throbber
United States Patent £191
`Hall
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45} Date of Patent:
`
`4,955,379
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`[54] MOTION ARTEFACI REJECI'ION SYSTEM
`FOR PULSE OXIMETERS
`
`[75)
`
`Inventor: Peter R. Hall, Dyfed. United
`Kingdom
`
`[73] Assignee: National Research DeTelopment
`Corporation, London, England
`
`[21] Appl. No.: .229,692
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Aug. 8,1988
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`[30]
`Aug. 14, 1987 [GB) United IGngdom ................. 8719333
`
`Int. Q,$ ................................................ A61B 5/00
`[51]
`(52) u.s. a. .................................... 128/ 633; 128/664;
`128/666; 128/687
`(58] Field of Search ............... 128/633, 634, 664, 665,
`128/666, 687; 356/39, 41
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,109,643 8/1978 Bond et al ........................... 128/666
`4,167,331 9/1979 Nielsen .................................. 356/41
`4,260,9Sl 4/1981 Lewyn .•.........•.................... 128/690
`4,3S3,1S2 10/1982 O'Connor et al ................... 128/666
`4,641,658 2/1987 Lepper ................................ 128/633
`4,6SI,741 3/1987 Passafaro .........•.................. 128/633
`4,723,554 2/1988 Oman .................................. 128/633
`Primary Examiner-Kyle L. Howell
`Assistant Examiner-John C. Hanley
`Attorney, Agent, or Finn-Howard F. Mandelbaum
`ABSTRAcr
`[57]
`A pulse oximeter apparatus characterized in that it com(cid:173)
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artefact from wanted signal is disclosed.
`Also disclosed is the use of such an apparatus for the
`determination of pulse rate and/or arterial blood oxy(cid:173)
`gen saturation.
`
`6 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`'"''
`
`•ito>~ il
`
`ttl AC
`si;•llool
`
`lr AC
`sl;oal .. l
`
`Apple Inc.
`APL1036
`U.S. Patent No. 9,289,135
`
`001
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`4,955,379
`
`Pulse rate
`
`(Hz l
`Frequency
`(BOOnm channel)
`
`0
`
`Fig.1
`
`Pulse rate
`
`1.7
`
`0
`
`Frequency (Hz)
`( 1300 n m channel)
`
`Fig.2
`
`002
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`4,955,379
`
`Pulse rate
`
`.
`
`7.5
`
`5
`Frequency (Hz)
`( 1300 nm channel)
`
`2.5
`
`1.7
`
`0
`
`Fig. 3
`
`after
`filtering
`
`before
`filtering
`
`r - - - - - -- --
`
`-
`
`- - - time
`
`Fig.4
`
`003
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 11, 1990
`
`red AC
`signal in
`
`129 tap
`lowpass fi~er
`5.5 Hz
`
`ir AC
`signal in
`
`129 tap
`lowpass filter
`5.5 Hz
`
`4,955,379
`
`red AC
`signal out
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`r
`
`129 tap
`band pass filter
`0.75-,Hz
`I
`
`T
`
`129 tap
`bandpass filter
`0.75-,Hz
`I
`
`zero
`crossing
`counter
`
`ir AC
`si gnat out
`""
`
`loop filter
`(lowpass)
`
`calculate
`sample
`rate
`
`.
`Frg. 5
`
`004
`
`

`

`~
`~
`
`\C
`.._.J;;..
`
`~
`
`~ g,
`[
`
`i
`...
`,.....
`~ ,.....
`
`rJJ
`
`~ ......
`~ ......
`~ rn
`
`8 bit
`
`X 2
`t1mers
`116 bil
`
`oximeter
`to main
`communications
`
`8 bit
`
`65C22
`I. A.
`
`V.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`EPROM
`X 16
`32k
`
`RAM
`x16
`BK
`
`from main oximeter
`signal
`ir front end
`
`signal
`red front end
`
`Fig.6
`
`~
`
`DC
`ir
`
`AC
`ir
`
`I
`
`System Buses
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`AC
`red
`
`DC
`red
`
`I dual 12 bil I l 1
`
`O.
`
`I
`{AGC)
`A.C.
`
`CPU
`68000
`
`lOMHz
`
`AOC
`12 bit
`
`hold
`
`1 sample
`
`---1 MPX
`
`~way
`
`~
`
`,
`
`-
`
`,------
`
`005
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,955,379
`
`MOTION ARTEFACT REJECTION SYSTEM FOR
`PULSE OXIMETERS
`
`2
`skin, their distance from it may vary slightly when the
`patient moves. By simple 1/d2 function through air,
`measured light levels may change disastrously in real-
`life situations.
`S Additionally, even if the optical components are ide-
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`ally fixed to the skin, the path length between them may
`This invention relates to a motion artefact rejection
`change if the tissue is slightly deformed by the move-
`system for pulse oximeters; more particularly, it relates
`ment. Again, light level changes by this mechanism may
`to a system for filtering out signals due to patient move-
`seriously interfere with measurements. In this case, the
`ment, i.e. motion artefact signals, from wanted signals.
`The operation of pulse oximeters which measure 10 function of intensity versus distance is more compli·
`cated than Id!2, since, as tissue is deformed, its optical
`arterial blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate is preju-
`charactenstics change. This is because of the mobility
`diced when the patient performs any movement. Oxim-
`eters have difficulty in distinguishing the pulsating sig-
`of the blood, the major absorbing species at the wave·
`nals due to arterial blood flow from the pulsating signals
`lengths in use; for instance, as the fmgertip is com-
`due to patient movement. Since the results are calcu- IS pressed, the path length between the optical compo-
`nents will reduce, but, additionally, venous and capil·
`lated from this pulsatile signal and the size thereof, it is
`highly desirable to be able to distinguish signals from
`lary blood is squeezed out of the light path.
`these two sources. The present invention, which en-
`Furthermore, during severe motion, one or both opti-
`cal transducers may be pulled laterally along the tissue
`compasses an apparatus and the use thereof, reduces the
`severity of this problem and offers significant advan- 20 under measurement, effectively changing the measure·
`tages to a clinician.
`ment site. This typically occurs when the cable connect-
`In general terms, a pulse oximeter apparatus will
`ing the sensor to the instrument is pulled and may cause
`typically comprise the following units: a sensor, con-
`major optical disturbance.
`taining two LEDs of different wavelength (commonly
`Since the AC signal is typically only 2-5% of the
`660 nm and 940 nm), and a photodetector, which are 2S amplitude of the DC signal, it is this which is propor(cid:173)
`tionally most seriously affected by movement artefact.
`applied directly to a patient. The sensor is connected to
`the main instrument by a cable. The instrument contains
`.
`.
`.
`Considering this, it is a reasonable approximation to
`a system to adJUSt LED power, hence controllmg hght

`al
`'thm t
`th AC · al
`d t
`1 mt
`0
`~PP Y a e~g gon
`intensity, and a system to analyse the incoming light
`.
`e
`Stgn s an o
`from the photodetector. Means are provided to isolate 30 Ignore e.n:ors m ~he DC stgnals.
`.
`Surpnsmgly_. 1t has now ~en discovered that the
`the pulsatile components of these incoming light signals.
`wanted AC Signals, othe~tse known as plethysmo-
`The nonvarying ("DC signals") at each wavelength are
`either maintained equal by the LED power adjusting
`graph waveforms, have typtcal frequency versus power
`spectra as illus~ted in ac~ompan~g FIG. L That is,
`system, whereby the effects thereof cancel, or they may
`themselves be isolated and measured. The time-varying 3S about 90% of thelt' energy IS con~ed a~ the ~damen-
`tal f~equency (the pul:U: rate) w1th relattvely little. har-
`signals ("AC signals") then pass through an AGC (auto•
`matic gain control) system to ensure that they supply an
`moruc energy.. Additionally,
`the un:-vanted . stgnal
`adequate signal to an analogue-to-digital converter,
`caused by monon artefact frequently lies o~tstde the
`where they are digitised. The AC and DC signals are
`frequen~y band of the pulse rate. AccompanytDg FIGS.
`then taken into a microprocessor, which analyses the 40 2. and 3 ~ustrat~ the fre~uency versus power spectra ~f
`AC signals for amplitude and frequency (corresponding
`SJgnals wtth which motton artefacts, random and pen-
`to pulse rate). Oxygen saturation is calculated by the
`odic, respectively, are interfering. It follows from these
`microprocessor by inserting the amplitudes of the vari-
`realisations that a bandpass filter may be adapted selec-
`tively to exclude motion artefact from wanted signals.
`ous signals into the following formula:
`45 Accompanying FIG. 4 illustrates the effectiveness of
`the present system in the removal of unwanted motion
`artefact signals from wanted plethysmograph signals.
`
`and reading the result from an experimentally-deter(cid:173)
`mined reference table. The results may be displayed on SO
`LEDs or LCDs. There is additionally provided a sys.
`tem to judge whether motion artefact is present by
`examination of variability of AC signal frequency. If
`motion is judged to be present, displayed values are
`frozen and, if this state of affairs continues for any ss
`length of time, a warning message is given.
`In use, the sensor is closely applied to a well-perfused
`region of a patient, such as a fingertip. Light from the
`LEOs needs to pass through a well-perfused region to
`ensure a good AC signal is obtained. The emergent light 60
`pulsates in intensity due to arterial pulsation. Since dur-
`ing systole the internal vessels are dilated, the total path
`length for the light is increased and intensity falls. Arte-
`rial blood is examined exclusively since it alone is the
`cause of the AC signals.
`Patient movement interferes with the operation of
`pulse oximeters in several ways. If either th.e LEOs or
`photodetector ~ not fixed directly in contact with the
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`In a first embodiment, the present invention relates to
`a pulse oximeter apparatus characterised in that it com(cid:173)
`prises a bandpass filter adapted selectively to exclude
`motion artefact from wanted signal.
`In order to achieve this, the ftlter must initially be
`tuned to the pulse rate. M~reover, as the pulse rate
`changes, the filter is so-adapted that its pass-band will
`follow the frequency change.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals found in the environment of the preferred em·
`bodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 2 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with random motion artefacts found in the envi·
`65 ronment of the preferred embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 3 is a graphical view of the plethysmographic
`signals with periodic motion artefacts found in the envi-
`ronment of the preferred embodiment of the invention.
`
`006
`
`

`

`4,955,379
`
`3
`FIG. 4 is a graphical view of plethylsmographic sig(cid:173)
`nals demonstrating the effectiveness of the preferred
`embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram view of the
`preferred embodiment of the invention.
`FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram view of appara(cid:173)
`tus comprising an environment for the preferred em(cid:173)
`bodiment of the invention.
`
`4
`1. In a pulse oximeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation which produces pulsatile sig(cid:173)
`nals in response to a patient's pulsating arterial blood
`flow in a first variable range of frequencies and motion
`s artefact signals at frequencies outside of said fli'St vari(cid:173)
`able range of frequencies, apparatus for minimizing the
`effect of said motion artefact signals on said measure(cid:173)
`ment of blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a tunable bandpass fllter having an input to which
`said pulsatile signals and said motion artefact sig(cid:173)
`nals are applied;
`a frequency determining means connected to the
`output of said tunable bandpass ftlter for determin(cid:173)
`ing the frequency of the pulsatile signals at the
`output of said tunable bandpass fllter;
`and a tuning means operatively connected to said
`frequency determining means and said tunable
`bandpass ftlter for tuning said tunable bandpass
`ftlter in response to said determined frequency to
`align the pass band of said band pass falter with the
`determined frequency of said pulsatile signals
`whereby motion artefact signals are attenuated.
`2. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
`a first low pass filter connected to the input of said
`tunable bandpass ftlter.
`3. Apparatus according to claim 1 further comprising
`a loop filter connected between said frequency deter(cid:173)
`mining means and said tuning means.
`4. Apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said band
`pass filter is a digital pass falter tunable by changing its
`sampling rate, and said tuning means comprises means
`for changing said sampling rate in accordance with the
`output of said frequency determining means.
`5. Apparatus according to claim 6 wherein said fre(cid:173)
`quency determining means comprises a zero crossing
`counter.
`6. In a pulse oximeter for making a measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation having a rust channel wherein
`there are produced first pulsatile signals in response to
`red light absorbed by a patient's pulsating arterial blood
`flow and a second channel wherein there are produced
`second pulsatile signals in response to infrared light
`absorbed by a patient's pulsating arterial blood flow in a
`first variable range of frequencies, and in which motion
`artefact signals at frequencies outside of said fli'St vari(cid:173)
`able range of frequencies are produced iin said fli'St and
`second channels, apparatus for m.inimizing the effect of
`said motion artefact signals on said measurement of
`blood oxygen saturation comprising
`a first tunable bandpass filter disposed in said fmt
`channel and having an input to which said first
`pulsatile signals and said first channel motion
`artefact signals are applied;
`a second tunable bandpass ftlter disposed in said sec(cid:173)
`ond channel and having an input to which said
`second pulsatile signals and said second channel
`motion artefact signals are applied;
`a frequency determining means connected to the
`output of at least one of said ftrst and second tun(cid:173)
`able bandpass falters for determining the frequency
`of the pulsatile signals at the output of said at least.
`one tunable bandpass filter;
`and a tuning means operatively connected to said
`frequency determining means and said first and
`second tunable bandpass filters for tuning said tun(cid:173)
`able bandpass falters to align the pass bands of the
`band pass filters with the determined frequency.
`• • • • •
`
`10
`
`DESCRIPTION OF TilE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT OF TilE INVENTION
`As mentioned above, a motion artefact detector sys(cid:173)
`tem decides by examination of the variability of the
`amplitude and frequency of the incoming AC signals
`whether motion artefact is present. If artefact is not IS
`judged present, the bandpass fJ.lter is tuned to the pulse
`rate as determined by the normal oximeter algorithms.
`Additionaly, the AGC system adjusts the input signal
`levels to the bandpass ftlter such that there is a large
`overload margin, for example x16, above the incoming 20
`wanted AC signals. When artefact is present, the AGC
`system is frozen, fiXing the gain level, and the bandpass
`filter is configured in a feedback loop as illustrated in
`accompanying FIG. 5. The output of the bandpass fil(cid:173)
`ters is substantially sinusoidal and so a simple frequency 25
`detector, for example a zero crOMing counter, is suitable
`to determine its output frequency. The output of this
`frequency detector passes through a low-pass loop fil(cid:173)
`ter, whose output in turn directly turns the bandpass
`filter. The system thus formed is a frequency-locked 30
`loop or tracking fLlter.
`Thus, when motion artef~t is present, the bandpass
`filters can stay tuned to the pulse rate, tracking its
`change. The fLlters selectively exclude motion artefact
`during operation and the amplitude of the AC signals 35
`emergent from the fllters may be used by the oximeter
`as normal. The errors in oxygen saturation measure(cid:173)
`ments, as well as pulse rate, caused by patient move(cid:173)
`ment are thus advantageously reduced.
`For purposes of exemplification, the present system 40
`has been incorporated into a Novametrix oximeter
`model 500 as an additional68000-10 slave processor. A
`hardware block diagram is illustrated in accompanying
`FIG. 6.
`Regarding digital signal processing algorithms, the 45
`present system is illustrated in ~companying FIG. 5.
`AC signals are fii'St passed through a high grade 5.5 Hz
`lowpass ftlter, 129 tap FIR fLlter, which is a necessary
`anti-aliasing filter at the lowest bandpass fllter sampling
`rates. The lowpus falter sampling rate is fixed at 100Hz. 50
`The bandpass falter has fiXed coefficients, and is tuned
`by varying its sample rate as illustrated in accompany(cid:173)
`ing FIG. 5. Finite impulse response (FIR) fllters have
`been used for their predictable frequency versus delay
`characteristics. The design of this filter is the result of a ss
`number of conflicting requirements which are outlined
`below:
`(i) optimal artefact filtering demands a narrow pass(cid:173)
`band and high stop-band rejection, implying long
`tap-length filters;
`(ii) adequate tracking of changes in pulse rate demands
`a wide pass-band and fast servo loop performance,
`implying short tap-length filters.
`One suitable filter is a 129 tap FIR of sampling rate
`15-80 Hz, with -3 dB points ± 16% of centre fre- 6S
`quency and stopband rejection of -40 dB at ±50% of
`centre frequency.
`I claim:
`
`60
`
`007
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`: 4 , 955,379
`PATENT NO.
`Sep . ll, 1990
`LJA TED
`INVENTO R(S) : Peter R. Hall
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-I dentified patent and that sa1d Letters Patent
`is hereby corrected as shown below:
`line 11 , change " ld/2
`" to -- l/d 2-- .
`At
`column 1,
`
`At column 4 , line 30 , afte r "digital " insert --band--.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Eleventh Day of February, 1992
`
`Attest:
`
`HARRY F. MANBECK. JR.
`
`Attesting Officer
`I
`Commissioner of Paumts and TrrJdemar/cs
`~---------------------------------------------------------------~
`
`008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket