throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.,
`Patent Owner,
`
`v.
`
`FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FÖRDERUNG DER
`ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG E.V.,
`Patent Owner.
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00690
`Patent No. 6,314,289
`___________________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`10822219
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Fraunhofer (“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests an oral hearing in this
`
`IPR2018-00690
`Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`
`
`matter. Per the Scheduling Order (Paper 30), Patent Owner understands that oral
`
`argument in IPR2018-00690 will be held on May 19, 2020.
`
`Patent Owner further requests 45 minutes of total argument time per side to
`
`present its arguments in IPR2018-00690. Patent Owner specifies the following
`
`issues to be argued (without intent to waive consideration of any allowable issue
`
`not requested or raised):
`
`1. The patentability of challenged claims 1-15, 17-33 and 35 of the ‘289
`
`patent over all grounds asserted in the Petition.
`
`2. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving Campanella and
`
`Smallcomb are prior art.
`
`3. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving Chen discloses all
`
`asserted elements of the challenged claims, including (a) a partitioner
`
`or partitioning, and (b) an encoder arranged to output two portions of
`
`output bits.
`
`4. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving Smallcomb discloses
`
`all asserted elements of the challenged claims, including an encoder
`
`arranged to output two portions of output bits.
`
`5. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that it would have
`
`been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`10822219
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2018-00690
`Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`invention to modify the cited references to utilize the specific generator
`
`polynomials recited by dependent claims 7 and 24.
`
`6. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that its proposed
`
`combinations and modifications of the cited references would have
`
`been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the
`
`invention.
`
`7. Exclusion of new arguments and evidence belatedly presented in the
`
`Petitioner’s Reply, to the extent unresolved via pre-hearing conference,
`
`or resolution of those new issues on their merits based on the arguments
`
`and evidence identified in Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply.
`
`8. Responding to any issues specified by Petitioner in its request for oral
`
`argument in IPR2018-00690 or otherwise presented by Petitioner.
`
`9. Any other relevant issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding,
`
`including issues raised in papers yet to be filed.
`
`10. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`Petitioner is the party with the burden of proof and will therefore present
`
`first at the oral hearing. Fraunhofer will address any issues raised by Petitioner, or
`
`questions raised by the Board during Petitioner's presentation.
`
`10822219
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Patent Owner requests the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`IPR2018-00690
`Patent No. 6,314,289
`
`
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector, and screen for a
`
`PowerPoint display. In accordance with the Trial Practice Guide (77 Fed. Reg. at
`
`48768) and Section II.M of the Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (2019), Patent
`
`Owner will contact the Board Trial Division paralegal to discuss this request.
`
`
`
`Date: April 7, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Ben J. Yorks/
`Ben J. Yorks (Reg. No. 33,609)
`Babak Redjaian (Reg. No. 42,096)
`David McPhie (Reg. No. 56,412)
`Kamran Vakili (Reg. No. 64,825)
`Irell & Manella LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 277-1010
`Fax: (310) 203-7199
`Email: FraunhoferIPRs@irell.com
`
`10822219
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on April 7, 2020,
`
`a copy of the foregoing document PATENT OWNER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served, by electronic mail, as agreed to by the parties, upon the
`
`following:
`
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`
`Jonathan Caplan (Reg. No. 38,094)
`jcaplan@kramerlevin.com
`
`Mark Baghdassarian (pro hac vice)
`mbaghdassarian@kramerlevin.com
`
`Jeffrey H. Price (Reg. 69,141)
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`Shannon Hedvat (Reg. No. 68,417)
`shedvat@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Susan M. Langworthy/
`By:
` Susan M. Langworthy
`
`
`
`10822219
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket