throbber
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
`
`ISSN: 0036-5521 (Print) 1502-7708 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/igas20
`
`Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of omeprazole
`in animals and man - an overview
`
`C-G Regårdh, M Gabrielsson, K-J Hoffman, I Löfberg & I. Skånberg
`
`To cite this article: C-G Regårdh, M Gabrielsson, K-J Hoffman, I Löfberg & I. Skånberg (1985)
`Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of omeprazole in animals and man - an overview, Scandinavian
`Journal of Gastroenterology, 20:sup108, 79-94, DOI: 10.3109/00365528509095821
`To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00365528509095821
`
`Published online: 08 Jul 2009.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 181
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles: 61 View citing articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=igas20
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`79
`
`Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of omeprazole
`in animals and man - an overview
`
`REGARDH C-G, GABRIELSSON M,
`
`HOFFMAN K-J, L~~FBERG I, SKANBERG I.
`Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug
`Metabolism,
`A B Hassle, Molndal, Sweden.
`RegArdh C-G, Gabrielsson M, Hoffman K-3, Liifberg I, SkAnberg I. Phar-
`macokinetics and metabolism of omeprazole in animals and man - an over-
`view. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985;2O(suppl 108):79-94.
`The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole have been studied to varying extent in the mouse,
`rat, dog and in man.
`The drug is rapidly absorbed in all these species. The systemic availability is relatively
`high in the dog and in man provided the drug is protected from acidic degradation in the
`stomach. In man the fraction of the oral dose reaching the systemic circulation was found
`to increase from an average of 40.3 to 58.2 Vo when the dose was raised from 10 to 40 mg,
`suggesting some dose-dependency in this parameter.
`The drug distributes rapidly to extra-vascular sites. The volume of distribution, Vp, in
`man is comparable to the volume of the extracellular water. The penetration into the red
`cells is low, the ratio between the concentration in whole blood and in plasma being about
`0.6. Omeprazole is bound to about 95 Va to proteins in human plasma. The binding is
`lower in the dog and rat (90 and 87 Vo, respectively).
`Omeprazole is eliminated almost completely by metabolism and no unchanged drug has
`been recovered in the urine in the species studied. Two metabolites, characterised as the
`sulfone and sulfide of omeprazole, have been identified and quantified in human plasma.
`The mean elimination half-life in man and in the dog is about 1 hour, whereas half-lives
`in the range of 5 to 15 minutes have been recorded in the mouse. In two studies in man,
`the mean total body clearance was 880 and 1097 ml x min-l, indicating that omeprazole
`belongs to the group of high clearance drugs. In the dog, too, the drug appears to be rapid-
`ly cleared from the blood, the mean total body clearance being about 10.5 ml x min-' x
`kg-l .
`In the rat and dog, 20 to 30 To of an i.v. or oral dose of omeprazole is excreted as
`metabolites in the urine and the remaining fraction is recovered in the faeces within three
`days after the administration. in man, the excretion of radioactivity via the kidneys is
`much more efficient and the recoveries in the excreta are approximately the reverse of
`those in the rat and dog.
`In vifro studies with rat liver microsome preparations suggest that omeprazole and
`cimetidine inhibit cytochrome P-450-mediated metabolic reactions to about the same ex-
`tent in equimolar concentrations. However, since the molar daily dose of cimetidine will
`be 25 to 50 times higher than that of omeprazole, the latter might have less influence on
`the mixed function oxidase system than cimetidine. Results obtained in man with an-
`tipyrine and aminopyrine support this hypothesis.
`
`Key-words: Pharmacokinetics; disposition; metabolism; proteinbinding; drug interac-
`tions; animals; man
`Regardh C-G, Ph.D. Dept of Pharrnacokinetics ond Drug Metabolism, Hassle Research
`Laboratories, S-431 83 Molndal, Sweden.
`
`Introduction
`is a substituted benzimidazole
`benzimidazole
`which inhibits gastric acid secretion in animals and
`-2-[[(4-methoxy -3,5- man. The drug acts via an interaction with
`Omeprazole, 5-methoxy
`sulphinyl1lH- H'K'ATPase - the gastric proton pump - in the
`dimethyl
`-2-pyridinyl) methyl]
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`80
`
`secretory membrane of the parietal cell (1). A single,
`oral dose of 20 to 80 mg omeprazole induces a dose-
`dependent
`and
`long-lasting
`inhibition
`of
`pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in
`healthy volunteers (2, 3). The inhibitory effect o n
`this parameters is further strengthened during the
`first days of repeated administration (2 - 4).
`Effect studies over 24 hours have revealed a pro-
`found decrease in intragastric acidity throughout
`the study period (5, 6).
`When omeprazole has been given to duodenal ulcer
`patients, the recovery frequency has been extremly
`high. After four weeks of treatment, the healing
`rate has been over 90 Vo (7, 8). On the basis of
`these initial clinical studies omeprazole thus ap-
`pears to be an effective drug in the treatment of
`duodenal ulcer. Its therapeutic potential is now be-
`ing further assessed in comparative, clinical trials.
`In this paper our present knowledge concerning the
`pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in various species
`is summarised.
`
`Animal pharmacokinetics
`Studies in the mouse
`The plasma concentrations of omeprazole have
`been followed after oral administration of a single,
`oral dose of 40 and 400 pmol/kg to groups of 5
`starved, male mice, which were killed at various
`times after theadministration. The doses wereiden-
`tical to the lowest and highest dose in the
`cancerogenicity study in this species and the same
`formulations were used. Omeprazole was analysed
`In plasma samples from each animal by liquid-solid
`chromatography and UV-detection (10).
`Maximum plasma concentration was already
`recorded in the first sample drawn, i.e., 10 minutes
`after dosage, whereafter the concentration of
`omeprazole declined very rapidly to minimum
`detectable levels 0.5 and 2 hours after gavage. The
`mean maximum concentration increased from 15.9
`r4 5.3 pmol/l after the lowest dose to 155.4 zk 24.5
`pmol/l after the dose of 400pmol/kg, i.e., the con-
`centration increased proportionally to the amount
`of drug administered. Estimated mean half-lives
`were in the range of 5 to 15 minutes with a tendency
`towards a longer half-life for the highest dose.
`
`The distribution of omeprazole and its metabolites
`in the mouse has been studied by autoradiography
`and by liquid scintillation counting of various
`tissues (11).
`Studies in the rat
`The absorption, excretion and tissue distribution of
`omeprazole have been studied in rats after intra-
`venous and oral administrations of I0 and 100
`pmol/kg, respectively, to male, unstarved Sprague-
`Dawley rats. The doses contained trace amounts of
`i4C-labelled drug. The radiochemical purity was
`>99 Vo determined by liquid-solid chromatog-
`raphy.
`Radioactivity measurements were performed ac-
`cording to the following procedures using Insta-
`Gel@, alternatively Dimilume0-30, as scintillation
`liquid. Faeces homogenates were combusted by a
`mixture of concentrated hydrogen peroxide (30 Vo)
`and perchloric acid (70 To) and blood was hemo-
`lysed in Soluene@-350/isopropranolol (1:l) and
`decolourised by hydrogen peroxide (30 To) prior to
`the addition of the scintillation liquid. Tissue
`homogenates were dissolved in 1 ml Soluene@-350.
`Counting was performed in a Mark I11 Model 6880
`(Searle Analytical Inc.) liquid scintillation spec-
`trometer. Quenching was corrected for by external
`standardisation.
