`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper: 47
`Entered: October 25, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`VISA INC., and VISA U.S.A. INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-008131
`Patent 9,100,826 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before PATRICK R. SCANLON, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and
`JASON W. MELVIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ERRATA
`The Board modifies its Final Written Decision (Paper 46) entered in
`this proceeding on October 8, 2019. Specifically, the Final Written Decision
`is corrected as follows:
`
`
`1 Visa Inc. and Visa U.S.A. Inc., which filed a petition in IPR2019-00176,
`have been joined as parties to this proceeding.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`Patent 9,100,826 B2
`
`
`On page 3, the sentence: “For the reasons that follow, we determine
`that Petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1,
`2, 8, 10, 11, 21, 22, 24, 27, 30, and 31 of the ’826 patent are unpatentable,
`but has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 7, 14, 15,
`26, and 34 are unpatentable,” is replaced with “For the reasons that follow,
`we determine that Petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence
`that claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 15, 21, 22, 24, 27, 30, and 31 of the ’826 patent are
`unpatentable, but has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that
`claims 7, 8, 14, 26, and 34 are unpatentable.”
`The summary table on page 49 is replaced with the following:
`35
`Claims
`Claims
`U.S.C.
`Shown
`Not Shown
`§
`Unpatentable
`Unpatentable
`1, 2, 10, 11, 21,
`22, 24, 27, 30,
`and 31
`
`Basis
`
`102
`
`Jakobsson
`
`
`
`103
`
`
`
`7, 14, 26, and
`34
`
`Claims
`
`1, 2, 10, 11,
`21, 22, 24,
`27, 30, and
`31
`7, 14, 26,
`and 34
`
`Jakobson,
`Verbauwhede,
`and Maritzen
`Jakobsson and
`Gullman
`
`8
`
`7, 8, 14, 26,
`and 34
`
`8 and 15
`
`103
`
`Overall
`Outcome
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`1, 2, 10, 11, 15,
`21, 22, 24, 27,
`30, and 31
`On page 50, the sentence: “ORDERED that claims 1, 2, 8, 10, 11, 21,
`22, 24, 27, 30, and 31 of the ’826 patent have been shown to be
`unpatentable,” is replaced with “ORDERED that claims 1, 2, 10, 11, 15, 21,
`22, 24, 27, 30, and 31 of the ’826 patent have been shown to be
`unpatentable.”
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00813
`Patent 9,100,826 B2
`
`
`On page 50, the sentence: “FURTHER ORDERED that claims 7, 14,
`15, 26, and 34 have not been shown to be unpatentable,” is replaced with
`“FURTHER ORDERED that claims 7, 8, 14, 26, and 34 have not been
`shown to be unpatentable.”
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Monica Grewal
`Benjamin Fernandez
`Mark Selwyn
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`monica.grewal@wilmerhale.com
`ben.fernandez@wilmerhale.com
`kelvin.chan@wilmerhale.com
`mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Glass
`Tigran Guledjian
`Christopher Mathews
`Nima Hefazi
`Richard Lowry
`Razmig Messerian
`Jordan B. Kaericher
`Harold A. Barza
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`tigranguledjian@quinnemanuel.com
`chrismathews@quinnemanuel.com
`nimahefazi@quinnemanuel.com
`richardlowry@quinnemanuel.com
`razmesserian@quinnemanuel.com
`jordankaericher@quinnemanuel.com
`halbarza@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
