`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and PFIZER INC.,
`Patent Owners.
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,326,945 to Patel et al.
`
`Inter Partes Review IPR2018-00892
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF KAREN L. CARROLL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT 1045
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Karen L. Carroll, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP and back-up
`
`counsel for Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan” or “Petitioner”) in the above-
`
`captioned inter partes review (“IPR”). I am registered to practice before the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) with registration number
`
`50,748. I am a member in good standing of the Bars of the States of Illinois and
`
`Georgia. I respectfully submit this declaration in support of Petitioner’s Motion to
`
`Correct a Typographical or Clerical Mistake in the Petition Under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.104(c) and Petitioner’s Motion to File Supplemental Information Pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.123(a).
`
`2.
`
`On December 28, 2016, Mylan filed with the United States Food and
`
`Drug Administration (“FDA”), an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”)
`
`for a generic version of apixaban tablets, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, which is marketed by
`
`Bristol-Myers Squibb Company as Eliquis®. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
`
`§ 355(b)(2)(a)(4), Mylan filed with its ANDA a certification with respect to each
`
`patent listed in the Orange Book for Eliquis®, including U.S. Patent No. 9,326,945
`
`(“the ’945 patent”), which is the patent-at-issue in this IPR. As a part of its due
`
`diligence for its certification, Mylan’s counsel solicited a third party to conduct a
`
`prior art search for the ’945 patent, the contents of which are protected under at
`
`least under the attorney-work product doctrine.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`As part of that search, the third party provided a chapter – Chapter 10
`
`– from the treatise Modern Pharmaceutics, entitled “Tablet Dosage Forms” and
`
`authored by E.M. Rudnic and M.K. Kottke. The page numbers of the Chapter 10
`
`provided were pages 333-359. The reference was not provided with a cover page,
`
`table of contents, or publication date information; however the third-party search
`
`provided the following citation: Rudnic, E.M. and M.K. Kottke, “Tablet Dosage
`
`Forms,” in Modern Pharmaceutics, 4th ed., G.S. Banker and C.T. Rhodes, eds.,
`
`Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 333-359 (2002). Thus, the third-
`
`party prior art search identified the Rudnic reference as from the fourth edition of
`
`Modern Pharmaceutics published in 2002. Mylan did not have any basis at that
`
`time to doubt either the accuracy of the reference or the corresponding citation
`
`provided by the third party prior art search.
`
`4.
`
`Pursuant to § 505(j)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
`
`Act and §§ 314.94 and 314.95 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
`
`Mylan provided information to Patent Owners via letter, dated March 2, 2017,
`
`regarding the filing of Mylan’s ANDA, which included the foregoing citation to
`
`the Rudnic reference provided by the third party vendor.
`
`5.
`
`In preparing the Petition (Paper No. 2) and the Declaration of Kinam
`
`Park, Ph.D. (Ex. 1002) (“the Park Declaration”) for this IPR proceeding, Mylan
`
`and its counsel similarly relied upon the version of the Rudnic reference and
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`
`
`citation provided by the third party vendor, including providing a copy of said
`
`reference to Dr. Park for his review and consideration.
`
`6. When compiling the references for submission for this IPR
`
`proceeding, we reviewed the copy of said reference and instructed our paralegal
`
`that it lacked a cover page and publication date information. Accordingly, in
`
`reliance of the citation provided by the third party prior art search, our paralegal
`
`contacted the law firm’s librarian and requested a cover page and publication date
`
`information for the fourth edition of Modern Pharmaceutics. This cover page and
`
`publication information was attached to Chapter 10 of the Rudnic reference
`
`provided by the third party search firm and was submitted with the Petition and the
`
`Park Declaration as Ex. 1010.
`
`7.
`
`In their Preliminary Response Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.107, Patent
`
`Owners challenged Ex. 1010, stating that: “the Table of Contents for the 2002
`
`version of Rudnic does not state that Chapter 10: Tablet Dosage Forms begins on
`
`page 333. Compare Ex. 2019 at 6 (identifying page 287 as the beginning of
`
`Chapter 10: Tablet Dosage Forms), with Ex. 1010 at 333 (identifying page 333 as
`
`the beginning of Chapter 10: Tablet Dosage Forms).” (Paper No. 18 at pp. 42-43.)
`
`8.
`
`As a result of Patent Owners’ allegations in their Preliminary
`
`Response, Mylan investigated the Rudnic reference and discovered that, because of
`
`the reliance on the incorrect citation provided by the third party prior art search, the
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`
`incorrect cover page and publication date information was attached to Ex. 1010
`
`and an incorrect citation was provided in the Petition and in the Park Declaration.
`
`In particular, Mylan obtained a full copy of the fourth edition of Modern
`
`Pharmaceutics and confirmed that, although the disclosure was virtually identical,
`
`the pagination did not align with the third edition. Accordingly, through further
`
`investigation, Mylan determined that the Rudnic reference provided by the third
`
`party prior art search and submitted as a part of Ex. 1010 originated from the third
`
`edition of Modern Pharmaceutics, which published in 1996, and not the fourth
`
`edition published in 2002.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct. Executed on November 26, 2018, at Atlanta, Georgia.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-6-
`
`