throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`wwwnsptogov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`11/768,729
`
`06/26/2007
`
`Kenneth P. Weiss
`
`W0537—7006
`
`3536
`
`EXAMINER
`.
`Jew/Imam —
`06/29/2011 —
`7590
`c/o Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
`DADA, BEEMNET w
`Riverfront Office Park, One Main Street
`ART UNIT
`PAPER
`Cambridge, MA 02142
`— NW
`2435
`
`BER
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`06/29/201 1
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`1 of 7
`1 0f 7
`
`APPLE 1112
`
`APPLE 1112
`
`

`

`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`11/768,729
`
`Examiner
`BEEMNETDADA
`
`WEISS, KENNETH P.
`
`Art Unit
`2435
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1. 136( a).
`In no event however may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX () MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 18 Agril2011.
`
`a)IZl This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)I:l This action is non-final.
`
`3)|:l Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quay/e, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`4)IXI Claim(s) 1-5 9-16 18-2124-30 32-39 and 41-45is/are pending in the application.
`
`4a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`5)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`
`6)|Zl Claim(s) 1 -5 9- 16 18-2124-30 32-39 and 41 -45is/are rejected.
`
`7)I:l Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`8)I:l Claim(s) _ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`
`9)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`OH] The drawing(s) filed on _ is/are: a)|:l accepted or b)I:l objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`11)|:l The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`
`a)|:l AII
`
`b)I:l Some * c)|:l None of:
`
`1.|:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.|:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. _
`
`3.|:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) I] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`2) D Notice of Draftsperson‘s Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948)
`3) IZI Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/OS)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`.
`US. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`4) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper N°(5 )/Mai| Date. _
`5)I:I Notice of Informal Patent Application
`)6|:| Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06)
`
`Office Action Summary
`20f7
`
`2 of 7
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20110627
`
`
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`This office action is in reply to an amendment filed on 04/18/2011. Claims 1-5, 9-16, 18-
`
`21, 24-30, 32-39 and 41-45 are pending.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments filed 04/18/2011 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive. Applicant argues that the prior art on record fails to teach the limitation 'mapping the
`
`time varying multicharacter code to information required to provide the services" Examiner
`
`disagrees.
`
`Examiner would point out that, Gioradano teaches a method/system configured to map
`
`the multi-character code to secure data including information required to provide the services,
`
`the information including account identifying information where the account identifying
`
`information is unknown to the service provider, to provide the account identifying information to
`
`a third party to enable a transaction without providing the account identifying information to the
`
`service provider (i.e., note that the POS system does not get access to customers credit/debit
`
`account information, column 18, lines 5-47). Gioradano is silent on the multi-character code
`
`being time-varying. However, Brainard teaches an authentication system that maps time-varying
`
`multi-character code to stored secure data (i.e., verifying by comparing an authentication code,
`
`wherein the authentication code is time dependent, paragraphs 0019, 0020, 0045 and 0063).
`
`Examiner would further point out that, the time varying multi-character code of Brainard can be
`
`implemented into the multi-character code of Gioradano in order to enhance security of the
`
`system by changing the code based on timing data. It is therefore, the combination of
`
`Gioradano and Brainard that teaches the limitation mapping a time-varying multi-character code
`
`3 of 7
`
`3of7
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`to secure data
`
`unknown to the service provider. Examiner would further point out that the art
`
`on record teaches the claim limitations and therefore, the rejection is respectfully maintained.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 1-5, 9-16, 18—21, 24-30, 32-39 and 41-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as
`
`being unpatentable over Gioradano et al. US 7,571,139 B1 (hereinafter Gioradano) in view
`
`Brainard et al. US 2006/0256961 A1 (hereinafter Brainard).
`
`As per claims 1 and 16, Giorandano teaches a secure registry system for providing
`
`information to a service provider to enable the service provider to provide services to entities
`
`with secure data stored in the secure registry system, comprising:
`
`a database including secure data for each entity, wherein each entity is associated with
`
`and a multicharacter_code for each entity having secure data in the secure registry system,
`
`respectively [column 18, lines 14-47] and
`
`a processor configured to receive, from the service provider, the multicharacter code for
`
`the entity on whose behalf services are to be provided, configured to map the multicharacter
`
`code to secure data including information required to provide the services, the information
`
`including account identifying information where the account identifying information is unknown
`
`to the service provider, to provide the account identifying information to a third party to enable a
`
`transaction without providing the account identifying information to the service provider (i.e.,
`
`4 of 7
`
`4of7
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`note that the POS system does not get access to customers credit/debit account information,
`
`column 18, lines 5-47). Giorandano does not explicitly teach a time-varying code. In the same
`
`field of endeavor, Brainard teaches an authentication system including a time-varying
`
`multicharacter code to secure data and data access [paragraphs 0019 and 0020]. It would have
`
`been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of applicant’s invention to employ
`
`the teachings of Brainard within the system of Gioradano in order to enhance the security of the
`
`system.
`
`As per claims 2 and 18, Gioradano further teaches the system wherein the
`
`multicharacter code represents an identity of the entity [column 18, lines 14-47].
`
`As per claims 3 and 19, Gioradano further teaches the system wherein the
`
`multicharacter code is provided to the system via a secure electronic transmission device
`
`[column 18, lines 14-47].
`
`As per claim 4 and 20, Gioradano further teaches the system wherein the code is
`
`encrypted and transmitted to the system and wherien the system is configured to decrypt the
`
`code with a public key of the entity [column 18, lines 14-47].
`
`As per claims 5 and 21, Gioradano further teaches the system wherein said service
`
`provider's service includes delivery, wherein the information is an address to which n item is to
`
`be delivered to the entity, wherein the system receives the code and wherein the system uses
`
`the code to obtain the appropriate address for delivery of the item by the third party [column 18,
`
`lines 14-47].
`
`5 of 7
`
`50f7
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`As per claim 9-15, 41-45, 24-27, 30, 32 and 41-45 Gioradano further teaches the system
`
`wherein the account identifying information includes credit card information regarding the entity
`
`and the processor is configured to provide the credit card information based upon the code of
`
`the entity to enable the transaction [column 18, lines 14-47].
`
`As per claims 28-29 and 33-39, Gioradano further teaches the system wherein the
`
`database is further configured to associate biometric information with each entity having secure
`
`data in the secure registry respectively [column 18, lines 14-47].
`
`Conclusion
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as
`
`set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after
`
`the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event,
`
`however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date
`
`of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to BEEMNET DADA whose telephone number is (571 )272—3847. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday (9:00 am - 5:30 pm).
`
`6 of 7
`
`6of7
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Kim Y. Vu can be reached on (571) 272-3859. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you
`
`would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the
`
`automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272—1000.
`
`/BEEMNET DADA/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
`
`7 of 7
`
`70f7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket