throbber
I, Edward Balassanian, hereby testify as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
`
`I am the founder, member, and manager Implicit, LLC (“Implicit”),
`
`the Patent Owner in these proceedings, IPR2018-00766 and IPR2018-00767 (“the
`
`Proceedings”).
`
`3.
`
`Implicit owns the two patents at issue in these proceedings, U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 7,391,791 (“the ’791 Patent”) and 8,942,252 (“the ’252 Patent”)
`
`(collectively, “the Patents”). I am the lead inventor on both of the Patents.
`
`4.
`
`I am also the founder and owner of the predecessors-in-interest to
`
`Implicit, specifically BeComm Corp. (“BeComm”), Implicit Networks, Inc.
`
`(“Implicit Networks”), and Digbee Media Corporation (“Digbee”). I served as the
`
`President and Chief Executive Officer of BeComm, Implicit Networks, and
`
`Digbee. I am the duly authorized custodian of Implicit and its predecessor entities
`
`BeComm and Implicit Networks.
`
`5.
`
`I first recall becoming aware of the October 4, 2001 email between
`
`Dr. Peterson and Mr. Fuiczynski (“the Peterson Email”) after Dr. Peterson
`
`produced the email to Implicit’s counsel on February 27, 2019 in connection with a
`
`litigation involving NetScout and Sandvine. Dr. Peterson and Mr. Fuiczynski
`
`were not involved in the projects that would later form the genesis of the audio-
`
`video synchronization technology at BeComm (for example, the Juno project).
`
` 1
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Implicit Exhibit 2091
`Sonos v. Implicit, IPR2018-0766, -0767
`
`

`

`6.
`
`Implicit did not have possession, custody, or control of the Peterson
`
`Email until after it was produced to Implicit’s counsel on February 27, 2019.
`
`7.
`
`In 2018, and prior to December 18, 2018, I searched for potentially
`
`relevant records in connection with the Proceedings and did not locate the Peterson
`
`Email. If Implicit had possession of the Email, my searches would have produced
`
`the Email. I also provided Implicit’s records to counsel between 2017 and prior to
`
`December 18, 2018. My understanding is that counsel was unable to locate the
`
`Peterson Email when they searched Implicit’s records in connection with these
`
`Proceedings.
`
`8.
`
`After I became aware of the Peterson Email, I searched Implicit’s
`
`records again. I specifically searched for the Email. My searches did not locate the
`
`Email. My understanding is that counsel also searched Implicit’s records again after
`
`Dr. Peterson produced the Email and that their searches also did not locate the Email.
`
`9.
`
`I am listed as a “CC” on the Peterson Email. I do not recall receiving
`
`the Email. I believe the Email was likely deleted from Implicit’s records many
`
`years ago. BeComm frequently switched email servers in the early years of the
`
`company, and, sometime after 2001, BeComm again switched email servers. When
`
`BeComm made this switch, an account’s emails did not automatically import into
`
`the new server. The account holder needed to archive or save an email prior to the
`
`migration or the emails would be lost. I do not recall saving my emails, archiving
`
` 2
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Implicit Exhibit 2091
`Sonos v. Implicit, IPR2018-0766, -0767
`
`

`

`my emails, or otherwise transitioning my emails to the new server at this time. I
`
`believe the emails that were located in connection with these Proceedings during the
`
`2001 time period were emails that had been saved, archived, or otherwise
`
`transitioned to the new email server.
`
`
`
` 3
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Implicit Exhibit 2091
`Sonos v. Implicit, IPR2018-0766, -0767
`
`

`

`I declare under penalty of perjury that all statements made herein of my knowledge
`
`are true, and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be
`
`true, and that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`In signing this declaration, I understand that the declaration will be filed as
`
`evidence in a contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office. I acknowledge that I may be subject to
`
`cross-examination in this case and that cross-examination will take place within the
`
`United States. If cross-examination is required of me, I will appear for cross-
`
`examination within the United States during the time allotted for cross-
`
`examination.
`
`Executed this 4th day of April 2019, in San Francisco, California.
`
`By _________________________
`Edward Balassanian
`
` 4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Implicit Exhibit 2091
`Sonos v. Implicit, IPR2018-0766, -0767
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket