throbber

`
`and Bristol's ARIS10TLE Study Finds the Golden Mean of Antic...
`
`http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/201 l/08/28/pfizer-and-bristo
`
`
`
`Forbes
`
`Contributor
`Lauy Hysten,
`
`
`rm e medical journaMst covering cardiology news.
`
`PHARMA & HEALTHCARE I B/28/2011 C 2:08AM I 3,733 views
`
`Pfizer and Bristol's ARISTOTLE
`
`Study Finds the Golden Mean of
`Anticoagulation
`
`In ancient Greece the philosopher Aristotle
`
`
`l was the desirable
`
`thought thJ•.goldm:iJnE.\ll
`
`
`middle between two extremes, one of excess
`
`and the other of deficiency. In cardiology,
`
`apixaban may be the golden mean of
`
`
`anticoagulation, achieving the ideal balance
`
`of reduced strokes and deaths without
`
`causing any additional bleeding
`complications.
`
`The Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and
`
`
`
`Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial
`
`
`Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) study compared
`
`
`warlarin to apixaban (5 mg twice daily) in
`Chris Granger and Lars Wallentin at the
`
`
`
`18,201 patients with AF and at least one
`
`ESC Press Conference
`
`
`additional risk factor for stroke. The
`
`
`overachieving trial demonstrated that
`apixaban (Eliquis, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb) was not only noninferior
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to warfarin in efficacy, it was superior. Further, treatment with apixaban
`
`
`
`
`
`
`resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mortality, and reduced the
`
`
`risk of major bleeding. The results of ARISTOTLE were presented by
`
`
`
`
`Christopher Granger on Sunday morning at the European Society of
`ously in the Nw.
`
`Cardiology meeting in Paris and llllblifil1ed simultane
`
`
`England Journal Q/Medicine.
`
`Here are the key details:
`
`After 1.8 years of followup, stroke or systemic embolism (the primary
`
`
`
`
`endpoint) occurred in 212 out of 9120 apixaban-treated patients versus 265
`
`out of 9081 warlarin-treated patients:
`
`• Yearly rate: 1.27% in the 11pixaban group versus 1.60% in the warfarin group (HR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0.79, CI 0.66-0.95, p<o.001 for noninferiority, p=o.01 for superiority)
`
`Major bleeding occurred in 327 of the apixaban-treated patients versus 462
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the warlarin-treated patients.
`
`
`
`
`
`• Yearly rate: 2.13% versus 3.09% (HR 0.69, CI 0.60-0.80, p<o.001
`
`
`
`11/28/2012 6:1
`
`BMS 2006
`MYLAN v. BMS
`IPR2018-00892
`
`

`

`http://www.fortJes.com/sites/larryhusten/2011/08/28/pfizer-and-bristo
`and Bristol's ARISTOTLE Study Finds the Golden Mean of Antic...
`
`
`
`
`
`Death occurred in 603 apixaban-treated patients versus 669 warfarin­
`
`
`
`
`
`treated patients.
`
`• Yearly rate: 3.52% versus 3.94% (HR 0.89, CI 0.80-0.99, p=o.047)
`
`
`
`• Yearly rate of death from cardiovascular causes: 1.80% versus 2.02% (HR 0.89, CI
`
`
`
`
`
`0.76-1.04)
`
`
`
`
`
`Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 40 apixaban-treated patients versus 78
`
`
`
`
`warfarin-treated patients.
`
`
`
`• Yearly rate: 0.24% versus 0.47% per year (HR 0.51, Cl 0.35-0.75, p<o.001)
`
`Ischemic or uncertain stroke occurred in 162 apixaban-treated patients
`
`
`versus 175 warfarin-treated patients.
`
`
`
`• Yearly rate: 0.97% per year vs 1.05%, HR 0.92, CI o. 74-1.13, p=o-42)
`
`
`
`Stroke, systemic embolism, MI, or death from any cause occurred in
`
`
`
`
`810 apixaban-treated patients versus 906 warfarin-treated patients.
`
`• Yearly rate: 4.85% versus 5.49%, HR o.88, p=o.01
`
`The results were consistent across a broad range of subgroups. Of note, there
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were no significant differences between geographic regions. There was a
`
`
`
`
`greater reduction in major bleeding associated with apixaban in nondiabetics
`
`
`
`
`
`compared to diabetics {p=o.003 for interaction) and in patients with
`
`
`moderate or severe renal impairment compared to those with mild or no renal
`
`
`impairment ((p=o.03 for interaction).
`
`The investigators calculated that for every 1000 patients treated with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`apixaban instead of warfarin for 1. 8 years
`
`• stroke would be avoided in 6 patients,
`
`
`• major bleeding would be avoided in 15 patients, and
`
`
`
`
`
`• death would be avoided in 8 patients.
`
`Comparing their results with the RE-LY trial of dabigatran, the authors wrote
`
`
`
`
`
`that apixaban "appears to combine the advantages of each of the two doses of
`
`
`
`
`dabigatran, with both a greater overall reduction in the rate of stroke and a
`
`
`lower rate of bleeding than the rates with warfarin." They also noted that in
`
`
`
`
`the ROCKET AF trial rivaroxaban lowered intracranial hemorrahge and fatal
`
`
`
`bleeding but was not better than warfarin in other major bleeding. They listed
`
`
`
`
`
`possible reasons for the differences in trials of the three drugs: "differences in
`
`and pharmacodyn amic properties of
`the doses of drugs, the pharmacokinetic
`
`
`
`
`the drugs, patient populations, or other features of the clinical-trial design."
`
`They also noted that the 3 novel anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and
`
`
`
`
`
`rivaroxaban) have all demonstrated a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke
`
`
`
`
`compared to warfarin, suggesting "a specfic risk associated with warfarin,
`
`
`
`
`
`possibly related to its inhibition of multiple coagulation factors or interaction
`
`
`between warfarin and tissue factor VIia complexes in the brain."
`
`
`In.an.W..:.G9mp�nyim� �di.twia.J, Jessica Mega called
`the ARISTOTLE results
`
`
`
`
`"impressive" and wrote that "a new era of anticoagulation in patients with
`
`
`
`
`atrial fibrillation appears to be emerging." She said that all three newer
`
`
`
`anticoagulants significantly reduce hemorrhagic stroke and have similar
`
`
`
`
`effects on mortality, though the difference in mortality was significant only in
`ARISTOTLE. The three drugs, she writes, "have been shown to have a more
`
`
`
`favorable bleeding profile than warfarin and are at least as efficacious."
`
`11/28/2012 6:•
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`and Bristol's ARIS'IOTLE Study Finds the Golden Mean of Antic...
`http://www.forbes.com/sites/lanyhusten/2011/08/28/pfizer-and-bristo
`
`In an interview, Christopher Granger, the first author of the study, said that
`
`
`
`
`the investigators felt "as though we hit the sweet spot" with the drug in the
`
`
`
`
`
`trial, achieving greater efficacy in preventing stroke while also producing a
`
`
`
`"really remarkable reduction in major bleeding, and all with a drug that's
`
`really very well tolerated" and that has produced "no real safety signal."
`
`In addition, Granger said that the results in the United States appear to be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consistent with the overall trial, although a detailed analys is has not yet been
`performed.
`
`Granger speculated that after the forthcoming ENGAGE AF=TIMI 48 trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with edoxaban, "there will not be another large trial with a a warfarin
`comparator."
`
`At the ESC press conference for ARISTOTLE, Lars Wallentin presented
`
`
`
`results of the trial stratified by the time in the therapeutic range (TTR).
`
`
`
`Although the benefits of apixaban were more pronounced in centers with poor
`
`
`
`INR control, apixaban was still beneficial in centers that had good INR
`control.
`
`Click here to download the press release from Bristol-Myers Squibb and
`
`
`
`
`
`Pfizer:
`
`
`08�1811.ARISTOTLE.ESC Data.Rele,t�.e <;opy
`
`This article is available online at:
`
`
`
`h tip: I I www.for h<:s. <:<1m/sl. tes/l a.rrvhus tmi/20 l l/08i28/.l)fiz,�r-t1 ud-bl'istols-:n·fal.otl,,-stu d \' -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fi11ds-tl1e--gold,,n-m�,an-of-,ft11ti,,o.igulaiio11,,2/
`
`
`
`11/28/2012 6:•
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket