`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`EXOCAD GMBH and EXOCAD AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`3SHAPEA/S
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-00788
`Patent 9,336,336 B2
`
`DECLARATION OF KEVIN M. LITTMAN IN SUPPORT OF
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`exocad Ex. 1022
`exocad v. 3Shape, IPR2018-00788
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00788
`Patent 9,336,336 B2
`
`I, Kevin M. Littman, state and declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts and am admitted to practice before the Federal Circuit and the
`
`United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
`
`2.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board's Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`6.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ ll.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`In the past three years, I have not appeared pro hac vice in any
`
`proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigator and have established familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in the proceeding. I was a law clerk to the Honorable
`
`Margaret M. Morrow in the United States District Court for Central District of
`
`exocad Ex. 1022
`exocad v. 3Shape, IPR2018-00788
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00788
`Patent 9,336,336 B2
`
`California in 1999-2000. I have been practicing law since 2000 and have extensive
`
`experience litigating intellectual property disputes across the country, including
`
`patent disputes in district courts and before the U.S. International Trade
`
`Commission (ITC). I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. I am counsel in the following proceeding, which is related to and
`
`involves the same patent at issue in this proceeding: 3Shape AIS v. exocad GmbH
`
`and exocad America, Inc., No. 1 :18-cv-11955-NMG (D. Mass.).
`
`9.
`
`On December 6, 7 and 10, I conferred with Mr. Lee, counsel for
`
`Patent Owner, by email, regarding whether Patent Owner opposes a motion to
`
`admit me pro hac vice in the proceeding. Mr. Lee stated that Patent Owner does
`
`not oppose the motion.
`
`10.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true.
`
`Dated: December 10, 2018
`
`Kevin M. Littman
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`111 Huntington A venue
`Boston, MA 02199
`Telephone: (617) 342-4000
`Fax: (617) 342-4001
`klittman@foley.com
`
`exocad Ex. 1022
`exocad v. 3Shape, IPR2018-00788
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