`Recovery of the radioactive dose in
`urine and faeces
`The urinary and fecal excretions of the radioactive
`i.v. and oral doses are given in Table I. After i.v. ad-
`ministration 25.9 Vo of thedose was excreted via the
`kidneys over a period of 72 hours, while the average
`cumulative urinary recovery of the oral dose during
`the same period was 22.7 Vo. In both experiments,
`more than90 Vo of the total urinary recovery was ex-
`creted during the first 24 hours after dosage. The
`corresponding recoveries in the faeces over the en-
`tire collection period were 71.9 and 73.1 % of the i.v.
`and oral doses, respectively. Less than 0.1 Vo of the
`amount excreted via the kidneys was due to un-
`changed omeprazole.
`These data indicate a complete gastrointestinal up-
`take of the radioactive oral dose, but further studies
`are needed for evaluation of the systemic availabil-
`ity of omeprazole in the rat.
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Table I. The excretion of ['TI omeprazole and its total pool of metabolites after intravenous and oral administrations
`of 10 pmol/kg and 100 pmol/kg, respectively, to the rat. Mean values f SD from 4 rats.
`
`81
`
`Route of ad-
`ministration
`
`Time
`(h)
`
`i.v.
`
`p.0.
`
`~~
`
`0- 6
`6-24
`24 - 48
`48 - 72
`0-72
`
`0- 6
`6-24
`24 - 48
`48 - 72
`0-72
`
`Recovered radioactivity 70 of dose
`
`Urine
`
`19.0k 1 .O
`6 . 0 f 1.4
`0.7f0.1
`0.2f0.1
`25.9f2.0
`
`16.0f 1.9
`5.0f0.4
`1.4f0.6
`0.3f0.1
`22.7k 1.5
`
`Faeces
`
`0.6f0.4
`68.0k6.0
`2.8f0.8
`0.5f0.3
`71.9f4.2
`
`0.2f0.2
`48.2f9.7
`20.8f7.6
`3.9f2.8
`73.1k4.4
`
`Total
`
`19.6f1.8
`74.0f3.9
`3.5f0.8
`0.7f0.4
`97.8f4
`
`16.2f 1.9
`53.0f9.5
`22.4f 7.6
`4.2k2.8
`95.8k2.3
`
`Tissue distribution of [ I4C]ome-
`prazole and its metabolites
`
`The concentrations of radiochemical entities have
`been determined in 15 different tissues of the rat at
`various times after i.v. and oral administrations of
`[14C]omeprazole. Table I1 shows the results for the
`i.v. dose. After 0.5 hours the highest concentrations,
`12 to 23 nmol/g tissue, were found in the liver,
`kidneys and duodenum. The -stomach and the
`
`thyroid gland also contained comparatively high
`amounts of radioactivity. In all other tissues
`studied, the concentration of omeprazole plus
`metabolites was lower than in whole blood and
`plasma (- 3.5 nmol/g). Particularly the brain con-
`tained low levels of radioactivity suggesting that
`omeprazole and/or its metabolites pass the blood
`brain barrier to a very limited extent. The high
`recovery of radioactivity in the stomach agrees with
`observations in the whole-body autoradiographic
`
`Table 11. Tissuedistribution and retention of total radioactivityin the rat after intravenous administration of lOpmol/kg
`of [14] omeprazole. Mean values f SD from 4 rats in nmol/g organ.
`
`Tissue
`
`Blood
`Plasma
`Heart
`Lungs
`Liver
`Kidneys
`Brain
`Thymus
`ds
`Salivary glans
`Thyroid
`Stomach
`Duodenum
`Spleen
`Fat (white)
`Muscle
`
`Mean weight of
`4 rats (g)
`
`Time after administration
`
`0.5 h
`
`72 h
`
`Minimum
`detectable
`concent ration
`
`3.2f1.0
`3.6k 1.4
`1.9f0.6
`2.2f0.6
`13.Ot4.0
`12.0f4.0
`0.3kO.l
`1.3f0.8
`1.8f0.6
`5.2f0.8
`8.6t3.0
`23.0f6.0
`2.2 f 0.2
`0.6f0.2
`1.3f0.4
`
`0.79f0.06
`0.03f0.02
`0.09f0.01
`0.12f0.02
`0.34f0.04
`0.28f0.02
`<M.d.c.
`<M.d.c.
`<M.d.c.
`0.30f0.12
`0.09f0.2
`<M.d.c.
`0.19k0.04
`<M.d.c.
`0.03 f 0.02
`
`0.004
`0.002
`0.04
`0.04
`0.01
`0.02
`0.03
`0.09
`0.1
`0.07
`0.04
`0.2
`0.06
`0.07
`0.02
`
`250
`
`270
`
`M.c.d. = minimum detectable concentration
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`82
`
`study of the mouse in which it was found that
`omeprazole was concentrated in the mucosal cells
`of the stomach (11).
`Secretion into the bile or directly over the intestinal
`epithelium probably accounts
`for
`the high
`duodenal content of radioactivity after the i.v. dose.
`Insignificant amounts of unchanged omeprazole
`were recovered in the bile in a subsequent study,
`suggesting that the radioactivity in the duodenum
`of the rat is primarily due to metabolites. About
`75 Yo of the given i.v.
`radioactive dose was
`recovered in the faeces over a period of 72 hours.
`The distribution pattern of the oral dose was very
`similar to that of the i.v. dose though, as a conse-
`quence of the route of administration, the stomach
`and duodenum contained the highest amount of
`radioactivity during the first 6 hours following the
`administration.
`The levels of unchanged omeprazole in the plasma
`0.5 hours after the i.v. and oral dose were 9 and 6 To
`of the total radioactivity, respectively. Six hours
`after the administration the proportion of un-
`changed drug in the plasma had further decreased
`about tenfold.
`
`Studies in the dog
`The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole have been
`studied in the dog to varying extents in several
`studies.
`
`Design of Study I
`In the initial study (12) three dogs with gastric-
`duodenal fistulas were given 0.25 pmol/kg i.v. via
`the vena antibrachi or intraduodenally via a
`duodenal fistula. Another three dogs provided with
`a Heidenhain pouch received 1.0 pmol/kg by a
`stomach tube. Gastric acid secretion was induced in
`all dogs by continuous subcutaneous infusion of
`histamine, 150 to 400 nmol/kg/h, throughout the
`experiment. The dogs were deprived of food and
`water for about 18 hours prior to the start of the ex-
`periment.
`The i.v. dose, dissolved in 40 To PEG 400 and 4 mM
`bicarbonate buffer (pH = 8), was given over a
`period of 1 to 2 minutes. ~h~ oral and intra-
`duodenal doses were suspended in 0.5 Yo of a
`
`MethoceP-water solution (0.5 To). Each dose con-
`tained a tracer dose of [14C]omeprazole.
`Omeprazole was determined in plasma according
`to the method of Persson et a1 (10).
`Results and discussion
`The mean plasma concentration-time curves of all
`three doses are shown in Figure 1. Following the i.v.
`dose the omeprazole plasma levels declined bi-
`exponentially in each dog. The average half-life of
`the terminal phase (ti,@) was 62 minutes and the
`average volume of distribution, VB, was 0.56 Vkg,
`i.e., about half of the actual body space. Total
`plasma clearance, determined by the ratio between
`the dose and the integrated area under the plasma
`6.3
`concentration-time-curve
`(AUC) was
`the ratio between
`ml x min-Ikg-l. Since
`the
`blood and plasma concentration of omeprazole is
`0.60 in the dog (Table VII), the total body clearance
`of omeprazole in the dog would be about 10.5
`ml x min-I kg-l.
`
`The intraduodenal dose of omeprazole was very
`rapidly absorbed. Maximum concentration was
`already attained during the first 5 to 15 minutes
`post dosage. The fraction of this dose available to
`
`Plasma concentration
`II mnlll
`1 .o
`
`0.10
`
`0.01
`
`3
`2
`h
`4
`0
`1
`Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of ['4C] omeprazole
`Or i d . (0.25 pmol/kg,
`given i.V. (0.25 W O W % n = 2,
`n = 3, W) in thegastric fistula dog and orally (1 qol/kg,
`n = 3, 0) in the Heidenhahn pouch dog. MeanfSEM.
`
`
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`83
`
`the systemic circulation was, on average, about 70
`070 determined by AUC comparisons. The mean
`half-life in the terminal phase of the plasma
`concentration-time-curve was essentially the same
`as for the i.v. dose, i.e., approximately one hour.
`Compared with the intraduodenal dose, intra-
`gastric administration resulted in a lower rate of
`absorption and a reduction
`in the systemic
`availability. Maximum concentration was obtained
`from 30 to 75 minutes after administration and the
`AUC was only about 15 070 of that of a correspond-
`
`ing i.v. dose of omeprazole. The terminal half-life
`was again close to one hour. The difference between
`the fraction of the intraduodenal and intragastric
`dose available to the systemic circulation is prob-
`ably a consequence of acidic degradation of
`omeprazole in the histamine-stimulated stomach.
`
`The average plasma concentration-time profiles of
`the total pool of radioactive metabolites following
`all three doses are shown in Figure 2. The radioac-
`tivity due to the metabolites declined essentially
`
`1 .o
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`(
`
`0
`
`3
`h
`4
`2
`1
`Figure 2. Plasma concentrations of radioactive metabolites following administration of [14C] omeprazole i.v. (0.25
`pmol/kg, n = 2, a) or i.d. 0.25 pmollkg, n = 3, H) in the gastric fistula dog and orally (I pmol/kg, n = 3, 0) in the
`Heidenhan pouch dog. Meanf SEM.
`
`
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`84
`
`mono-exponentially in each dog during the last two
`hours of each experiment. Estimated half-lives dur-
`ing this period were unrelated to the route of ad-
`ministration and ranged between 2.7 to 5.0 hours,
`i.e., in the dog some metabolite(s) is/are eliminated
`at a lower rate than that of the parent drug.
`Design of Study I1
`This study was performed to measure the excretion
`of [14C]omeprazole and its metabolites in the urine
`and faeces, following i.v. and oral administration of
`0.25 and 1.0 pmol/kg, respectively, to three dogs.
`The doses were given cross-over at least two weeks
`apart. The dogs had fasted for 18 hours prior to
`drug administration. Food and water were acces-
`sible 6 hours post dosage. The oral dose was given
`by an intragastric tube and the animals were kept in
`metabolic cages permitting separate collection of
`urine and faeces over a 72 hour period. The concen-
`tration of [14C]omeprazole and its radioactive
`metabolites was determined by methods previously
`described in the rat study.
`Results and comments
`Totally, 87 Vo of the i.v. and 95 VO of the oral dose
`were recovered in the excreta over a three-day
`period, Table 111. During this time 32 Vo of the i.v.
`dose was excreted in the urine. The corresponding
`recovery of the oral dose was 21 Vo. The major frac-
`tion recovered in urine and faeces was excreted dur-
`ing the first 24 hours after the administration. Dur-
`ing this period more than 80 Vo of the 72-hour
`
`urinary recovery of both doses was excreted in the
`urine. Approximately 2/3 of the three-day fecal
`recovery was expelled with the faeces during the
`first 24 hours after both i.v. and oral ad-
`ministration.
`In both experiments, the excretion of unchanged
`[14C]omeprazole in the urine was less than 0.5 To.
`No attempt was made to quantify unchanged drug
`in the faeces. However, preliminary analysis of bile
`from three bile-fistulated dogs has not revealed any
`unchanged omeprazole in the bile. Accordingly,
`omeprazole seems to be eliminated primarily by
`biotransformation in the dog. The metabolites are
`excreted rapidly via the kidneys, in the bile and/or
`over the gastrointestinal epithelium.
`Human pharmacokinetics
`Two basic pharmacokinetic studies and one interac-
`tion study with aminopyrine and antipyrine have
`been completed in man until now.
`Balance study with single i.v.
`and oral [ 4C]omeprazole
`Study design
`The absorption and disposition of i.v. and orally ad-
`ministered omeprazole have been studied in a
`single-dose study with 10 mg i.v. and 20 mg orally
`(13). The radioactive dose was 20 pCi of I4C-
`labelled omeprazole. The doses were administered
`
`Table 111. Excretion of [l4C1 omeprazole and its radioactive metabolites in the dog following i.v. and oral administration
`of 0.25 and l.Oprnol/kg, respectively, of 14C-labelled drug. (MeankSD; n = 3).
`
`Dose
`
`i.v.
`
`oral
`
`~~
`
`Time
`h
`
`0-24
`24 - 48
`48 - 72
`0-72
`
`0-24
`24 - 48
`48 - 72
`0-72
`
`-
`Urine
`
`29.5-CO.7
`2.0 +0.9
`0.5 kO.1
`3 2 . 0 f 1 . 1
`
`~
`
`17.5rt6.4
`3 . 2 2 3 . 2
`0.5k0.3
`21.2f3.5
`
`Per cent of dose
`
`Faeces
`
`Total
`
`38.2f21.1
`15.2f12.6
`1.4& 0.7
`54.7+ 7.9
`
`67.7f21.8
`17.1 f 12.7
`1 . 9 f 0.8
`86.7+ 8.3
`
`~
`
`~~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~~
`
`_ _ _ _ ~
`
`51.9f21.6
`1 6 . 0 f 9.6
`5 . 7 f 4.9
`7 3 . 6 f 12.3
`
`69.4k24.2
`19.2f12.2
`6 . 1 k 5.1
`94.7f13.3
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 7
`
`

`

`85
`
`Figure 3. Chemical structure of omeprazole and two metabolites identified in human plasma.
`
`randomised cross-over 1 to 4 weeks apart to eight,
`healthy, malevolunteers, 24 to 31 years of age. Both
`doses were administered dissolved in a mixture of
`PEG 400 and water. The subjects were pre-treated
`with 8 mmol NaHCO, 5 minutes prior to drug ad-
`ministration. Sixteen mmol of bicarbonate were
`given together with each dose and during the next
`30 minutes they received a further 8 mmol of bicar-
`bonate every tenth minute to prevent degradation
`of the oral dose by the acid in the stomach.
`
`[‘4C]omeprazole and the total pool of radioactive
`metabolites were measured in the plasma over 24-
`hours according to methods mentioned previous-
`ly. In addition, two identified metabolites with the
`code-numbers H 168/22 and H 168/66, Figure 3,
`were quantified in the plasma over the same period
`of time. The identification of these two metabolites
`is described below.
`
`Urine and faeces were collected quantitatively over
`a period of 96 hours and analysed for unchanged
`drug and metabolites according to previously
`described methods. The urine portions were ad-
`justed to pH 7 to 8 by 1 M NaHCO, to prevent
`acidic degradation of omeprazole while waiting for
`analysis.
`
`Identification of omeprazole
`and two metabolites in human
`plasma
`Pooled plasma samples from the individuals par-
`ticipating
`in
`the study were extracted with
`methylene chloride at pH 7.4. Aliquots of the
`organic phase were injected repeatedly onto a
`straight-phase LC column using 3.5 Vo methanol in
`methylene chloride as the mobile phase (10). The
`methanol contained 5 Vo of a solution of 25 Yo
`NH,. Fractions of the eluate with retention times
`identical to those of the references omeprazole,
`oxidised omeprazole (H 168/66, “omeprazole
`sulfone”) and reduced omeprazole (H 168/22,
`“omeprazole sulfide”) were collected. The “ome-
`prazole sulfide” fraction was further purified
`using 2 Vo methanol in methylene chloride as
`mobile phase. The methanol contained the same
`proportion of NH, as in the first mobile phase. Col-
`lected fractions were evaporated to dryness and the
`residue was dissolved in 25 p1 of methanol. The
`samples were then introduced into the mass spec-
`trometer (MAT 112, Bremen. W Germany) by a
`direct inlet system. The sample rod was heated ac-
`cording to the following temperature programme:
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 8
`
`

`

`86
`
`initial, rapidly declining distribution phase, tii2 a,
`ambient temperature for 10 seconds, 150°C for 35
`seconds and flush evaporation to 300°C for 75
`was 3.0 min (range 2.1 to 4.3 min). The drug was ini-
`itially distributed into a very limited fraction of the
`seconds. The sample rod was cooled to 30 “C before
`the next analysis. The measurement was performed
`available body space. The average volume initially
`in repetitive scanning or selected ion monitoring
`available for the distribution of omeprazole was
`mode. Identical retention times o n the LC column
`0.079 l/kg (range 0.052 to 0.139 l/kg, i.e., com-
`and the presence of significant ions in the mass
`parable with the blood volume. Also the apparent
`spectra of isolated plasma metabolite and syn-
`volume of distribution a t pseudo-distribution
`equilibrium, Vg, was relatively small. The mean
`thesised reference were taken as identity.
`value was 0.31 i/kg (range 0.19 to 0.45 I/kg, which
`The electron impact mass spectra of the isolated
`would be compatible with localisation of a major
`fractions of the human plasma having identical
`fraction of omeprazole in the extracellular water.
`retention times to those of synthesised omeprazole
`The ratio between the blood volume and V p sug-
`and H 168/66 are given in Figure 4. These spectra
`gests that about 25 To of the total amount of
`were in all details identical to those of the two
`omeprazole in the body is confined to the blood.
`reference compounds confirming the existence of
`unchanged omeprazole, and “omeprazole sulfone” Omeprazole was eliminated rapidly in all eight in-
`in human plasma.
`dividuals. The average half-life was about 60
`minutes (range 16 to 151 minutes). The total plasma
`The concentration of the metabolite with the same
`clearance varied between 59 to 828 ml x min-‘
`retention time as “omeprazole sulfide” was too low
`(mean value 530 ml x min-l). Since the average ratio
`in the plasma to yield a complete mass spectrum
`between the omeprazole concentration in blood
`like the one of the reference compound in Figure 5.
`and plasma is about 0.6 in man (see below), the
`Therefore, three characteristic ions; the molecular
`average total blood clearance of omeprazole was
`ion m/z329+, and (M-32y, and (M-32-15)+, were
`about 880 mlxrnirri in this study.
`used to improve the sensitivity of the mass spec-
`trometer by selected ion monitoring. A fragmen-
`The rapid elimination of omeprazole appears to be
`togram with the expected relative intensity of the
`primarily due to metabolic processes since in-
`three ions was obtained (Figure 5). The time for
`significant amounts of unchanged drug were ex-
`direct probe evaporation was the same for the
`creted via the kidneys and in the stools. On the
`metabolite as for the reference compound. Accord-
`average, 78.2 070 of the i.v. radioactive dose (range
`ing to these results, “omeprazole sulfide” can be
`74.3 to 81.9 070) was recovered in the urine over the
`assigned as a minor human plasma metabolite of
`collection period of four days. The corresponding
`recovery of the oral dose was 75.7 Yo (range 72.7 to
`omeprazole.
`78.6 070). During the same period the fecal excretion
`Results and comments
`was 19.3 Yo (range 15.0 to 24.3 Yo) for the i.v. dose
`and 18.3 To (range 13.6 to 20.7 070) after oral ad-
`The mean plasma concentration-time-curves
`ministration. The excretion of
`radioactive
`following the i.v. and oral doses of omeprazole are
`metabolites via the kidneys was initially very rapid
`shown in Figure 6. The oral solution of omeprazole
`and during the first six hours post dosage an
`was very rapidly absorbed. The average time of
`average of about 60 Yo of the administered radio-
`was 13.8 minutes (range 11 to 25
`peaking, t,,,,
`active dose was recovered in the urine after both i.v.
`minutes). The maximum Concentration varied
`and oral omeprazole.
`seven-fold from 660-4580 nmol/l (mean 1914
`nmol/l) and the mean systemic availability was
`Only a minor fraction -less than 1 070 -of the dose
`53.6 9’0 (range 24.9 to 117.0 070).
`was excreted via the kidneys as the metabolite H
`168/66. In spite of its low urinary recovery the
`The plasma levels of the i.v. dose declined bi-
`metabolite H 168/66 was, however, available in the
`exponentially with time in all eight subjects and
`plasma in relatively high concentration, suggesting
`gave excellent fits to the equation of the two-
`that this metabolite is either further metabolised
`compartment model on non-linear regression
`the kidneys or mainly
`before excretion via
`analysis. The mean half-life of omeprazole in the
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 9
`
`

`

`87
`
`260
`300 miz
`260
`2i0
`160
`160
`100
`280
`240
`140
`150
`Figure 4. Electron impact mass spectrum of omeprazole (A) and metabolite H 168/66 (B) isolated from
`human plasma.
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 10
`
`

`

`88
`
`Relative intensity
`
`50
`
`Intensity
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`R
`
`250
`
`300
`
`350
`
`:30
`
`:40
`
`150
`
`IiOO
`
`1.10
`
`1[20
`
`1:30
`
`1:40
`
`1'50
`
`. I 0
`
`:20
`
`200
`min
`Figure 5. Electron impact mass spectrum of reference compound H 168/22 (A) and selected ion monitoring of
`plasma metabolite H 168/22 (B).
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 11
`
`

`

`89
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`120 rnin
`20
`40
`60
`0
`100
`80
`Figure 6. Mean plasma concentrations of omeprazole following administration of single doses of 10 mg (28.95 pmol)
`i.v. ( 0 ) and 20 mg (57.90 pmol) orally (0) to 8 young healthy subjects. The bars indicate SEM.
`
`eliminated in the bile or by secretion over the
`gastrointestinal wall. Figure 7 shows the mean con-
`centrations of omeprazole, H 168/66, and uniden-
`tified metabolites in the plasma over the first 2
`hours following the i.v. dose of omeprazole. During
`this interval the concentrations of H 168/22 were
`consistently below minimum determinable levels
`(-30 nmol/l).
`Effect of dose on the phar-
`macokinetics of omeprazole
`Study design
`The effect of various i.v. and oral doses on the
`
`kinetics of omeprazole has been evaluated in ten
`healthy, male subjects 19 to 27 (mean = 25) years of
`age (14). The subjects were given 10 and 40 mg
`omeprazole i.v. and 10, 40 and 90 mg orally ran-
`domised and cross-over. The drug was administered
`dissolved in a mixture of PEG 400 and water, and
`the buffer intake in association with the administra-
`tion was the same as in the previous study.
`
`Results and comments
`The mean plasma concentration-time-curves of
`omeprazole following the oral doses are given in
`Figure 8. The maximum concentration and AUC
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 12
`
`

`

`90
`
`MmoM
`2.0
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`30
`90
`120 min
`0
`60
`Figure 7. Mean plasma levels of omeprazole. and its metabolites following a single oral dose of 20 rng omeprazole
`(omeprazole (n = 8) (0) omeprazole; (0) H 168/66; (.)unidentified metabolites.
`
`increased disproportionately with the amount of
`drug administered, resulting in dose-dependent
`systemic availability. On average, 40.3 % (range
`14.9 to 73.4 To) of the oral 10 mg dose was available
`to the systemic circulation, while the value of this
`parameter increased to 58.2 070 (range 29.0 to
`105.0 %) for the 40 mg dose and further to 96.9 %
`(range 57.5 to 155.0 To) when 90 mg omeprazole
`was given orally.
`The increase in systemic availability by 44 %, when
`the oral omeprazole dose was raised from 10 to 40
`mg, appears to be caused primarily by a partial
`5aturation of the first-pass effect since the mean
`plasma clearance of the corresponding i.v. doses
`
`was unaffected by the dose (658 and 633 ml
`x min-l). On the other hand, the further increase
`in F to a mean value of almost 100 070 for the oral 90
`mg dose probably resulted from a continued satura-
`tion of the first-pass effect in combination with
`reduced systemic clearance. F-values in the range of
`140 to 160 070 in three individuals and a significant
`increase in the mean tih from 29 minutes for the 40
`mg dose to 45 minutes after 90 mg orally support
`this hypothesis. However, since this high dose was
`not given i.v., adjustments for potentially altered
`systemic clearance of the 90 mg dose in relation to
`the 10 and 40 mg i.v. dose could not be made in the
`calculations of F of the highest oral dose.
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 13
`
`

`

`91
`
`pmolll
`10
`
`5.0
`
`2.0
`
`1 .o
`
`0.5
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`40
`
`80
`20
`60
`0
`Figure 8. Mean plasma levels of omeprazole following
`administration of 3 single oral doses of omeprazole (n =
`10 ). The bars indicate SEM.
`
`120
`100
`(*) 10 mg (28.95 pmol)
`(A) 40 mg (115.8 pmol)
`( e) 90 mg (260.6 pmol)
`
`140
`
`160
`
`180min
`
`Some disposition characteristic of the two i.v. doses
`derived according to the two-compartment model
`are presented in Table IV. Calculated parameters
`were in good agreement with those derived from the
`
`i.v. dose of [14C]omeprazole. There was no indica-
`tion of any dose-related changes
`in
`these
`parameters when the i.v. dose was increased from 10
`to 40 mg.
`
`Table IV. Some disposition characteristics of omeprazole in man determined from an i.v. dose of 10 mg and 40 mg,
`respectively (MeankSD; n = 10).
`
`Dose
`
`vc
`1 . kg-1
`
`V8
`1 . kg-’
`
`td28
`h
`
`10 mg i.v.
`40 mg i.v.
`
`0.14f0.03
`0.15f0.02
`
`0.34k0.04
`0.37k0.05
`
`0.48f0.04
`0.59f0.08
`
`Plasma
`clearance
`ml . min-I
`
`658f37
`633f42
`
`DRL EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 14
`
`

`

`92
`Binding to plasma proteins
`The binding of omeprazole to rat, dog, and human
`plasma proteins, human serum albumin (HSA) and
`cY,-acid glucoprotein (a,-AGP) has been studied at
`ambient temperature and at 37 "C by the ultrafiltra-
`tion technique (15).
`Omeprazole in concentrations covering the normal
`range of therapeutic i.v. and oral doses was added to
`fresh plasma, solutions of HSA (Albumin, Kabi;
`purity >95 Yo; 6.8 X W4M) an a,-AGP (Sigma; 0.8
`mgxml-I) in phosphate buffer pH = 7.35, I =
`0.167. Trace amounts of [3H]omeprazole (radio-
`chemical purity 98.4 070) were added to each
`sample, and the concentration of omeprazole in the
`plastic bag and in the ultra-filtrate was determined
`by liquid scintillation counting.
`Omeprazole was bound to about 95.5 070 in the
`human plasma at 20"C, Table V. The degree of
`binding was not affected by a hundred-fold varia-
`tion in the concentration. The binding was less ex-
`tensive in the dog and the rat, in which the average
`binding was close to 90 and 87 070, respectively,
`Table V. Like in the human plasma, the degree of
`binding was constant in the plasma of these animal
`species over the concentration interval studied.
`
`Table V. Binding of omeprazole to human, dog, and rat
`plasma at 20°C. (MeanfSD)
`
`Plasma conc
`prnol.l-'
`
`Per cent bound omeprazcrle
`
`Man
`
`Dog
`
`0.19
`
`1.9
`
`19.4
`
`95.8k0.42
`(n = 7)
`95.7f0.40
`(n=7)
`95.5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket