throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 44
`
`
` Entered: May 16, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`M & K HOLDINGS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00696 (Patent 9,113,163 B2)
`Case IPR2018-00697 (Patent 9,191,673 B2)
` Case IPR2018-00698 (Patent 9,197,896 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before MELISSA A. HAAPALA, Acting Vice Chief Administrative Patent
`Judge, and KARL D. EASTHOM and SHARON FENICK, Administrative
`Patent Judges.
`
`EASTHOM, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the three listed cases. The parties shall not
`employ this heading and filing style.
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00696 (Patent 9,113,163 B2)
`IPR2018-00697 (Patent 9,191,673 B2)
`IPR2018-00698 (Patent 9,197,896 B2)
`
`
`The parties request a consolidated oral argument for the three cases
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). Papers 34, 35.2 We grant the parties’
`requests.
`Each party will have 90 minutes total to present its arguments for the
`three cases. See Paper 34, 2 (Patent Owner requesting 75 minutes to argue
`the three cases collectively); Paper 35, 2 (Petitioner requesting 90 minutes to
`argue the three cases collectively). Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of
`proof to show unpatentability of the challenged claims. See 35 U.S.C.
`§ 316(e). At oral argument, therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to argue
`the grounds of unpatentability on which we instituted trial, and may reserve
`rebuttal time (no more than 45 minutes). Thereafter, Patent Owner may
`respond to Petitioner’s presentation and may reserve time for sur-rebuttal. If
`Petitioner reserves rebuttal time, Petitioner may then reply to Patent Owner’s
`responses.3 Finally, Patent Owner may present a brief sur-rebuttal
`responding to Petitioner’s rebuttal arguments.
`Oral argument will commence on June 11, 2019 at 1:30 PM Eastern
`Time at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in Alexandria, Virginia.
`All attendees must present a valid form of government-issued identification
`in order to enter the building and may be subject to security screening. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance on a first-come,
`
`
`2 References to the record herein refer to IPR2018-00696. The three cases
`include similar filings.
`3 Because each party has the burden on any motion it files, Patent Owner
`may address its Motion to Exclude Evidence (Paper 33) during its response
`time if desired, and then Petitioner may respond during its rebuttal time if
`desired. Or the parties may rest on their Papers.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00696 (Patent 9,113,163 B2)
`IPR2018-00697 (Patent 9,191,673 B2)
`IPR2018-00698 (Patent 9,197,896 B2)
`
`first-served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing
`and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the oral
`argument.
`At least seven (7) business days prior to oral argument, each party
`shall serve on the other party any demonstrative(s) it intends to use during
`oral argument. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The parties shall also file the
`demonstrative(s) in the record at least five (5) business days prior to oral
`argument. Demonstratives do not constitute evidence, but merely provide a
`visual aid at the oral arguments. Demonstratives may not introduce new
`evidence or raise new arguments unless addressing recent cases, and should
`cite to evidence in the record where applicable.
`The parties must attempt to resolve any objections to demonstratives
`prior to involving the Board. The parties must request a conference call with
`the Board at least three (3) business days before the hearing to present any
`unresolved objection regarding the propriety of any demonstrative. Any
`untimely objection to demonstratives shall constitute a waiver of the
`objection. The parties must confine demonstrative objections to those
`identifying violations prejudicial to the administration of justice.
`To aid in the preparation of an accurate transcript, each party shall
`provide paper copies of its demonstratives to the court reporter on the day of
`the oral argument. Each presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative (e.g., by slide or screen number), paper, or exhibit
`referenced during the oral arguments to ensure the clarity and accuracy of
`the transcript.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00696 (Patent 9,113,163 B2)
`IPR2018-00697 (Patent 9,191,673 B2)
`IPR2018-00698 (Patent 9,197,896 B2)
`
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at oral argument. If a party anticipates that its lead counsel will not attend,
`the parties should request a joint telephone conference with the Board no
`later than seven (7) business days prior to the oral argument to discuss the
`matter. Any counsel of record, however, may present the party’s arguments.
`Lead counsel and back-up counsel may use portable computers in the
`hearing rooms at the counsel tables and at the hearing room lectern. A party
`must request any audio-visual equipment desired five (5) business days in
`advance of the oral argument date. Please send any such requests to
`Trials@uspto.gov. An untimely request may result in unavailability of the
`equipment.
`So ORDERED.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Naveen Modi
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`Joseph Palys
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`Quadeer Ahmed
`quadeerahmed@paulhastings.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John Bauer
`jabauer@mintz.com
`Kongsik Kim
`kkim@mintz.com
`Jonathon Western
`jpwestern@mintz.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket