throbber
Effect of cold extrusion and heat treatment
`on the mechanical properties of polypropylene
`
`Y.W. Mai( 1 ), B. Cotterell and J. Fante
`
`Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
`
`Polypropylene rods are cold extruded through a die with three nominal area reductions of
`18, 40 and 64 o/o. These extrudates are subject to subsequent heat treatments at 100°, 120°
`and 140 °Cfor two hours after which this is followed by either air cooling or water quen-
`ching. The effect of cold extrusion increases the tensile strength, the elastic moduli in ten-
`sion and compression as we/las the specific impact energy absorption. The 0.2 o/o offset
`yield strength in tension decreases slightly for the 18 and 40 o/o extrudates but increases
`above the value of the as received polymer at 64% coltl work. Howeve1, cold extlusion
`decreases the compressive yield strength and the density which is a measure of crystallinity
`of the cold worked polymer. Cold extrusion followed by heat treatment reduces the elastic
`moduli but raises the yield strengths of the extrudates. The impact energy absorption
`shows a sharp increase with annealing temperature and the fracture surfaces display
`increasing orientation effect with increasing amounts of cold work. Air-cooled and quen-
`ched samples do not have any significant differences in these macroscopic mechanical pro-
`perties. It is apparent that heat treatment increases the density and hence the crystallinity
`of the cold worked polymer. The improvement is marginally larger for the air-cooled than
`for the quenched samples. The results of this investigation suggest that it is possible to
`obtain a combination of mechanical properties of polypropylene by a suitable extrusion-
`heat treatment process.
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`There has been considerable interest in applying
`metalworking processes to solid phase polymers in
`order to study the influence on subsequent mechanical
`properties. Cold rolling [I-9] is the most widely studied
`process for a wide range of amorphous and crystalline
`polymers. Improvements of both yield and tensile
`strengths, suppression of stress whitening, and postpo-
`nement of necking and cold drawing have been repor-
`ted. Another advantage not available in cold-worked
`metals is that cold-rolled polymers have a large increase
`of ductility [I, 5] if the cold work imparted is not exces-
`sive. This desirable effect has enhanced the drawability
`of cold-rolled polymers [2, IO, II]. The effect on the
`modulus of elasticity is, however, less clear as in some
`polymers increases are obtained [2-5] but in others
`reductions are reported [IJ.
`
`(I) The 1981 Robert L'Hermite Prize and Medal was granted to
`Dr. Mai who wrote the above paper on this opportunity.
`
`0025-5432/1982/99 !$ 5.00!© BORDAS-DUNOD
`
`Fewer investigations have been conducted on solid
`phase extrusion of polymers [I2]. While there is general
`agreement that cold extrusion increases the tensile
`strength and true strain at maximum load there is again
`no definite effect on the elastic modulus. For example,
`cold extruded amorphous polymers such as polycarbo-
`nate [I3, I4] and a crystalline ·polymer, polypropylene
`[I5], have higher elastic moduli compared to the as-
`received material. But for· some other crystalline poly-
`mers such as polyethylene and nylon [13] cold extrusion
`decreases the elastic moduli. Hot extrusion of poly-
`propylene produces even higher tensile strengths but
`lower elastic moduli than the cold extrudates [I5].
`Other metalworking processes that have been applied
`to polymers have been summarised by Broutman and
`Kalpakjian [2]. The list given is however not exhaustive
`and it does not include the more recent work related to
`cold drawing [13, 16] and upsetting processes [I7, 18].
`Metalworking followed by appropriate heat treatment
`
`99
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`Vol. 15 - N° 86 - Materiaux et Constructions
`
`are commonly adopted in the metals industry to pro-
`vide a combination of mechanical properties to metals
`and alloys. This is a relatively unexplored method for
`polymers although a few investigations have been car-
`ried out previously on the effect of heat treatment on
`mechanical properties [7, 14, 20] and microstructures
`(21, 22] of cold-worked polymers. For amorphous
`polymers it is important that the heat treatment tempe-
`rature does not exceed the glass transition temperature.
`Otherwise, all cold-work effects induced in the poly-
`mers are erased [3, 7, 14]. Lee et a!. [14] have shown
`that heat treatment of polycarbonate raises the yield
`strength of the cold extrudates without a noticeable
`decrease in tensile strength. However, heat treatment
`tends to lower the elastic modulus, the true fracture
`stress [14] and the impact energy absorption [7] of the
`cold-worked polycarbonate samples. For crystalline
`polymers the annealing temperature is usually above
`the glass transition temperature but below that for mel-
`ting. Annealing at sufficiently high temperature usually
`encompasses partial melting which
`is followed by
`recrystallisation. This gives an increase of density for
`the cold-worked polymer and results in lamellar thicke-
`ning [21, 22]. For cold-drawn polypropylene fibres
`which are subsequently annealed at 140 oc Nadella et
`a!. [20] have demonstrated that compared to the as-
`.ill!!Il_fihres both the elastic_ modulus .and tensile
`strength are increased but the percentage elongation to
`break is decreased. In another crystalline polymer,
`polyoxymethylene, Bahadur [19] has studied the effect
`of annealing over a range of temperatures on the aniso-
`tropic mechanical properties of the cold-rolled poly-
`mer. Cold rolling increases the tensile strength and the
`ductility in the rolling direction. These increases howe-
`ver become less as the angle from the rolling direction is
`increased and there is almost no effect in the transverse
`direction. Annealing at 70 oc increases the ductility of
`the cold-rolled polymer in the rolling direction but
`decreases the yield arid tensile strengths as well as the
`elastic modulus. At higher annealing temperatures of
`120° and 170 oc the cold-rolled material has approxi-
`mately the same yield and tensile strengths in the longi-
`tudinal direction and the percentage elongation to
`break is smaller at the higher temperature. In the trans-
`verse direction all the mechanical properties are either
`inferior or at most approximately equal to the cold-
`rolled polymer. These results indicate therefore that it
`is possible to alter the mechanical properties of the
`polymer, as in metals, by cold-working and subsequent
`heat' treatment. Much future research work should be
`carried out in this direction.
`The present paper reports the results of an explora-
`tory experimental investigation to_ study the effect of
`cold extrusion and subsequent heat treatment on the
`mechanical properties of a typical engineering polymer,
`polypropylene (PP). There does not seem to be any
`such work reported previously in the literature on this
`polymeric material. Th!s work is confined mainly to
`mechanical properties and not microstructures of the
`polymer as affected by extrusion and heat treatment.
`
`100
`
`2. EXPERIMENTAL WORK
`
`The polypropylene used for the experiments was
`obtained from Cadillac Plastics (Australia) Pty. Ltd as
`a regular commercial material in the form of 16-mm
`diameter extruded rods. To avoid any variation in the
`processing conditions of the extruded rods all subse-
`quent test specimens were machined from rods of the
`same batch. Solid cylindrical billets of 12.7 mm diame-
`ter and 110 m long were prepared for cold extrusion in
`the experimental setup shown in figure 1. By using
`three dies of varying outlet diameters three "nominal"
`area reductions -
`18, 40 and 64 Oi'o - were available.
`All extrusion experiments were performed in a single
`pass at room temperature using an Instron testing
`machine with a crosshead speed of 10 mm per minute.
`For lubrication between contacting surfaces petroleum
`jelly was used.
`
`DIRECT EXTRUSION PRESSURE
`H'H
`
`EXTRUDED POLYPROPYLENE
`
`Fig. I. - Experimental setup for extrusion operation.
`
`For subsequent tensile and compressive testing a
`total of 35 standard round specimens was prepared for
`each reduction. These specimens were tested in the fol-
`lowing conditions : (1) as extruded; (2) as extruded and
`subsequently heat treated for two hours at 100°, 120°
`and 140 °C respectively, followed by either air cooling
`or water quenching. True stress (a)-true strain (l) curves
`were obtained from the load-diameter records using the
`standard definitions : a = 4 Fl7rD2 and · T = 2/n
`(Do/D), where F is the applied load, D and Do are the
`instantaneous and original diameters of the test speci-
`mens. The tensile and compressive tests were not car-
`ried to fracture due to the very large deformations that
`could be sustained by the polymer.
`Charpy impact tests were also conducted on the
`various heat treated samples containing notches accor-
`ding to the ISO Recommendation Rl79 but these were
`not successful as many testpieces did not break during
`impact and slipped out of the supports. To increase the
`bending stiffness non-standard round specimens
`(12.20, 11.50 and 10 mrfl diameter for the 18, 40 and
`64 Oi'o reductions respectively) with segmental cuts to
`depths of approximately 2 mm were eventually used in
`the impact experiments.
`Diametrical measurements were made for the as-
`extruded and heat treated specimens to determine the
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`dimensional recovery or "spring-back" over a 48-hour
`period. Finally, to determine crystallinity changes of
`the polymer after extrusion and heat treatment density
`measurements were made on small off-cuts using the
`ASTM D-792-64 T method.
`As a basis for comparison all the above experiments
`were repeated for the as-received polypropylene.
`
`3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
`
`3.1. Dimensional Changes
`The significant elastic recovery or "spring-back"
`suffered by a cold-formed polymeric part has often
`been suggested as the major limitation of cold forming
`operations since this presents problems of dimensional
`control. However, if dimensions of cold-formed parts
`can be accurately predetermined given constant for-
`ming conditions, as have been shown from previous
`experiments [ 12, 18], "spring-back" should not be con-
`sidered as a serious obstacle to the use of cold-formed
`plastics. Figure 2 shows the magnitude of elastic reco-
`very for the polypropylene specimens after being sub-
`jected to various mechanical-thermal treatments. The
`percentage spring-back is calculated from the ratio of
`the diameter difference of the extrudate and die to the
`diameter of the die. For a given heat treatment tempe-
`rature, the larger the cold work the larger is the dimen-
`sional change. For the 40 and 64 OJo cold-worked poly-
`mer the heat treatment temperature has a considerable
`effect on the spring-back. There is no obvious diffe-
`rence between either air-cooling or water quenching on
`the spring-back. It may be noted that these elastic reco-
`veries are much larger than those obtained for polycar-
`bonate with similar mechanical-thermal treatments
`[14]. This may be partly due to the different glass tran-
`two polymers which
`temperature of these
`sition
`influences dissimilarly the relaxation behaviour.
`
`40,---------·--
`
`NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE
`BETWEEN AIR COOLED AND
`QUENCHED EXTRUDATES
`
`30
`
`-
`;;.
`
`w
`Cl
`$
`i5 u
`~ 10
`
`t.O% CW
`
`18% cw
`
`0
`
`20
`
`50
`80
`140
`120
`100
`HEAT TREATMENT TEMPERATURE. T. (CI
`
`150
`
`Fig. 2. - Variation of spring-back with heat treatment tempera-
`ture for the three nominal reductions : 18, 40 and 64 "lo.
`
`Y. W. Mai - B. Cotterell - J. Fante
`
`It has been suggested that the spring-back is directly
`related to the relative proportion of the crystalline
`region to the amorphous domain of the spherulite [18].
`The crystalline part takes up the plastic deformation
`and the amorphous part which is rubber-like influences
`the spring-back. This hypothesis provides an acceptable
`qualitative explanation for the results of the plain
`extrudates given in figure 2 (since as discussed in sec-
`tion 3.2 the crystallinity of the polymer decreases with
`cold work). It seems that there is no rigorous theoreti-
`cal analysis to date that can be used to predict the
`spring-back or elastic recovery of cold formed parts.
`The difficulties of modelling this phenomenon have
`been highlighted in [18]. For any successful analysis
`structural parameters must be built in the model to
`account for changes due to various mechanical-thermal
`treatments.
`
`3.2. Density Changes
`Density measurements give an indication of the gross
`molecular readjustments of the polypropylene samples.
`An increase in density for a crystalline material implies
`an increase in crystallinity and vice versa. Table I gives
`the density values of the as-received and various
`mechanical-thermal treated polypropylenes. It may be
`seen that increasing amounts of cold-work progressi-
`vely reduce the crystallinity and hence the density of the-
`polymer. Annealing tends to increase the density (and
`crystallinity) and the improvement is higher the higher
`the annealing temperature. These results are in agree-
`ment with those reported in [15, 21] for the same poly-
`mer. An additional information, not previously stu-
`is
`that quenched samples have consistently
`died,
`slightly lower density (and crystallinity) than air-cooled
`samples at the same heat treatment temperature.
`
`3.3 Mechanical Properties of Non-Heat Treated
`Extrudates
`A summary of the mechanical properties of the non-
`heat treated extrudates is given in Table I. Note that the
`yield strength is calculated based on the 0.2 OJo offset
`method and the tensile strength is determined from the
`maximum load sustained by the testpiece. Figure 3
`shows the true stress-true strain curves for the various
`cold worked extrudates and the as-received polymer.
`As noted in Table I small amounts of cold working (18
`and 40 OJo) reduce slightly the 0.2 OJo yield strength but
`at the maximum level of cold work (64 OJo) the yield
`strength is fully recovered to the value of the as-
`received polymer. It is however more remarkable that
`cold working improves both the tensile elastic modulus
`and the tensile strength. These results are in agreement
`with those reported by other investigators [15, 20].
`It is initially thought that the cold worked polymer
`can be regarded as the as-received material with an
`imparted equivalent prestrain (E;,) being determined by
`the degree of cold work. By matching the true stress-
`strain curves to that of the as-received· polymer as
`
`101
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`Vol. 1 5 - N ° 86 - Materiaux et Constructions
`
`00,----------------------------------------·--------------,
`
`so
`
`IO
`Vl. 30
`Vl
`UJ
`
`~
`1:'! 20
`cr >-
`
`10
`
`03
`I €' I
`TRUE STRAIN
`Fig. 3. - Tensile true stress-true strain curves for the as-received and cold worked polypropylene.
`
`04
`
`05
`
`06
`
`01
`
`02
`
`TABLE I
`MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYPROPYLENE AFTER VARIOUS EXTRUSION-HEAT TREATMENT PROCESSES
`
`Nominal OJo
`reduction
`in area
`
`Heat
`treatment*
`
`0.2 OJo offset yield stress
`Elastic modulus
`Tension Compression Tension Compression
`(MPa)
`(MPa)
`(MPa)
`(MPa)
`
`Engineering
`tensile strength**
`(MPa)
`
`Specific impact
`energy absorption***
`(kJ/m')
`
`Density
`(gm/cm')
`
`~4Q- 0 GA
`
`As-received
`I8
`
`40
`
`64
`
`I I 50
`I2IO
`1160
`1150
`1128
`1120
`IQSO
`I050
`I329
`I270
`I250
`I200
`I205
`1130
`1120
`I400
`I223
`I220
`1148
`1144
`IOI9
`1025
`
`7IO
`1190
`952
`940
`788
`770
`+-:m
`725
`I2IO
`993
`985
`861
`845
`77I
`77I
`I480
`903
`885
`755
`775
`720
`7I5
`
`13.5
`I2.5
`I3.2
`I3.I5
`I3.20
`I3.25
`lJAO
`I3.40
`I2.90
`I3.20
`I3.20
`I3.40
`13.45
`13.70
`I3.80
`I4.0
`I4.20
`I4. I5
`I4.30
`I4.20
`I4.50
`I4.50
`
`I4.0
`IO.O
`I0.5
`I0.5
`Il.5
`Il.6
`n.2$
`I2.50
`Il.O
`I2.5
`13.0
`13.25
`I3.0
`I4.0
`I3.5
`I 1.5
`I0.75
`10.80
`I2.0
`I2.2
`I3.0
`I3.0
`
`None
`None
`100 oc A
`100 oc Q
`I20 oc A
`I20 oc Q
`140 oc Q
`None
`IOO oc A
`IOO oc Q
`I20 °C A
`I20 oc Q
`I40 oc A
`I40 oc Q
`None
`100 oc A
`IOO oc Q
`I20 oc A
`I20 oc Q
`I40 oc A
`I40 oc Q
`* Heat treatments were at indicated temperature for 2 hours. A implies air cooling and Q is for quenching in water.
`** Calculated from maximum load divided by original cross-sectional area.
`*** Calculated from energy absorbed divided by nominal ligament area of notched cylindrical specimens. For 40 OJo C. W. specimens fracture
`plane is not flat. None of the 64 OJo C.W. specimen breaks by the available impact energy.
`N.B. All values shown in the above table are average of at least three measurements.
`
`29
`33
`
`35
`
`43
`
`4.02
`5.65
`7.05
`6.60
`I5.88
`I2:20
`37.90
`24.73
`I4.05
`20.I5
`I8.0
`34.0
`33.0
`58.0
`56.0
`>60
`
`0.9I89
`0.9006
`0.9040
`0.90IO
`0.9058
`0.9029
`0.9090
`0.9032
`0.8868
`0.8988
`0.89IO
`0.9052
`0.9008
`0.9I38
`0.9I04
`0.8676
`0.9090
`0.9060
`0.9I30
`0.9IOI
`0.9I58
`0.9I07
`
`shown in figure 4 it is clear that Eo is not identical to the
`cold work induced prestrain. This implies that the
`structural changes (i.e. crystallinity transformation,
`molecular chain orientation, etc.) caused by cold extru-
`sion are not the same as by simple tensile pre-straining.
`The same finding has also been observed for an amor-
`phous polycarbonate polymer [3].
`To examine the effect of drawing on tensile strength
`specimens that were extruded with nominal 18 and
`40 Ofo cold work were. further drawn at room tempera-
`ture with an lnstron testing machine to a maximum
`draw ratio of 2. Standard tensile tests performed on
`these drawn samples showed that enormous improve-
`ments could be obtained for tensile strength as given m
`figure 5.
`102
`
`In figure 6 and Table I the compressive true stress-
`true strain curves are given. It is seen that cold working
`decreases the 0.2 % offset yield and the compressive ·
`strengths but it increases significantly the elastic modu-
`lus. The stress-strain curves for the extrudates are lower
`than the as-received polymer. Shayota and Babcock
`[ 17] have observed the same behaviour for polypropy-
`lene cold worked by upsetting and specimens cut along
`the billet axial direction. They explained the reduction
`of compressive strength in terms of the competing pro-
`cesses between molecular chain orientation which for
`the particular load/specimen configuration increases
`the strength and the breaking of backbone chains by
`upsetting which decreases the strength. Due to the lack
`of equipment we have not conducted any x-ray diffrac-
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`Y.W. Mai - B. Cotterell - J. Fante
`
`60
`
`50
`
`~ 40
`.!
`
`vi
`Vl w
`~
`Vl
`w
`::::>
`0: >-
`
`10
`
`0
`
`01
`
`TRUE STRAIN. E
`Fig. 4. - Matching of the true stress-true strain curves of the extrudates to that of the as-received polymer.
`
`110
`
`100
`
`90
`
`00
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`20
`
`10
`
`;f
`.!
`5 0
`iE.
`~ w
`~
`w .J
`Vi z
`~
`
`"' z a: w w z
`G z w
`
`Nomtnol l.O% CW
`
`Nomtnol 18% cw.
`
`CONDITION
`Ours
`IMPal
`29
`AS RECEIVED
`18% EXTRUDATE 33
`40% EXTRUDATE 35
`
`~~0--~12~~1L4--~15~--1L8---2~0--~2~2---2~4--~25
`
`100 /01
`DRAW RATIO
`Fig. 5. - Variation of tensile strength with draw ratio for the 18
`and 40 fl!o extrudates.
`
`tion and gel permeation chromatograph studies to
`investigate the molecular orientation and molecular
`weight change of the extrudates. There is ample evi-
`dence that extrusion tends to orientate the c-axis in the
`direction of extrusion and that the orientation increases
`with increasing cold work and temperature [15]. Little
`information is however known about molecular chain
`breakage (i.e. molecular weight reduction) due to extru-
`sion. We cannot therefore conclude whether the unfa-
`vourable chain orientation and/ or the chain breakage
`mechanisms are responsible for the reductions in com-
`p!"essive strength
`The impact resistances of the as-received and cold
`worked polymers are given in Table I. There is a consi-
`derable improvement in the Charpy value as the
`amount of cold work is increased. At 64 Olo cold work
`the potential energy available in the impact tester is
`unable to cause complete fracture of the notched sam-
`ples (i.e. C.V. > 60 kJ/m'). It is further noted that the
`orientation effect becomes increasingly dominant as the
`cold work increases. The fracture plane is at an angle to
`the longitudinal axis of the sample at above 40 % cold
`work and its surface roughness also increases with cold
`working (jig. 7). Impact resistances enhanced by cold
`working should widen the use of the polymer in engi-
`
`40.----------------------------------------------------,
`
`30
`
`18%CW
`40%CW
`
`64%0N
`
`0
`
`-""""o~o5;o------ -o1o- -- ---,.0~15----------,co 2"'o _______ -:o~.25
`
`TRUE STRAIN . E'
`
`Fig. 6. - Compressive true stress-true strain curves for the as-received and cold worked polypropylene.
`
`103
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`Vol. 15 - N° 86 - Materiaux et Constructions
`
`Fig. 7. - Fracture surfaces of polypropylene. Left to right :(a) as-
`received, (b) 18 OJo C.W., (c) 40 OJo C.W. and (d) 64 OJo C.W.
`
`neering applications where toughness is needed to
`improve wear and crack propagation resistances.
`
`3.4 Mechanical Properties of Heat Treated Extrudates
`
`The mechanical properties of the heat treated extru-
`dates are given in Table I. Since in engineering design it
`is the 0.2 O'Jo offset yield strength that is required only
`this value is given in the Table. It is clear that heat treat-
`ment of the various cold worked extrudates tends to
`decrease the elastic moduli but increase the yield
`strengths both in tension and in compression. This ten-
`dency is more visible at higher annealing temperatures
`but it is not distinguishable between air cooling or
`water quenching. After the yield point, the true stress-
`true strain cotves, whether in tension 6r compression,
`are generally slightly raised for the air cooled specimens
`in comparison to the quenched specimens at a given
`heat treatment temperature. Some selected true stress-
`strain curves are given in figures 8 to 11 . A significant
`engineering implication from these results is that suita-
`ble thermal treatments can raise the tensile stress-strain
`curves (figure 9, 60 O'Jo cold work) and the compressive
`stress-strain curves (figures 10 and 11, 40 and 60 %
`cold work respectively) of the extrudates. For compari-
`son the true stress-strain curves are even raised close to
`that of the as-received polypropylene. These findings
`have not been previously reported elsewhere and an
`
`explanation to the results obtained must be sought in
`terms of microstructural changes of the polymer in the
`future.
`The Charpy energy absorption values for the heat
`treated extrudates are given in Table I. For a given
`amount of cold work the higher the heat treatment tem-
`perature the larger is the impact resistance. There is no
`significant difference between air-cooled and water
`quenched samples. It is also noted that these experi-
`mental results are in direct contrast to those of an
`amorphous polycarbonate polymer which has been
`subjected to cold rolling [7]. It is shown that for this
`latter polymeric material annealing reduces the residual
`stresses and relaxes the molecular orientation so that
`the impact resistance is decreased. These explanations
`however cannot be used for the heat treated polypropy-
`lene extrudates and it is thought that the annealing
`induced "lamellar" microstructure may be responsible
`for the improvement in impact strength [21].
`
`4. CONCLUSION
`
`Within the limitec range of mechanical-thermal
`treatments used in this exploratory investigation it is
`shown that the mechanical properties of polypropylene
`can be controlled and altered to suit specific enginee-
`ring applic;itioris. Improvements in elastic moduli, ten-
`sile strength, resilience to plastic deformation, and
`particularly impact resistance can be promoted in the
`polymer by a selective combination of cold working
`and heat treatment operations. Except the density mea-
`surements which show that cold work decreases the
`crystallinity of the polymer and that heat treatment
`improves the crystallinity of the extrudates no detailed
`work has been done in this study to examine the micros-
`tructural changes associated with
`the various
`mechanical-thermal
`treatments. This knowledge
`is
`mandatory if it is required to explain the experimental
`findings reported in this paper.
`
`70
`
`60
`
`so
`
`1.0
`
`ll
`
`20
`
`1()
`
`0
`a.
`~
`
`'0
`
`V\
`
`V\ w a:
`tii
`w
`:::> a:
`1-
`
`03
`TRUE STRAIN . €
`Fig. 8. - Tensile true stress-true strain curves for the 40 OJo C. W. extrudates. No heai treatment versus heat treatment. A for air-cooled and Q for
`water quenched.
`
`0.5
`
`06
`
`0
`
`02
`
`104
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`1.(]
`
`;£
`~
`
`Y.W. Mai - B. Cotterell - J. Fante
`
`V1
`
`V1 w a: 30
`>--V1
`UJ
`
`0"> a: 20
`>--
`
`- -~----:!-0::-2------0::1::-3--­
`
`- ' - - - - ____ ____L ____ - _ ____J
`0"
`05
`06
`
`TRUE STRAIN . E
`
`Fig. 9. - Tensile true stress-true strain curves for the 64 OJo C. W. exlrudates. No heal treatment versus heal treatment.
`
`_;;11.0'c a
`
`:£'
`.
`.
`..- _..- . . ~- -
`/
`-·ll.o·c A
`..... / . - :- ~ . --. ______ ........ _...., ·
`/ · __..-__.. . --- :.-----' =--
`\\
`12o:c A
`//{ __.. ~
`=IOOC A
`//··~;.... ..-
`
`- ~-~- =-~ -~--~~:~~:~ ~
`~"' / 0-----------------c
`
`/- /
`
`-
`
`NO HEAT TREATMENT
`
`30
`
`~
`~
`
`V1
`
`V1 w a:
`t;
`UJ
`:J
`::':
`
`I
`
`Fig. 10. - Compressive lrue slress-lrue strain curves for I he 40 OJo C. W. exlrudales. No heal lrealmenl versus heal treatment.
`
`oto - -· --·-ofs--------,o-To --- ----cr2s
`
`TRUE STRAIN . E .
`
`"0
`
`30
`
`20
`
`c;
`~
`
`ID
`
`V1
`V1 w
`::': V1
`w :J
`IE
`
`NO HEAT TREATMENT
`
`Fig. II. - Compressive I rues stress-true strain curves for I he 64 OJo C. W. exlrudales. No heat treatment versus heal lrealmenl.
`
`005
`
`OXJ
`
`015
`
`020
`
`025
`
`TRUE STRAIN . E'
`
`105
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

`

`Vol. 15 - N° 86 - Materiaux et Constructions
`
`REFERENCES
`
`(I] Wilchinsky Z. W. - Reduction of brittleness in poly-
`propylene by cold rolling, SPE Journal, Vol. 22, March,
`1966, pp. 46-49.
`(2] BROUTMAN L.J., KALPAKJIAN S. - Cold forming of
`plastics, SPE Journal, Vol. 25, October, 1969, pp. 46-52.
`(3] BROUTMAN L.J., PAT!L R.S. - Cold rolling of poly-
`mers. 1 -
`Influence of rolling on properties of amor-
`phous polymer, Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. II, 1971, pp. 165-
`173.
`(4] CADDELL R.M., BATES Jr.T., YEH G.S.Y. - On the
`tensile behaviour of HDPE subjected to cold rolling,
`Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 9, 1973, pp. 223-230.
`Investigation of the ductility
`(5] BAHADUR S., HENKIN A. -
`of rolled polymers, Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. 13, 1973, pp.
`422-428.
`(6] BROUTMAN L.J., KRISHNAKUMAR S.M. - Cold rolling
`of polymers. 2- Toughness enhancement in amorphous
`polycarbonates, Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. 14, 1974, pp. 249-
`259.
`Impact strength of
`(7] THAKKAR B.S., BROUTMAN L.J. -
`polymers. 3 - The effect of annealing on cold worked
`polycarbonates, Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. 21, 1981, pp. 155-
`162.
`- Deformation of
`[8] GEZOVICH D.M., GEIL P.H.
`polyoxymethylene by rolling, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 6,
`1971, pp. 509-530.
`- Deformation of
`[9] GEZOVICH D.M., GEIL P .H.
`polyethylene oxide, nylon-11 and polyethylene tereph-
`zhalaze by rot'ting, J. Mater. Sci., Vat. 0, t971, pp . .511-
`536.
`(10] HOUTMAN L.J., KALPAKJIAN S., CHAWLA J. - Deep
`drawability of biaxially rolled thermoplastic sheets,
`Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. 12, 1972, pp. 150-156.
`(II] Ll H.L., KOCH P.J., PREVORSEK D.C., OSWALD H.J.-
`Cold forming of plastics : draw forming of thermoplas-
`tic sheets, Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. II, 1971, pp. 99-108.
`
`[12] BuCKLEY A., LONG H.A. - The extrusion of polymers
`below their melting temperatures by the application of
`high pressures, Technical Papers, 14, 664 (May, 1968),
`SPE 26th Annual Technical Conference, New York.
`Also in Poly. Eng. Sci., Vol. 9, 1969, pp. 115-120.
`[13] LEE C.S., CADDELL R.M., YEH G.S.Y. - Cold extru-
`sion and cold drawing of polymeric rod : the influence of
`subsequent tensile and compressive mechanical proper-
`ties, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 10, 1972, pp. 241-248.
`(14] LEE C.S., CADDELL R.M., ATKINS A.G. - Heat treat-
`ment of cold extruded po!ycarbonate : some implica-
`tions for design engineers, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 18,
`1975, pp. 213-220.
`[15] BAHADUR S. - The effect of cold and hot extrusion on
`the structure and mechanical properties of polypropy-
`lene, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 10, 1975, pp. 1425-1433.
`Influence of the
`(16] CADDELL R.M., WOODLIFF A.R. -
`gradient in orientation on the compressive elastic modu-
`lus and yield strength of oriented polypropylene, Mater.
`Sci. Eng., Vol. 40, 1979, pp. 187-189.
`(17] SHAYOTA M., BABCOCK S.G. - Compressive behaviour
`of worked plastics, J. Appl. Poly. Sci., Vol. 18, 1974,
`pp. 2693-2702.
`(18] ELLIS D.T., BRAMLEY A.N., ATKINSON J.R. - The
`so/ide phase forming (or forging) of polypropylene,
`Proc. 18th Int. Machine Tool Design and Research Con-
`ference, London, England, 1977, pp. 283-288.
`[ 19] BAHADUR S. - The effect of annealing on the mechani-
`cal anisotropy of cold rolled polyoxymethylene, Poly.
`Eng. Sci., Vol. 18, 1978, pp. 255-259.
`(20] NADELLA H., SPRUIELL J.E., WHITE J.L. - Drawing
`and anneaT/ng of polypropylene fibres :structural chan-
`ges and mechanical properties, J. Appl. Poly. Sci., Vol.
`22, 1978, pp. 3121-3133.
`(21] PETERMANN J., SCHULTZ J.M. - Microstructure and
`annealing behaviour of cold-drawn isostatic polypropy-
`lene, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 13, 1978, pp. 2188-2196.
`(22] SCHULTZ J .M. - Polymer Materials Science, p. 193,
`Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1974.
`
`RESUME
`Effet de !'extrusion a froid et des traitements thermi-
`ques sur les proprit~tes mecaniques du polypropylene.
`- Les jones de polypropylene sont extrudes a froid a
`travers une filiere aux sections de reduction nominates
`de 18, 40 et 64 o/o. Les extrudants sont ensuite soumis a
`des traitements thermiques de 100, 120 et 140 oc de
`deux heures suivis par un refroidissement soit a /'air,
`soit par immersion dans l'eau. L 'extrusion a froid aug-
`mente Ia resistance en traction, les modules e/astiques
`en traction et en compression, ainsi que Ia capacite
`d'absorption de l'energie de choc. Cependant, Ia marge
`de 0,2 o/o de Ia limite e/astique en traction et en com-
`pression se trmtve legerement reduite. C'est un resultat
`de /'extrusion a froid que /e po!ymere so it mains dense,
`ce qui implique une diminution de Ia cristallinite. Le
`travail a froid sui vi par un traitement thermique reduit
`106
`
`les modules e/astiques mais augmente les limites elasti-
`ques. La resistance au choc monte rapidement avec Ia
`temperature de recuit. II ne semble pas qu 'if y a it de dif-
`ference notable dans /es proprif?tes mecaniques determi-
`nees par le refroidissement a /'air ou par immersion
`dr;ns l'eau. Cependant, les eprouvettes refroidies a /'air
`montrent une crista//inite un peu plus grande et des
`courbes contrainteldeformation en traction et en com-
`pression meil/eures au-de/a de Ia limite e/astique pour
`une temperature donnee de recuit. Les resu/tats de cette
`etude suggerent qu 'if est possible d'obtenir une combi-
`naison des proprietes mecaniques du polypropylene par
`une procedure appropriee d'extrusion suivie du traite-
`ment thermique. Une etude approfondie des micros-
`tructures du polypropylene affecte par les divers traite-
`ments mecaniques et thermiques permettra une com-
`prehension plus complete de Ia relation proprietel
`stru~ture.
`
`KASHIV1041
`IPR of Patent No. 9,492,393
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket