`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE CO., LTD.
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018-00807
`Patent No. 8,102,833
`
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,102,833
`CHALLENGING CLAIMS 1-14
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§311-319 AND
`37 C.F.R. §42.100 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,102,833 (the “’833 Patent”)
`
`File History for the ’833 Patent
`
`File History for U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/972,244
`
`File History for U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/987,427
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0304467 (“Papasakellariou
`
`Publication”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,331,328 (“Papasakellariou”)
`
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/942,843 (“Papasakellariou
`
`Provisional”)
`
`First Declaration of Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum vitae of Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0262871 (“Cho”)
`
`Motorola, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #50, R1-073361, “Uplink
`
`channel interleaving” (“Motorola”)
`
`1012
`
`File History for U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/988,433
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`Description
`
`Claim Construction Order, Optis Wireless Tech., LLC and
`
`PanOptis Patent Mgmt., LLC v. Huawei Techs. Co. Ltd., et al.,
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-123 JRG-RSP, Dkt. #114 (E.D. Tex. filed Jan.
`
`18, 2018)
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0185159 (“Seo”)
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2006/0098568 (“Oh”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,421,527 (“DeMartin”)
`
`WIPO Publication No. 2007/081145 (“Kwak”)
`
`Second Amended Complaint, Optis Wireless Tech., LLC and
`
`PanOptis Patent Mgmt., LLC v. Huawei Techs. Co. Ltd., et al.,
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-123 JRG-RSP, Dkt. #22 (E.D. Tex. filed
`
`March 21, 2017)
`
`Declaration of Xiaoan Fan
`
`File History for Papasakellariou Provisional
`
`Second Declaration of Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.
`
`EP Patent Publication No. 1793639
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1023
`
`Description
`
`“3GPP – LTE” webpage, available at
`
`http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/98-lte
`
`1024
`
`3GPP TS 36.211 v2.0.0 (2007-09), Technical Specification
`
`Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial
`
`Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation
`
`(Release 8)
`
`1025
`
`3GPP TS 36.212 v2.0.0 (2007-09), 3rd Generation Partnership
`
`Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;
`
`Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA);
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 8)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,732,316 (“Tong”)
`
`“3GPP – About 3GPP” Home webpage
`
`Internet Archive’s record of www.3gpp.org on September 14,
`
`2006
`
`1029
`
`Internet Archive’s record of www.3gpp.org/tb/home.htm on
`
`September 23, 2006
`
`iii
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1030
`
`Description
`
`Internet Archive’s record of TSG RAN WG1 homepage on
`
`September 23, 2006
`
`1031
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FTP webpage for TSG RAN
`
`WG1 on September 23, 2006
`
`1032
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FTP webpage for TSG RAN
`
`WG1 meeting #46 on September 23, 2006
`
`1033
`
`Internet Archive’s record of www.3gpp.org on September 2,
`
`2007
`
`1034
`
`Internet Archive’s record of www.3gpp.org/tb/home.htm on
`
`August 19, 2007
`
`1035
`
`Internet Archive’s record of TSG RAN WG1 homepage on
`
`August 23, 2007
`
`1036
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FTP webpage for TSG RAN
`
`WG1 on July 1, 2007
`
`1037
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FTP webpage for TSG RAN
`
`WG1 meeting #50 on July 14, 2007
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1038
`
`Description
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FAQ webpage on September
`
`23, 2006
`
`1039
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FAQ webpage on September
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`6, 2007
`
`3GPP FAQ webpage
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP E-mail Exploder Lists on
`
`September 23, 2006
`
`1042
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP E-mail Exploder Lists on
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`August 25, 2007
`
`3GPP meetings for group R1
`
`3GPP FTP webpage for TSG RAN WG1 meeting #50
`
`3GPP FTP webpage for “Docs” directory for TSG RAN WG1
`
`meeting #50
`
`1046
`
`Internet Archive’s record of 3GPP FTP webpage for
`
`contribution documents of TSG RAN WG1 meeting #50 on
`
`January 19, 2008
`
`1047
`
`Brian Classon’s email to 3GPP ListServ on August 14, 2007
`
`v
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1048
`
`Description
`
`3GPP FTP webpage for “Reports” directory for TSG RAN WG1
`
`meeting #50
`
`1049
`
`Internet Archive’s record of “3GPP meetings for group R1”
`
`1050
`
`1051
`
`1052
`
`1053
`
`1054
`1055
`1056
`
`1057
`1058
`1059
`
`webpage on August 15, 2007
`
`Internet Archive’s record of “3GPP E-mail Exploder Lists”
`webpage as of July 5, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of “Archives of
`3GPP_TSG_RAN_WG1@LIST.ETSI.ORG” webpage as of
`July 28, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of “List Archives at LIST.ETSI.ORG”
`webpage as of July 6, 2007
`3GPP RAN WG1 Meeting #50, List of Registered Attendees,
`View Badges
`3GPP RAN WG1 Meeting #50, List of Registered Attendees
`List Archives at LIST.ETSI.ORG
`Brian’s Classon’s e-mail message to RAN WG1’s e-mail
`reflector dated August 14, 2007, as found on 3GPP’s public e-
`mail website
`R1-073361_UL_channel_interleaver.doc
`R1-073361_UL_channel_interleaver.doc
`Internet Archive’s record of “http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/”
`webpage as of July 30, 2007
`
`vi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO.
`(HUAWEI)
`Exhibit #
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1062
`
`1063
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`1066
`
`1067
`
`1068
`
`Description
`
`Internet Archive’s record of “TSG Organization” webpage as of
`July 5, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of “TSG RAN WG1 (Radio layer 1)
`Overview” webpage as of July 16, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of “http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/” on
`August 13, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of “http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/”
`on August 10, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of
`“http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/” on July 1, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of
`“http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_50/” on
`July 14, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of
`“http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_50/” on
`November 16, 2007
`Internet Archive’s record of
`“http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_50/Docs/”
`on January 19, 2008
`Tdoclist_RAN1 #50(Aug_2007).xls
`
`
`
`vii
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`I.
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
`II. MANDATORY NOTICES ............................................................................. 3
`A.
`Real Parties-in-Interest (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1)) ................................... 3
`B.
`Related Matters (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2)) ............................................... 3
`C.
`Lead and Backup Counsel (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3)) .............................. 3
`D.
`Service Information (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(4)) ........................................ 4
`FEES (37 C.F.R. §42.103) ............................................................................... 4
`III.
`IV. REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR (37 C.F.R. §42.104) ......................................... 4
`A. Grounds for Standing (37 C.F.R. §42.104(a)) ...................................... 4
`B.
`Citation of Prior Art .............................................................................. 5
`C.
`Claims and Statutory Ground for Relief (37 C.F.R.
`§§42.104(b)(1) & (b)(2)) ....................................................................... 5
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART .......................................... 6
`V.
`VI. OVERVIEW OF THE ’833 PATENT ............................................................ 6
`A.
`Specification and Figures ...................................................................... 6
`B.
`Challenged Claims ..............................................................................12
`C.
`Prosecution History Summary of the ’833 Patent ...............................12
`VII. Claim Construction (37 C.F.R. §42.104(b)(3)) .............................................13
`VIII. OVERVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART .............................................................15
`A.
`Papasakellariou (Ex. 1006) ................................................................16
`B.
`Cho (Ex. 1010) ....................................................................................17
`C. Motorola (Ex. 1011) ............................................................................17
`
`viii
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`X.
`
`IX. THE RELEVANT DISCLOSURES OF PAPASAKELLARIOU ARE
`AVAILABLE AS PRIOR ART AS OF JUNE 4, 2007 ................................18
`A.
`Papasakellariou Provisional provides § 112, ¶ 1 support for at
`least Claims 4 and 5 of Papasakellariou .............................................20
`Claim 4 ......................................................................................21
`Claim 5 ......................................................................................27
`Papasakellariou Provisional Discloses the Subject Matter on
`which this Petition Relies ....................................................................27
`THE COMBINATION OF PAPASAKELLARIOU, CHO AND
`MOTOROLA RENDERS CLAIMS 1-14 OBVIOUS ...................................28
`A. Ground I: Claims 1-14 Are Obvious Over the combination of
`Papasakellariou, Cho, and Motorola ..................................................30
`Claim 1 ......................................................................................30
`Claim 2 ......................................................................................72
`Claim 3 ......................................................................................73
`Claim 4 ......................................................................................75
`Claim 5 ......................................................................................77
`Claim 6 ......................................................................................78
`Claim 7 ......................................................................................85
`Claim 8 ......................................................................................86
`Claim 9 ......................................................................................88
` Claim 10 ....................................................................................88
` Claim 11 ....................................................................................89
` Claim 12 ....................................................................................89
` Claim 13 ....................................................................................89
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ix
`
`
`
`
`
` Claim 14 ....................................................................................90
`XI. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................91
`
`
`
`
`x
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Huawei Device Co., Ltd. (“Petitioner” or “Huawei”) petitions for Inter
`
`Partes Review (“IPR”) seeking cancellation of claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,102,833 (Ex. 1001, the “’833 Patent”), assigned to Optis Cellular Technology,
`
`LLC (“Patent Owner”).
`
`The ’833 Patent discloses a “method for transmitting uplink signals, which
`
`include ACK/NACK signals, control signals other than the ACK/NACK signals,
`
`and data signals” whereby “the uplink signals can be transmitted to improve
`
`receiving reliability of signals having high priority.” Ex. 1001, Abstract.
`
`“ACK/NACK signals” are transmission acknowledge (ACK) and not
`
`acknowledged (NACK) signals which indicate the receipt status of transmissions.
`
`Ex. 1008, ¶38.
`
`Claim 1 requires a method for transmitting uplink signals in a wireless
`
`communication system by (i) serially multiplexing first control signals and data
`
`signals, (ii) mapping the multiplexed signals to a 2-dimensional resource matrix
`
`row by row, where columns of the resource matrix correspond to single carrier
`
`frequency divisional multiple access (SC-FDMA) symbols and rows of the
`
`resource matrix correspond to subcarriers, (iii) mapping ACK/NACK control
`
`signals to the columns of the resource matrix right adjacent to the columns carrying
`
`a reference signal by overwriting some of the multiplexed signals from the last row
`
`1
`
`
`
`of the resource matrix, and (iv) transmitting the multiplexed signals. Ex. 1001, cl.
`
`1.
`
`The ’833 Patent does not purport to have invented transmitting uplink
`
`signals in a wireless communication system, multiplexing first control signals and
`
`data signals, mapping the multiplexed signals to a 2-dimensional resource matrix,
`
`mapping ACK/NACK control signals to columns of the resource matrix right
`
`adjacent to the columns carrying a reference signal, or transmitting the multiplexed
`
`signals. The prosecution history indicates that the purported novel limitations of
`
`the ’833 Patent relate only to (i) placing the first control signals at a front part of
`
`the multiplexed signals and the data signals at a rear part of the multiplexed
`
`signals, (ii) mapping the multiplexed signals to a 2-dimensional resource matrix
`
`row by row, and (iii) overwriting some of the multiplexed signals with
`
`ACK/NACK signals from the last row of the resource matrix. Ex. 1002, 302.
`
`As shown below, the challenged claims are obvious in light of the
`
`combination of Papasakellariou, Cho, and Motorola. Papasakellariou discloses
`
`multiplexing ACK/NACK control signals, first control signals, and data signals,
`
`mapping the multiplexed signals to a 2-dimensional resource matrix, and
`
`transmitting the multiplexed signals. Ex. 1006, Figs. 1, 2, 6; Ex. 1007, Figs. 1, 2,
`
`5. Papasakellariou further discloses mapping ACK/NACK control signals to the
`
`columns of the resource matrix that are right adjacent to the columns that carry a
`
`2
`
`
`
`reference signal. Id., Fig. 6. Cho discloses serially multiplexing first control
`
`signals and data signals by placing first control signals at a front part of the
`
`multiplexed signals and data signals at a rear part of the multiplexed signals. Ex.
`
`1010, Figs. 3, 4, 6. Motorola discloses mapping signals to a 2-dimensional
`
`resource matrix row by row. Ex. 1011, Fig. 1. The combination of
`
`Papasakellariou, Cho, and Motorola also suggests overwriting multiplexed signals
`
`with ACK/NACK control signals from the last row of the resource matrix. Ex.
`
`1006, Fig. 6, 2:62-3:3; Ex. 1010, Figs. 3, 4, 6; Ex. 1011, Fig. 1.
`
`II. MANDATORY NOTICES
`A.
`Real Parties-in-Interest (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1))
`The real parties-in-interest for this Petition are Huawei Device Co., Ltd.,
`
`Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA Inc., Huawei Investment &
`
`Holding Co., Ltd., Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., Huawei Tech.
`
`Investment Co., Ltd., and Huawei Device (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.
`
`Related Matters (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2))
`B.
`Patent Owner has asserted the ’833 Patent in litigation against Huawei
`
`Device USA Inc. and Huawei Device Co., Ltd. in Optis Wireless Technology, LLC,
`
`et al. v. Huawei Techs. Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 2:17-CV-123-JRG-RSP (E.D.
`
`Tex.) (the “Litigation”) (Ex. 1018).
`
`Lead and Backup Counsel (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3))
`C.
`Petitioner designates Peter P. Chen (Reg. No. 39,631, pchen@cov.com) as
`
`3
`
`
`
`lead counsel, of Covington & Burling LLP, 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700,
`
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065 (postal and hand delivery), telephone: 650-632-4700,
`
`facsimile: 650-632-4820, and David A. Garr (Reg. No. 74,932, dgarr@cov.com)
`
`and Gregory S. Discher (Reg. No. 42,488, gdischer@cov.com) as back-up counsel,
`
`both of Covington & Burling LLP, One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW,
`
`Washington, DC 20001 (postal and hand delivery), telephone: 202-662-6000,
`
`facsimile: 202-662-6291.
`
`Service Information (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(4))
`D.
`Service information for lead and back-up counsel is provided in the
`
`designation of lead and back-up counsel above. Counsel for Petitioner also
`
`consents to service of all documents via electronic mail at Huawei-
`
`POIPR@cov.com. A power of attorney is submitted with this Petition.
`
`III. FEES (37 C.F.R. §42.103)
`The undersigned authorizes the Office to charge $30,500 ($15,500 request
`
`fee, $15,000 post-institution fees) to Deposit Account No. 50-0740 for the fees set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §42.15(a) for this Petition for IPR, and for any additional fees
`
`that might be due in connection with this Petition.
`
`IV. REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR (37 C.F.R. §42.104)
`A.
`Grounds for Standing (37 C.F.R. §42.104(a))
`The ’833 Patent is available for IPR, and Petitioner is not barred or estopped
`
`from requesting an IPR challenging the ’833 Patent.
`
`4
`
`
`
`B.
`Exhibit
`
`Citation of Prior Art
`Reference
`
`Publication
`
`Availability
`
`or Filing Date
`
`as Prior Art
`
`Ex. 1006 U.S. Patent No. 8,331,328
`
`June 4, 2008
`
`§ 102(e)
`
`(“Papasakellariou”)1
`
`Ex. 1010 U.S. Patent Publication No.
`
`November 23,
`
`§ 102(a)
`
`2006/0262871 (“Cho”)
`
`2006
`
`Ex. 1011 Motorola, 3GPP TSG RAN1 #50,
`
`August 15,
`
`§ 102(a)
`
`R1-073361, “Uplink channel
`
`2007
`
`interleaving” (“Motorola”)
`
`C.
`
`Claims and Statutory Ground for Relief (37 C.F.R. §§42.104(b)(1)
`& (b)(2))
`Petitioner requests that claims 1-14 of the ’833 Patent be found unpatentable
`
`and cancelled from the ’833 Patent, on the ground below.
`
`1 Papasakellariou claims domestic priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application
`
`No. 60/942,843, which was filed on June 8, 2007. Ex. 1006, cover page; Exs.
`
`1007, 1020. Papasakellariou has an effective filing date of June 8, 2007. See
`
`Section IX below.
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ground Claims Basis
`
`I
`
`1-14
`
`Obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) based on Papasakellariou,
`
`Cho, and Motorola
`
`
`
`V.
`
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`A person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA”) of the ’833 Patent at the
`
`time of the alleged invention would be someone with a working knowledge of
`
`wireless networking. The person would have gained this knowledge through an
`
`undergraduate Bachelor of Science degree in Electronic Engineering or a related
`
`field, and approximately two years of education, training or experience in
`
`developing wireless communication applications. Ex. 1008, ¶34. In addition, the
`
`applied prior art reflects the appropriate level of skill at the time of the claimed
`
`invention. See Okajima v. Bourdeau, 261 F.3d 1350, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
`
`VI. OVERVIEW OF THE ’833 PATENT
`Specification and Figures
`A.
`The ’833 Patent claims priority to: i) U.S. provisional application No.
`
`60/972,244, filed on September 13, 2007 (Ex. 1003); ii) U.S. provisional
`
`application No. 60/987,427, filed on November 13, 2007 (Ex. 1004); iii) U.S.
`
`provisional application No. 60/988,433, filed on November 16, 2007 (Ex. 1012),
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`and iv) Korean application 10-2008-0068634 (Ex. 1002, 116-49).2 Ex. 1001, 1;
`
`see also Ex. 1008, ¶64.
`
`The ’833 Patent describes “a method for transmitting uplink signals, which
`
`include ACK/NACK signals, control signals other than the ACK/NACK signals,
`
`and data signals.” Id., Abstract; Ex. 1008, ¶¶65-81. In a mobile communication
`
`system, a user equipment (UE), such as a mobile device, transmits “uplink signals”
`
`to a base station, and the base station transmits “downlink signals” to the UE. Ex.
`
`1008, ¶¶35-39. ACK/NACK signals are a type of control information or signals.
`
`Ex. 1001, 5:3-6. ACK signal signifies receipt of downlink data, and NACK signal
`
`signifies some type of error with received downlink data. Ex. 1008, ¶38. The ’833
`
`Patent may refer to “control information” or “control signals” as control
`
`information or control signals other than the ACK/NACK signals. See, e.g., Ex.
`
`1001, 1:40-44, 5:13-24.
`
`The ’833 Patent relates to 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Long
`
`Term Evolution (LTE) system. Id., 1:33-35, 4:4-5, 4:9-11, 8:58-62. 3GPP stands
`
`for “3rd Generation Partnership Project.” 3GPP LTE system uses a single carrier
`
`frequency division multiplexing access (SC-FDMA) scheme for uplink
`
`
`
` 2
`
` Petitioner does not concede that the ’833 Patent is entitled to priority benefit of
`
`any of these documents.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`transmission. SC-FDMA is closely related to orthogonal frequency division
`
`multiplexing access (OFDMA) scheme. Ex. 1008, ¶¶40-56, 67.
`
`The ’833 Patent describes transmitting information using “resource block”
`
`and “sub-frame.” Ex. 1001, 5:38-45. Each sub-frame includes two slots, and each
`
`slot includes 7 SC-FDMA symbols. Id., 5:40-45, cl. 3; Ex. 1008, ¶¶47-54, 73.
`
`Each resource block includes 12 OFDM subcarriers and 7 SC-FDMA symbols in
`
`one slot. Ex. 1001, 5:37-40; Ex. 1008, ¶¶47-54, 73. Two of the 14 SC-FDMA
`
`symbols in each sub-frame are used as reference signals, which are used to provide
`
`channel estimation for coherent demodulation of the received signal. Ex. 1001,
`
`5:40-43; Ex. 1006, 1:56-65; Ex. 1007, 7 (referring to “a sub-frame structure
`
`comprising of symbols carrying data or control signals and demodulation reference
`
`signals”); Ex. 1008, ¶¶55-56, 73.
`
`Figure 6, annotated below, illustrates a method for transmitting control
`
`information, data information, and ACK/NACK signals. Ex. 1001, 6:49-7:14.
`
`Figure 6 illustrates multiplexed signals 601 and 602, and multiplexed signals 603
`
`that is mapped to a “time-frequency region,” which is described as a “2-
`
`dimensional resource matrix” in claim 1. Id. 6:60-7:5; cl. 1; Ex. 1008, ¶¶78-79.
`
`Unlike the conventional orientation of rows and columns, in Figure 6, the
`
`orientation of “rows” is vertical and the orientation of “columns” is horizontal. Ex.
`
`1001, cl. 1 (describing that columns correspond to SC-FDMA symbols and rows
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`correspond to subcarriers); Ex. 1008, ¶¶78-79. The first row corresponds to the
`
`first subcarrier from the left of the matrix, and the first column corresponds to the
`
`first SC-FDMA symbol (#1) from the top of the matrix. Ex. 1008, ¶79.
`
`The embodiment disclosed in Figure 6 corresponds to claim 1 of the ’833
`
`Patent. Ex. 1008, ¶¶78-81. As shown in annotated Figure 6 above, the control
`
`information and data information are “serially multiplexed” in 601 and 602. Ex.
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`1001, 6:52-60, 8:36-40, 9:1-5.
`
`As also shown in annotated Figure 6 above, the control information is placed
`
`at a front part of the multiplexed signals 601 and 602 (1 through NC) and the data
`
`information is placed at a rear part of the multiplexed signals 601 and 602 (1
`
`through ND). Ex. 1001, 6:52-56; Ex. 1008, ¶78. Multiplexed signals 602
`
`“illustrates that the ACK/NACK signals are arranged by puncturing the
`
`multiplexed data.” Ex. 1001, 6:63-66 (coloring added); Ex. 1008, ¶78.
`
`The multiplexed signals, such as 602, are then mapped row by row to a
`
`resource matrix with a plurality of rows and columns (603), where rows
`
`correspond to subcarriers and columns correspond to SC-FDMA symbols. Ex.
`
`1001, 6:66-7:3, 7:6-10, 9:6-21. A POSITA would understand that mapping row by
`
`row as disclosed in claim 1 is the same as the “time-first mapping” method as
`
`disclosed in the specification “because the SC-FDMA symbols are segmented
`
`temporally,” or in other words, the SC-FDMA symbols are arranged temporally
`
`along the time axis. Ex. 1001, 5:46-52; Ex. 1008, ¶80.
`
`A number of columns in the resource matrix in Figure 6 corresponds to a
`
`number of SC-FDMA symbols within one subframe because “information is
`
`transmitted through one sub-frame.” Ex. 1001, 5:37-45. “[T]he reference signal is
`
`transmitted through a part between symbol indexes #3 and #4 and a part between
`
`symbol indexes #9 and #10.” Id. 7:2-5. The two parts correspond to “specific SC-
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`FDMA symbols used for a reference signal” in claim 1. Id. 9:12-16.
`
`The ACK/NACK signals (highlighted in yellow) “overwrite some of the
`
`multiplexed signals mapped to the 2-dimensional resource matrix” in columns
`
`“right adjacent to the specific SC-FDMA symbols” where the reference signal is
`
`transmitted. Id. 9:22-29. The ACK/NACK signals overwrite multiplexed signals
`
`“from the last row of the specific columns” at modulation symbols N-2, N-3, N-8,
`
`and N-9. Id.
`
`A modulation symbol is an individual unit of modulated data in the
`
`frequency / time domain. Ex. 1008, ¶52. An SC-FDMA symbol, on the other
`
`hand, includes multiple modulation symbols in all of the frequency subcarriers in
`
`one time unit. Ex. 1001, Figs. 6-9 (showing that one SC-FDMA symbol includes
`
`multiple modulation symbols in one time unit); Ex. 1008, ¶75.
`
`The term “overwrite” in the ’833 Patent means that “specific information
`
`mapped in the resource region is skipped and the corresponding region is mapped,”
`
`and that “the length of the entire information is maintained equally even after
`
`specific information is inserted.” Ex. 1001, 6:15-21; Ex. 1008, ¶¶71-72. “This
`
`overwriting procedure may be represented by puncturing.” Ex. 1001, Fig. 6
`
`(“Possible ACK/NACK Modulation Symbols Position which Punctures Data
`
`modulation symbols”) (emphasis added), 6:15-21.
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
` Challenged Claims
`B.
`Petitioner requests that claims 1-14 of the ’833 Patent be found unpatentable
`
`and cancelled from the ’833 Patent on Ground I below.
`
`Prosecution History Summary of the ’833 Patent
`C.
`In an office action dated June 24, 2011, the Examiner rejected all of the
`
`pending claims in the ’833 Patent’s application over the combination of U.S.
`
`Patent Publication No. 2008/0304467 (“Papasakellariou Publication,” Ex. 1005),
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0185159 (“Seo,” Ex. 1014), and U.S. Patent
`
`Publication No. 2006/0098568 (“Oh,” Ex. 1015). Ex. 1002, 263-77.
`
`In an amendment, the applicant acknowledged that Figures 2 and 3 of
`
`Papasakellariou Publication disclose “multiplex[ing] data bits and CQI bits,” but
`
`stated that Papasakellariou Publication “does not teach anything about the
`
`sequence of data bit and CQI bits within the multiplexed signals.” Ex. 1002, 302.
`
`Second, the applicant stated that “[e]ven though Papasakellariou
`
`[Publication] simply mentions that the resource for transmitting multiplexed
`
`signals is 2-dimensional, Papasakellariou [Publication] does not teach the mapping
`
`scheme in view of this 2-dimensional resource matrix.” Id.
`
`Finally, the applicant stated that Papasakellariou Publication does not
`
`disclose that “the ACK/NACK control signals overwrite some of the mapped to the
`
`2-dimensional resource matrix at step (b) from the last row of the specific
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`columns[.]” Id. (emphasis in original).
`
`The Examiner subsequently allowed the claims. Ex. 1002, 308-16. See also
`
`Ex. 1008, ¶¶82-87.
`
`VII. Claim Construction (37 C.F.R. §42.104(b)(3))
`An unexpired claim subject to IPR is given its “broadest reasonable
`
`construction in light of the specification of the patent in which it appears.” 37
`
`C.F.R. §42.100(b); Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131, 2142
`
`(2016).
`
`In the Litigation, the parties agreed upon several constructions that were
`
`adopted by the court as set forth in the table below. Ex. 1013, 12-14. Petitioner
`
`adopts the court’s constructions for purposes of this IPR proceeding.
`
`WesternGeco, L.L.C. v. PGS Geophysical AS, IPR2015-00309, 2016 WL 3193820,
`
`*2 (P.T.A.B. June 8, 2016) (“We construe only those claim terms or phrases in
`
`controversy, and we do so only to the extent necessary to resolve the
`
`controversy.”) (quoting Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795,
`
`803 (Fed. Cir. 1999)). See also Ex. 1008, ¶¶89-97.
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“serially multiplexing first control
`
`“First control signals and data signals
`
`signals and data signals . . ., wherein
`
`are mapped with a sequence in which
`
`the first control signals are placed at a
`
`one is directly after the other, wherein
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`front part of the multiplexed signals
`
`the first control signals are placed at a
`
`and the data signals are placed at a rear
`
`front part of the multiplexed signals
`
`part of the multiplexed signals” (Claim
`
`and the data signals are placed at a rear
`
`1)
`
`part of the multiplexed signals.”
`
`“mapping” / “mapped”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning3
`
`(Claims 1, 8)
`
`“mapping the multiplexed signals to”
`
`“after placing the first control signals
`
`(Claims 1, 8)
`
`
`
`and the data signals [in step (a)],
`
`mapping the multiplexed signals to”
`
`“mapping ACK/NACK control signals
`
`“after mapping the multiplexed signals
`
`to”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`[in step (b)], mapping ACK/NACK
`
`control signals to”
`
`“the ACK/NACK control signals
`
`“(1) Some of the multiplexed signals,
`
`overwrite some of the multiplexed
`
`from the last row of the specific
`
`
`
` 3
`
` Thus, no construction of this term is needed. WesternGeco, 2016 WL 3193820,
`
`*2 (“We construe only those claim terms or phrases in controversy, and we do so
`
`only to the extent necessary to resolve the controversy.”) (quoting Vivid Techs.,
`
`Inc., 200 F.3d at 803).
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`signals mapped to the 2-dimensional
`
`columns of the 2-dimensional resource
`
`resource matrix at step (b) from the last
`
`matrix, are skipped and the
`
`row of the specific columns”
`
`corresponding ACK/NACK signals are
`
`(Claims 1, 8)
`
`mapped, and (2) the length of the entire
`
`information is maintained equally even
`
`after the ACK/NACK control signals
`
`are inserted”
`
`“serially multiplexing first control
`
`“First control signals and data signals
`
`signals and data signals, wherein the
`
`are mapped with a sequence in which
`
`first control signals are placed at a front
`
`one is directly after the other, wherein
`
`part of the multiplexed signals and the
`
`the first control signals are placed at a
`
`data signals are placed at a rear part of
`
`front part of the multiplexed signals
`
`the multiplexed signals”
`
`and the data signals are placed at a rear
`
`(Claim 8)
`
`
`
`part of the multiplexed signals”
`
`VIII. OVERVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART
`The First Wells Declaration describes the state of the art regarding generally,
`
`mobile radio communication, long term evolution (LTE), and signal processing
`
`functionalities. Ex. 1008, ¶¶35-63 (citing Exs. 1023-1026). As that discussion and
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`the prior art discussed below make clear, by August 2007, the purported invention
`
`of the ’833 Patent was obvious. Each applied reference pertains to transmitting
`
`uplink control signals and data signals in a wireless communication system. Id.,
`
`¶¶99-146. A POSITA would have combined their teachings using routine skill
`
`because these features were well-known in the industry. Id., ¶¶171-76, 196-99.
`
`Papasakellariou (Ex. 1006)
`A.
`Papasakellariou is directed to “multiplexing control and data information in
`
`single-carrier frequency division multiple access (SC-FDMA) communication
`
`systems,” and discloses transmitting “positive or negative acknowledgement bits
`
`(ACK or NAK, respectively) and channel quality indicator (CQI) bits together with
`
`data information bits in an SC-FDMA communications system” in connection with
`
`3GPP LTE standards. Ex. 1006, 1:15-28. The ACK/NAK bits and the CQI bits
`
`may be referred to as control information bits. Id. 1:36-38. See also Ex. 1008,
`
`¶¶99-106.
`
`Papasakellariou4 claims priority to Papasakellariou Provisional, which was
`
`filed on June 4, 2007. As shown in Section IX below, Papasakellariou is prior art
`
`
`
` 4
`
` Papasakellariou (Ex. 1006) is the issued patent that corresponds to
`
`Papasakellariou Publication (Ex. 1005), which was considered and cited by the
`
`Examiner during prosecution. Ex. 1001, cover page; Ex. 1002, 264-78.
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as of the date of this provisional application.
`
`Cho (Ex. 1010)
`B.
`Cho discloses multiplexing control and data signals, and transmitting the
`
`multiplexed control and data signals for uplink communication in a Localized
`
`Frequency Division Multiple Access (LFDMA) system. Ex. 1010, ¶[0068]; Ex.
`
`1008, ¶¶129-139. Both the ’833 Patent and Papasakellariou disclose using a
`
`LFDMA system. Ex. 1001, 2:20-22; Ex. 1006, 2:27-28; Ex. 1008, ¶134.
`
`The Examiner did not cite to or otherwise rely on Cho in any office action.
`
`Ex. 1002.
`
`C. Motorola (Ex. 1011)
`Motorola was submitted to the 3GPP TSG RAN1 WG1 Working Group for
`
`meeting