throbber
APPENDIXB
`
`Naltrexone: Disposition, metabolism, and effects
`
`after acute and chronic dosing
`

`
`The dispo5.ition of naltrexone during acute and chronic administration of JOO-mg oral
`dose was studied in 4 subjects. Following an acute dose the mean (X) peak naltrexone
`plasma level was 43.6 ± 29.9 nglml at I hr and for the major biotransformation
`prodttct, {3-naltrexol, was 87.2 ± 25.0 ng/ml at 2 hr. Twenty-four hours after the dose
`the X levels of naltrexone and {3-naltrexol declined to 2.1 ± 0.47 and 17.6 ± 5.0 ng/ml,
`respectively. Following chronic administration the X peak plasma levels of naltrexone and
`/3-naltrexol rose to 46.4 ± 18.5 and 158.4 ± 89.9 ng/ml at 1 hr, but by 24 hr both
`compounds declined to levels of the same order as in the acute state at 24 hr. Plasma
`levels of naltrexone and {3-naltrexol measured 24 hr after the daily doses of naltrexone
`throu_ghout the study indicated that steady-state equilibrium was rapidly attained and that
`there was no accumulation of naltrexone and beta naltrexol in the plasma after chronic
`treatment on 100 mg oral doses. Bi exponential kinetics were observed for naltrexone and
`{3-naltrexol in the first 24 hr. The half-life of naltrexone and {3-naltrexol decreased
`slightly from the acute to the chronic study from IO .3 ± 3 .3 to 9. 7 ± I. 1 hr and from
`12 .7 ± 2 .6 to JI .4 ± ·2 .0 hr. The plasma levels of naltrexone declined slowly from 24
`through 72 hr from 2 .4 to 1.7 ng/ml, with an apparent half-life of 96 hr. The renal
`clearance data indicate that naltrexone is partially reabsorbed while beta naltrexol is
`actively secreted by the kidney. During acute and chronic naltrexone administration the
`mean fecal excretion was 2.1% and 3.6%, while urinary excretion was 38% and 70% of
`the dose in a 24-hr period. Opiate antagonism to 25 mg heroin challenges was nearly
`complete through 48 hr after naltrexone. At 72 hr the objective responses reappeared to a
`greater extent than the subjective ones. Correlation coefficient (r) between naltrexone
`plasma levels and opiate antagonism was 0.91 and between individual half-life of
`naltrexone and opiate antagonism it was 0.99.
`
`Karl Verebey, Ph.D., Jan Volavka, M.D., Salvatore J. Mule, Ph.D., and
`R. B. Resnick, M.D. Brooklyn and New York, N. Y.
`New York State Office of Drug Abuse Services, Testing and Research Laboratory, and
`Department of Psychiatry, The New York Medical College
`
`Supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Contract No.
`ADM-45-74-133 and Grant No. DA 00073.
`Received for publication March 16, 1976.
`Accepted for publication April 27, 1976.
`Reprint requests to: Dr. K. Verebey, N. Y. S. Office of Drug
`Abuse Services, :resting and Research Laboratory, 80 Hanson
`Place, Brooklyn, N. Y. 11217.
`
`Naltrexone (N-cyclopropylmethylnoroxymor(cid:173)
`phone), a potent narcotic antagonist, is an ex(cid:173)
`perimental drug proposed for the treatment of
`opiate dependence. It was synthetized in 1965
`by Blumberg, Pachter, and Matossian. 3 Animal
`
`~\i,~ :lli-.%-~:S.1S.'®..i~ @.~~· s.~ @.~~wt¢.~,~ ~,~t~l ~~ ~~ @~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~""-~1S:~'®- ~~ ~i~®S ~~ ~"'~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~~1!,'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~,i~~ 1~ ~'@.t~~\~o
`
`ALKERMES EXHIBIT 2017
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited
`IPR2018-00943
`
`Page 1 of 14
`
`

`

`316 Vere bey et al.
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`and Therapeutics
`
`Table I. Clinical study protocol for drug administration, sample collection, heroin challenges, and
`pupillary photography
`
`JO
`
`NT
`
`II
`
`NT
`
`12
`
`NT
`
`13
`
`PL
`
`14 I
`
`15:
`NT
`
`NT
`H§
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`NT
`
`NT
`H:j:
`
`PL
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`PL
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`H§
`
`NT
`H§
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`Subject I I
`c. L.
`
`PL
`H*
`
`2
`
`PL
`
`3
`
`PL
`Ht
`
`E. M.
`
`PL
`
`PL
`
`PL
`H*
`
`B. P.
`
`PL
`
`PL
`H*
`
`p
`PL
`Ht
`
`R. J.
`
`PL
`H*
`
`PL
`
`PL
`Ht
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`PL
`
`7 I 8 I 9
`
`NT NT NT NT NT
`H:j:
`tV2
`UF
`F24
`p
`p
`B
`B
`B
`B
`PL NT NT NT NT NT
`Ht
`t~
`UF
`F24
`p
`B
`B
`B
`B
`NT NT NT NT NT
`Ht
`t~
`UF
`F24
`p
`p
`B
`B
`B
`B
`PL NT NT NT NT NT
`H:j:
`t~
`UF
`F24
`p
`
`PL
`
`p
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`PL, Placebo dose of naltrexone; NT, I 00 mg oral dose of naltrexone; H ( 15, 25 mg), heroin challenge, 15 mg, 25 mg intravenously, H (24, 48, 72 hr),
`heroin challenge of 25 mg intravenously; 24, 48, and 72 hr after the last naltrexone dose (when NT is noted on the same day the dose was given after the
`challenge); B, blood sample 24 hr after naltrexone: tJ, serial blood samples in a 24-hr period for biological half-life determination; P, pupillary
`photography; UF, fractional urine collection 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, and 12-24 hr; U(24), 24-hr urine collection, F(24), 24-hr fecal collection.
`*15 mg.
`t25 mg.
`:f:24 hr.
`§48 hr.
`
`studies indicated that naltrexone had undetect(cid:173)
`able or minimal agonistic effects and its relative
`opiate antagonistic potency was 40 times that of
`nalorphine and 2 to 3 times that of naloxone. 2•
`17 In man, naltrexone was 17 times as potent as
`naloxone in precipitating acute abstinence. 20
`The time-course of narcotic blockade in rats
`was 3 times as
`long as that achieved by
`naloxone. 1 A slow-release preparation of zinc(cid:173)
`tennate-naltrexone complex in mice maintained
`about 40% opiate blockade for 21 days,
`whereas a similar dose of naltrexone HCl lasted
`only 1 day. 12 Martin and Sandquist reported 21
`to 29 days antagonistic activity of naltrexone
`suspended in small particles of a polylactide
`plastic given intramuscularly to dogs. 22
`The pharmacology and narcotic antagonistic
`activity of naltrexone in man were studied by
`Martin, Jasinsky, and Mansky, 21 Resnick and
`associates, 24 and Volavka and associates. a-1
`
`These investigators found that the greater po(cid:173)
`tency (smaller oral doses) and longer duration
`of action of naltrexone present a definite
`therapeutic advantage over naloxone. No with(cid:173)
`drawal symptoms were observed after the
`abrupt discontinuation of 200-mg daily
`doses given for 3 to 8 wk. 24
`A comparative urinary excretion study of
`naltrexone in man and animals was reported by
`Dayton and
`lnturrisi. 9 Cone5
`isolated and
`identified ,8-naltrexol, the major urinary excre(cid:173)
`tion product of naltrexone in man. The chemis(cid:173)
`try of ,8-naltrexol was investigated in detail by
`Cone, Gorodetzky, and Yeh, 6 Chattargie and
`colleagues, 4 and Malspeis and colleagues. 19
`The quantitative aspects of human urinary dis(cid:173)
`position of naltrexone was studied by Cone,
`Gorodetzky, and Yeh 7 and Verebey, Mule, and
`Jukofsky, 28 both reporting that the major uri(cid:173)
`nary excretion product was ,8-naltrexol and that
`
`~\i,~ :lli~~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~- s.~ @.~~wt¢.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~%ss ®.~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.~~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~"\.~ ~~~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~<§:.%'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~".i@.~ is§: ~'@.t~~'~"
`
`Page 2 of 14
`
`

`

`Volume ]0
`Number 3
`
`Naltrexone 317
`
`~6
`NT
`
`17
`
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`H§
`
`NT
`
`PL
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`/8
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`NT
`NT
`U (24) U (24)
`F (24)
`
`NT
`t 1h
`UF
`
`22
`
`PL
`
`23
`
`PL
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`H (72 hr)
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`B
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`B
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`B
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`B
`NT
`U (24)
`F (24)
`
`p
`B
`NT
`NT
`U (24) U (24)
`F (24)
`
`B
`NT
`
`B
`NT
`
`NT
`U (24)
`
`NT
`U (24)
`
`B
`NT
`
`NT
`t 1h
`UF
`
`p
`NT
`t 1h
`UF
`
`p
`
`PL
`
`H (72 hr)
`
`NT NT
`tlf.?
`UF
`
`B
`PL
`
`p
`
`PL
`
`PL
`
`B
`
`H (72 hr)
`
`PL
`
`H (72 hr)
`
`B
`PL
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`B
`
`a small quantity of unchanged drug, mainly in
`the conjugated form, was also present in the
`urine.
`The relative narcotic antagonistic potency of
`,B-naltrexol to naltrexone was reported to be
`l: 53 in the rat by Fujimoto and associates.11
`times as potent as
`Naltrexone was 12
`,B-naltrexol in the chronic spinal dog. 7 Re(cid:173)
`cently, Verebey and co-workers26 reported the
`isolation and identification of another human
`urinary metabolite of naltrexone, 2-hydroxy-
`3-methoxynaltrexol, which represents approx(cid:173)
`imately 10% of the urinary excretion products
`of naltrexone. Determination of naltrexone and
`,B-naltrexol in human plasma after therapeutic
`doses was only recently accomplished. 27 Using
`this method, the total disposition of naltrexone
`in conjunction with its pharmacological activity
`was evaluated and the results reported in this
`communication.
`
`Methods
`Subjects. Four male post-addict paid volun(cid:173)
`teers from the New York State Office of Drug
`Abuse Services were the subjects in the study.
`The subjects were admitted
`to a closed
`metabolic ward located at Manhattan State
`
`Hospital. The physical characteristics and drug
`history of subjects were: ( 1) average age, 28 yr
`(24 to 36); (2) average weight, 159 pounds (135
`to 180); (3) average duration of heroin use, 11
`yr ( 6 to 16). The subjects were all heavy
`cigarette smokers and occasional cocaine users.
`Some, but not all, of the subjects occasionally
`used marijuana, LSD, and barbiturates. At the
`beginning of the study all subjects stated that
`they were free of drugs for an average of 3 mo
`(2 to 6). After admission, the subjects were kept
`in the metabolic ward for 1 wk to assure a
`drug-free state. Prior to the study, each subject
`received a thorough physical examination and
`clinical blood chemistry survey; control urine
`and blood samples were collected. The urine
`samples were screened for all common drugs of
`abuse. 23
`Drug administration and protocol sched(cid:173)
`ule. All subjects recei\ed initial and subse(cid:173)
`quently daily oral doses of 100 mg nal(cid:173)
`trexone. The dosage schedule, metabolic sam(cid:173)
`ple collections, and time of heroin challenges
`are presented in Table I. The techniques used in
`this study to measure pupil size and to calculate
`plasma half-lifes have been reported. 29 Heroin
`in aqueous solution was injected intravenously
`
`~t~~~ ~~%'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~'-.i@.~ i~ ~'@.t~~\~o
`
`~\i,~ :m~~:s.1S.~i~ ~~~· s.~ ~~~wt¢.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~~ ®.~ ~,i~~~ i"-"• ~~ ~""-~~~'@. ~~ ~i~~ ~"\.~ ~"'~~'..~'i(cid:173)
`
`Page 3 of 14
`
`

`

`318 Vere bey et al.
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`and Therapeutics
`
`Table II. Plasma levels of naltrexone (NT) and beta-naltrexol (/3-0L) (ng/ml) in acute and
`chronic treatment after JOO mg doses of naltrexone
`
`Subject
`
`C. L.
`
`E. M.
`
`B. P.
`
`R. J.
`
`Drug
`NT
`
`{3-0L
`
`NT
`
`{3-0L
`
`NT
`
`{3-0L
`
`NT
`
`(3-0L
`
`Type of
`treatment
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`
`Hours
`
`I
`
`2
`
`I 4
`
`I 8
`
`I 12
`
`I 24
`
`47.1
`42.9
`110.8
`114.7
`
`50.3
`28.8
`98.7
`204.0
`
`15.2
`21.9
`52.6
`131. l
`
`32.0
`32.9
`86.7
`96.0
`
`32.4
`21.4
`69.3
`103.4
`
`20.7
`18.0
`49.3
`163.8
`
`8.9
`15.1
`85.1
`68.4
`
`18.6
`20.8
`72.5
`68.8
`
`11.2
`10.8
`40.5
`79.6
`
`7.6
`9.5
`··37.5
`67.1
`
`5.3
`9.1
`33.6
`56.6
`
`8.0
`10.3
`57.6
`53.0
`
`4.7
`7.3
`34.8
`56.7
`
`5.0
`4.9
`25.2
`54.0
`
`3.3
`6.0
`28.9
`44.0
`
`4.3
`7.0
`44.0
`38.6
`
`1.5
`3.5
`18. l
`34.2
`
`2.6
`2.2
`11.7
`21.4
`
`2.3
`3.1
`16.7
`22.4
`
`2.0
`3.1
`23.8
`18.6
`
`1
`
`58.7
`55.5
`129.7
`143.3
`
`64.2
`53.7
`80.8
`288.0
`
`11.2
`18.7
`39.I
`119.3
`
`40.3
`57.6
`81.0
`83.0
`
`over a period of 3 min. Two such injections (15
`and 25 mg) were given before the naltrexone
`treatment. All subsequent heroin injections
`were of 25 mg.
`Sample collections. Following an acute oral
`dose of 100 mg naltrexone, 20 ml of blood was
`collected in tubes containing sodium oxalate at
`times 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hr after naltrexone
`for the determination of the acute half-life (t1h).
`The same blood collection schedule was used
`during the maintenance phase of the study for
`the determination of the chronic tyz. The sam(cid:173)
`ples were centrifuged, the plasma obtained and
`frozen at -16° C until analyzed. Single blood
`samples were collected throughout the study,
`24 hr after each dose of naltrexone, to evaluate
`build-up and stabilization plasma levels of drug
`and metabolite during continued naltrexone
`administration. A single blood sample was
`collected just prior to heroin challenges to
`determine the narcotic antagonist blood levels
`at that time. Twenty-four hour urine specimens
`were collected on 3 successive days and feces
`samples on 2 successive days during the chronic
`phase of the study. Fractional urine samples of
`
`O to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12, and 12 to 24 hr were
`collected along with the acute and chronic t1h
`blood samples, to allow determination of renal
`clearance values and cumulative urinary excre(cid:173)
`tion patterns. The volumes of urine samples and
`weights of feces were recorded and the samples
`frozen at -16° C until analyzed.
`Analytical methods. The methods used in
`this study have been reported. 27
`• 28 An aliquot
`of plasma and internal standard (naloxone) were
`mixed and extracted into chloroform at pH
`8.5. 27 After a series of purification steps, the
`residue resulting from the evaporation of the
`last organic phase was derivatized with pen(cid:173)
`tafluropropionic anhydride (PFPA). The PFPA
`/3-naltrexol, and
`derivatives of naltrexone,
`naloxone were analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard
`Model 5830A instrument, equipped with a 63Ni
`linear electron capture detector. The column
`was packed with 3% OV-22 and the operating
`column oven temperature was 215° C. For urine
`and feces determinations of naltrexone and
`metabolites a modified method was used. 28
`Bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoracetamide (BSTF A)
`derivatives of the weak organic bases were
`
`~\i,~ :lli~~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~, s.~ @.~~wt¢.~,~ ~,~t~l ~~ ~%ss @~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.1S:~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~~~ ~~~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~<§:.1!,'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~,i~~ 1<§: ~'@.t~~'~"
`
`Page 4 of 14
`
`

`

`Volume 20
`Number]
`
`2.0
`
`]
`
`1.5
`
`ACUTE
`
`-Naltruone
`-JS-Nalhexol
`
`2.0
`
`1.S
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0
`
`120
`
`Naltrexone 319
`
`CHRONIC
`
`-Nallrexone
`--JI-Nalbeml
`
`I.LT
`.ri ......... .
`,
`··1 ......... 1
`-i--·----------....... ..
`
`I
`
`0
`
`.§ I '°
`I~·
`1120 -I:
`
`0
`
`160
`
`J O
`
`012 4
`
`8
`
`12
`
`24
`
`012 4
`HOlllS
`
`8
`
`12
`
`Fig. 1. The time-course of naltrexone and J3-naltrexol plasma levels and the corresponding pupillary
`effects after a single IOO-mg dose (acute) and following multiple 100-mg doses of naltrexone
`(chronic). Each point on the graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 4).
`
`the ARCI (Addiction Research Center In(cid:173)
`prepared and anlyzed using a hydrogen flame
`ventory) was used. Table VIII presents a list of
`ionization detector. The column was packed
`questions: ( 1) absolute heroin effects were in(cid:173)
`with 3% OV-17 and the operating column oven
`vestigated by 10 true or false questions, repre(cid:173)
`temperature was 270° C. Feces samples were
`senting commonly reported opiate symptoms
`weighed and homogenized (1: 10 w/v) in 0.1 N
`elicited by intravenous heroin; (2) the relative
`HCl with a Waring blender, and small aliquots
`heroin effects were examined by a comparative
`were extracted, derivatized, and analyzed. 28
`test relating to past heroin experiences, referred
`Objective responses. Respiration rate was
`to as "opiate high"; (3) "liking" is a separate
`measured by a strain-gauge and recorded on a
`entity from
`''highs'' and symptoms and is
`polygraph. Respiratory depression was deter(cid:173)
`strongly influenced by the circumstances under
`mined by calculating the difference between the
`respiratory rate just prior to a heroin challenge
`which the drug is taken. It represents a state of
`and the rate 10 min after heroin administration.
`euphoria, rated on a scale of O to 4 (none to
`Pupillography was performed prior to a heroin
`best); (4) the observers not knowing what was
`administered, placebo 6r drug, also rated the
`challenge and 5 min after heroin administration.
`subjects' state of euphoria during and after
`Pupillary rniosis is expressed as the difference
`challenges on a scale of Oto 5; (5) the econom(cid:173)
`in millimeters between the pre- and post(cid:173)
`ics of heroin appears to provide a numerical
`challenge pupil sizes. Total objective responses
`were determined by summing the respiratory
`subjective measure. The test is based on the
`subject's estimate of the street value in dollars
`and pupillary responses.
`of the heroin or placebo injection.
`Subjective responses. A modified version of
`~\i,~ :lli~~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~, s.~ @.~~wt¢.~,~ ~,~t~l ~~ ~%ss @~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.1S:~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~"\.~ ~"\.~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~<§:.1!,'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~,i~~ 1<§: ~'@.t~~'~"
`
`Page 5 of 14
`
`

`

`320 Verebey et al.
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`and Therapeutics
`
`40
`
`315
`
`fS-NALTREXOL
`
`I
`
`!
`
`JH ---t I I
`\!1
`1
`
`levels of naltrexone were
`Peak plasma
`reached at I hr in the acute and chronic studies,
`averaging 43.6 ± 29.9 ng/ml and 46.3 ± 18.5
`ng/ml, respectively. The levels declined rapidly
`to an average of 2.1 ± 0.47 and 3.0 ± 0.55
`ng/ml by 24 hr after the dose in the acute and
`chronic studies . .B-Naltrexol plasma levels were
`high at 1 hr in the acute study, peaking at 2 hr
`(average of 87.2 ± 25.0 ng/ml). The levels
`declined to an average of 17.6 ± 5.0 ng/ml 24
`hr after the dose. In the chronic study, the
`average peak
`level of
`.B-naltrexol was
`158.4 ± 89.9 ng/ml at 1 hr, and by 24 hr the
`level declined to 24.2 ± 6.9 ng/ml. The simi(cid:173)
`lar 24-hr values in the acute and chronic studies
`for naltrexone and also for .B-naltrexol indicated
`no accumulation of naltrexone and .B-naltrexol
`in the plasma during the daily administration of
`100 mg naltrexone (Fig. 2). The figure shows
`that a steady-state equilibrium was almost in(cid:173)
`stantaneously achieved after the first dose was
`given.
`,8-Naltrexol levels varied more than
`naltrexone day to day. At 24 hr, .B-naltrexol
`concentrations were approximately IO times
`Results
`those of naltrexone.
`Table III shows the apparent t1h values of
`Naltrexone was administered in l 00-mg daily
`oral doses to 4 post-addict volunteers according
`naltrexone and .B-naltrexol in acute and chronic
`treatment. Since naltrexone was administered
`to the study protocol (Table I). The plasma
`orally, the secondary exponential decay repre(cid:173)
`levels of naltrexone and .B-naltrexol were de(cid:173)
`sents the apparent t1h while for .B-naltrexol the
`termined in acute and chronic treatment (Table
`t1h values are estimates since ,8-naltrexol was
`II). Substantial individual variation in the peak
`levels of naltrexone, 1 hr after the dose, was
`not administered in the absence of naltrexone.
`observed especially in the acute study, ranging
`The mean t1h for naltrexone and .B-naltrexol
`between 15.2 and 64.2 ng/ml of plasma.
`slightly declined from the acute to the chronic
`study. Naltrexone t1h was 10.3 ± 3.3 and
`Twenty-four hours after the dose, the individual
`9.7 ± 1.1 hr and ,B-naltrexol t1h was 12.7
`differences were much smaller, ranging be(cid:173)
`± 2.6 and 11.4 ± 2.0 hr in the acute and
`tween 1.5 and 2.6 ng/ml. .B-Naltrexol levels
`chronic studies, respectively.
`were higher than the parent compound at all
`· times, with differences of 1.5- to 10-fold.
`The 24-hr urinary excretion data are shown in
`Fig.
`l shows the average pupillary and
`Table IV. Naltrexone accounted for approxi(cid:173)
`plasma level time-courses of the 4 subjects
`mately 20% of the total ba&e recovered in 24 hr
`determined in the acute and chronic state. The
`in both the acute and chronic study, and it was
`biphasic nature of the pupillary time curve,
`excreted 90% conjugated . .B-Naltrexol was the
`though observed in both acute and chronic
`major urinary excretion product, approximately
`states, should be interpreted with due regard to
`70% of the total base recovered in 24 hr, and
`the great range of individual values (as indi(cid:173)
`was excreted 30% conjugated. The newly
`cated by the large standard deviations). The
`identified metabolite, 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy
`greater degree of papillary constriction in the
`naltrexol, is expressed as .B-naltrexol equiva(cid:173)
`chronic state than in the acute appears to be
`lents because a pure standard was not yet
`significant.
`available. This compound was approximately
`~\i,~ :m~~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~, s.~ @.~~wt@.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~%ss ®.~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.1S:~'*- ~~ ~~~®S ~~~ ~~~~,1!:~(cid:173)
`
`I
`
`30 -e 25 p
`i
`! 15
`
`-
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8 ~ U M
`DAYS
`
`•
`
`~
`
`Fig. 2. Naltrexone and {3-naltrexol plasma levels 24
`hr after each daily I 00-mg dose. The data at day O
`represent the 24-hr period of the acute t'h. Each point
`on the graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 4).
`
`~t~~~ ~<§:.~~ ~'®o '" ~ }"\~~~ *'.~~~~".i@.~ i~ ~'@.\~~'~"
`
`Page 6 of 14
`
`

`

`Volume 20
`Number 3
`
`Naltrexone 321
`
`Table III. tl/2 (in hr)* of naltrexone (NT) and {3-naltrexol ({3-0L)from plasma after JOO mg doses
`of naltrexone
`
`Acute
`
`Chronic
`
`Subject
`
`10
`
`NT
`
`I 20
`
`(3-0L
`
`I 20
`
`JO
`
`NT
`
`I 20
`
`10
`
`{3-0L
`
`I 20
`
`10
`
`C. L.
`10.2
`13.5
`7.3
`3.0
`3.0
`13.8
`E. M.
`10.8
`2.0
`8.1
`2.0
`9.6
`9.5
`B. P.
`14.7
`4.1
`10.7
`5.5
`15.7
`12.3
`R. J.
`12.0
`8.5
`3.0
`9.8
`9.5
`2.1
`Mean± SD 3.0 ± 0.9 10.3 ± 3.3 2.3 ± 1.7 12.7 ± 2.6 3.2 ± 1.6 9.7±1.1 3.1 ± 2.9 11.4 ± 2.0
`
`6.9
`3.5
`2.1
`
`4.1
`2.0
`3.0
`
`*The plasma levels were plotted semilogarithmically against time and the best lit was determined by the least-squares method. In most cases a
`biexponential decay was observed up to 24 hr and thus reported as primary (I°) and secondary (2°) tY.z.
`
`Table IV. Total urinary excretion of naltrexone and metabolites in 24 hr in acute and chronic
`treatment after JOO mg daily doses of naltrexone
`
`Acute base (mg)
`
`--
`
`Naltrexone
`
`Subject
`
`Free
`
`I Total
`
`{3-naltrexol
`
`Free
`
`I Total
`
`2 hydroxy-
`3-methoxy
`naltrexol
`
`Total
`
`Total base
`
`C. L.
`27.35
`18.35
`7.99
`0.81
`25.00
`17.66
`7.00
`0.87
`E.M.
`19.61
`13.77
`5:51
`0.77
`B. P.
`R. J.
`32.74
`26.56
`12.08
`1.43
`Mean± SD 0.97 ± 0.30 8.15 ± 2.82 19.08 ± 5.38 26.18 ± 5.45
`
`4.01
`3.02
`2.71
`4.09
`3.46 ± 0.69
`
`39.35
`35.02
`27.83
`48.91
`37.77 ± 8.81
`
`Chronic base (mg)
`
`Free
`
`Total
`
`Free
`
`Total
`
`Total
`
`Total base
`
`c. L.
`32.03
`43.49
`17.14
`1.25
`24.60
`40.45
`10.21
`0.90
`E.M.
`50.44
`33.81
`0.72
`B. P.
`15.44
`R. J.
`51.41
`25.52
`1.33
`21.56
`Mean± SD 1.05 ± 0.28 16.09 ± 4.82 28.99 ± 4.61 46.45 ± 5.33
`
`8.40
`4.08
`9.68
`8.18
`7.57 ± 2.41
`
`69.03
`54.74
`75.56
`81.15
`70.12 ± I l.39
`
`Table V. ,B-naltrexol-naltrexone
`concentration ratio for the 24-hr urinary
`excretion in acute and chronic treatment
`
`10% of the total base recovered in 24 hr in the
`acute and chronic study and was present only in
`the free form. In the acute study an average of
`38% and in the chronic study 70% of the dose
`was recovered in the 24-hr urine as naltrexone
`and known metabolites. Some increase in the
`urinary excretion of the conjugated bases was
`observed from the acute to the chronic study.
`Naltrexone conjugation increased from 88% to
`94% and
`,B-naltrexol conjugation increased
`from 24% to 38%. The nearly double urinary
`recovery of all the bases in the chronic study
`~\i,~ :lli-.%-~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~, s.~ @.~~wt@.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~%ss ®.~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.1S:~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~'\.~ ~~~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~<§:.1!,'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~".i@.~ is§: ~'@.t~~'~"
`
`Subject
`
`c. L.
`E.M.
`B. P.
`R. J.
`Mean± SD
`
`Beta-naltrexol I naltrexone
`
`\
`Acute
`
`Chronic
`
`3.42
`3.57
`3.55
`2.71
`3.31 ± 0.41
`
`2.54
`3.96
`3.26
`3.38
`3.29 ± 0.58
`
`Page 7 of 14
`
`

`

`322 Verebey et al.
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`and Therapeutics
`
`80
`
`70
`
`ACUTE
`
`CHRONIC
`
`80
`
`_.; ,,,--,-,._.--/
`,~ ...
`.'.~ -·-·-
`
`~ .................... ---· .. ··"·
`, ..
`10
`.. ··········
`,, ... ··----..HIUl'IUll---
`v:_~--·-
`·-·*·
`24
`4
`HOURS
`
`0
`
`8
`
`12
`
`~-/
`..... ···
`......
`,,.,
`/
`/r---
`-·-· .
`4
`
`-
`
`8
`
`_ _J!_af!rUl:lm_ --·
`
`12
`
`24
`
`Fig. 3. Urinary excretion of naltrexone and its metabolites in acute and chronic treatment after
`100-mg oral doses of naltreX:one (n = 4).
`
`Table VI. Renal clearance of naltrexone and beta-naltrexol in acute and chronic treatment
`
`Subject
`
`Acute
`
`Renal clearance*t (ml/min)
`
`Naltrexone
`
`l
`
`Chronic
`
`Acute
`
`C. L.
`E. M.
`B. P.
`R. J.
`Mean± SD
`
`16.5
`75.0
`!07.2
`68.2
`66.7 ± 37.5
`
`27.5
`10.7
`38.5
`42.3
`29.8 ± 14.2
`
`242.7
`340.0
`284.9
`404.6
`318.1 ± 70.1
`
`{3-Naltrexol
`
`I
`
`Chronic
`
`527.3
`256.4
`375.8
`318.2
`369.4 ± 116.0
`
`*Renal clearance equals the slope of the plot of t:.X.u/ ~t vs Cp(t), where ~xu = the change in the amount of free drug excreted in the urine,
`~t = the time interval in min, Cp(t) is the drug plasma concentration at the midpoint of the interval. The intervals Oto 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12, and 12 to
`24 hr were used in the calculation.
`tNaltrexone plasma concentrations were corrected for protein binding by multiplication of the plasma value by 0.8 (see Reference 18).
`
`(from 37.8% to 70.1 % of the dose) did not
`age clearance value of 67 and 30 ml/min and
`involve any qualitative changes in the propor(cid:173)
`{3-naltrexol is secreted by the kidney tubules,
`tion of naltrexone and its metabolites. In fact
`indicated by the average values of 318 and 369
`the ratios of naltrexone over
`(Table V),
`ml/min. The naltrexone values were corrected
`{3-naltrexol were strikingly similar in the acute
`for plasma protein binding of 20% (Ludden and
`and chronic studies.
`associates 18).
`Availability of plasma level and urinary
`The urinary excretion time-course of nal(cid:173)
`excretion values of free naltrexone and
`trexone and metabolites were similar in the
`,B-naltrexol for the same time periods permitted
`acute and chronic study but the quantities of all
`the calculation of renal clearance for both com(cid:173)
`bases nearly doubled in the chronic state (Fig.
`pounds. Table VI shows the renal clearance
`3). Most of the naltrexone excretion is limited
`data for naltrexone and {3-naltrexol. Naltrexone
`to the first 4 hr after the dose when the plasma
`is partially reabsorbed as indicated by the aver-·
`levels of naltrexone were highest. {3-Naltrexol
`~\i,~ :fil-.%-~:S.1S.'®..i~ @.~~, S.~ @.~~Wi@.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~~ @.~ ~,i~~~ i,s\.< ~~ ~":,.'@S.~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~'\.~ ~'\.~~'..1S:~(cid:173)
`~:§.~~~ ~~:S.'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~".i@.~ i~ ~~t~i.'~"
`
`Page 8 of 14
`
`

`

`Volume 20
`Number]
`
`Naltrexone 323
`
`Table VII. Total fecal excretion of naltrexone
`and metabolites in 24 hr in acute and chronic
`treatment after JOO mg oral doses of
`naltrexone
`
`Acute* base (mg)
`
`2-hydroxy-3-
`{3-0L methoxy na/trexol
`
`Subjects NT
`c. L.
`E.M.
`B. P.
`R. J.
`
`0.041 0.264
`0.130 4.921
`0.228 0.306
`0.116 2.204
`
`Mean
`
`0.128 1.924
`
`Chronict
`
`c. L.
`E.M.
`B. P.
`R. J.
`Mean
`
`0.251 2.792
`0.143 4.832
`0.370 1.612
`0.408 2.313
`0.293 2.887
`
`0.087
`0.074
`0.036
`0.110
`
`0.077
`
`0.942
`0.122
`0.491
`0.186
`0.435
`
`Total
`
`0.392
`5.125
`0.570
`2.430
`
`2.129
`
`3.985
`5.097
`2.473
`2.907
`3.615 ·
`
`• A single 24-hr collection.
`tAvcrage of two 24-hr collections after 10 days of treatment with
`100 mg naltrexone daily.
`
`Table VIII. The pharmacological testing
`protocols during and after heroin challenges
`
`Opiate symptoms
`(Reports by the subject about his feelings or
`physiological state.)
`I. Absolute-True and False Questionnaire (IO)
`(a) I feel so good that I know other people can
`tell it.
`(b) My voice sounds different than usual.
`(c) I feel as if something pleasant has just
`happened to me.
`(d) I feel it in my stomach.
`(e) I feel it in my mouth.
`(t) I feel it in my throat.
`(g) I feel it in my head.
`(h) I feel it in my nose.
`(i) My skin itches.
`U) I felt a rush.
`2. Relative- "Opiate High"
`Remember the experience when you had the
`very best high after heroin in your whole life?
`Now let us say we call it a I 00% high.
`Compared with that, how high are you now?
`____ %
`3. "Liking" the relative state of euphoria a scale of
`(0 to 4).
`4. Street value of heroin. How much would you pay
`for this shot if I asked you to pay me now?
`$ ___________ _
`
`TRUE
`
`Opiate signs
`(Measurements or notations of the physiologic state
`of the subject by observers.)
`l. Respiratory rate (No./min)
`2. Pupillary response (mm diameter)
`3. "Liking" the observers' rating of apparent
`euphoria (no change: l, 2, 3, 4, 5, very high)
`4. EEG (frequency and amplitude)*
`5. EKG (pattern)*
`6. Heart rate (No./min)*
`7. Blood pressure (mm Hg)*
`Phannacodynamic parameters
`Plasma levels of opiate antagonist at the time of
`heroin challenge (ng/ml).
`
`•Data not presented in this study.
`
`and 2-hydroxy-3-methoxynaltrexol, however,
`were steadily excreted throughout the 24-hr
`period_

`Table VII shows the fecal excretion data after
`acute and chronic treatment. A total of 2.1 %
`and 3 .5% of the dose was excreted in the feces
`in the acute and chronic states, respectively.
`the major fecal excretory
`,8-Naltrexol was
`product together with small amounts of nal(cid:173)
`trexone and 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy naltrexol.
`Acid hydrolysis of the fecal material did not
`yield larger amounts of any of the compounds,
`indicating the absence of conjugated metabo(cid:173)
`lites.
`Table VIII is a list of tests and questionnaires
`used during heroin challenges. The data ob(cid:173)
`to
`to 9.83 ± 3.16 ng/ml at 48 hr and
`tained through the use of these testing protocols
`3. 75 ± 1.63 ng/ml at 72 hr. The estimated H~
`are presented in Fig. 4. The plasma levels of
`of this terminal phase decline of naltrexone and
`naltrexone and ,8-naltrexol just prior to heroin
`/j-naltrexol was 96 and, 18 hr, respectively. In
`challenges are shown in the first panel. The
`the following panels (2 through 8), the first two
`mean naltrexone levels of 4 subjects declined
`marks on the abscissa represent control re(cid:173)
`very slowly from 2.35 ± 0.34 ng/ml at 24 hr to
`2.03 ± 0.31 ng/ml at 48 hr and to 1. 73 ± 0.15
`sponses to 15 and 25 mg intravenous heroin
`injections, respectively, in the absence of nal(cid:173)
`ng/ml at 72 hr. Decline of ,8-naltrexol plasma
`levels was substantially faster than that of
`trexone. The following three markings on the
`naltrexone, from 24. 95 ± 7 .57 ng/ml at 24 hr
`abscissa represent responses to 25 mg intrave-
`~\i,~ :lli~~:s.1S.~i<§: @.~~, s.~ @.~~wt@.~,~ ~,~i~l ~~ ~%ss ®.~ ~,h~~ i,s\.• ~~ ~~'1SS.1S:~'@. ~~ ~i~®S ~"\.~ ~~~~'..1!:'i(cid:173)
`~t~~~ ~<§:.%'~ ~'®o '" ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~".i@.~ is§: ~'@.t~}~'~"
`
`Page 9 of 14
`
`

`

`324 V erebey et al.
`
`Clinical Pharmacology
`and Therapeutics
`
`25
`
`5
`
`0
`
`. \
`
`\
`\
`
`Plasma level
`(llg,'mlt
`
`18
`
`~ \
`' \
`\
`........
`
`"'-.
`
`"•1!!115111:
`
`•
`•
`
`Opillle high
`Sub;ects' rating
`scale 0-100
`
`12
`
`8
`
`4
`
`0
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`~mioN(mmt
`
`..
`
`ANpinilory depiwion
`(No./min)
`•
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`Umg
`~·r.ting
`ec.i.o-o
`
`0
`
`5
`
`4
`
`2
`
`• ..
`
`•
`
`Liking
`Subilda'l'lting
`sc11eo-•
`
`•
`• ••
`
`• v - .
`
`Opiate s,, llptolilS
`(No.dbul-5)
`
`..
`
`H
`
`• •
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Street,,_,. ol heroin
`Subjec:ta'l'Ming
`($)
`
`•
`
`8
`
`8
`
`4
`
`2
`
`8
`
`Fig. 4. The first panel represents the average plasma levels of naltrexone and ,B-naltrexol (n = 4)
`measured just before heroin challenges. The second and third panels represent the objective, and the
`rest of the panels the subjective responses after heroin, 25 mg. intravenously. The first two markings
`on the abscissa are heroin challenge controls in the absence of naltrexone to 15 and 25 mg heroin
`intravenously. The next three markings represent responses to 25 mg heroin intravenously. 24, 48,
`and 72 hr after the last naltrexone dose. For further clarification of the test system, see Table VIII.
`
`Table IX. Correlation coefficients (r) between the t1h of naltrexone and {3-naltrexol and the
`objective, subjective, and total responses to 25 mg heroin intravenously 72 hr after naltrexone
`
`Correlation coefficient ( r)
`
`Chronic
`tVz (2~)
`
`Respiratory
`depression
`
`Pupillary
`constriction
`
`Naltrexone
`Beta naltrexol
`
`-0.97
`-0.76
`
`-0.85
`-0.78
`
`Total
`objective
`effects
`
`-0.99
`-0.82
`
`Total
`subjective
`effects
`
`-0.50
`-0.32
`
`Total
`subjective
`and objectives
`effects
`
`-0.66
`-0.46
`
`nous heroin at 24, 48, and 72 hr after the last
`agonistic responses to heroin slowly began to
`dose of naltrexone (Table I). In the second
`return, a respiratory depression of 1 and 6
`breaths per minute, respectively.
`panel (Fig. 4), data are presented of the respira(cid:173)
`The pupillary miotic effects of heroin are
`tory depression. In the controls, 7 and 10
`shown in panel 3 of Fig 4. Narcotic antagonism
`breaths per minute respiratory depression were
`was nearly complete up to 48 hr, but by 72 hr
`observed following 15 and 25 mg intravenous
`there was a slightly greater pupillary· miosis
`heroin, respectively. Twenty-four hours after
`following heroin than in the control periods.
`the last dose of naltrexone, no respiratory de-.
`pression w

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket