throbber
Hedvat, Shannon H.
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Kamran,
`
`Thank you for your e-mail.
`
`Hedvat, Shannon H.
`Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10:31 AM
`Vakili, Kamran; Baghdassarian, Mark; Federico, Alexis; Caplan, Jonathan S.;
`provner@potteranderson.com; ~Choa, Jonathan
`Yorks, Ben; McPhie, David; Michael J. Farnan; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com);
`Holland, Eileen
`RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Unfortunately, your response does not address the issues raised in our e-mail or during our meet and confer yesterday
`and these issues will need to be presented to the Court today.
`
`With respect to Dr. Lyon's deposition, you had agreed to let us know yesterday if Fraunhofer will proceed with his
`deposition. Please let us know immediately if Fraunhofer will proceed with the deposition.
`
`Shannon
`
`From: Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 9:07 PM
`To: Hedvat, Shannon H. <SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>;
`Federico, Alexis <AFederico@irell.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>;
`provner@potteranderson.com; ~Choa, Jonathan <jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J. Farnan
`<mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland, Eileen
`<EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Shannon,
`
`See below for some further responses from Fraunhofer in view of the parties’ meet-and-confer this afternoon and your
`most recent email.
`
`Chart: Fraunhofer agrees to forego the early Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of SXM (D.I. 163) if SXM confirms that it will
`provide the information Fraunhofer has been seeking in the written format of our proposed February 28 chart as we
`have requested. If SXM agrees, please confirm by email before the hearing tomorrow that this issue has been resolved,
`except for the question of by what deadline SXM will provide the requested chart.
`
`IPR Deposition: Fraunhofer appreciates SXM’s offer to make Dr. Lyon available for a telephonic deposition, in light of the
`circumstances surrounding COVID-19. Fraunhofer is considering SXM’s offer and will respond shortly. We think the
`remainder of your commentary is beside the point (and we do not agree in any event).
`
`Code Review: As we explained during the call today, Fraunhofer needs to be able to proceed with the source code
`review right away. Please confirm whether SXM will or will not agree to facilitate a source code review in the near term,
`whether in person or over a secure remote connection. If SXM refuses to do this, Fraunhofer will need to seek the
`
`1
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 1
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`assistance of the Court. Note that Fraunhofer’s code expert is located in the New York City area, which is where you
`previously indicated the code would be produced for inspection.
`
`Schedule: Fraunhofer objects to SXM’s continued mischaracterization of its purported need to modify the case
`schedule. SXM still has not explained why the timing of the non-pseudonymized email production (which was directly
`attributable to SXM’s lack of cooperation and delay) or the filing of the Amended Complaint requires a modification of
`the schedule. And we do not view SXM’s previous proposal (i.e., that we simply push the fact discovery cut off until the
`day before opening expert reports are due) as a reasonable approach. Nonetheless, as we discussed during today’s call,
`we understand that the situation surrounding COVID-19 has been rapidly evolving and may ultimately impact the case
`schedule. As of a few hours ago, we are in receipt of SXM’s new scheduling proposal to change the fact discovery
`deadline to July 1 and to move out all other deadlines by 60 days. We are currently considering that proposal. Given
`that we received the proposal less than 24 hours before the hearing and have not had the opportunity to consult with
`our client, it is unlikely that we will have a final response for you at the hearing. That said, we are willing to continue to
`meet and confer with SXM on this issue.
`
`Best,
`Kamran
`
`Kamran Vakili, Ph.D
`Irell & Manella LLP | kvakili@irell.com | www.irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Direct: (949) 760-5151
`
`This message and its contents are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain
`confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
`anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
`
`From: Hedvat, Shannon H. <SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 2:42 PM
`To: Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>; Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Federico, Alexis
`<AFederico@irell.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Rovner, Phil
`<provner@potteranderson.com>; ~Choa, Jonathan <jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J. Farnan
`<mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland, Eileen
`<EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Kamran,
`
`Per our discussion earlier today, both parties agreed to get back to each other on the various issues discussed. Below
`please find SXM’s updates. We look forward to Fraunhofer’s positions, including on the 30(b)(6) and chart issue, and
`those outlined below, by today.
`
`IPR Deposition: For purposes of the IPR only, and in an effort to address Fraunhofer’s April 1 deadline as you raised
`during the call, SXM is amenable to making Dr. Lyon available for a telephonic deposition in light of the travel
`restrictions and other concerns surrounding COVID-19. We understood your proposal to be one whereby Fraunhofer
`would forego the deposition of Dr. Lyon if SXM would forego the deposition of Fraunhofer's expert who will submit a
`responsive declaration. However, under the PTAB rules, Fraunhofer is prohibited from submitting any additional
`evidence, including in the form of an expert declaration, in its sur-reply. Accordingly, SXM does not consent
`to Fraunhofer’s submission of a declaration with its sur-reply. Please confirm whether Fraunhofer wishes to proceed
`with a telephonic deposition of Dr. Lyon next Tuesday.
`
`2
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 2
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`Schedule: As we explained during the call, and in our various correspondence last week, SXM proposes to push out the
`fact discovery deadline, and potentially other deadlines in the schedule, to account for Fraunhofer’s belated decision to
`proceed with the Amended Complaint, Fraunhofer’s delayed e-mail production, to resolve issues relating to case
`narrowing and additional Markman proceedings for outstanding disputed claim terms, and now to account for the
`uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic including its impact on depositions, such as for SXM witnesses
`located in New York and elsewhere as well as Fraunhofer’s witnesses many of which are located in
`Germany. Notwithstanding that circumstances globally are changing almost daily, and noting that the parties can agree
`to work with the Court to amend any deadlines as needed to account for such uncertainty, SXM proposes (as it did last
`week) to change the fact discovery deadline to July 1 and to move out all other deadlines by the same number of days
`(60). As part of this schedule, we would want to include dates for case narrowing and for the Court to resolve remaining
`claim construction issues.
`
`Fraunhofer’s Response to ROG 10: In anticipation of the hearing tomorrow, and in light of Fraunhofer’s newly identified
`case law in its letter of Friday, March 13, as a matter of courtesy, SXM identifies the following case that it intends to
`raise with the Court tomorrow in order to properly present the law on the issue surrounding Fraunhofer’s ongoing
`insufficient response to ROG 10: Knauf Insulation, LLC v. Johns Manville Corp., No. 1:15-CV-00111-WTL-MJD, 2018 WL
`6659726 (S.D. Ind. Jun. 28, 2018).
`
`Shannon
`
`Shannon H. Hedvat
`Associate
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.9185 M 973.809.4768 F 212.715.8385
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 7:19 PM
`To: Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Federico, Alexis <AFederico@irell.com>; Hedvat,
`Shannon H. <SHedvat@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>;
`provner@potteranderson.com; ~Choa, Jonathan <jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J. Farnan
`<mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland, Eileen
`<EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Mark,
`
`I understand your email to mean that SXM is now refusing to provide the requested information in chart form. If that is
`right, then please immediately identify available dates for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition as we have requested numerous
`times.
`
`3
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 3
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`We have yet to receive a complete scheduling proposal from SXM and this is not an issue that has been properly raised
`for this week’s hearing. That said, we are willing to consider any scheduling proposal you may have and can meet and
`confer once we have had the opportunity to discuss with our client.
`
`Regards,
`Kamran
`
`Kamran Vakili, Ph.D
`Irell & Manella LLP | kvakili@irell.com | www.irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Direct: (949) 760-5151
`
`This message and its contents are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain
`confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
`anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
`
`From: Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 3:57 PM
`To: Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>; Federico, Alexis <AFederico@irell.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Rovner, Phil
`<provner@potteranderson.com>; ~Choa, Jonathan <jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J. Farnan
`<mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland, Eileen
`<EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Kamran:
`
`Thank you for confirming the meet and confer. Sirius XM's letter outlines its position, but we will be prepared
`to discuss these issues. Please confirm that Fraunhofer will be prepared to discuss the scheduling issues we
`previously identified in my email from this morning and Shannon's e-mail dated March 9 and provide
`Fraunhofer's position on these issues prior to tomorrow's meet and confer.
`
`Thanks.
`-Mark
`
`Mark Baghdassarian
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.9193 F 212.715.8362
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: Vakili, Kamran [KVakili@irell.com]
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 4:06 PM
`To: Baghdassarian, Mark; Federico, Alexis; Hedvat, Shannon H.; Caplan, Jonathan S.; provner@potteranderson.com;
`4
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 4
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`~Choa, Jonathan
`Cc: Yorks, Ben; McPhie, David; Michael J. Farnan; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com); Holland, Eileen
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Dear Mark,
`
`We confirm for 1 pm ET (10 am PT) tomorrow. Please use the following bridge:
`
`Dial-in: (866) 349-7797
`Passcode: 9497605151
`
`Can SXM confirm that it will provide the accused product information we have been seeking in the written format of our
`proposed February 28 chart so as to avoid the need for deposition practice? If not, what are SXM’s available dates for a
`deposition (either remote or in person) in the next 2-3 weeks to provide that information?
`
`Regards,
`Kamran
`
`Kamran Vakili, Ph.D
`Irell & Manella LLP | kvakili@irell.com | www.irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Direct: (949) 760-5151
`
`This message and its contents are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain
`confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
`anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
`
`From: Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 12:35 PM
`To: Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>; Federico, Alexis <AFederico@irell.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon
`<shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Rovner, Phil
`<provner@potteranderson.com>; ~Choa, Jonathan <jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J. Farnan
`<mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland, Eileen
`<EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Kamran,
`
`Let's plan on speaking at 1pm ET tomorrow to discuss these issues.
`
`Thanks.
`-Mark
`
`Mark Baghdassarian
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.9193 F 212.715.8362
`
`5
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 5
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: Vakili, Kamran [KVakili@irell.com]
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 2:06 PM
`To: Baghdassarian, Mark; Federico, Alexis; Hedvat, Shannon H.; Caplan, Jonathan S.; provner@potteranderson.com;
`~Choa, Jonathan
`Cc: Yorks, Ben; McPhie, David; Michael J. Farnan; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com); Holland, Eileen
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Dear Mark,
`
`In light of your email, can SXM confirm that it will provide the accused product information we have been seeking in the
`written format of our proposed February 28 chart so as to avoid the need for deposition practice? We are also willing to
`consider taking the IPR deposition off calendar. We reached out separately this morning about meeting and conferring
`in advance of Wednesday’s discovery teleconference and can discuss the issues you’ve raised below at that time as well
`(including issues regarding source code review). Please let us know when you are available during our proposed times
`(today until 4 pm PT, or tomorrow between 10 am and 4 pm PT) and we will circulate a dial-in.
`
`Regards,
`Kamran
`
`Kamran Vakili, Ph.D
`Irell & Manella LLP | kvakili@irell.com | www.irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Direct: (949) 760-5151
`
`This message and its contents are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain
`confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
`anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
`
`From: Baghdassarian, Mark <MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 8:41 AM
`To: Federico, Alexis <AFederico@irell.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon <shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; Caplan, Jonathan S.
`<JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Rovner, Phil <provner@potteranderson.com>; ~Choa, Jonathan
`<jchoa@potteranderson.com>
`Cc: Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>; McPhie, David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Michael J.
`Farnan <mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian E. Farnan (bfarnan@farnanlaw.com) <bfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Holland,
`Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>
`Subject: Fraunhofer v. Sirius XM
`
`Counsel:
`
`In light of measures taken by our firm relating to the Covid-19 virus, it is not clear that we can proceed with the
`deposition and source code review scheduled for next week. In response to new guidance issued by government
`authorities encouraging social distancing in an effort to reduce rates of transmission of the virus, Kramer Levin
`has implemented a temporary work-from-home program in the New York and Silicon Valley offices, starting
`today, in order to keep our people safe. Sirius XM has taken similar measures.
`
`6
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 6
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`In light of this, the other issues we have raised regarding the schedule and the current travel restrictions in place,
`please let us know your availability for a call to discuss these issues.
`
`-Mark
`
`Mark Baghdassarian
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.9193 F 212.715.8362
`mbaghdassarian@kramerlevin.com
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside
`information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
`strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by
`replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`7
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1034, p. 7
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket