`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Wednesday, June 20, 2018 11:12 AM
`Trials@uspto.gov
`KL Sirius XM IPR Team; McPhie, David; Vakili, Kamran; Yorks, Ben
`IPR2018-00681 and IPR2018-00682
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests a call with the Board to address the issues identified below relating to IPR2018-
`00681 and IPR2018-00682. Counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner have met and conferred and counsel for
`both parties are available for the requested call on Thursday, June 21 between 1pm and 5pm EST this week
`and can provide additional dates for a call next week.
`
`IPR2018-00681 – Petitioner requests permission to submit a reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response to
`address the following:
`
`1. Patent Owner incorrectly asserts that Sirius XM was required to identify Sirius XM Holdings and Liberty
`Media as real parties in interest. Sirius XM will explain through case law and company information that
`neither Sirius XM Holdings nor Liberty Media is a real party interest. In addition, Sirius XM will explain that,
`in circumstances such as these, the PTAB routinely grants requests to amend RPI disclosures without
`affecting the filing date accorded to the petition.
`
`2. Patent Owner presents a legally erroneous proposal for the construction of the preamble of the ‘997
`Patent. Sirius XM will explain the correct view of the law to be applied for the construction.
`
` IPR2018-00682 – Petitioner requests permission to submit a reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response to
`address the following:
`
`1. Patent Owner incorrectly asserts that Sirius XM was required to identify Sirius XM Holdings and Liberty
`Media as real parties in interest. Sirius XM will explain through case law and company information that
`neither Sirius XM Holdings nor Liberty Media is a real party interest. In addition, Sirius XM will explain that,
`in circumstances such as these, the PTAB routinely grants requests to amend RPI disclosures without
`affecting the filing date accorded to the petition.
`
`2. Patent Owner presents an erroneous view of Federal Circuit case law relating to applicant’s
`concessions during prosecution. Sirius XM will explain the correct view of Federal Circuit case law
`applicable to applicant’s actions during prosecution.
`
`Patent Owner has indicated that it (1) opposes the requests set forth above, and (2) in the alternative seeks
`leave to submit a sur-reply. Petitioner opposes Patent Owner’s requested sur-reply.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Jonathan S. Caplan
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Jonathan S. Caplan
`Partner, Co-chair, Intellectual Property
`
`1
`
`Fraunhofer Ex 2037-p 1
`Sirius v Fraunhofer
`IPR2018-00690
`
`
`
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.9488 M 973.420.5047 F 212.715.7718
`jcaplan@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`2
`
`Fraunhofer Ex 2037-p 2
`Sirius v Fraunhofer
`IPR2018-00690
`
`