throbber
Alcoholism, clinical and experimental res
`v. 2S, no. 5, suppl. (May 2002'
`DUP - GenN.al Collection
`W1 ·' l 30&R
`2002-05-21 0? · :~ ·~ :00
`
`PROPERTY O F THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`AMN1035
`IPR of Patent No. 7,919,499
`
`

`

`RSA ABSTRACTS
`
`752-767
`
`750
`
`COMBINING NALTREXONE AND MEMANTINE TO BLOCK THE
`REWARDING EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL AN EXPERIMENTAL PILOT
`STUDY IN HUMAN SUBJECTS
`cG SchOlz, C Mayer, G Koller, M Werntcke, R Gueorgweva, JH Krystal
`Bonn Untverstty, Stgmund-Freund Str 25. Bonn Germany Yale
`Untversrty, 34 Park Str New Haven CT
`
`The htgh pnonty for developmg new pharmacotherapy approaches to
`the treatment of alcoholism has not decreased With recent data
`tndtcating the lack of efftcacy of naltrexone treatment m alcohol
`dependent veterans (Krystal et at 2001) Supported by results from
`precltntcal work (HOlter et al 1990), we have been collectmg data on the
`capacity of naltrexone (unspectftc op101d antagontst). memantme (an
`uncompett\Jve NMOA receptor antagont~t), and the combtnatton to bloc.k
`the rewardtng effects of ethanol mtox1cattonm healthy human subjects
`Our expert mental study Is betng conducted m a double blmd, placebo
`controlled, cross-over fashion Subjects recetve 37 5 mg naltrexone or
`placebo before admtmstratton of 30 mgf70kg memantme or placebo
`Two hours later a total of 49gf70kg of alcoholts admJntstered tn a
`wtthtn-sesston cumula1Jve-dos1ng procedure Stunulatmg subjective
`effects are assessed tn several measurements, mcludmg the BAES
`(Btphastc Alcohol Effect Scale) Further assessments mclude
`cogn1t1vron (CPT, word recall) and coordmatton (one leg stand) Results
`are analyzed usmg generalized l1near m1xed models (SAS PROC
`MIXED, SAS PROC GENMOD). Our ptlot data m 8 healthy human
`subJects tndicate that memantine and naltrexone, by themselves.
`Influence the basal level of sttmulalton (naltrexone 1s mtldly sedatmg,
`memantine is mtldly sttmulating) Of greatest mterest. our data suggest
`that the combmat1on of memantme and naltrexone (but not etther drug
`alone) blocks the dose-related Stimulatory effects of ethanol Suntlarly,
`naltrexone blocks the memantme-poten!Jatton of dtscr1mmattve stm1Uius
`effects of ethanol (i e , blocks the abrltty of 1ncreastng doses of ethanol
`to be perceived as '"more ethanol like"") Together. these data suggest
`that naltrexone might be a cnttcal therapeuttc adjuvant 1f memant1ne or
`other related drugs are developed as pharmacotherapres for alcohol
`dependence Krystal JH et al NEJM 2001.345 1734-1739 Holter SM et
`al Eur J Pharamcol1996. 31 314-315
`
`751
`
`NALTREXONE AND ACAMPROSATE META-ANALYSIS OF TWO
`MEDICAL TREATMENTS FOR ALCOHOLISM
`J S Hopktns. J C Garbutt, C L. Poole. S L West, T S Carey
`Center for Alcohol Studies, Departments of Psychiatry and
`Eprdemtology, Unlverstty of North Carolma, Chapel Hrll, NC 27599
`
`A meta-analysrs was performed to assess the relattve effecttveness of
`naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcoholism Studies
`tdenttfted from the medical literature were collected and revtewed
`Databases searched for relevant studtes Included Medlin e. PSYCinfo,
`EM BASE, IPA, and CINAHL Outcomes common to the maJorrty of
`studtes were chosen for quantttattve analysts For the naltrexone
`stud1es, outcomes tncluded relapse to heavy dnnk1ng, relapse to any
`drmkmg, and percentage of dnnkmg days dur1ng the treatment penod
`For the acamprosate studtes, only relapse to any dnnkmg was
`assessed m all of the tnals summary rtsk differences for dtchotomous
`outcomes were calculated wtthm each group of stud1es Metol-
`regresston was performed to compare the two drugs dtrectly and to
`assess the influence of study charactensttcs on treatment effect
`B naltrewne studies (N = 1 ,462) and 15 acamprosate stUdieS (N =
`3,979) were included m thts analysts Random effects e~ttmates were
`reported, due to the high between-study varrance for all outcomes tn
`both treatment groups For naltrexone, the nsk dtfference for relapse to
`heavy drmkmg In treatment versus placebo groups was 16 (95% Cl
`07, 25. NNT = 6 28) The rtsk difference for relapse to any drmktng
`was 08 (95% Cl -02, .17; NNT = 12 95) In the acamprosate studies,
`the overall nsk difference for relapse to any dnnktng was .12 (95% Cl
`08. 17, NNT = 8 15) Meta-regression mdtcated that prescrtbmg
`acamprosate versus naltrexone (p < 1) and gtvmg some form of
`requued psychotherapy (p < .05) were both predtctors of treatment
`effect on absttnence. The evidence of effecttveness of these two
`medtcattons ts considered m the context of thts cumulattve body of
`published studtes Wh1le more research Will be necessary to understand
`fully the effectiveness of these drugs and the populations m whtch one
`or the other may be Indicated, these results suggest that acamprosate
`1s more effecttve than nallrexone at helprng weaned alcoholiC pattents
`ma1nta1n abstmence
`
`B. Early intervention
`752
`
`CONSIDERATIONS FOR SCREENING INSTRUMENTS IN A
`HOSPITAL TRAUMA SETTING
`T R. Apodaca, C R Schermer; D 0 Squtres
`Untverstty of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131
`
`Evtdence has accumulated over the past ten years that brtef
`mterventtons can be as effective as more mtenstve treatments wtlh at-
`nsk or problem dnnkers, and there is a growing consensus that
`screening and brtef interventions should be promoted m health care
`settmgs Trauma and emergency department settings in particular are
`tdeal for thts type of mtervenliOn, when pattents m the mtdst of
`expertencmg physical distress related to their alcohol use may be ready
`to change thetr drtnktng Because ltme ts extremely ltmtted In these
`settmgs, the current study examined var1ous ways of gathermg
`mformatton for use tn the feedback component used in many bnef
`mterventtons The Alcohol Use Disorders ldenltftcatton Test (AUDIT).
`and several Ukert-scaled questtons regardmg alcohol use were
`admmistered to 61 pattents admttled wtth a posittve blood alcohol
`concentration to a Level 1 trauma center Results indtcate that paltents
`were more likely to attribute thetr InJUry to thetr alcohol use when usmg
`a Ltkert-scaled questiOn (75%) than a stmtlar questton on the AUDIT
`(38%). In order to tmplement effecttve bnef mterventtons wtth pattents
`hospttalized followmg an alcohol-related InJury, 1t may be helpful to
`supplement the AUDIT wtth add1t1onal questtons when conductmg
`screentng
`
`This mat€ ria I was copiEd
`atth.a NLM and may be
`Su !J.je<t US OJ·pyright Laws
`
`130A
`
`7 4 7
`LCOHOLISM TREATMENT·
`SEROTONERGIC AGENT~~:t BY COMPUTER SIMULATION
`TESTING THE JOHNSON
`sF Stoltenberg
`d 1 Research Center, Ann Arbor, Ml 48108
`University of Michigan Ad IC ion
`
`1 may respond better to treatment w1th
`Those With early onset alcoho ISm tagonlst) than With selective serotonin
`ondansetron.(a 5-HT3 receptor fnthose w1th late onset alcoholism may
`reuptake Inhibitors (SSRis). w~l ~ m subtyping may be useful1n makmg
`respond bette~ to SSRis. Alec 0 '\ent's genotype at loci that mfluence
`treatment de.clslons, although ~ pa ore so Johnson {ACER 24 1597-
`the dysfunctional syst~~ ~~~ro~:nm (S-HT) funct1on that focuses on a
`1601) proposed a mo e
`1 5 HT transporter regulatory reg1on (5-
`- allzes and extends Johnson's
`common genetiC variant In t 18
`HDLPR) The present study fo;m based stmulatton that uses ftntte
`descnpttve model mto ~ com~u e:~nables used m the ~odel were
`dtfference equ~ttons Value~ ~~ human and animal literature Data
`based on empmcal findmgs tn
`e by 100 stmulatlon runs Results of
`were generated for each condttton ctattons that the LL genotype would
`the model are conststent wtth ex~~ 5 HT than the S genotype
`have lower mean levels of synap 1 ctl;n due to chrontc alcoholism
`Reducttons m 5-H~ tral~~~~srt;~/~;e LL genotype by B2?o and for the S_
`tncreased meaon SFHT h se with alcoholtsm, bmge drmkmg episodes
`or 1 0
`genotype by 2 Vo
`%and 54% for LL's and S_s,
`ratsed mean 5-HT levels by 111 d mean 5-HT levels by 75% for LL's
`respecttvely. SSRI treatme~t :at~~esults suggest that SSRI treatment
`and 57% for S_s. Th~ st:n~.~i~~als wtlh the LL genotype because bmge
`may ~ot be effecttve or ~~u~ctton to a greater degree Durmg bmge
`tment decreased 5-HT3 receptor medtated
`dnnkmQ enhances 5-H;
`drtnklnQ, ondansetrono~~~ LLs and by 33% m S_s Ondansetron
`dopamtne ftnng by ~1 ~ttve at reducmg alcohol's rewardtng effects tn
`treatment ts more e e
`Th
`esults generally supportthe Johnson
`e~pes may become useful for treatment
`those wtth the Ll genotype
`model, na.,nd1~~~tl~~t:J..8g~~5)

`
`deCISIO "
`
`7 48
`E TO NALTREXONE IN THE
`PREDICTORS OF RESPH06LSDEPENDENCE IN MEN
`TREATMENT OF ALJC~ Ol a sergto Orttz, M A Jtmenez-Arrtero. J
`G Ponce, G Rubto,
`.
`IV
`'
`Manzanares. T. PalomoH
`t 112 de Octubre, Avda Cordoba s/n,
`Servtcto de Pstqutalna, ospt a
`28041 Madnd, Spatn
`
`be effecttve in the treatment of alcohol
`Naltrexone has shown t~
`ffecttveness vanes from patten! to patten!
`f
`dependence However, Is e
`lcohol dependence II was of tnterest
`Constdertng the heterogen~.~~ ~s ~f response to treat~ en! The purpose
`to tnvesttgate potenttal pre .1c 0 htch vartables are related wtth_ a good
`of this study was to det~rmt~et:ated Wtlh naltrexone We studted the
`outcome tn alcoholic P~ tens at the outpat1ent Untt of Problems
`outcome of 336 patten sr!~e~omized way, 168 patients recetved
`Related to Alcohol Jnv:nt and usual treament (psychotherapy, referral to
`t wtth occasional dtsulftram) and 1G8
`naltrexone as coadJ~
`self-help groups an supp~tr xone We studied the tnfluence of
`pat1ents did not recetve na r~ 1 ents present1ng vartables whtch are
`naltrexone on the outcome 0 ~: 1
`Giobally the group treated wtth
`potenttal predtctors of:~~;~~~tcome (p=ci 03) The use of naltrexone
`naltrexone show1e1~throvement 1n pattents wtth early onset of problems
`~ _0 028) those w1th postltve famtly htstory
`produced a clea
`nit~ htstory of abuse of other drugs
`related wtth alcohol p-
`(p=O 017) and those pr~se
`g dtd nottmprove the outcome of pat1ents
`(p<O 001) However, na tre~o~eln conclusion the treatment wtth
`not presenttng thesel:~~re ~ffecttve among ~lcohol dependent pattents
`naltrexone may re~u ractensttcs that Sllggest a greater vulnerabtlily to
`showmg spectftc c a
`early onset of problems related to
`h 1
`alcohol addictiOn (famtly
`ts ory, morbtdtty) Supported by Grant from
`alcohol and other drug abuse co
`FIS (0111 438 to J Manzanares)
`
`7 4 9
`C ACID VS NAL TREXONE 11'-'
`~~~'-'~~~~\~~;(cygi~6~~IBSTINENCE AN OPEN f~ANDOMIZED
`COMPA~A6IV;d~~~~;t·o~~u~:renztn1
`. M Domentcalt, A Oel Re. G
`F Caput ·
`rdt & G F Stef<lllH11
`Gd$~<Hflr1l, ~ _Bernaf
`the Study and MulttdiSCJplrnary Treatment of
`"G Fontana .centr~e 0~rtrnent of Internal MtHJrcme. CardJoarlgiOIOUY
`:~c;~~:a~~/~:;~Via ~assarentJ9, 40138, Untversrty of Bologna, Italy
`After the rem1ssron of wrth~:~~a~~~~~1~r1o:~~~da~~1~1~ntlrnega:~:~~e~~~y
`from aiLOtwlts tile ma~n g have been recently tested rn the treatment of
`pharmacologiCal a~~~ :nd GHB have proved able to ma1n!am alcohol
`nlcohfll addJct1_0 n 1120 GO% and 30-80% of treated pat1ents
`abs!JrH!n(..e Jn abo~sent there are no studieS comparmg the effect of
`respectively ~t~~~maJnt~mmg abstmence from alcohol after a short-term
`NTX "nd GH od The atm of our open randomrzed pilot-stud)' was to
`treatment pert fftcac of Gf 10 compared wrth NTX m m<~rntammg
`evaluate th~ e
`1 y hoi ilfter 3 months of treatment A total of 35
`ab~ttnence r~~e~ -~~co hoi dependence outpatrents. wer~ rculdumly
`GHB group was composed by 18 pattents
`rec.ently de to
`enrolled m two Tr~upss ~f SO mgtkg of GHB fractJonatfld tn three daily
`05~ . Nrx 'roup was composed by 17 patrents
`treated With ora
`dose~ for t~ll~r:;1~~~~~'0i 50 mggfday of NTX for t111ee months The
`dmlntstratron has been entrusted to a referred family
`treated Wit
`drugs and 11
` ~lien\!:> were abstrnent at ttme of admiSSIOn Eacl1 subject
`rnemUer AI ~eked as an outpatient every week for the duration of the
`has been ch
`d At the end of the st•Jdy a statJs!Jc<JIIy s1gnrf1cant
`treatme~t per~o 0 02) 11 the number of abstment patrents between GHB
`dtfference (p Tx
`r was found In pattents who failed to be abstment
`group and N h~~~updrtnkmg were observed in NTX group. while m
`no relapses 1~11
`,Jit~;nto; reldpsed Morf!over, a s1gmfrcant reduc;!ion m
`GHB aroup. il p d laboratOIY markers of alcohol abuse were found rn
`alcohol cravu~ a~ravmg for the drugs was observed m both groups The
`0
`. 1 study show thdl GHB IS more effrcac1ous than
`both g_roLrps
`results of Hle presen bstmence from alcoholm a short-term treatment
`~eT:o~ ~~a;~~~~t~~~r ahand. NTX confrrmed 1\s ability 1n reduc.rn:J alcohol
`relapses m htmvy drmkmg
`
`15
`
`AMN1035
`IPR of Patent No. 7,919,499
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket