throbber
From: Paul Hart paul.hart@eriseip.com
`Subject: Re: IPR2018-00884: Dr. Easttom Deposition
`Date: March 11, 2019 at 12:40 PM
`To: Brett Mangrum brett@etheridgelaw.com
`Cc: Danny Butts danny@etheridgelaw.com, Ryan Loveless ryan@etheridgelaw.com, Jeff Huang jeff@etheridgelaw.com,
`Jim Etheridge jim@etheridgelaw.com, Adam Seitz adam.seitz@eriseip.com, Travis Richins travis@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Brett,
`Throughout this weeks-long back and forth Petitioner has never stated or suggested that it seeks cross examination that exceeds the
`scope permitted by the rules. Your attempt to manufacture such an issue simply finds no support in the parties communications.
`I will state our position once again, to ensure there is no confusion. Petitioner disagrees with Mr. Easttom’s claim construction position
`and Patent Owner’s reliance on the same. Unless Patent Owner agrees to strike Mr. Easttom’s declaration and all reliance on that
`declaration, Petitioner demands a deposition of Mr. Easttom. It is our right to cross examine Mr. Easttom and we will not consider
`written questions (and the potential for gamesmanship those introduce) an adequate substitute for live cross examination.
`As we’ve now requested multiple times, either (i) provide dates for Mr. Easttom’s deposition or (ii) confirm that (1) you are refusing to
`make Mr. Easttom available for cross examination and that (2) you will not oppose a motion to strike his declaration and any
`references or citations thereto following the close of our discovery period.
`Best,
`
`PaulP"#$ H"'( | S+"',+-$.,'
`E'01, IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`On Mar 8, 2019, at 3:56 PM, Brett Mangrum <brett@etheridgelaw.com> wrote:
`
`Paul,
`
`To more produc9vely advance this discussion, it would be helpful if you addressed our prior
`ques9ons, including whether Pe99oner disputes the sole proposi9on for which the expert
`declara9on is cited. You also neglected to address our proposed compromise. Nevertheless, we
`understand from your last, including your comment that Uniloc’s admiHedly narrow reliance on
`the declara9on is “irrelevant,” that you seek a deposi9on for the impermissible purpose of
`asking ques9ons directed to arguments outside the scope of the Patent Owner Response. You
`are reminded that 37 CFR 42.23 states a Pe99oner’s reply may only respond to arguments
`raised in a patent owner response. You apparent posi9on in scope is in conflict with this rule.
`You have provided no authority in support of your posi9on, though we invited you to do so.
`
`In the absence of the clarifica9on we specifically requested, we can only conclude that your
`purpose in seeking a deposi9on is to ask ques9ons outside what the rules allow. We need the
`clarifica9on we requested in order to properly address your ques9ons. Under the present
`circumstances, we cannot agree to not oppose a new mo9on to strike.
`
`Regards,
`BreH
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 1
`
`

`

`BreH
`
`From: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 1:46 PM
`To: BreH Mangrum <breH@etheridgelaw.com>
`Cc: Danny BuHs <danny@etheridgelaw.com>; Ryan Loveless <ryan@etheridgelaw.com>; Jeff
`Huang <jeff@etheridgelaw.com>; Jim Etheridge <jim@etheridgelaw.com>; Adam Seitz
`<adam.seitz@eriseip.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2018-00884: Dr. EasHom Deposi9on
`
`BreH,
`
`You’ve submiHed an expert declara9on in this case and have relied on that declara9on in your
`Patent Owner Response. Under the rules, we’re en9tled to cross examine your expert in a
`deposi9on. The narrowness of your expert’s opinions on which you rely is irrelevant. We’re
`en9tled a deposi9on and, if you won’t agree to strike his declara9on and your reliance on that
`declara9on, we want to proceed with his deposi9on.
`
`To the extent you are unwilling to provide dates of availability for Dr. EasHom, the only op9on is
`his tes9mony must be stricken. As we stated previously, either (i) provide dates for Dr. EasHom’s
`deposi9on or (ii) confirm that (1) you are refusing to make Dr. EasHom available for cross
`examina9on and that (2) you will not oppose a mo9on to strike his declara9on and any
`references or cita9ons thereto following the close of our discovery period.
`
`Best,
`Paul
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Mar 7, 2019, at 8:21 AM, BreH Mangrum <breH@etheridgelaw.com> wrote:
`
`Paul:
`
`As we stated in prior communica9on, the Patent Owner Response ONLY cites Dr.
`EasHom’s declara9on (EX2001 ¶¶ 8-9) for the sole proposi9on that “a POSITA
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 2
`
`

`

`EasHom’s declara9on (EX2001 ¶¶ 8-9) for the sole proposi9on that “a POSITA
`would understand that the en9ty intercep9ng a message would not be one of the
`intended recipients of that message.” Our posi9on is that it would be a waste of
`the par9es resources to schedule a deposi9on that, under the rules, must be
`restricted to that sole proposi9on. Indeed, Pe99oner has not indicated whether
`that straighoorward proposi9on is even disputed. Please do so. Given your
`insistence in scheduling a deposi9on, we can only assume that you intend to
`expand the scope of the deposi9on beyond what the rules allow. Please clarify
`your posi9on as to the scope and the authority in support of your posi9on.
`Alterna9vely, and in the interest of compromise, we would not be opposed to you
`submipng a limited number of interrogatory ques9ons directed to the single
`proposi9on for which the declara9on is cited.
`
`Regards,
`BreH
`
`
`From: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 2:58 PM
`To: BreH Mangrum <breH@etheridgelaw.com>
`Cc: Danny BuHs <danny@etheridgelaw.com>; Ryan Loveless
`<ryan@etheridgelaw.com>; Jeff Huang <jeff@etheridgelaw.com>; Jim Etheridge
`<jim@etheridgelaw.com>; Adam Seitz <adam.seitz@eriseip.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2018-00884: Dr. EasHom Deposi9on
`
`BreH,
`
`Pupng this back to the top of your inbox. Please let us know Uniloc’s posi9on.
`
`To the extent we do not hear from you on this issue, your silence will be
`interpreted as confirma9on that (1) you will not provide Dr. EasHom for cross
`examina9on and (2) you will not oppose a mo9on to strike his declara9on and any
`references or cita9ons thereto following the close of our discovery period.
`
`Best,
`Paul
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`wrote:
`
`BreH,
`
`Given the Court’s ruling (aHached) that striking EasHom’s declara9on
`is premature prior to the expira9on of our discovery period, we
`wanted to follow up with you all on next steps. To the extent that you
`are maintaining your prior posi9on, please confirm that (1) you will
`not provide Dr. EasHom for cross examina9on and (2) you will not
`oppose a mo9on to strike his declara9on and any references or
`cita9ons thereto following the close of our discovery period.
`Otherwise, please provide dates of availability for Dr. EasHom so
`Pe99oner can take his deposi9on in advance of our Reply.
`
`Best,
`Paul
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`
`
`<Order denying mo9on to strike EasHom's Dec.pdf>
`
`
`On Feb 21, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Paul Hart
`<paul.hart@eriseip.com> wrote:
`
`BreH,
`
`Here’s what we intend to send the Board by COB this
`arernoon:
`
`>>>
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 4
`
`

`

`>>>
`In IPR2018-00884, Pe99oner Apple respecoully requests
`permission to file an Unopposed Mo9on to Strike under
`37 CFR 42.5(a) and 42.20(a). Specifically, the Pe99oner
`seeks to strike the EasHom Declara9on (Exhibit 2001)
`and all references or cita9ons to the declara9on in any
`filing as an alterna9ve to making the declarant available
`for cross-examina9on. Pe99oner and Patent Owner
`have conferred, and Patent Owner indicates that they
`do not oppose the mo9on.
`
`If needed, Pe99oner and Patent Owner are available for
`a Board call on Monday or Tuesday next week (2/25 or
`2/26) between 11:00am and 3pm EDT.
`>>>
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:00 AM, BreH
`Mangrum <breH@etheridgelaw.com>
`wrote:
`
`Paul,
`
`Please provide us a drar copy of the email
`you intend to send to the Board. While we
`do not believe a call with the Board is
`necessary, we can make ourselves available
`either Monday or Tuesday of next week
`from 10am to 2pm (CST).
`
`Regards,
`BreH
`
`From: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 5
`
`

`

`From: Paul Hart <paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 11:52
`AM
`To: BreH Mangrum
`<breH@etheridgelaw.com>
`Cc: Danny BuHs
`<danny@etheridgelaw.com>; Ryan
`Loveless <ryan@etheridgelaw.com>; Jeff
`Huang <jeff@etheridgelaw.com>; Jim
`Etheridge <jim@etheridgelaw.com>; Adam
`Seitz <adam.seitz@eriseip.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2018-00884: Dr. EasHom
`Deposi9on
`
`Counsel,
`
`We’ve had a chance to confer with our
`client, and we agree that an unopposed
`mo9on to strike Dr. EasHom’s declara9on
`and any references or cita9ons thereto is
`an acceptable alterna9ve to cross
`examina9on. We’ll reach out to the Board
`to request permission for the filing. To the
`extent they would like to convene a
`conference call to discuss, what’s your
`availability next week? We can generally
`make ourselves available at any 9me next
`week.
`
`Best,
`Paul
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 6
`
`

`

`On Feb 7, 2019, at 2:07 PM,
`BreH Mangrum
`<breH@etheridgelaw.com>
`wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Uniloc cites to Dr. EasHom’s
`declara9on solely for the
`proposi9on that “a POSITA
`would understand that the
`en9ty intercep9ng a message
`would not be one of the
`intended recipients of that
`message. EX2001 ¶¶ 8-9. In
`other words, a POSITA would
`understand that the device
`that is intercep9ng a message
`would be a third party to the
`intended recipients of that
`message.”
`
`Under these circumstances,
`Uniloc believes a cross
`examina9on of Dr. EasHom is
`a waste of the par9es’ 9me
`and resources. If you s9ll
`disagree, Uniloc would not
`oppose a mo9on to strike Dr.
`EasHom’s declara9on.
`
`Regards,
`BreH
`
`From: Paul Hart
`<paul.hart@eriseip.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 5,
`2019 3:07 PM
`To: Danny BuHs
`<danny@etheridgelaw.com>;
`Ryan Loveless
`<ryan@etheridgelaw.com>;
`BreH Mangrum
`<breH@etheridgelaw.com>;
`Jeff Huang
`<jeff@etheridgelaw.com>;
`Jim Etheridge
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 7
`
`

`

`Jim Etheridge
`<jim@etheridgelaw.com>
`Cc: Adam Seitz
`<adam.seitz@eriseip.com>
`Subject: IPR2018-00884: Dr.
`EasHom Deposi9on
`
`Counsel,
`
`We would like to schedule Dr.
`EasHom’s deposi9on in
`IPR2018-00884. The week of
`March 18 works well on our
`end. Please let us know if Dr.
`EasHom is available any day
`that week.
`
`Thanks very much.
`
`Best,
`Paul
`
` Paul Hart | Shareholder
`Erise IP, P.A.
`Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`(main) 913-777-5600
`(direct) 720-689-5441
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`(fax) 913-777-5601
`www.eriseip.com
`
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd.
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Statement
`This email message and any attached files are
`confidential and are intended solely for the use of
`the addressee(s) named above. This
`communication may contain material protected by
`attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If
`you are not the intended recipient or person
`responsible for delivering this confidential
`communication to the intended recipient, you have
`received this communication in error, and any
`review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing,
`copying, or other distribution of this email message
`and any attached files is strictly prohibited. Erise IP,
`P.A. reserves the right to monitor any
`communication that is created, received, or sent on
`its network. If you have received this confidential
`communication in error, please notify the sender
`immediately by reply email message and
`permanently delete the original message.
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Statement
`This email message and any attached files are confidential and are
`intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This
`communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work
`product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 8
`
`

`

`product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person
`responsible for delivering this confidential communication to the intended
`recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review,
`use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of
`this email message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. Erise IP,
`P.A. reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created,
`received, or sent on its network. If you have received this confidential
`communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply
`email message and permanently delete the original message.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Statement
`This email message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This
`communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or
`person responsible for delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and
`any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this email message and any attached files is strictly
`prohibited. Erise IP, P.A. reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created, received, or sent on its network. If you have received
`this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email message and permanently delete the original
`message.
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Statement
`This email message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain
`material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential
`communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other
`distribution of this email message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. Erise IP, P.A. reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created, received,
`or sent on its network. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email message and permanently
`delete the original message.
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 9
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 10
`
`IPR2018-00884
`Apple Inc. EX1017 Page 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket