throbber
Case: 14-4 Document: 8 Page: 3 Filed: 07/07/2014
`
`Personal Statement of Edward R. Reines
`
`I seriously regret the consequences to the Court and Judge Rader from my
`forwarding of his email of March 5. I did not anticipate or intend any of this. Let
`me explain. The oral arguments on March 4 were some of my best work as an
`advocate. I had represented my clients to the best of my ability and was gratified
`that a member of the panel had complimented the presentations. I saw nothing
`untoward about the kind compliment or the email passing along that compliment,
`neither of which addressed the merits of the cases. I forwarded the email to people
`in my personal and professional network who I thought would be interested-my
`mom, my brothers and sister, friends, clients, former clients, prospective clients,
`lawyers with whom I have worked, and law firm colleagues. I did so because I
`was proud of my performance and the compliment and, as regards clients, former
`clients, and prospective clients, because the compliment regarding my advocacy
`might properly encourage them to consider me as their advocate in the future.
`
`I did not forward the email to advertise a friendship with Judge Rader. I
`hope I have many friends among the judges and bar of this Court. Over the last
`couple decades, I have worked professionally in many ways to assist my clients,
`the Court, its members, and its bar, and I treasure the friendships that have
`developed during that work and take pride that I have been recognized as a loyal
`supporter of the Court. But I perceive no need or utility to advertise those
`friendships, and I am aghast at the suggestion that I was implying that I could
`somehow improperly influence case outcomes. It is not true. It did not even occur
`to me that forwarding the email might be misconstrued as a suggestion that I could
`improperly influence the Court on the basis of friendship. I intended to suggest
`only that I was capable of excellent advocacy as illustrated by my performance in
`the back-to-back oral arguments in March. And Judge Rader's encouragement that
`I show the email to others reinforced my sense that it was appropriate to share.
`
`Consistent with the following submission by my counsel and the
`accompanying opinions of independent experts, I respectfully believe that I have
`not violated professional standards. But that belief in no way diminishes my regret
`for the consequences of forwarding the email. I would never intentionally harm
`the interests of this Court or any of its members. In hindsight, it was a mistake to
`distribute the Email, and I apologize for having done so.
`
`PROTIVA - EXHIBIT 2003
`Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. v. Protiva Biotherapeautics, Inc.
`IPR2018-00739
`
`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket