throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313- 1450
`wwwnsptogov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`
`
`
` F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`
`
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`11/768,729
`
`06/26/2007
`
`Kenneth P. Weiss
`
`W0537—7006
`
`3536
`
`EXAMINER
`.
`Jew/Imam —
`”3’2““ —
`”90
`c/o Lowrie, Lando & Anastasi, LLP
`DADA, BEEMNET w
`Riverfront Office Park, One Main Street
`ART UNIT
`PAPER
`Cambridge, MA 02142
`— NW
`2435
`
`BER
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`02/03/2010
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL—90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`1 of 5
`1 0f 5
`
`APPLE 1107
`
`APPLE 1 107
`
`

`

`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`11/768,729
`
`WEISS, KENNETH P.
`
`Examiner
`
`BEEMNET w. DADA
`
`Art Unit
`
`2435 -
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`In no event however may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)IXI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 20 November 2009.
`
`2a)IZI This action is FINAL.
`
`2b)I:I This action is non-final.
`
`3)I:I Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`
`closed in accordance with the practice under EX parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`
`4)IZI Claim(s) 1-5 8-16 18-21 and 24-40 is/are pending in the application.
`
`
`4a) Of the above Claim(s)
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`5)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`
`6)IXI Claim(s) 1-5 8-16 18-21 24-40 is/are rejected.
`
`7)I:I Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`
`8)I:I Claim(s) _ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`
`9)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`
`10)I:I The drawing(s) filed on
`
`is/are: a)I:I accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`11)I:I The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)I:I Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)—(d) or (f).
`
`a)I:I All
`
`b)I:I Some * c)I:I None of:
`
`1.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2.I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`
`
`3.I:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`4) D Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`1) D Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date. _
`2) D Notice of Draftsperson‘s Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948)
`3) |:| Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`5) I:I Notice of Informal Patent Application
`
`Paper No(s)/Mai| Date
`.
`6) D Other:
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06)
`
`Office Action Summary
`20f5
`
`2 of 5
`
`Part of Paper No./Mai| Date 20100201
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`This office action is in reply to an amendment filed on November 20, 2009. Claims 1, 3-
`
`5, 8, 9, 11, 16 and 21 have been amended and new claims 31-40 have been added. Claims 1-5,
`
`8-16, 18-21, 24-40 are pending.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-5, 8-16, 18-21, 24-40 have been
`
`considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Examiner would point out that
`
`the claim amendments include a phrase that is directed to negative limitation: "..where the
`
`information is unknown to the service provider..." and "...provide the service without the service
`
`provider's knowledge of the information..." “Any negative limitation or exclusionary proviso must
`
`have basis in the original disclosure. If alternative elements are positively recited in the
`
`specification, they may be explicitly excluded in the claims. See In re Johnson, 558 F.2d 1008,
`
`1019, 194 USPQ 187, 196
`
`(CCPA 1977) ("[the] specification, having described the whole, necessarily described the part
`
`remaining. ’9. See also Ex parte Grasse/li, 231 USPQ 393 (Bd. App. 1983), aff ’dmem., 738 F. 2d
`
`453 (Fed. Cir. 1984). The mere absence of a positive recitation is not basis for an exclusion.
`
`Any claim containing a negative limitation which does not have basis in the original disclosure
`
`should be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written
`
`description requirement.”
`
`The phrase clearly recites a negative limitation. Indeed, the specification must contain a
`
`full, clear and concise description of the claimed subject matter.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`3 of 5
`
`3of5
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112:
`
`The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of
`making and using it,
`in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the
`art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same and shall
`set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
`
`Claims 1-5, 8-16, 18—21and 24-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as
`
`failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter
`
`which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one
`
`skilled in the relevant art that the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had
`
`possession of the claimed invention. The specification fails to mention or teach the
`
`system/method, "...where the information is unknown to the service provider..." and "...provide
`
`the service without the service provider's knowledge of the information..."
`
`Conclusion
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this
`
`Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant
`
`is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after
`
`the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event,
`
`however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this
`
`final action.
`
`4 of 5
`
`4of5
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 11/768,729
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 2435
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to BEEMNET W. DADA whose telephone number is (571 )272—3847. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday (9:00 am - 5:30 pm).
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Kim Y. Vu can be reached on (571) 272-3859. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent
`
`Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications
`
`may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished
`
`applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR
`
`system, see http://pair—direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private
`
`PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you
`
`would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the
`
`automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/Beemnet W Dada/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
`February 1, 2010
`
`5 of 5
`
`50f5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket