throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Redjaian, Babak
`"Trials"
`Caplan, Jonathan S.; Baghdassarian, Mark; Hedvat, Shannon H.; McPhie, David; Yorks, Ben; Vakili, Kamran;
`Price, Jeffrey H.; Redjaian, Babak
`[EXTERNAL] RE: IPR2018-00681, -00682, -00689, -00690 - Supplemental Authority
`Friday, February 08, 2019 1:40:07 PM
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner SXM’s request below is improper and should be denied. It the latest of a string of
`repeated attempts by SXM to make additional submissions to the Board on the RPI issue, even
`though the Board already stated weeks ago that “[n]o additional briefing is authorized at this time.”
`See 1/16/2018 email from Andrew Kellogg. Thus, SXM’s submission of substantive arguments in the
`email brief below directly violates the Board’s instructions in this case.
`
`In any event, the new arguments in Petitioner’s email should be rejected on the merits. The Board’s
`decision denying institution in this case is entirely consistent with the non-precedential ZTE
`decision. The Board in ZTE applied existing law and exercised its discretion to permit amendment
`because the petitioner there (unlike SXM) proved that this was in the interest of justice based on a
`different set of facts. For example, the petitioner in ZTE had already indirectly identified the missing
`RPI in its original petition, and had further shown diligence by immediately filing an updated
`mandatory notice as soon as the omission was raised. None of those facts are present here.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Babak Redjaian
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`From: Price, Jeffrey H. <JPrice@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 2:00 PM
`To: 'Trials' <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Caplan, Jonathan S. <JCaplan@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Baghdassarian, Mark
`<MBaghdassarian@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; ~Hedvat, Shannon <shedvat@kramerlevin.com>; McPhie,
`David <DMcPhie@irell.com>; Yorks, Ben <BYorks@irell.com>; Redjaian, Babak
`<BRedjaian@irell.com>; Vakili, Kamran <KVakili@irell.com>
`Subject: IPR2018-00681, -00682, -00689, -00690 - Supplemental Authority
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner, Sirius XM Radio, Inc., writes to notify the panel of supplemental authority bearing on
`Petitioner’s outstanding Requests for Rehearing in the above-identified cases.
`
`The attached decision, ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Fundamental Innovation Systems Int’l LLC, IPR2018-
`00425, Paper 34 (February 6, 2019), provides further legal support for Petitioner’s request that, in
`the event the Board considers Petitioner’s original identification of real parties in interest to be
`inadequate, the Board permit Petitioner to amend its Mandatory Notices to identify additional
`real parties in interest without changing the Petitions’ filing dates.
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1023, p. 1
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

`

`
`This new decision fully supports Petitioner’s aforementioned request first made in its Reply to
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses and repeated in each of its Requests for Rehearing.
`See, e.g., IPR2018-00681, Paper 9 at 3-4 and Paper 13 at 7-15. In particular, after the Board
`found that the petitioner had failed to identified all real parties in interest, the Board
`concluded that “[o]n the whole, we find it in the interest of justice to allow Petitioner to
`update its mandatory notices, while maintaining the proceeding’s original filing date. Doing
`so furthers the purpose of 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2) and avoids significant prejudice to Petitioner
`(i.e., dismissal of its Petition), without undue prejudice to Patent Owner.” ZTE at 8.
`
`Petitioner does not believe any briefing regarding this supplemental authority is necessary.
`However, should the Board seek briefing on this authority, Petitioner would be happy to
`provide such a submission. Patent Owner’s counsel, copied on this communication, indicated
`that they object.
`
`Best regards,
`Jeff Price
`Counsel for Petitioner, Sirius SM Radio, Inc.
`
`Jeffrey H. Price
`Associate
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036
`T 212.715.7502 F 212.715.8302
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain
`information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this
`communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
`by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`
`PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged,
`confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication
`by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be
`unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying
`to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. – Exhibit 1023, p. 2
`Sirius XM v. Fraunhofer – IPR2018-00690
`U.S. Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket