre-
`viously reported from this laboratory (Jusko et al.,
`1978), although we now have more selective inclusion
`of subjects as the original report did not control OC
`and caffeine use. Increases in CL are likely due to the
`inductive effects of cigarette smoke components such
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`SMOKING AND OC STEROIDS AFFECT THEOPHYLLINE CLEARANCE
`
`277
`
`Table 3 Summary of statistical analysis conducted to assess the effects of various factors on theophyl-
`line plasma clearance normalized for IBW
`
`Source of variation
`
`Sum of
`squares
`
`d.f
`
`Mean
`square
`
`Covariates
`Caffeine (Caf)
`1408.62
`7303.88
`Main effects
`Cigarettes (65.2;44.7)b
`5129.13
`OC use (47.3;63.1)
`1909.96
`Marijuana use (MJ)
`186.02
`Acute exposure (AE)
`78.77
`3569.47
`Two-way interactions
`0.26
`Cig-Caf
`Cig-OC
`152.28
`20.30
`Cig-MJ
`2305.26
`Cig-AE (59.8;53.4)
`10.36
`Caf-OC
`Caf-MJ
`51.77
`389.72
`Caf-AE
`199.40
`OC-MJ
`67.23
`MJ-AE
`12281.96
`Explained
`7038.09
`Residual
`19320.05
`Total
`a Given as P-value for F-distribution with appropnate degrees of freedom
`b (Average CL for group indicated; average CL for complementary group)
`cP>0.05
`
`1408.62
`1825.97
`5129.13
`1909.96
`186.02
`78.77
`396.61
`0.26
`152.28
`20.30
`2305.26
`10.36
`51.77
`389.72
`199.40
`67.23
`877.28
`207.00
`
`1
`4
`1
`1
`1
`1
`9
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`14
`34
`
`F
`
`6.80
`8.82
`24.78
`9.23
`0.90
`0.38
`1.92
`0.01
`0.74
`0.10
`11.14
`0.05
`0.25
`1.88
`0.96
`0.33
`4.24
`
`Significance
`ofP
`
`0.013
`< 0.001
`< 0.001
`< 0.005
`NSC
`NS
`0.082
`NS
`NS
`NS
`0.002
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`NS
`< 0.001
`
`as the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on distinct
`forms of cytochrome P-450 (Jusko, 1978).
`Daily OC exposure was shown to markedly inhibit
`the clearing processes responsible for theophylline
`removal from plasma, although the magnitude of this
`effect was not as striking as that elicited by the use of
`tobacco. Subjects employing this form of birth con-
`trol were shown to have clearance values which aver-
`aged approximately 28% below those exhibited by
`non-OC users. This difference is similar to that
`reported previously in a subgroup of non-smoking
`(Tornatore
`1982).
`normal
`volunteers
`al.,
`et
`Patwardhan and associates (1980) presented results
`which indicate that similar metabolic inhibition
`occurs following the single-dose administration of
`caffeine which is generally sensitive to the same
`affecting theophylline
`factors
`disposition.
`Daily
`exposure to OC for periods longer than 6 months in
`nonsmoking subjects resulted in a 40% reduction in
`caffeine plasma clearance. Also, examination of
`blood concentration data obtained from women using
`OC have led others to note concomitant elevations in
`plasma concentrations of caffeine and ethinylestra-
`diol (Ahluwalia et al., 1977; Kaul et al., 1981). Since
`theophylline is almost exclusively eliminated via
`hepatic biotransformation pathways, it is reasonable
`to conclude that such inhibitory behavior reflects
`either specific competition for metabolic sites or
`
`generalized depression of hepatic function secondary
`to contraceptive steroid exposure. The primary re-
`sults of the present analysis should be considered
`qualitative in nature, and the numerical values
`presented should serve only as an approximation of
`the magnitude of any metabolic perturbations which
`might occur during chronic dosing of patients with
`theophylline.
`Crawford and co-workers (1981) reported that
`cigarette smoking had no effect on plasma concentra-
`tions of either ethinyloestradiol or norgestrel when
`compared to nonsmoking subjects. Similar observa-
`tions have been made in our laboratory with respect
`to the plasma clearances of these compounds (to be
`published). The results of the present investigation as
`well as those of others have shown that the primary
`metabolic pathways responsible for theophylline
`degradation are very sensitive to such exposure, thus
`suggesting minimal overlap of metabolic mechanisms
`or pathways. The observation that acute exposure to
`OC agents apparently has no significant effect on
`theophylline clearance may partly support this con-
`tention. However, the possibility does exist that a
`competitive effect occurs, but that single dose
`exposure to these agents does not produce sufficient
`concentrations in the milieu of the metabolic sites to
`elicit a discernible effect.
`The most likely explanation for this inhibitory
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`278
`
`M.J. GARDNER ETAL.
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`s 20-0
`
`0
`
`00
`
`*
`0'm
`z
`
`a
`
`r-
`
`*
`
`\
`
`°0
`
`\

`
`0
`
`*
`
`-19
`
`c
`
`<1> 100 -
`('
`100
`5
`O
`
`80
`
`40 -
`
`20
`
`0.o2
`0.5
`5
`2
`Total norgestrel AUC x 10-2 (ng ml' h)
`
`,
`
`.,
`
`1
`
`10
`
`*
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`*
`*
`
`0
`
`* \XX
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`00
`
`60
`
`0
`\
`
`0
`
`20
`
`o 0
`0.5
`5
`2
`1
`Total ethinyloestradiol AUC x 10-3 (pg mi-' h)
`Figure 4
`Relationships between theophylline clear-
`ance and the areas under the curves (AUC) for nor-
`gestrel and ethinyloestradiol for 26 women who received
`single or multiple doses of Ovral. A log transformation
`ofthe AUC data was performed in adherence to classical
`dose-response theory. Symbols are defined in Figure 1.
`Norgestrel results from one subject were excluded as
`Regression
`grossly
`misrepresentative.
`lines
`were
`generated
`employing
`an
`orthogonal
`least-squares
`approach. Significant negative correlations were found
`for both norgestrel (r = -0.53, P < 0.01) and ethinyl-
`oestradiol (r = -0.46, P < 0.02) exposure.
`
`phenomenon is that chronic exposure to these
`steroidal agents results in a reduction of the non-
`conjugative activities of the liver. This is strongly
`suggested by the numerous observations that contra-
`ceptive steroids are capable of markedly inhibiting
`oxidative pathways that are mediated through dis-
`tinct cytochromic apoproteins (i.e., antipyrine via
`cytochrome P450 and theophylline via P-448). More
`direct evidence in this regard has also been reported
`(MacKinnon and co-workers, 1977), as rats subjected
`to a 5 day exposure to ethinyloestradiol (5 mg kg-'
`day-'), exhibit a significant reduction in the activity of
`
`hepatic ethylmorphine N-demethylase and of cyto-
`chrome P-450, cytochrome b5, and NADPH cyto-
`chrome-c-reductase. The strong correlation between
`theophylline CL and AUC of the OC steroids supports
`this hypothesis.
`
`Secondary factors
`
`The social or occasional use of marihuana was shown
`not to significantly alter theophylline disposition.
`Jusko and co-workers (1978) had concluded that
`regular marihuana use results in an enhancement of
`theophylline metabolism. In this earlier instance, the
`marihuana users were subjects whose use of cannabis
`greatly exceeded that of current subjects. A more
`rigorous analysis of this phenomenon showed that
`occasional use of marihuana was not a primary factor
`influencing theophylline CL (Jusko et al., 1979) . In
`fact, the analysis suggested that the social use of
`marihuana results in a reduction of metabolic acti-
`vity. 'iThis finding, however, appeared as a low priority
`possibility in the statistical cascade of influential
`*factors. Minimal use of tobacco has also been re-
`ported not to affect theophylline clearance (Piafsky et
`al., 1977; Grygiel et al., 1979).
`The use of caffeine has been implicated in markedly
`altering theophylline clearing processes. Both en-
`hancement (Mitoma et al., 1969) and inhibition of
`theophylline metabolism (Monks et al., 1979) have
`been reported. In the subjects examined in the present
`investigation, it appears that a significant, but rather
`small enhancement of clearance occurred in caffeine
`users.
`The apparent volume of distribution of theophyl-
`line was unaffected by OC use in the subjects studied.
`Similar findings have been reported for caffeine
`vPatwardhan e al., 1980). However, a modest reduc-
`t.
`. * '
`.
`ton in VD was evident in the cigarette smoking group.
`This phenomenon was noted earlier (Hunt et al.,
`1976) but cannot be explained.
`A significant interaction between cigarette smoking
`and acute exposure to OC was noted. As previously
`discussed, it is possible that a portion of the inhibitory
`effect exhibited by these agents may be ascribable to
`competitive binding to metabolic sites, and hence
`could manifest itself acutely. Although such acute
`exposure was deemed insignificant when considered
`alone, a notable effect was present when super-
`imposed upon smoking. This finding is consistent
`with those of Conrad & Nyman (1980) who reported
`that the inhibitory effects of both propranolol and
`metoprolol are most pronounced in subjects whose
`theophylline plasma clearance values were initially
`elevated (i.e. in smokers). Qualitatively similar find-
`ings were presented by LaForce and co-workers
`(1981) who reported that subjects with the highest
`initial clearance rates of theophylline, tended to have
`the largest reductions in clearance subsequent to
`
`AMN1073
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`

`

`SMOKING AND OC STEROIDS AFFECT THEOPHYLLINE CLEARANCE
`
`279
`
`treatment with erythromycin ethylsuccinate. Carter
`and co-workers (1975) reported that only subjects
`with the shortest antipyrine half-lives exhibited signi-
`ficant increases in this parameter following a 3 month
`exposure to 2 mg norethindrone/0. 1 mg mestranol. In
`addition, it has been apparent that the enzyme induc-
`tive effects of smoking on disposition of several drugs
`does not occur in patients with cirrhosis (Farrell et al.,
`1978) or in the elderly whose metabolic capabilities
`are intrinsically low (Vestal et al., 1980). It thus
`appears that a higher degree of metabolic activity may
`be associated with greater sensitivity to metabolic
`inhibition.
`These findings suggest that perturbations in theo-
`phylline elimination may occur during pregnancy, a
`period when circulating concentrations of endo-
`genously produced gonadotropins are relatively high.
`Preliminary data do not appear to support this
`(Sutton et al., 1978). Presently,we are engaged in a
`more comprehensive examination of the effects of
`pregnancy on theophylline disposition. To date our
`results are in agreement with those of Sutten and
`co-workers (i.e., there is a trend towards a reduction
`in theophylline clearance during pregnancy albeit
`statistically insignificant).
`
`Statistical complexities
`
`Evaluation of data upon which multiple factors have
`exerted diverse effects is difficult. Such difficulty is
`compounded when partitioning of the study group by
`these factors results in disjoint subgroups of unequal
`sizes. Attempts are generally made to avoid such a
`situation by carefully matching experimental units
`with regard to extraneous factors known to

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket