throbber
United States Patent
`Ciminiet al.
`
`{15
`
`US005914933A
`(1) Patent Number:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`5,914,933
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`[75]
`
`[54] CLUSTERED OFDM COMMUNICATION
`SYSTEM
`Inventors: Leonard Joseph Cimini, Howell, N_J.;
`Babak Daneshrad, Los Angeles, Calif.;
`Nelson Ray Sollenberger, Tinton Falls,
`N.J.
`
`[73] Assignee: Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill,
`N.J.
`
`5,675,572
`5,687,165
`
`10/1997 Hidejima et al. wo...ccs 370/206
`11/1997 Daffara et al.
`..........cccceeeerseee 370/208
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Casas et al, “OFDM for Data Communication Over Mobile
`Radio FM Channels” IEEE Transactions on Communica-
`tions, vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 783-793, May 1991.
`Sakakuraet al., “Pre—Diversity using Coding, Multi—carriers
`and Multi-antennas”, paper presented at 1995 Fourth IEEE
`International Conference on Universal Personal Communi-
`cations, pp. 605-609. (Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 1995).
`Leonard J. Cimini, Jr, “Performance Studies for High—
`[21] Appl. No.: 08/730,430
`Speed Indoor Wireless Communications,” Wireless Personal
`-
`Communications 2: pp. 67-85 (1995).
`Filed:
`[22]
`Oct. 15, 1996
`Primary Examiner—Chau Nguyen
`Related U.S. Application Data
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`Provisional application No. 60/011,601, Mar. 8, 1996.
`[60]
`A multicarrier communication system for wireless transmis-
`Ite Che cc ccccccssssssnnsssesecsssccesesssensnnnnes HO4L 27/26
`[ST]
`Sion of blocks of data having a plurality of digital data
`Ch:er 370/208; 370/210; 370/343;
`symbols in each block. The communication system includes
`375/299; 375/347
`a device for distributing the digital data symbols in each
`sessseeseeee
`370/203, 206
`............
`Field of Search.
`[58]
`370/208, 491.210, 482, 204, 480, 343,_Dlock over a plurality of clusters, each of the clusters
`484: 375/261, 364, 344, 355, 347, 299:
`receiving one or more digital data symbols. The digital data
`455/101—104
`symbols are encoded in each of the cluster; and modulated
`in each cluster to produce a signal capable of being trans-
`mitted over the sub-channels associated with each cluster. A
`transmitter thereafter transmits the modulated signal over
`the sub-channels. By distributing the modulated signal over
`® Plurality ofclusters, overallpeak-to-average power (PAP)
`ratio is reduced during transmission andtransmitter diversity
`‘1S improved.
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`5,416,767
`5,507,035
`5,548,582
`§,602,835
`5,610,908
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`5/1995 Koppelaaretal. ..
`. 370/206
`
`. 455/133
`.....
`4/1996 Bantz et al.
`
`we 370/206
`.
`8/1996 Brajal et al.
`..sssccssscrrsseseressee 370/206
`2/1997 Sekiet al.
`
`3/1997 Shelswell et al. cscs 370/210
`
`42 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`13
`
`4
`
`‘1
`
`
`
`OVERSAMPLED
`FFT +
`CODING
`FOR PAP
`SHAPING-
`
`
`
`REDUCTION
`GUARD.
`INTVL
`SERIAL DATA
`
`
`7.5 ioe
`NH SYMBOLS
`
`;
`el (exfet)
`
`5 253
`TRANSMITTER
`
`13
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 1
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 1 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`FIG.
`
`1A
`
`("
`
`e/a
`
`
` N SYMBOLS
`
`FIG.
`
`1B
`
`SINGLE
`RECEIVE
`ANTENNA
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 2
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`
`
`e/2
`
`c9IH
`
`)
`
`09~~
`1bseEI
`
`Sheet 2 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`9TAINImnsoo$1*
`UILLIWSNVELEGa9 (134x2)(°
`
`'NOTLING3HVIVOWIulsaedd10sall
`
`STO8WASWN
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 3
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 3
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`FIG. 3
`
`TO IMAGINARY
`DFT TABLES:
`
`rst_fft_entre
`FROM FIG.
`4
`
`
`
`TO FIG. 3 LOOP FILTER
`
`
`rst_fft_cntr
`
`H{s)
`
`105
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 4
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 4
`
`

`

`5,914,933
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`X001J1eV1
`
`WI1N3H35510
`
`ASVHd
`
`NOI193130
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 5
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 5
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 5 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`OUTAGE
`
`OUTAGE
`
`FIG. 6
`
`Pyangin’ 10 48
`
`01
`
`0
`
`9
`
`10
`
`15
`
`NUMBER OF FREQUENCIES CORRECTED
`
`0001
`
`001
`
`01
`
`NUMBER OF FREQUENCIES CORRECTED
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 6
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 6
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`QUTAGE
`
`FIG. 8
`
`01
`
`NUMBER OF FREQUENCIES CORRECTED
`
`FIG. 9
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`REQ. NUMBER
`OF CORRECTED
`FREQUENCIES
`
`= =. =. - -
`
`===
`=<...
`
`"=
`= =e
`Tee eeeee,
`
`=
`
`"=<...
`
`
`
` Puarcin’ 10 08
`
`0
`
`09
`
`10
`
`%15
`
`#20
`
`25
`
`43.
`
`NORMALIZED RMS DELAY SPREAD
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 7
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 7
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 22, 1999
`
`Sheet 7 of 7
`
`5,914,933
`
`FIG. 10
`
`
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 8
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 8
`
`

`

`5,914,933
`
`1
`CLUSTERED OFDM COMMUNICATION
`SYSTEM
`
`RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S.
`patent application Ser. No. 60/011,601, filed Mar. 8, 1996.
`
`FIELD OF INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates generally to communication
`systems and more specifically, to a clustered multicarrier
`wireless communication system.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
`
`15
`
`In a radio environment, multipath delay spread can
`severely limit the maximum transmission rate. Multicarrier
`transmission such as OFDM (orthogonal frequency division
`multiplexing) and single-carrier systems with equalization
`are offen proposed as techniques for overcoming these
`limitations. However, both techniques present practical dif-
`ficulties which can restrict their application.
`the
`For instance,
`in a wireless LAN/ATM application,
`desire to transmit short packets requires fast start-up, espe-
`cially in a peer-to-peer architectures and this requirement
`could limit the usefulness of an equalized system, especially
`one using the LMS (“least mean square”) algorithm to
`acquire the equalizer coefficients, because of the typically
`long convergence time of this algorithm. Algorithms which
`converge faster, such as RLS (“recursive least square”), may
`be too complex for applications requiring transmission rates
`of 20 Mb/s or more. On the other hand, a multicarrier
`transmission scheme has, the advantage of requiring very
`little training since equalization can usually be avoided.
`However, a multicarrier signal with a large number of
`sub-channels is burdened with a large peak-to-average ~
`power ratio. Hence, highly linear (andinefficient) amplifiers
`must be used to avoid distortion and spectral spreading. In
`addition, with cither approach,
`a
`technique which can
`exploit the potential of diversity without requiring multiple
`receivers is desirable.
`
`40
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention improves the performance of a wireless
`data communication system by employing a clustered
`approach to a multicarrier modulation technique.
`According to a preferred embodiment of the invention,
`there is provided a multicarrier communication system for
`wireless transmission ofblocks ofdata having a plurality of
`digital data symbols in each block, the system comprising:
`a device for distributing the plurality of digital data symbols
`in each block over a plurality of clusters, each of the
`plurality of clusters capable of receiving one or more digital
`data symbols; a device for encoding the one or more digital
`data symbols in each ofthe plurality of clusters; a device for
`modulating the encoded one or more digital data symbols in
`each cluster to produce a modulated signal capable of being
`transmitted over sub-channels associated with each respec-
`tive cluster; and a transmitter for transmitting the modulated
`signal over the sub-channels.
`Advantageously, by distributing the modulated signal
`over a plurality of clusters,
`the overall peak-to-average
`power (PAP)ratio is reduced during signal transmission and
`transmitter diversity is improved.
`A non-linear coding technique may be implemented by
`the encoding device to encode the one or more symbols in
`each cluster to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio.
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`2
`The clustered multicarrier communication system
`includes a receiver for receiving and demodulating the
`modulated signal. The system further includes a device
`located at the receiver for measuring frequency response of
`each sub-channel ofthe plurality of clusters, and for pro-
`viding feedback representing a frequency response charac-
`teristic of each transmission sub-channel to the transmitter.
`The transmitter includes a device for switching each of the
`one or more symbols to be transmitted to an optimum
`transmission sub-channel according to the frequency
`response of the optimum transmission sub-channel.
`The clustered multicarrier communication system further
`includes a device for synchronizing data to enable simulta-
`neous transmission ofdata overall the sub-channels of the
`plurality of clusters to effect simultaneous transmission of
`data over an entire transmission bandwidth.
`
`The device for modulating the encoded one or more
`digital data symbols includes a device for providing OFDM
`modulation.
`
`The various features of novelty which characterize the
`invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims
`annexed to and forming a part of the disclosure. For a better
`understandingof the invention, its operating advantages, and
`specific objects attained by its use, reference should be had
`to the drawing and descriptive matter in which there are
`illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the
`invention.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIGS. 1A and 1B are general block diagramsillustrating,
`respectively the transmitter and receiver portions of the
`improved OFDM communication system of the invention.
`FIG, 2 is a detailed block diagram illustrating one trans-
`mitter portion of the improved OFDM communication sys-
`tem ofthe invention.
`
`FIG, 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a single
`cluster ofthe transmitter.
`
`FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram ofa clock generation
`circuit for the transmitter.
`
`FIG, $ is a detailed block diagram illustrating the receiver
`portion of the improved OFDM communication system of
`the invention.
`
`FIG. 6 is a diagram showing outages versus the number
`of frequencies which are being corrected in the decoder in
`the case of flat fading.
`FIG. 7 is a diagram showing outages versus the number
`of frequencies which are being corrected in the decoder in
`the case of a two-ray power delay profile.
`FIG, 8 is a diagram showing outages versus the number
`of frequencies which are being corrected in the decoder in
`the case of an exponential power delay profile.
`FIG. 9 is a diagram showing outages versus the number
`of frequencies which need to be corrected to achieve a 1%
`outage for a RMS delay spread.
`FIG, 10 showing frame synchronization acrossall clusters
`and utilizing the entire transmitted bandwidth.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`The clustered wireless communication system 10 includes
`a transmitter portion 13 shown conceptually in FIG. 1A, and
`a receiver portion 16 shown conceptually in FIG. 1B. In the
`transmitter portion, an input digital data stream of informa-
`tion 17 is input at a predetermined data rate, 1/T,
`to an
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 9
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 9
`
`

`

`5,914,933
`
`20
`
`40
`
`3
`encoder 21 to allow for error/erasure correction in the
`receiver portion 16, As shown in FIG. 1A, the encoder 21
`(and modulator) produces a multicarrier (or multitone) sig-
`nal 19 comprising a quantity of NM symbols that is demul-
`tiplexed by demultiplexer circuit 26 to separate the serial
`encoded signal 19 into M blocks or clusters 27a, .
`.
`. 27M
`with each cluster being transmitted in parallel over a sepa-
`rate sub-channel. Preferably, each sub-channel is of narrow
`bandwidth for carrying N tones separated in frequency by
`L/NT. For each cluster, Orthogonal Frequency Division
`Multiplexing (OFDM) is implemented by respective Fast
`Fourier Transform devices 41a, ..., 41M for converting
`each digital stream into N tones for transmission over the
`respective sub-channel. In each of the M clusters,
`the N
`tones are carrier modulated and amplified by devices
`52a, ...,52M for transmission over respective separate and
`ideally independent antennas 60a, .
`.
`.
`, 60M.
`At the receiver portion 16 shown in FIG, 1B,a single
`receive antenna 40 and demodulator devices 65 and 73 are
`used for demodulating the OFDM signal using conventional
`techniques such as coherent or differential detection.
`Decoder 82 is used as the erasure/error correction decoder.
`It is understood that
`the receiver portion may consist of
`multiple receivers, and, that the system 10 may be provided
`with full duplex transmission capability.
`The clustered OFDM communication technique is advan-
`tageous in that minimal or no training is required, enabling
`short packets to be accommodated more efficiently in peer-
`to-peer architectures. The usual benefit of using OFDM in a
`frequency-selective environment
`is that by dividing the ;
`transmitted bandwidth into many narrow sub-channels M
`which are transmitted in parallel, the effects of delay spread
`are minimized, eliminating the need for an equalizer.
`Additionally,
`the peak-to-average power ratio is reduced
`since there are fewer tones transmitted per transmitter result-
`ing in less spectral spreading when subjected to a non-
`linearity and/or smaller required power amplifier backoff, or
`equivalently, better power efficiency. The average power for
`an individual amplifier is also reduced as the amplifier
`requirements are distributed across the M clusters. The
`proposed architecture allows for a
`flexible, parallel
`implementation, with lower complexity than equalizer
`approaches.
`Amore detailed block diagram of the transmitter portion
`13 of the improved clustered wireless communication sys-
`tem 10 is shown in FIG. 2. In FIG, 2, the input digital data
`stream 19 that has been previously encoded using conven-
`tional techniques, e.g., Reed-Solomon coding, to allow for
`eventual error/erasure correction at the receiver. The input
`encoded digital data stream 19 is represented as a multitone
`signal comprising a quantity of NM symbols, cach symbol
`having a period of T, and a symbolrate 1/T whichis usually
`limited by the amount of multipath fading as experimentally
`realized in the particular environment, ¢.g.,
`indoor or
`outdoor, that the communication system is operating. It is ;
`understood that the coding is provided across all frequencies
`of the multitone signal, with Reed-Solomon coding being an
`example coding technique. The encoded digital data stream
`19 is then input to a demultiplexer or equivalent circuit 26
`that separates the serial encoded signal 19 into M parallel
`signals, 25a, ..., 25M, for transmission over separate M
`blocks or clusters 27a,
`.
`.
`.
`, 27M, with each cluster
`constituting a separate sub-channel. In the diagram shown in
`FIG. 2,
`the input digital data stream multitone signal 19
`comprises a quantity of NM tones (e.g., NM=28)fordistri-
`bution over M clusters (M=4), with each cluster 27@ trans-
`mitting N tones (N=7). Each sub-channel 27a, ... 27M is a
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`4
`narrow bandwidth channel carrying N tonesfor transmission
`at a sub-channel symbol rate of 1/NT. Ideally, the bandwidth
`of the sub-channels will be narrow enough so there is no ISI
`and that the only effect of multipath is flat fading in each
`sub-channel. As will be explained, the clustering of tones in
`this manner has several advantages. First,
`the peak-to-
`average power (“PAP”)
`ratio is reduced by 10 log(M);
`second, the size of the table needed for non-linear coding as
`will be explained below,is significantly reduced; and third,
`the transmission of different clusters on separate antennas
`results in independent fading on each cluster. With the use
`of error correction coding across all
`frequencies and a
`minimal amount of information from the receiver regarding
`the relative performance of the clusters,
`the clustering
`approach can result
`in an effective means for realizing
`transmit diversity.
`In the clustered OFDM communication system, the input
`digital data stream 25a,
`.
`.
`.
`, 25M carrying N tones for
`transmission over each respective M clusters 27@,...27M
`is subject to Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
`(OFDM). As shownin cluster 27a ofFIG. 2, the digital data
`stream 25a is input to a serial-to-parallel converter 31 that
`produces a data word in parallel that is suitable for coding
`in the PAP reduction coder 35 for the purposes of PAP
`reduction. Preferably, the PAP reduction coder 35 imple-
`ments a non-linear code or mapping ofsignal 25a based on
`PAP-ROM table lookup techniques which guarantees the
`PAP ratio reduction. As an example, a sequence of seven (7)
`tones (14 bits each) may be mappedinto eight 8 tones (16
`bits cach) requiring 214 16-bit entries in the transmitter
`PAP-ROM 35. Asseventy-five percent (75%) of the PAP-
`ROM table look-up entries may be avoided, in this instance,
`then those table entries forming large power peaks may be
`avoided.
`It should be understood that other mathematical
`
`coding and decoding techniques such as Complementary
`Golay sequences may be utilized instead of PAP reduction
`look-up tables. Having accomplished the non-linear
`mapping, the resulting non-linear coded signal 39 is then
`modulated onto the tones (subcarriers) by performing a
`Discrete Fourier Transform implemented by DFT element
`41, shown in cluster 27a in FIG. 2. As will be explained
`herein, the receiver portion 16 of the OFDM communication
`system is capable of receiving pilot tones from the trans-
`mitter to measure frequency response characteristics of
`particular transmission sub-channels. The receiver will pro-
`vide the transmitter portion with sub-channel frequency
`response information in the form of a feedback signal, to
`enable optimal switching of particular tonesto a particular
`sub-channels (in a particular cluster) having a matching
`frequency response characteristic.
`The OFDM multicarrier signal generated in each of the M
`clusters is then multiplexed into serial form as shown by the
`parallel to serial converter 45, converted to analog form by
`D/A converter 47, carrier modulated by RF mixer 52,
`amplified by RF amplifier 57, and transmitted over a sepa-
`rate and ideally independent antenna 60.
`FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a non-limiting,
`example embodiment of a datapath for single transmit
`cluster 27a of the transmitter portion 13 of FIG. 2, that is
`simple to implement with a minimization of hardware and
`complexity. The system operates at a maximum clockrate of
`10 MHz and requires three different clock signals which are
`related to each other through the implementation of PLL/
`clock generation circuit such as shown in FIG. 4, described
`below. Although the components used in the embodiment
`were chosen to support data rates of up to 22 Mbps,it should
`be understood that higher speed versions of the transmit
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 10
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 10
`
`

`

`5,914,933
`
`5
`cluster can be realized depending upon the components and
`the printed circuit board fabrication technique used.
`In the non-limiting example embodiment of a single
`transmit cluster 27a shown in FIG, 3, the serial data bit
`Stream input
`to the cluster is al a rate, e.g., 1.875 MHz,
`which would imply that the digital data stream input to the
`transmitter demultiplexer 26 (FIG. 2) was at a bit rate equal
`to 7.5 Mbps for distribution to each of the four clusters
`(M-=4) at the same rate (1.875 Mbps/cluster). In each cluster,
`the serial-to-parallel converter 31 produces a 12-bit word at
`a reduced rate of 156.25 kHz. In a conventional OFDM
`system, this 12-bit word could have been used to modulate
`6 complex tones, however, in the improved OFDM system,
`the 6 tones are coded (mapped) into 7 complex tones for
`purposes of PAP reduction. A non-linear code is used for this
`purpose which guarantees the PAPratio of the 7 tones to be
`no more than 3.2 dB, Due to its non-linear nature, the PAP
`coding needs to be implemented via table lookup and in the
`embodiment shown in FIG. 3, a 4 Kx14 ROM based table
`35 and lookup technique is provided to implement
`the
`non-linear mapping. The 14-bit PAP-ROM output word 39
`represents the encoded complex symbols of a QPSK
`constellation, which modulate a cluster of seven (7) complex
`tones.It should be noted that the speed with which these PAP
`ROM tables are accessed is equal to the speed with which
`the OFDM blocks are generated and in the implementation
`shownin FIG. 3, this rate is 156.25 kHz.
`In OFDM, modulation onto the tones (subcarriers) is
`performed by way of a Discrete Fourier Transform imple-
`mented by (DFT). Given a desire to transmit M (M=4)
`clusters of N (N=7) tones each,
`the modulator on each
`section must realize the following equation (1):
`
`6
`prefixing, windowing, and the DFT operation was consoli-
`dated into a ROM lookuptable 41 in order to avoidthe use
`ofelaborate and costly signal processing ICs and to provide
`a flexible mechanism in which the relative size ofthe cyclic
`prefix and guard intervals of the OFDM symbol can be
`varied. The implementation of the ex ample embodiment
`shown in FIG, 3, also enable s the user to realize any
`windowing function on the OFDM symbol.
`In the embodiment described, the DFT ROM 41 has a
`total of twenty (20) input address bits, fourteen (14) from the
`PAP ROM 35output signal 39 and six (6)bits for the output
`signal 43 ofa 64-bit counter 46that readsoff the 64 samples
`of the OFDM symbol. This results in a total ROM address
`space of one million words and a ROM access speed equal
`to a preferred D/A converter rate of 10 MHz. In order to
`avoid the use of high-end memory modules when higher
`D/A data rates (e.g. 30 MHz) are implemented, the DFT
`lookup table 41 is partitioned into two DFT ROMS, 41a,6,
`each for modulating N/2 complex tones, ¢.g., 3.5 tones in the
`embodiment shown in FIG. 3. Taking into account sampling
`quantization and the resulting in-band interference, an 8-bit
`representation was used for the DFT samples stored in each
`of the two DFT ROMS. The outputs of these ROMs41a and
`41b are then added together by adder element 48 in a
`programmable logic device 45 (“PLD”) to realize the
`desired total of N tones for the channel, ¢.g., seven (7) tones.
`Thus, partitioning of the DFT task enables the replacement
`of a 1 Mbyte ROM with a pair of 8 kByte ROMS.
`To enable cluster switching, Le., to enable each transmit-
`ter cluster board to transmit tones over any one of the four
`clusters,
`the two 8 kbyte DFT ROMs 41a,41b, may be
`replaced by two 32 kbyte ROMs having two additional
`address lines 42 that enable selection between one ofthe
`four different clusters as shown in FIG, 3.
`k=0,...,55
`_-ptehlacrTon
`;
`Yk
`ie a2
`Xin + JXInet
`mth) =
`As further illustrated in the example embodiment ofthe
`
`
`" Vin+Panel m=, 1,2,3
`nO
`transmit cluster shown in FIG. 3, a synch-word ROM 83 is
`provided that contains a synchronization word 56 that is sent
`at the beginning of each packet (a packet consists of many
`OFDM symbols) to enable the receiver to identify the start
`of the incoming packet of OFDM symbols. In the embodi-
`ment of FIG, 3,
`the synchronization word is stored in a
`separate ROM 53 and its samples are sent
`to the D/A
`converter by way of the multiplexer device 56 built into PLD
`45.
`The operation of the datapaths described in connection
`with the transmit cluster 27a of FIG. 3 is governed by three
`clocks and a control signal. In the schematic diagram of the
`clock generation circuit 90 shown in FIG. 4, it is observed
`that the serial data coming into the cluster is clocked at a
`1.875 MHzrate, that is a clock reference signal 91 is input
`at
`the rate that data is input
`to each cluster. The clock
`reference signal 91 is then be divided by twelve (12) to
`provide the clock signal 92 at, e.g., 156.25 kHz, for timing
`operation of the serial-to-parallel converter 31, as well as the
`PAP ROM 35of transmit cluster 27a. As shown in FIG. 4,
`a voltage controlled oscillator (VCXO) 95 centered at 10
`MHz is used to generate the clock signal 93 for the D/A
`converter. As described above, for each 14-bit word pro-
`duced by the PAP ROM 35,sixty-four (64) samples have to
`be read from the DFT ROMs41a,6 and processed through
`to the D/A converter 47 which is being clocked at 10 MHz
`(64x156.25 kHz) with the D/A clock signal 93. To provide
`for the sampling of the DFT ROMs,the D/A clocksignal 93
`is input to a six-bit counter 107 to divide the D/A clock
`signal 93 in frequency by sixty-four (64) and provide a
`divide-by-64 D/A clock signal 97 that is phase locked with
`serial
`to parallel converter clock signal 92. A simple
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 11
`
`6
`
`”
`
`(1)
`
`is the output
`is the cluster number, Y,,(k)
`where “m”
`sequence which is fed to the D/A for transmission and x,,
`represents the n” bit of the 14-bit word appearing at
`the
`output of the PAP ROM 35. In the embodiment shown in
`FIG, 3, the even bits were assigned to the real part ofthe
`symbol and the odd bits were assigned to the imaginary part.
`Acloser look at equation (1) reveals that the output sequence
`consists of 56 complex samples, twice of what is required
`for a typical 28-point DFT. This is due to the desire to
`oversample the DFT output sequence by a factor of two,
`which requires the one-half (!4) multiplier introduced into
`the exponential function in equation (1). The oversampling
`guarantees a separation of{,/2 between the baseband signal
`and the first
`image of the signal output
`from the D/A
`converter 47, The separation results in a significant relax-
`ation of the specification for the image canceling lowpass
`filters following the D/A converter 47,
`As the OFDM transmit block typically consists of an
`original N-point block (N=56 in the embodiment of FIG. 3),
`a cyclic prefix or extension block, and possibly a guard
`interval block, a total of eight (8) samples were allowed for
`the combination of the cyclic prefix and the guard interval
`and, in the particular implementation described, the contents
`of these eight samples may be freely chosen. Consequently,
`for every 14-bit word that appears at the output of the PAP
`ROMs35(FIG. 3), sixty-four (64) samples need to be read
`from the DFT ROMs41 and presented to the D/A converter
`47. These 64 samples constitute a complete OFDM symbol
`(block). In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3,
`the cyclic
`
`20
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`Petitioner Sirius XM Radio Inc. - Ex. 1003, p. 11
`
`

`

`5,914,933
`
`7
`exclusive-OR gate 101 is used as a phase detector and the
`phase error signal 103 output from the exclusive-OR gate
`101 is filtered by an active loop filter 105 having a transfer
`function H(s)=(R,Cs+I)/R,Cs before being fed-back to the
`VCXO oscillator 95.
`It
`is understood that
`the transfer
`
`function H(s)for the active loop filter 105 was chosen for the
`particular components and frequencies used in the cluster
`transmitter shown in FIG. 3, and may change depending
`upon the frequencies and circuit designs used.
`In addition to synchronizing the frequency of the three
`system clocks 91, 92 and 93, it
`is also important to syn-
`chronize the 6-bit counters that generate the divide-by-64
`D/A clock signal 97 and the 6-bit counter 46 that generates
`the 6 LSB’s of the DFT addresses. As the DFT address
`
`counters 46 (FIG. 3) are started immediately upon system
`start-up and the divide-by-64 D/A clock signal 97 signal
`undergoes some frequency fluctuations until
`the PLL is
`locked, synchronization is required to ensure that the rela-
`tive position of these two 6-bit counters are the same in
`Steady state. In order to guarantee synchronization, a reset
`control signal 109 signal is generated by sensing a sixty-two
`(62) count and delaying the signal by one D/A clock period
`93. This signal 109 is then sent to the DFT address counter
`which undergoes a synchronous reset at the next rising edge
`of D/A clock 93.
`The complete clustered-OFDM transmitter illustrated in
`FIG. 2 and described in detail with respect to FIG. 3, would
`require four transmitter boards, and a single clock generation
`board which can be realized using inexpensive, off-the-shelf
`ROMs and PLDs. With a modular approach in providing
`separate clock and control circuitry, the capability is pro-
`vided for varying the number of clusters at will so that any
`numberof transmit cluster board s can be plugged into the
`OFDM communication system,
`Asthe clustering approach applies only to the transmitter,
`the receiver must
`implement a complete N-point DFT to
`recover the data. However, with the exception ofthis single
`processing element, the remainder of the receiver can be
`realized using inexpensive, off-the-shelf ROMs and PLDsin
`the same manner as the transmitter.
`A non-limiting, example embodiment for implementing
`the single receiver portion 16 of the OFDM communication
`system is illustrated in FIG. 5. As shownin FIG. 5, a single
`receive antenna 50 receives the OFDMsignal transmitted by
`clusters 27a, ... , 27M and an RF demodulator 65 is used
`to demodulate the received signal. The demodulated signal
`is then converted into digital form by A/D converter 68 and
`signal processing suchas coherent or differential detection is
`implemented to recover the data. To implement a preferred
`method ofdifferential detection, a synchronous detector 70
`and buffer 71 elements provide the parallel digital words to
`a Fast Fourier Transform element 73, the output of which is
`converted back into serial form by parallel to serial con-
`verter clement 76. Using a ROM table phase look-up table
`78 and associated phase detectcircuitry 79, the serial data is ;
`differentially phase detected. Further serial to parallel trans-
`formation of the digital signal
`is performed by serial to
`parallel converter 81, and PAP non-linear decoder 83 is used
`to obtain the original data. Using the PAP non-linear coder
`having 2" described above in connection with FIG. 2, the
`receiver PAP non-linear decoder 83 will contain 2'° 14-bit
`entries. It should be understood that suitable error/erasure
`correction (¢.g., Reed-Solomon) decoding is performed (not
`shown).
`The performance ofthe clustered OFDM communication
`system can be improved (that is, more bit rate achieved for
`a given bandwidth) by optimally assigning a given cluster to
`
`8
`a particular antenna, i.e., providing cluster switching.First,
`pilot tones are sent over each cluster 27a, .
`.
`.
`, 27M and,at
`the expense ofreceiver training, the receiver measures the
`frequency response of each sub-channel associated with
`each of the clusters. As shownin FIG. 5, the receiver portion
`16 includes a device 67 for analyzing the frequency response
`of the sub-channels. The frequency response information of
`the sub-channels is provided back to the transmitter in the
`form of feedback signal 119 shown in FIGS. 2 and 5. Thus,
`it may be determined which tones are bad and a bad cluster
`may be switched to a different antenna by appropriate
`circuitry such as demultiplexer 26 (FIG. 2) and cluster select
`address lines 42 (FIG. 3) which enable the dynamic assign-
`ment of clusters to antennas,
`resulting in a significant
`improvement in the outage performance. In particular, for a
`20-dB fade margin, cluster switching provides more than
`two orders of magnitude improvement
`in the outage.
`Alternatively, for a fixed outage of 1%, cluster switching can
`provide about a 10 dB reduction in the required fading
`margin. Table 1, shows the a performance comparison
`between systems implementing cluster switching (adaptive)
`versus a system without.
`
`TABLEI
`
`Pom (Fixed)
`3.44 x 1071
`3.94 x 1077
`3.99 x 104
`3.99 x 104
`
`Pom (Adaptive)
`3.70 x 10-*
`3.97 x 10-4
`4,00 x 107°
`4,00 x 10-*
`
`P
`0.9000
`0.9900
`0.9990
`0.9999
`
`As the clustered OFDM system is intended for wireless
`data packet transmission, frame or block synchronization
`between transmitter and receiver portions is necessary. As
`illustrated in FIG. 10, separate frame synchronization words
`120 are transmitted simultaneously on all cluster antennas
`60a—60M (FIG. 1) using the entire transmission bandwidth,
`resulting in independent fading. Four conventional correla-
`tor detectors (not shown) are used at
`the receiver with
`noncoherent combining. The advantages of this approach
`are: (1) using the full bandwidth provides more accurate
`timing and (2) simultaneous transmission onall clusters with
`separate frame synch words (pseudo-random number
`sequence) provides diversity in the synch signal, which is
`extremely important. As shown in FIG. 10, the synchroni-
`zation is obtained at the expense of minimal training 130, for
`e.g., for carrier recovery.
`Assuming N sub-channels, each of bandwidth 1/T and
`separated by 1/T, where T is the symbol interval for the
`individual sub-channels, and assuming no ISI and that the
`individual sub-channels are narrow enough so that the only
`effect of multipath is flat fading in each sub-channel, it is
`shownthat the peak-to-aver

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket