throbber
GLIA 53:733–743 (2006)
`
`AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Alpha 2 Isoform
`Promotes Hypoxia-Induced VEGF Expression
`in Human Glioblastoma
`KATHRYN M. NEURATH,1 
`MARTIN P. KEOUGH,1 
`AND KEVIN P. CLAFFEY1*
`TOM MIKKELSEN,2
`1Department of Cell Biology, Center for Vascular Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3501
`2Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202
`
`KEY WORDS
`hypoxia; AMPK; VEGF; HIF-1; glioma
`
`ABSTRACT
`Tumor cells respond to hypoxic stress by upregulating a va-
`riety of genes involved in glucose uptake, glycolysis, and
`angiogenesis, all essential to maintaining nutrient avail-
`ability and intracellular ATP levels. Adenosine monopho-
`sphate-dependent kinase (AMPK) is a key sensor for cellu-
`lar homeostasis and is highly sensitive to changes in AMP:
`ATP ratios. The two catalytic AMPK alpha isoforms (AMPKa1,
`AMPKa2) were investigated with respect to their expres-
`sion,
`cellular distribution, and contribution to VEGF
`expression under hypoxic stress in human U373 glioblas-
`toma cells. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed
`AMPKa1 mRNA to be constitutively expressed in normoxia
`and hypoxia, whereas AMPKa2 mRNA levels were low in
`normoxia and significantly induced in hypoxia. Fluorescent
`immunohistochemistry showed that AMPKa2 protein redis-
`tributed to the nucleus under hypoxia, whereas AMPKa1
`remained distributed throughout the cell. The AMPK chem-
`ical
`inhibitor, 5-iodotubericidin, effectively repressed the
`hypoxic induction of VEGF mRNA levels and hypoxia in-
`ducible factor-1 dependent transcription. AMPKa2 repres-
`sion with RNA interference reduced hypoxia-induced VEGF
`mRNA and HIF-1 transcription, whereas AMPKa1 re-
`pression did not. Human glioblastoma cell lines U118 and
`U138 also showed hypoxia-induction of AMPKa2 as well as
`VEGF. Immunohistochemistry analysis of human astrocy-
`toma/glioma samples revealed AMPKa2 present in high
`grade gliomas within hypoxic pseudopalisading microenviron-
`ments. These data suggest that prolonged hypoxia promotes
`the expression and functional activation of AMPKa2 and
`VEGF production in glioma cell lines and glioblastoma multi-
`form tumors, thus contributing to tumor survival and angio-
`genesis in high grade human gliomas.
`VVC 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`is regulated by a number of angiogenic factors (Claffey
`et al., 1996; Dvorak, 2000). An important angiogenic fac-
`tor is vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF), which
`is over expressed in response to environmental hypoxia
`(Denko et al., 2003; Michiels, 2004). Human glioblastomas
`are among the most highly vascularized tumors and ex-
`press high levels of VEGF (Kaur et al., 2004). A primary
`mechanism of increased VEGF expression is through the
`activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), a hetero-
`dimeric transcription factor (Semenza, 2000). Under nor-
`moxia, HIF-1a protein levels are regulated by ubiquitina-
`tion and rapid proteosomal degradation (Maxwell et al.,
`2001; Maxwell and Ratcliffe, 2002). In hypoxic conditions,
`HIF-1a degradation is inhibited; HIF-1a is stabilized,
`translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and di-
`merizes with HIF-1b/aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear
`translocator (ARNT). This complex associates with co-
`activators, such as p300/CREB, to induce transcription of
`genes containing hypoxia responsive elements (HREs),
`such as VEGF (Fedele et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2004).
`AMP-dependent kinase or AMP-activated kinase (AMPK)
`is a heterotrimeric protein composed of a catalytic alpha
`subunit, and two regulatory subunits, beta and gamma.
`The alpha subunit contains a serine/threonine protein
`kinase catalytic domain (Carling, 2004). AMPK has been
`identified as a primary sensor of cellular energy change
`by responding to increases in AMP:ATP ratios, concur-
`rent with hypoxia or nutrient depletion (Hardie, 1999;
`Hardie and Carling, 1997). AMPK is activated by the in-
`crease in AMP and in turn activates catabolic pathways
`and provides general repression of anabolic pathways by
`direct phosphorylation of downstream substrates, result-
`ing in cellular protection from metabolic or nutritional
`stress (Hardie et al., 2003). Previous reports have shown
`that AMPK is activated in hypoxia (Frederich et al., 2005;
`Lee et al., 2003; Marsin et al., 2002; Nagata et al., 2003).
`
`Hypoxia plays a critical role in regulating tumor
`growth and angiogenesis. The cellular response to hy-
`poxia is adaptive and necessary to maintain the minimal
`energy levels required for cell survival. Once a tumor
`reaches a volume greater than a few mm3, regions of hy-
`poxia begin to occur and neovascularization is essential
`for tumor survival (Folkman et al., 1989). Angiogenesis,
`the growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing blood
`vessels to supply the tumor with oxygen and nutrients,
`
`Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: NCI CA-064436; Grant sponsor: The
`Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Foundation.
`
`*Correspondence to: Kevin P. Claffey, Ph.D., Center for Vascular Biology,
`EM028, Department of Cell Biology-MC3501, University of Connecticut Health
`Center, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030-3501.
`E-mail: claffey@nso2.uchc.edu

`
`These authors contributed equally to this work.
`
`Received 18 October 2005; Accepted 13 January 2006
`
`DOI 10.1002/glia.20326
`
`Published online 3 March 2006 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.
`wiley.com).
`
`VVC 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
`
`L'OREAL USA, INC. EX. 1014
`
`733
`
`

`

`734
`
`Target
`
`huCyclophilinA
`huAMPKa1
`huAMPKa2
`huVEGF
`
`NEURATH ET AL.
`
`TABLE 1. qRT-PCR Primers
`0
`0
`Forward Primer (5
`
`– 3
`
`)
`
`CTGGACCCAACACAAATGGTT
`AGGAGAGCTATTTGATTATATCTGTAAGAATG
`CGGCTCTTTCAGCAGATTCTGT
`CGAGGGCCTGGAGTGTGT
`
`Reverse Primer (5
`
`0
`
`0
`– 3
`
`)
`
`CCACAATATTCATGCCTTCTTTCA
`ACACCAGAAAGGATCTGTTGGAA
`ATCGGCTATCTTGGCATTCATG
`GGCCTTGGTGAGGTTTGATC
`
`Repression of total AMPKa with chemical inhibitors or
`dominant negative isoform over expression represses HIF-
`1 dependent transcription (Hwang et al., 2004; Lee et al.,
`2003). However, there are two distinct AMPK alpha iso-
`forms—AMPKa1 and AMPKa2. Although highly homolo-
`gous, it is becoming clear that AMPKa1 and AMPKa2
`have exclusive functions. Mouse genetic deletion studies
`have shown that AMPKa2-null mice demonstrate glucose
`intolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity, while the
`AMPKa1-null mice do not show any appreciable altera-
`tions (Viollet et al., 2003a; Viollet et al., 2003b). However,
`the potential roles for the selective AMPK alpha isoform
`regulation and activity in response to hypoxia have not
`been clearly evaluated. The studies performed here inves-
`tigated the role of AMPK in the response to hypoxia in
`U373 glioma cells and whether the catalytic alpha iso-
`forms of AMPK show differential gene expression or func-
`tional roles in this response. RNAi technology targeting
`AMPK alpha isoforms selectively repressed protein levels
`and isoform specific activities. These studies indicate that
`AMPKa2, but not AMPKa1,
`is selectively induced in
`hypoxic conditions and significantly contributes to VEGF
`expression in human glioma cells as well as in high grade
`glioblastoma tumors.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Cell Line and Culture Conditions, Antibodies,
`and Chemical Effectors
`
`Human glioma cell lines, U373, U118, U138, and U87,
`were maintained at 37°C in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle
`Medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemen-
`ted with 10% FBS, and penstrep (100 ug/ml). Cells were
`cultured either under normoxic conditions (5% CO2,
`21% O2, 74% N2) or hypoxic conditions (5% CO2, 2%
`O2, 93% N2) as determined previously to be effective for
`maximal activation of VEGF expression without cytotox-
`icity through 48 h treatment (Claffey and Robinson,
`1996; Shih et al., 1999). Antibodies used for immuno-
`blots: AMPKa1 and AMPKa2 were from US Biological
`(Swampscott, MA), purchased p-AMPK(Thr172) and
`phospho-p70S6K(Thr389) from Cell Signaling Technology
`(Beverly, MA), and b-actin from Abcam (Cambridge, MA).
`Chemical effectors AICAR (5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxa-
`mide 1-b-D-ribofuranoside) and 5-iodotubericidin were pur-
`chased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
`
`Northern Blot Analysis
`
`Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy RNA extrac-
`tion kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Northern blot was
`performed as described previously (Claffey et al., 1998;
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`Hong et al., 2003). Hybridization was carried out over-
`night at 65°C with [a32P]dCTP-labeled human VEGF 165
`Acc I/Nco I fragment (823 base pairs) and an [a32P]
`dCTP-labeled human Glut-1 probe BamH I/BamH I frag-
`ment (2473 base pairs) (ATCC, Rockville, MD). A ribo-
`some-associated protein cDNA probe, 36B4, was used as
`a loading control. Blots were washed at high stringency
`(1% SDS, 1X SSC at 60°C) and exposed to Kodak MR
`film. Quantification was determined by densitometry
`using ImageQuant Software.
`
`RNA Interference
`
`siRNA oligos were obtained from Dharmacon (Lafay-
`ette, CO) and were used to specifically target either
`AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 subunits of the AMPK heterotri-
`mer. RNAi transfections were performed with Oligofec-
`tamine (Invitrogen) in OptiMEM according to manufac-
`turer’s protocols at various concentrations. Post-transfec-
`tion, cells were allowed to recover overnight and refed
`24 h before treatment with normoxic or hypoxic conditions.
`RNAi experiments were performed at least three times to
`assure representative results.
`
`SDS-PAGE and Immunoblots
`
`Cytoplasmic extracts were obtained as described pre-
`viously (Claffey et al., 1998). Protein extracts were sepa-
`rated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellu-
`lose membranes. Immunoblots were performed using
`various primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-
`conjugated species appropriate IgG secondary antibodies
`diluted in blocking buffer according to manufacturer’s
`protocols. Blots were developed using ECL reagents.
`
`VEGF ELISA Assay
`
`VEGF capture ELISAs were performed as described
`previously (Shih et al., 1999). Culture supernatants in
`triplicate were collected from cell culture wells and cleared
`by centrifugation. The samples were buffered with Tris-HCl
`pH 7.5 to a final concentration of 1 mM prior to analysis.
`
`Quantitative Real-Time PCR
`
`Cellular total RNA was harvested using RNeasy kit
`(Qiagen) and reverse transcribed with random hexamer
`primers using PowerScript RT Strips (BD Biosciences,
`Palo Alto, CA). Quantitative PCR primers were designed
`using ABI Primer Express software for use with a SYBER
`Green detection kit (Qiagen). Sequences of qRT-PCR pri-
`mers are in Table 1.
`Samples in duplicate or triplicate were run on an ABI
`7900 thermocycler for 40 cycles, and results were ana-
`
`

`

`DISTINCT ROLES FOR AMPKa ISOFORMS IN HYPOXIA
`
`735
`
`lyzed using GraphPad software using a mathematical
`model described by Lui and Saint (Liu and Saint, 2002).
`Results were normalized to an internal control gene,
`huCyclophilin A.
`
`Luciferase Assay
`
`Cells were transfected with siRNA oligos, as described
`above, along with a 5X HIF-1 promoter element luci-
`ferase reporter (Claffey et al., 1998), luciferase control
`vector, or CMV driven beta-galactosidase vector, and
`treated with either normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. Cells
`were harvested with a passive lysis buffer from assay
`kit, and luciferase activity was measured according to
`supplier’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). Luci-
`ferase activity was normalized to beta-galactosidase ex-
`pression as determined with a similar kit (Promega).
`
`Immunofluorescence
`
`Cells were grown on coverslips prior to exposure to
`normoxia or hypoxia. Cells were washed with PBS and
`fixed with 10% formalin in PBS. Cells were incubated in
`0.01% Triton X-100 detergent for 3 min, washed in PBS,
`and blocked in 3% BSA/PBS at RT for 1 h. Primary anti-
`bodies were added at a 1:50 dilution (5 ug/ml) in 3%
`BSA/PBS and incubated at RT for 1 h. Cells were washed
`and a secondary antibody at a 1:800 dilution was added
`and incubated for 30 min at RT. Finally, coverslips were
`washed thoroughly with PBS and mounted onto slides
`with PBS:Glycerol.
`
`Human Glioma Sample Immunohistochemistry
`
`Paraffin sections were received from Tom Mikkelsen
`at the Hermelin Brain Tumor Center at Henry Ford
`Hospital in Detroit, Michigan. Slides were processed af-
`ter antigen retrieval in sodium citrate buffer pH 6.0 for
`20 min at 95°C. Slides were blocked with PowerBlock
`(Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) for 10 min; and a 1:200 dilu-
`tion primary antibody, anti-AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 (US
`Biological), was incubated overnight at 4°C. Biotinolyated
`secondary was incubated for 30 min at RT and slides were
`developed using ABC (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame,
`CA) and DAB (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA)
`reagents. Methyl green was added as a counter stain.
`Slides were imaged using white light microscopy on a
`Zeiss Axioplan microscope and quantified using ImagePro
`Plus software (MediaCybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).
`
`Statistical Analysis
`
`Data from individual experiments were represented as
`mean 6 standard error unless otherwise stated. Statisti-
`cal comparison of groups was performed using a 2-tailed
`Student’s t-test with appropriate tests for equal var-
`iances. Statistical significance was defined and indicated
`as P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**).
`
`Fig. 1. Chemical modulators of AMPK affect hypoxia induced VEGF
`expression. U373 cells incubated in Normoxia or Hypoxia treated with
`0.5 mM AICAR (A), 10 lM 5-iodotubercidin (5-I), or no treatment (NT).
`A: VEGF, Glut-1, and 36B4 mRNA expression determined by northern
`blot. B: Hypoxia time course of VEGF mRNA normalized to 36B4
`mRNA expression. C: HIF-1 dependent luciferase expression normal-
`ized to beta-galactosidase transfection control from cellular lysates.
`(**P  0.01.)
`
`RESULTS
`Chemical Modulators of AMPK Affect
`Hypoxia Induced VEGF Expression
`
`To determine if AMPK has a role in the regulation of
`the hypoxia-inducible gene, VEGF, the AMPK activating
`5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-b-4-ribofura-
`agent,
`noside (AICAR), and an AMPK inhibitor, 5-iodotuberi-
`cidin, were used to treat human U373 glioblastoma cells
`under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Cells were treated
`with AICAR, 5-iodotubericidin, or no treatment control
`and exposed to hypoxia for 2, 4, 8, and 12 h. The treated
`cells were harvested for total RNA and northern blots per-
`formed to analyze VEGF and Glut-1 mRNA expression
`levels, Fig. 1A. No treatment controls showed a large
`increase in VEGF mRNA in hypoxia as compared to nor-
`moxia at 12 h. The addition of AICAR (0.5 mM) showed
`increases over the hypoxic induction of VEGF and Glut-1
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`

`

`736
`
`NEURATH ET AL.
`
`cells exposed to normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Under
`normoxic conditions the AMPKa1 isoform was the predo-
`minant isoform, showing 2- to 4-fold more mRNA than
`the AMPKa2 isoform. Exposure of U373 cells to 12 h of
`hypoxia showed little change in the baseline ratio of
`AMPKa1 to AMPKa2 mRNA levels. However, over a
`24 h hypoxic treatment, a significant 3-fold increase of
`AMPKa2 mRNA was observed over normoxic controls,
`Fig. 2A.
`A direct analysis of AMPKa isoform protein expression
`over a time course of hypoxia treatment showed a similar
`pattern of increasing AMPKa2 protein levels. The levels of
`phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK) also increased with ex-
`posure to hypoxia. AMPKa1 protein levels did not signifi-
`cantly change with the hypoxic time course, Fig. 2B.
`In order to determine whether hypoxia affects AMPKa
`isoform intracellular distribution, isoform-specific fluores-
`cent immunohistochemistry was employed on cells exposed
`to normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 24 h, Fig. 3. No
`significant change was observed in the localization of
`AMPKa1 between normoxia and hypoxia, showing a wide-
`spread nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution. AMPKa2 was
`found to redistribute within the cell from a uniform cyto-
`plasmic/nuclear distribution to a predominantly nuclear
`localization under hypoxia. These data demonstrate that
`AMPKa2, but not AMPKa1, is regulated at the mRNA
`and protein levels by hypoxia in U373 cells.
`
`Inhibition of AMPK Alpha Isoform Expression
`by RNA Interference
`
`In order to evaluate possible AMPK alpha isoform-spe-
`cific functions, RNA interference (RNAi) protocols were
`performed to repress AMPK alpha isoform gene expres-
`sion and function. Figure 4A shows AMPKa1 mRNA
`levels determined by quantitative RT-PCR when cells
`were transfected with either AMPKa1- or AMPKa2-tar-
`geted siRNA oligos. Post-transfected samples show that
`AMPKa1 mRNA levels were inhibited at greater than
`90% in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions when
`treated with AMPKa1 RNAi. AMPKa2 siRNA transfection
`did not significantly affect AMPKa1 mRNA levels. Conver-
`sely, Fig. 4B shows a similar pattern for the AMPKa2
`RNAi. AMPKa2 mRNA was repressed greater than 90% in
`normoxia and hypoxia by AMPKa2 RNAi, and AMPKa1
`siRNAs did not significantly affect AMPKa2 mRNA levels.
`To determine the effectiveness of the RNAi treatments
`at the protein level, AMPKa isoforms were evaluated by
`direct immunoblot of total cell extracts taken 60 h after
`transfection, Fig. 4C. The AMPKa1 RNAi repressed
`AMPKa1 protein in normoxia and hypoxia when com-
`pared to mock transfected controls. Hypoxia alone greatly
`increased AMPKa2 protein, as was observed in Fig. 2B.
`The AMPKa2 siRNA was effective at repressing AMPKa2
`protein levels in hypoxia, although the protein levels in
`normoxia were not significantly affected. These data
`demonstrate that RNAi against the individual AMPKa iso-
`forms was effective at repressing the targeted AMPKa
`mRNA and protein in U373 glioblastoma cells.
`
`Fig. 2. AMPKa isoforms are differentially expressed under hypoxic
`conditions. A: AMPKa1 (white bars) or AMPKa2 (dark bars) isoform
`mRNA expression as determined by qRT-PCR from U373 cells incu-
`bated in normoxia (N) or hypoxia (H) over 12 and 24 h periods. (*P 
`0.05.) B: Immunoblots on cellular lysates exposed to a hypoxia time
`course detected for AMPKa1, AMPKa2, and p-AMPK.
`
`mRNAs as compared to vehicle control. The addition of
`5-iodotubercidin (10 lM) completely repressed the hy-
`poxic expression of VEGF and Glut-1 mRNAs. In time
`course analysis, 5-iodotubercidin effectively repressed VEGF
`mRNA levels from 2 to 12 h in hypoxia, Fig. 1B.
`To evaluate the potential influence of AMPK on HIF-1
`mediated transcription, required for VEGF mRNA in-
`duction under hypoxic conditions, an HIF-1 dependent
`transcriptional assay was performed with the AMPK in-
`hibitor, 5-iodotubericidin. Transcriptional activity was
`measured using a transiently transfected HIF-1 respon-
`sive element driven luciferase reporter normalized to
`beta-galactosidase transfection baseline control, Fig. 1C.
`Under hypoxia, there was a significant, 12-fold increase
`in HIF-1 dependent transcription. This induction was
`completely inhibited to normoxic levels by AMPK inhibi-
`tor (5-iodotubericidin) treatment prior to hypoxic induc-
`tion. There was no regulation of HIF-1 dependent tran-
`scription using AICAR alone in a similar assay (data not
`shown).
`
`Differential Expression and Subcellular
`Localization of AMPK Isoforms Under
`Hypoxic Conditions
`
`In order to determine whether AMPKa isoforms are
`differentially regulated by hypoxia in human glioblas-
`toma cells, the mRNA expression of the two AMPKa iso-
`forms was determined by quantitative RT-PCR in U373
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`

`

`DISTINCT ROLES FOR AMPKa ISOFORMS IN HYPOXIA
`
`737
`
`Fig. 3. AMPKa isoforms are dif-
`ferentially localized under hypoxic
`conditions. AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 pro-
`tein localization as determined by im-
`munofluorescent histochemistry under
`normoxic (N) and hypoxic (H) condi-
`tions.
`
`The Effect of AMPKa Isoform Repression
`by RNAi on Hypoxia-Induced AMPK Activation
`and Downstream Signal Transduction
`
`In order to determine the effect of AMPK alpha isoform
`repression on functional AMPK protein, we examined the
`level of total phosphorylated AMPK, which detects both
`p-AMPKa1 and p-AMPKa2 isoforms at Thr172, an activat-
`ing phosphorylation site (Woods et al., 2003). Figure 5A
`shows that hypoxia increased p-AMPK and that applica-
`tion of siRNA targeted to AMPKa1 repressed the total
`p-AMPK considerably under normoxic and hypoxic condi-
`tions. AMPKa2 RNAi also repressed total p-AMPK under
`normoxia and hypoxia, although to a lesser extent than
`AMPKa1. Since AMPKa1 mRNA and protein are more
`abundant in the U373 cells, AMPKa2 repression only par-
`tially affects the total amount of p-AMPK protein.
`One essential function for AMPK is to repress protein
`translation by blocking mTOR/S6 kinase pathways
`through phosphorylation of the TSC1/2 complex (Inoki
`et al., 2003). To determine whether the mTOR pathway
`inhibition was selective to either AMPK alpha isoform,
`levels of phospho-p70S6K were evaluated in AMPK RNAi
`repressed cells. Hypoxia alone significantly reduced the
`amount of phospho-p70S6K signal in U373 glioblastoma
`cells, Fig. 5B. This data supports the observation of
`Krause et al., 2002, which states that AMPK activation
`leads to the repression of phospho-p70S6K through mod-
`ulation of the mTOR pathway. Under normoxic condi-
`tions, AMPKa1 and AMPKa2 RNAi resulted in increased
`levels of phospho-p70S6K. It was found that the RNAi
`treatment for both AMPKa isoforms increased the phos-
`pho-p70S6K in hypoxia, with the repression of AMPKa2
`demonstrating a slightly greater increase in phospho-
`
`p70S6K. These data indicate that both AMPK alpha iso-
`forms contribute to the repression of the protein transla-
`tional pathways by repressing active p70S6K under
`hypoxia. This also confirms that RNAi to AMPK alpha
`isoforms is effective at altering downstream pathways of
`AMPK and is sufficient to study the AMPK alpha iso-
`forms independently.
`
`AMPKa2 Selectively Contributes
`to Hypoxia-Induced VEGF Expression
`at the mRNA and Protein Levels
`
`In an effort to examine the potential selectivity for the
`AMPKa isoforms in regulating important hypoxia respon-
`sive genes, the hypoxic induction of VEGF under condi-
`tions where AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 is repressed with RNAi
`treatments was examined. Hypoxia responsive U373 cells
`were transfected with mock or AMPKa isoform specific
`siRNA oligo pools. To assess RNAi effectiveness for each
`experiment, the level of AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 specific
`mRNA repression was determined to be greater than 90%
`of mock transfected control by qRT-PCR (data not shown).
`Total cellular RNA was analyzed for VEGF mRNA expres-
`sion by qRT-PCR, and the level of secreted VEGF in condi-
`tioned media from the same cells was determined by
`ELISA. Figure 6A shows the quantitative levels of VEGF
`mRNA levels determined for normoxic and hypoxic cells
`corresponding to mock transfected, AMPKa1 RNAi, or
`AMPKa2 RNAi treated U373 cells. Only the AMPKa2
`RNAi
`treated cells showed repressed hypoxic-induced
`VEGF mRNA at a significant level (50% of non-transfected
`cells), whereas AMPKa1 RNAi had no effect. Similarly, the
`conditioned media of the AMPKa2 RNAi treated cells
`showed significant repression of secreted VEGF protein, as
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`

`

`738
`
`NEURATH ET AL.
`
`Fig. 5. RNAi targeted to AMPKa isoforms affects p-AMPK and a
`downstream AMPK target. Cellular lysates isolated from U373 cells
`treated with no siRNA oligos (NT) or with siRNA oligos against
`AMPKa1 (a1) or AMPKa2 (a2) under normoxia (N) or hypoxia (H). A:
`Immunoblot for p-AMPK (Thr172) and b-actin. B: Immunoblot for phos-
`pho-p70S6K (Thr389) (p-p70S6K) and b-actin.
`
`Inhibition of AMPKa isoforms by RNAi is effective at the
`Fig. 4.
`mRNA and protein levels. RNA and cellular lysates isolated from U373
`cells treated with no siRNA oligos (NT) or with siRNA oligos against
`AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 under normoxia (white bars or N) or hypoxia
`(dark bars or H). A: AMPKa1 isoform mRNA expression. B: AMPKa2
`isoform mRNA expression. C: Immunoblots on cellular lysates for
`AMPKa1, AMPKa2, or b-actin. (**P  0.01.)
`
`measured by ELISA assay, Fig. 6B. Protein lysates from
`the experiment were also evaluated for VEGF protein
`levels by ELISA assay, and AMPKa2 repression resulted
`in similar decrease of VEGF protein production at the
`time of harvest (data not shown). The novel finding that
`AMPKa2 repression selectively affects hypoxia induced
`VEGF expression supports the hypothesis that the
`AMPKa isoforms have distinct functions.
`
`Contribution of AMPKa Isoforms
`to Hypoxia-Induced Transcription Through
`HIF-1 Dependent Mechanisms
`
`the individual
`In order to assess the control of
`AMPKa isoforms on VEGF mRNA transcription, isoform
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`Fig. 6. RNAi targeted to AMPKa isoforms affects VEGF mRNA and
`protein expression. Total RNA and cellular lysates isolated from U373
`cells treated with no siRNA oligos (NT) or with siRNA oligos against
`AMPKa1 or AMPKa2 under normoxia (white bars) or hypoxia (dark
`bars). A: Fold change in VEGF mRNA expression as determined by
`qRT-PCR. B: Fold change in total VEGF secretion into conditioned
`media as determined by VEGF ELISA assay. (*P  0.05.)
`
`specific involvement in HIF-1 dependent transcription
`was tested. Figure 7 shows a transient transfection with
`an HIF-1 dependent luciferase reporter normalized to
`the baseline transcription of a CMV-driven beta-galacto-
`sidase reporter. Hypoxia resulted in a 4.5-fold induction
`of HIF-1 dependent luciferase activity at 24 h. AMPKa2
`inhibition by RNAi repressed HIF-1 dependent expres-
`sion by 30% as compared to mock transfected control.
`Interestingly, AMPKa1 RNAi treatment showed a dou-
`bling of HIF-1 dependent luciferase activity compared to
`
`

`

`DISTINCT ROLES FOR AMPKa ISOFORMS IN HYPOXIA
`
`739
`
`and hypoxic conditions, which correlates with the high
`AMPKa2 expression observed by qRT-PCR analysis.
`These data indicate that the hypoxic regulation of
`AMPKa2 occurs in at least three glioblastoma cell lines.
`The U87 cells show no hypoxia regulation, but have a
`constitutive high AMPKa2:AMPKa1 ratio consistent
`with the continuous VEGF production observed. These
`data support the hypothesis that AMPKa2 not only is a
`significant contributor to the response of glioblastoma
`cells to hypoxic conditions, particularly with respect to
`VEGF production, but that the balance between AMPKa1
`and AMPKa2 levels might be one mechanism that contri-
`butes to the hypoxic response in different cells.
`
`AMPKa2 Protein Expression May Be
`Associated with High Tumor Grade
`Clinical Glioma Samples
`
`In a retrospective analysis of low, mid, and high grade
`clinical human glioma samples, archived paraffin slides
`were evaluated for AMPKa1 and AMPKa2 protein expres-
`sion by immunohistochemistry. Representative examples
`are shown in Fig. 9A. AMPKa1 expression did not signifi-
`cantly change with glioma grade. AMPKa2 expression was
`nearly identical in low and mid grade glioma samples.
`However, in high grade glioma samples, AMPKa2 expres-
`sion was increased in individual cells. Maximal AMPKa2
`expression was typically observed in and around areas of
`vascular occlusion and pseudopalisades, Fig. 9B. High
`grade human glioma tumors with areas of pseudopalisades
`have been reported to be hypoxic, and correlate with HIF-
`1a and VEGF expression (Brat et al., 2004; Zagzag et al.,
`2000). Thus, our data suggest that high levels of AMPKa2
`correspond to high grade gliomas and hypoxic microenvir-
`onments defined by pseudopalisading histopathologies.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Glioma responses to hypoxic microenvironments are
`likely to affect tumor angiogenesis, progression, and in-
`vasion (Brat et al., 2003). AMPK is a central regulator
`of cellular homeostasis under stress and is activated by
`hypoxia (Hardie et al., 2003). We hypothesized that
`AMPK plays a crucial role in the response to hypoxia in
`glioblastoma. AMPK alpha isoforms are known to be dif-
`ferentially expressed in various tissues (Jorgensen et al.,
`2004; Stapleton et al., 1996), which suggests that the
`AMPK alpha isoforms could have distinct functions. To
`investigate this possibility, we evaluated the regulation
`of AMPK alpha isoforms in the human glioblastoma cell
`line, U373. AMPKa1 showed a constitutive pattern of
`expression in U373 cells cultured under normoxic or
`little AMPKa2 was
`hypoxic
`conditions. Conversely,
`detected in U373 cells in normoxia, but AMPKa2 expres-
`sion at the mRNA and protein level was induced by hy-
`poxia. AMPKa2 was also observed to concentrate in the
`nucleus under hypoxic conditions. The novel observation
`that AMPKa2 is induced in hypoxia, along with its nu-
`indicated that AMPKa2
`clear subcellular localization,
`may have distinct functions from AMPKa1.
`
`GLIA DOI 10.1002/glia
`
`Fig. 7. RNAi targeted to AMPKa isoforms affects HIF-1 dependent
`luciferase transcription. Cellular lysates isolated from U373 cells treated
`with no siRNA oligos (NT) or with siRNA oligo pools against AMPKa1
`(a1) or AMPKa2 (a2) and an HIF-1 dependent luciferase reporter vector
`expression normalized to beta-galactosidase transfection control from
`cellular lysates. (*P  0.05 and **P  0.01.)
`
`mock controls. There was no effect on the total HIF-1a
`protein levels when cells were treated with either AMPK
`alpha isoform siRNA oligos as determined by direct im-
`munoblot (data not shown). These data suggest that at
`least some of the effect on VEGF protein by AMPKa2 is
`through an HIF-1 dependent transcription activity in
`spite of not affecting the total level of HIF-1a protein.
`
`AMPKa2 mRNA Is Regulated by Hypoxia
`in Several Glioblastoma Cell Lines
`
`To determine if AMPKa2 regulation by hypoxia and
`contribution to VEGF production is selective to U373
`cells, three additional human glioblastoma cell lines were
`subjected to hypoxia and RNA isolated for qRT-PCR analy-
`sis, and conditioned medias evaluated for VEGF levels. In
`all cell lines tested, U373, U118, U138, and U87, there
`was no apparent regulation of AMPKa1 mRNA levels by
`hypoxia, Fig. 8A. Interestingly, in addition to U373 cells,
`U118 and U138 cells demonstrated increases in AMPKa2
`mRNA when treated with hypoxia, Fig. 8B. In contrast,
`the U87 cell line showed significant levels of AMPKa2
`mRNA levels in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions.
`To analyze the balance between AMPKa1 and AMPKa2
`levels in each cell line, we calculated the AMPKa2 to
`AMPKa1 ratios as defined by mRNA expression levels,
`Fig. 8C. This analysis was revealing in that U373 cells
`demonstrated the most significant
`increase in the
`AMPKa2:AMPKa1 ratio with hypoxia and that U87 cells
`had a high AMPKa2:AMPKa1 ratio in both normoxic
`and hypoxic conditions. The U118 and U138 appeared
`similar to the U373 line, showing higher AMPKa2:
`AMPKa1 ratios in hypoxia.
`To compare the observed levels of AMPK alpha iso-
`forms with VEGF expression and secretion, the condi-
`tioned medias from the same set of cells were tested for
`VEGF protein by ELISA. The expression and secretion
`of VEGF was upregulated in all three glioblastoma lines
`demonstrating hypoxic increases in AMPKa2, namely,
`U373, U118, and U138 cells, albeit at varying levels,
`Fig. 8D. Interestingly, U87 cells demonstrated a continu-
`ous and high level of VEGF production in both normoxic
`
`

`

`740
`
`NEURATH ET AL.
`
`Fig. 8. AMPKa2 is regulated by hypoxia in multiple glioblastoma cell
`lines. Glioblastoma cell lines treated normoxia (white bars) or hypoxia
`(dark bars). A: AMPKa1 isoform mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. B:
`
`AMPKa2 isoform mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. C: Ratio of AMPKa2
`mRNA expression to AMPKa1 mRNA expression. D: Total VEGF secre-
`tion into conditioned media as determined by VEGF ELISA assay.
`
`Hypoxia has been shown to regulate the expression of
`genes required for cellular adaptation to stress (Helfman
`and Falanga, 1993; Shih and Claffey, 1998). One of the
`classic hypoxia regulated genes is the angiogenic growth
`factor VEGF. We have previously shown that VEGF is
`significantly induced in U373 cells in response to hy-
`poxia (Claffey and Robinson, 1996). Chemical inhibition
`of AMPK with 5-iodotubericidin completely abolished
`the hypoxic induction of VEGF mRNA. Since VEGF is
`regulated transcriptionally in hypoxia through HIF de-
`pendent mechanisms (Fedele et al., 2002; Semenza,
`1999), we utilized an HIF-1 dependent luciferase reporter
`construct to evaluate whether AMPK modulates HIF-1
`dependent transcription. Repression of AMPK with 5-
`iodotubericidin abrogated the HIF-1 dependent luciferase
`activity. Investigative studies aimed at determining the
`role for AMPK in hypoxic responses have incorporated
`the overexpression of dominant negative AMPKa1 or
`AMPKa2 isoforms, or chemical inhibitors (Hwang et al.,
`2004; Lee et al., 2003; Nagata et al., 2003; Yun et al.,
`2005). These studies are limited in their ability to assign
`specific activities to AMPK alpha isoforms due to the
`likely saturation of the beta and gamma subunits with
`dominant negative overexpression and lack of isoform
`specificity of chemical inhibitors (Stapleton et al., 1996;
`
`Woods et al., 2000). Our findings with AMPK chemical
`inhibition confirm these previous reports, but have the
`same limitations to distinguish AMPK alp

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket