throbber

`
`People's Republic of China
`Guangdong Province Shenzhen Intermediate
`People's Court
`
`(2013)The deep and middle law know the first word of the people767Plaintiff Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligence Technology
`
`shares LimitedCompanyResidence in Baoan, Shenzhen
`
`District Guanlan Street Concave back community Tai Fu Industrial Park, Hui Qing Science and Technology Garden
`
`Factory0Building, organization Code 77411796-6。
`
`Legal representative Ye Weixiong, chairman.
`
`Principal agent Huang Zhiyong, lawyer of Guangdong Chinese business law firm.
`
`Agent Zhang Love, Guangdong China business law firm lawyer.
`
`Defendant Shenzhen ke da intelligent Equipment LimitedCompanyPlace of residence Shenzhen Luohu District People
`
`Min Nan Road Development Center1Building2204,Organization Code58155541-7。
`
`Legal representative Yang Lihui, chairman.
`
`Defendant Hunan Ke da high-tech intelligent Equipment Supply Co., Ltd, Changsha Yuelu Tongzi slope West Road,
`
`Hunan Province348Number, organization code57029604-2。
`
`Legal representative Yang Lihui, chairman.
`
`The defendant knows0Dagger0Seven03Guang 卩 Seven1*0DoorThe location of the company's headquarters8 0051^ 0「 1
`
`'Made 86(What0.,
`
`01730 Residence in the United States of Massachusetts.
`,
`
`The legal representative is Glenn and Weinstein.
`
`1
`
`1
`
`IROBOT 2017
`Shenzhen Silver Star v. iRobot
`IPR2018-00897
`
`

`

`
`
`Defendant Shenzhen Jian Yi Bao Electronics Co., Ltd., home to Shenzhen Baoan District Pine Gang Street Luotian Third
`
`industrial Zone Xiangshan Avenue5Resolution8Building, building,0Building
`
`Legal representative Wang Jianzhong, chairman.
`
`Jointly commissioned by the above four defendants: Conco, lawyer of the Shanghai branch of June he law firm.
`
`Jointly commissioned by the above four defendants: Mao Jian, lawyer of the Shanghai branch of June he law firm.
`
`The court is hearing the plaintiff Shenzhen Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Defendant Shenzhen ke da intelligent
`
`Equipment Co., Ltd, defendant Hunan Branch van Tatsu High-tech intelligent equipment Supply LimitedCompanyThe defendant
`
`knows01301:
`
`has
`
`The Defendant Shenzhen building overflow electronic
`
`Limited company infringement of utility model patent ("Cleaning brush" patent number21201120294292.6, Model of the accused
`
`infringing product^00171) 33 56708)During the dispute, the plaintiff Shenzhen Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. voluntarily applied to
`
`the Institute to withdraw the prosecution of the case.
`
`The court holds that the plaintiff Shenzhen-Yin Xing Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 's application for withdrawal is the
`
`voluntary punishment of its rights to litigation, without prejudice to the state, the collective and theThree People'sInterest, the
`
`plaintiff's application for withdrawal is subject to the law and shall be permitted. According to the Civil Procedure Law of the PRC,
`
`the firstBeshiThe first paragraph of the five articles, article 154th, paragraphFiveThe provisions of the bill are determined as follows:
`
`The plaintiff Shenzhen Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. was allowed to withdraw the prosecution.
`
`Case Handling Fee RMB23469.36Yuan, the plaintiff has been paid in advance, the court in half charge
`
`2
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Renminbi11734.68Yuan, by the plaintiff Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Burden, the remainder
`
`returned to the plaintiff.
`
`: People's Court
`Chapter
`
`Presiding Judge Chantiuhua Deputy Judge Huang
`
`Yuyu
`
`Agent trial
`
`This one is the same as the original check
`
`Clerk Xu Yinan (concurrently)
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`With relevant legal provisions:
`
`Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China
`
`145th article I, first paragraph: Before sentencing, whether or not the plaintiff applies for the withdrawal, is determined
`
`by the people's Court.
`
`154th article: The ruling applies in the following areas:
`
`A
`
`inadmissible;
`
`Two
`
`Having an objection to the jurisdiction;
`
`Three
`
`Dismiss the prosecution;
`
`Four
`
`Paoquan first to be executed;
`
`Five
`
`Permitting or not permitting the withdrawal;
`
`Six
`
`Suspend or terminate the proceedings;
`
`Seven
`
`Correcting the clerical error in the judgment;
`
`(eight)
`
`Suspension or termination of execution;
`
`Nine
`
`Revoke or refrain from enforcing an arbitral award;
`
`(10) No execution of the creditor's rights instrument which the notary organ entrusts with the enforcement effect;
`
`(11) Other matters that need to be determined and resolved.
`
`The first to third ruling of the preceding paragraph may be appealed.
`
`The award shall state the result and the grounds for the decision. Adjudication by
`
`The name of the officer and the clerk shall be stamped with the people's Court. Oral verdict, note in pen
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

`

`$$A%%fl§
`
`Ffififiwm¢fiAE&fi
`
`EEfiilfi?
`
`(2013) firFizéa’EuEfiJJ-fiifi 767 4%
`
`fig‘fiiflflfiiéflififilfifififlfififififlfl, TiffiflfiflflW$§
`
`EflfififimfifigkfilifiififlfififfiDfi.flfiflfi
`
`W25 77411796—63.
`
`iffiififi/Vffifi, §$i<o
`
`éfi-REAfii-“E. Vfifié‘fifi’iflfi$%5fi$flffio
`
`éfifiE/xfifli, Fififififlfi$§fifif¥flm
`
`fi%fiwfi&fi%%&%fimofi,fififlfiflfififiak
`
`Fcfiféfifitijto 11$ 2204, éfléfiflfififl 5815554145
`
`iii-Rfikfijifi, fi$i€o
`
`fi%ffififi#fifi%fi%fifiifléfifififififi , {iffi'fifififififi
`
`{eofiiogafififimama £7, éfiéflflfli’rfifify’ 57029604—20
`
`fifififikfiififi. §$fio
`
`V
`
`fifib iRobot Corporation,
`
`rfl'fi] Jé-‘éfififiéfit 8 Crosby Drive
`
`Bedford, MA 01730, fiFfifl%I5-5$ifigfl+lo
`
`ifiififi/xffié - fifififrifio
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`fi§fiflfifiifi$fimflfi,fififififlfii§fiflfifi
`
`fi§mfiilflfifimkfi5%BE2C&\Dfio
`
`§Efifik£%$.fi$fio
`
`ifimfi%w%flfifififik:Wfi,£%%W$%fiifi
`
`fififiwo
`
`ifiwfi%%%fi§fififikz%fi.£%¢fl$%fiifi
`
`2fi¢wo
`
`$fi£$flfi%fiflfifiifififififlfifimfiflfifi%
`
`fiflfiflfifififiéfifififi‘fi%fifififlfififi%%fi%fi
`
`fi’fiFfi/ZE'E'] ‘ fié- 1Robot Corporationx H%fi#fl§¥ifiifi%7fi
`
`Isa-22‘s? 12% wt] ia’rfl-iéfrum “fiififid” Jfidfi- ZL201120294292.6.
`
`fifififlFfifl%Rmmh%mwfififlfimfl,fi%fifl$fi
`
`E%%fififiwfififlfiEfimfi%$fifififi$$%flfie
`
`$%%%,fi%fi%fifii%%fififlfififi®fifififi$
`
`fififififiEfiwfififlflfiafikfi.fl$fi¥@i\%¢#
`
`figA2flfiQE2flflfi$fifigfifimz,@222022
`
`<¢$A%%fiflfi$fimfi>fi#fim+£%%#fix%#E
`
`£+E%%#%%(£)fiWflE,fiEflF:
`
`fifififififlfifiifi§fififififimflfimfiflfio
`
`fififififim‘cffi 23469.36fc, Eilémfiat, fiwwtlkm
`
`2
`
`6
`
`

`

`ABE fi' 11734.68 7'13, filfi’éfifillfifiiflfifififififiififififi
`
`fifi,#%%fififlfi%o
`
`
`
`fifififiififiifit
`
`7
`
`

`

`Wfiifififii:
`
`<¢$AK%#EK$%%%>
`
`¥#EE+£%%#%:Eflfi,fi%$fifififi.%§fi
`
`fi.mkfifi%fi%g
`
`%#fi£+wézfiifim%FWfi@:
`
`(H)$%%E;
`
`(:)fi%%fl€fiflfiz
`
`(E ) Eilflfl‘ifi:
`
`(E)%éfifi%fifi;
`
`(£)$fifi%$fifififi;
`
`(fi)$ifi%%%fim;
`
`(t)%£%%%¢%%fi;
`
`(A)$ifi%%%fifi:
`
`(fl)fi%fifi$?fififififi%;
`
`(+)$¥fififififl%fi?fififlfififlfififli%;
`
`(+H)fi@%¥fiifimfl$fia
`
`fiflflfiwigifififi,fluifia
`
`-fi%%fi¥§%fii%fifi¢$fifiififlmqfififimfi
`
`flkfixfififigfi,flfikfi%%W$oU%fi%%,fik%
`
`ii
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket