`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: April 5, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`SONOS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IMPLICIT, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
` IPR2018-00766 (Patent 7,391,791 B2)1
` IPR2017-00767 (Patent 8,942,252 B2)
`
`
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`NABEEL U. KHAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in each of these cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each
`case. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in
`any subsequent papers without prior authorization.
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00766 (Patent 7,391,791 B2)
`IPR2017-00767 (Patent 8,942,252 B2)
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`On April 2, 2019, the Board received an email from Patent Owner
`requesting authorization to permit the videotaping of Petitioner’s declarant
`Dr. Roman Chertov in a deposition scheduled for April 9, 2019. Petitioner
`opposes the request. The Board conducted a conference call with the parties
`on April 4, 2019. A reporter was on the call, and Patent Owner agreed to
`enter a transcript of the call into the record.
`Patent Owner asserts that authorization for videotaping should be
`permitted because videotaping will allow evidence to be preserved should
`credibility issues arise. Patent Owner alleges that the testimony in the
`deposition is expected to be related to disputed issues on source code
`interpretation where witness demeanor could be relevant. Patent Owner
`indicates that, as of this time, it is not seeking to have the videotape
`submitted in these proceedings. Patent Owner further stated that it would
`cover the cost of recording the deposition in the requested manner, and to
`provide a copy to Petitioner.
`Petitioner opposes Patent Owner’s request for videotaping because it
`is argued that Patent Owner has not established that there is any evidence to
`suggest that Dr. Chertov’s credibility is at issue, and the witness is offering
`expert opinions and is not a fact witness. Petitioner asserts that Patent
`Owner has represented that Patent Owner intends to use the videotaped
`deposition in a co-pending litigation, and not in these proceedings.
`Petitioner contends that videotaping would subject the witness to
`unnecessary stress. Petitioner also argues that, absent agreement of the
`parties to videotaping, authorizing Patent Owner’s request amounts to a
`broad grant of any one-sided request under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(a).
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00766 (Patent 7,391,791 B2)
`IPR2017-00767 (Patent 8,942,252 B2)
`
`
`After hearing the respective positions of the parties, we authorize
`videotaping the testimony of Dr. Roman Chertov, provided that Patent
`Owner pays costs associated with videotaping the deposition, including costs
`of providing a copy of the videotape to Petitioner. The purpose of this
`authorization is to preserve an opportunity for the panel to observe the
`recorded deposition testimony, should the need or desire arise. The
`authorization to conduct a videotaped deposition does not render the
`recording admissible in this, or another, proceeding. The recording may not
`be submitted in this proceeding without additional authorization under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.53(a).
`
`ORDER
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to videotape the deposition
`
`testimony of witness, Dr. Roman Cherov;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall bear the cost of the
`videotaped deposition; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that authorization granted by this Order does
`not extend to the submission of the videotaped deposition as evidence in this
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00766 (Patent 7,391,791 B2)
`IPR2017-00767 (Patent 8,942,252 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Rory P. Shea
`Cole B. Richter
`George I. Lee
`Michael P. Boyea
`LEE SULLIVAN SHEA & SMITH LLP
`224 N Desplaines St, Suite 250
`Chicago, Illinois 60661
`shea@ls3ip.com
`richter@ls3ip.com
`lee@ls3ip.com
`boyea@ls3ip.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Christian Hurt
`THE DAVIS FIRM, PC
`213 N. Fredonia Street, Suite 230
`Longview, Texas 75601
`churt@bdavisfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`