throbber
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
`
`ISSN: 0954-6634 (Print) 1471-1753 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ijdt20
`
`A comprehensive review and evaluation of the side
`effects of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab
`
`N Scheinfeld
`
`To cite this article: N Scheinfeld (2004) A comprehensive review and evaluation of the side effects
`of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, Journal of
`Dermatological Treatment, 15:5, 280-294, DOI: 10.1080/09546630410017275
`To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546630410017275
`
`Published online: 12 Jul 2009.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 1018
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles: 145 View citing articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ijdt20
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 1
`
`

`

`Journal of Dermatological Treatment (2004) 15, 280–294
`# 2004 Journal of Dermatological Treatment. All rights reserved. ISSN 0954-6634
`DOI: 10.1080/09546630410017275
`
`280
`
`A comprehensive review and evaluation of the side
`effects of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab
`
`N Scheinfeld
`
`Department of Dermatology, St Luke’s
`Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York,
`NY, USA
`
`For more than 5 years, inflixi-
`mab and etanercept have been
`utilized to
`treat
`rheumatoid
`arthritis and Crohn’s disease.
`There is therefore much post-
`approval data on their
`side
`effects. A variety of Medline
`searches were done at the begin-
`ning of
`June 2004 using the
`terms
`‘etanercept’,
`‘infliximab’
`and
`‘adalimumab’
`and
`the
`words
`‘lymphoma’,
`‘infection’,
`‘congestive
`heart
`failure’,
`‘demyelinating disease’,
`‘lupus’,
`‘antibodies’, ‘injection site reac-
`tion’,
`‘systemic’,
`‘side effects’
`and ‘skin’. Approximately 150
`articles were so identified.
`In
`
`addition, FDA and manufac-
`turers’ data obtained by internet
`searches using Google were
`reviewed. The important
`side
`effects
`that have been most
`extensively
`related
`to
`TNFa
`blockers
`include:
`lymphoma,
`infections, congestive heart fail-
`ure, demyelinating disease, a
`lupus-like syndrome,
`induction
`of auto-antibodies, injection site
`reactions,
`and systemic
`side
`effects. The risk of these side
`effects is very low. Nevertheless,
`it is important for clinicians to
`be aware of these side effects
`when prescribing therapy. (J Der-
`matol Treat (2004) 15: 280–294)
`
`Received 25th February 2004
`Accepted 26th May 2004
`
`Keywords: Adalimumab — Congestive heart failure — Etanercept —
`Infection — Infliximab — Lymphoma — TNFa
`
`Introduction
`
`There are three approved biologic therapies that block
`the activity of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa). They
`are
`etanercept
`(Enbrel), a dimeric
`fusion protein
`blocking the effect of TNFa;
`infliximab (Remicade), a
`chimeric monoclonal receptor antibody; and adalimu-
`mab (Humira), a human monoclonal TNFa antibody.
`Infliximab and etanercept have been approved and used
`respectively for more than 5 years to treat rheumatoid
`arthritis and Crohn’s disease. Therefore, there is much
`post-approval data on their side effects. This article will
`survey the side effects of TNFa blockers reported in the
`for etanercept,1
`literature and the package insert
`infliximab2 and adalimumab,3 with a particular focus
`on etanercept and infliximab.
`
`Correspondence:
`Noah Scheinfeld, MD JD , Department of Dermatology, St Luke’s Roosevelt
`Hospital Center, 1090 Amsterdam Ave, Suite 11D, New York, NY 10025,
`USA. Tel z1 212 523 3888; Fax z1 212 523 3808; E-mail:
`NSS32@columbia.edu
`
`The important side effects that have been most
`infec-
`extensively related to TNFa blockers include:
`tions,
`lymphoma, congestive heart failure, a lupus-
`like
`syndrome,
`induction of auto-antibodies and
`injection site reactions. Some aspects of these side
`effects and uses of these medications are compared in
`Table I.
`This article will discuss the class of agents of TNFa
`blockers generally and then each TNFa blocker
`specifically as it relates to these side effects. The data
`in this article were assembled using a variety of Medline
`searches done in June 2004 using the terms ‘etaner-
`cept’,
`‘infliximab’ and ‘adalimumab’, and the words
`‘lymphoma’,
`‘infection’,
`‘congestive heart
`failure’,
`‘demyelinating disease’,
`‘lupus’,
`‘antibodies’,
`‘injection
`site
`reaction’,
`‘systemic’,
`‘side
`effects’ and ‘skin’.
`Approximately 150 articles were
`identified
`and
`reviewed. In addition, the Food and Drug Administra-
`tion (FDA) and manufacturers’ data obtained by
`internet searches using the Google search engine were
`reviewed. (Figure 1)
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 2
`
`

`

`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`281
`
`Etanercept
`
`Infliximab
`
`Adalimumab
`
`PPD test required
`Worsens CHF, NYHA III–V
`Infusion can cause anaphylaxis
`Approved to treat Crohn’s disease
`Generation of clinically significant medication neutralizing antibodies
`
`No
`Minimal evidence
`No
`No
`No
`
`Yes
`Some evidence
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`No
`No evidence
`No
`No
`No
`
`PPD test=purified protein derivative test; CHF=congestive heart failure; NYHA=New York Heart Association.
`
`Table I
`Comparison of some side effects and indications of TNFa blockers1,2,3
`
`Evaluation of safety data and
`side-effect reports
`
`is
`effects of medications
`side
`evaluation of
`The
`complicated.
`In large well-designed, well-monitored,
`placebo-controlled, clinical studies, powered with a
`number of patients sufficient to detect efficacy differ-
`ences, side effects can be established with some surety in
`a population with a given disease. Such clinical studies
`are referred to as Phase III studies. After a medication is
`approved and used by the general population, its safety
`is monitored in so-called Phase IV studies
`(post-
`marketing studies). The safety assessment that goes
`on in these Phase IV studies is more amorphous than
`
`Figure 1
`Stable plaque psoriasis on the sacrum.
`
`that conducted in Phase III studies because reporting is
`more inexact. Adverse events can occur randomly in
`larger groups and thus because there is no control
`group in Phase IV studies, one cannot be sure which
`side effects are due to a medication that is used and
`which side effects are due to chance, i.e. some intrinsic
`quality of the population with a disease or some other
`uncontrolled factor(s).
`the data that were found
`This review cites all
`regarding medication side effects; however, case reports
`of side effects in one or several patients must be
`evaluated based on an understanding of their anecdotal
`nature. Additionally, it should be noted that side effects
`in one population (e.g. patients with rheumatoid
`arthritis) cannot strictly be compared with side effects
`in another population (e.g. patients with psoriasis)
`because a patient’s underlying disease state shapes the
`host response to external stimuli and may lead to
`different population side effect profiles.
`The FDA has assembled data on the side effects of
`TNFa blockers. In 2001, the FDA published the first
`such post-marketing data.4 These data will be discussed
`in this article. The FDA published additional data on
`these medications that it assembled in March of 2003,
`which are also summarized in this article.5 An excellent
`series of lectures on these medications is available from
`Medscape6 and the side effects of TNFa blockers have
`been surveyed recently by Cush.7
`
`Lymphoma
`
`immunosuppressive effects of TNFa
`The specific but
`blockers engendered a desire by the FDA to actively
`monitor their possible role in the induction of malignancy,
`in particular lymphoma.8 The FDA summarized the
`clinical trial experience data in 2003 (Table II).5 When
`considering these data it must be noted that the incidence
`of
`lymphoma is increased (approximately doubled) in
`patients with rheumatoid arthritis9 and psoriasis.10
`In 2002, scientists from the FDA further explicated
`the link between TNFa blockers and lymphoma and
`reported 26 cases of
`lymphoproliferative disorders
`following treatment with etanercept
`(18 cases) and
`infliximab (eight cases).11 In all, 81% of cases were
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 3
`
`

`

`282
`
`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`Treated/exposure
`patient numbers
`patient years
`Total number of lymphomas
`Hodgkin’s
`non-Hodgkin’s
`mean time to onset
`Standardized incidence ratio compared with general population
`
`Table II
`Lymphoma clinical trial experience5
`
`non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The interval between the
`initiation of therapy with etanercept or infliximab and
`the development of lymphoma was very short (median 8
`weeks). In two instances (one infliximab, one etaner-
`cept),
`lymphoma regression was observed following
`discontinuation of anti-TNFa treatment, in the absence
`of
`specific
`cytotoxic
`therapy directed toward the
`lymphoma.
`to review the
`The FDA asked an advisory panel
`evidence linking the TNFa blockers to an increased
`risk of
`lymphoma. In March 2003, summarizing the
`panel’s findings, the panel’s chairman stated,
`‘‘There
`are not enough numbers to say there’s causality, but
`there’s enough to say there may be a signal.’’12 Some
`have reviewed the data relating lymphoma and TNFa
`blockers and denied a link between TNFa blockers and
`lymphoma.13
`
`Lymphoma – etanercept
`
`The only linkage of lymphoma to etanercept appeared in
`the 2002 FDA case series mentioned above. Thus, it
`remains unclear whether there is an increased incidence
`of lymphoma in patients using etanercept.14 Informa-
`tion relating to lymphoma as a side effect of etanercept
`is not mentioned in its package insert.1
`
`Lymphoma – infliximab
`
`As stated, the 2002 FDA case series reported lymphoma
`in eight patients taking infliximab. Others postulated
`that use of infliximab in Crohn’s disease is associated
`with an increase in lymphoma risk of around fivefold
`compared with non-immunosuppressive use, and ten-
`fold compared with the general population.15 Non-
`Hodgkin’s
`lymphoma occurred in a patient with
`refractory dermatomyositis who had been treated with
`infliximab.16 The risk of lymphoma is not listed in the
`package insert of infliximab.2
`
`Lymphoma – adalimumab
`
`Adalimumab has only recently been approved and most
`data that relate its side effects come from clinical trials.
`
`Etanercept
`
`Infliximab
`
`Adalimumab
`
`3389
`8336
`9
`3
`6
`21 months
`3.47
`
`1298
`2458
`4
`1
`3
`10–19 months
`6.4
`
`8729
`7885
`13
`1
`12
`21 months
`4.35
`
`Among 2468 patients treated in clinical trials with
`adalimumab for a of 24 months, 48 malignancies of
`various types were observed, including 10 patients with
`lymphoma.3 The standardized incidence ratio (SIR)
`(ratio of observed to age-adjusted expected in the
`general population)
`for malignancies was 1.0 (95%
`CI, 0.7, 1.3) and for lymphomas was 5.4 (95% CI, 2.6,
`10.0).3 An isolated report
`linking adalimumab and
`lymphoma has been published.17
`
`Non-lymphoma cancers
`
`There does not appear to be any linkage between the
`use of TNFa blockers and the development of non-
`lymphoma malignancies. Only isolated case reports exist
`of the development of non-lymphoma cancers while
`these medications are being taken.
`
`Non-lymphoma cancers – etanercept
`
`the
`increases
`that entanercept does not
`seems
`It
`incidence of non-lymphoma malignancy. The package
`insert notes that in 3 years during clinical trials the
`incidence of non-lymphoma malignancies has not
`increased with extended exposure to etanercept1 and
`is similar to that expected when projected from the
`National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology
`and End Results database.18
`rapid onset of
`One
`initial
`report
`linked the
`cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with
`rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept.19 How-
`ever, a larger series did not support
`the linkage
`between etanercept and the development of cutaneous
`squamous cell cancer.20 A case of acute myelogenous
`leukemia following etanercept
`therapy has been
`reported.21
`
`Non-lymphoma cancers – infliximab
`
`There is no clear linkage between the use of infliximab
`and the development of non-lymphoma skin cancer. In
`trials, cancers did occur, including non-Hodgkin’s B-cell
`lymphoma, breast cancer, melanoma, squamous, rectal
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 4
`
`

`

`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`283
`
`adenocarcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, but at a rate
`no higher than in the general population.2 Acute
`leukemia has occurred after infliximab therapy.22 The
`acute development of multiple squamous cell carcino-
`mas and keratoacanthomas
`in a patient
`receiving
`infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis has been reported.23
`
`Non-lymphoma cancers – adalimumab
`
`In clinical trials, non-lymphoma malignancies observed
`during the use of adalimumab were breast, colon–
`rectum, uterine–cervical, prostate, melanoma, gallbladder–
`bile ducts, and other carcinomas. These cancers did not
`occur at a rate higher than in the general population.3
`
`Infections
`
`Infections occur at a higher rate among those who use
`TNFa blockers. The most common kind of infection that
`occurs is the upper respiratory infection but more serious
`infections can also occur, which will be considered in the
`next section. The FDA summarized data relating to
`significant infections, systemic side effects and etanercept
`and infliximab in 2001 (Table III).4
`
`Infections – etanercept
`
`The most common side effects linked to etanercept use
`in clinical trials are non-upper respiratory tract infec-
`tions followed by upper respiratory infections. The
`
`infection rate
`maker of etanercept puts the general
`with etanercept over an entire course of therapy at 35%
`in placebo-controlled trials.1
`Etanercept is associated with serious bacterial infec-
`tions. Multifocal septic arthritis and osteomyelitis caused
`by group A streptococcus has occurred in a child
`receiving etanercept.24 In addition, orbital myositis in a
`rheumatoid arthritis patient during etanercept treat-
`ment has been reported.25 Etanercept can also facilitate
`viral infections and has been linked to a case of viral
`pneumonia.26
`It has also been linked to fungal
`infections in particular histoplasmosis27 and toxoplas-
`mosis.28 There has been a report of a case of
`disseminated sporotrichosis in a 49-year-old man who
`was treated with multiple immunosuppressants, includ-
`ing etanercept and infliximab for arthritis.29 Pulmonary
`aspergillosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis
`treated by etanercept has been noted.30 Finally, a case
`of recurrent Mycobacterium xenopi infection presenting
`as Pott’s disease in a patient receiving etanercept for
`severe rheumatoid arthritis has been described.31
`
`Infections – infliximab
`
`Physicians, when examining patients who have used
`infliximab,
`should have a high index of clinical
`suspicion for the occurrence of infections.2 Pre-existing
`deep fungal and mycobacterial
`infections are contra-
`indications to the use of
`infliximab and residence in
`areas where these infections are endemic should
`engender cautious use of these agents.2
`
`Infectious agent or
`adverse event
`
`Infliximab
`(n ,170 000 worldwide)
`
`Etanercept
`(n ,104 000 worldwide)
`
`Mean age (years)
`Mycobacterium tuberculosis
`M. avium intracellulare
`M. marinum
`M. kansasii
`Histoplasmosis
`Listeria monocytogenes
`Pneumocystis carinii
`Aspergillosis
`Candidiasis
`Cryptococcosis
`Coccidioidomycosis
`Pancytopenia
`Aplastic anemia
`Multiple sclerosis: total
`Multiple sclerosis: new diagnosis
`Optic neuritis
`Seizures
`Lupus-like disease
`Colonic perforations
`Lymphoma
`
`53
`84
`0
`0
`0
`9
`11
`12
`6
`7
`2
`2
`15
`0
`6
`3
`4
`29
`4
`NA
`10
`
`Table III
`Infections, systemic side effects and TNFa blockers — 2001 data4
`
`56
`11
`6
`1
`1
`1
`1
`5
`2
`3
`3
`0
`12
`4
`14
`6
`3
`26
`4
`13
`18
`
`Historic population:
`incidence rate
`(historic)
`
`–
`USA 8.2/100 000 patient years
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`NA
`RA 5.7–8.2/100 000 patient years
`NA
`4/100 000 patient years
`5/100 000 patient years
`35/100 000 patient years
`NA
`NA
`NA
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 5
`
`

`

`284
`
`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`infections that
`Infliximab has been related to viral
`include: Kaposi’s sarcoma (HHV8),32 fulminant hepatitis
`B,33 herpes zoster,34,35 and disseminated cytomegalo-
`virus.36 A patient manifested with molluscum on the
`eyelids while using methotrexate and infliximab.37 It
`does not seem to increase the viral
`load in patients
`infected with the Epstein Barr virus.38
`Infliximab has been related to bacterial infections that
`include: Legionella,39Moraxella catarrhalis septic arthri-
`tis,40 and listeria.41,42 Severe pneumococcal pneumonia
`has followed treatment with infliximab for Crohn’s
`disease.43 Infliximab was linked to severe septicemia in
`a patient with polychondritis and Sweet’s syndrome
`after initiation of treatment.44
`Infliximab has been related to fungal infections that
`include: disseminated sporotrichosis,45 pulmonary cryp-
`tococcosis,46Pneumocystis
`pneumonia,47
`carinii
`and
`invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.48 The combined use
`of methotrexate and infliximab has been associated with
`disseminated cryptococcal infection.49 Pneumonia in a
`patient receiving infliximab due to a possible zoonotic
`transmission from a pet cockatiel has been noted.50
`Of particular concern in patients taking infliximab is the
`development of histoplasmosis.2 Reports have linked it to
`histoplasmosis infection51 and reactivation of histoplas-
`mosis infections.52 Data reported to the FDA noted:
`
`9 cases of histoplasmosis infection in patients treated
`with infliximab, the patients (5 with RA and 4 with
`CD) presented typically with fever, malaise, cough,
`dyspnea, and interstitial pneumonitis on chest X-ray
`(CXR) within 1 week to 6 months of receiving the first
`(or only) infliximab dose. All patients had preexisting
`immunosuppressive risk factors, typically the con-
`comitant use of prednisone and/or methotrexate. The
`9 patients resided in endemic histoplasmosis areas:
`Ohio (2 patients), Tennessee (2 patients), Alabama,
`Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, or Wisconsin. Eight
`patients required aggressive treatment in the inten-
`sive care unit; one patient was successfully managed
`
`as an outpatient. Definitive diagnosis of histoplasmo-
`sis was made by blood cultures or tissue biopsies of
`lung, liver, and/or bone marrow. Antifungal therapy
`(typically intravenous amphotericin B) resulted in
`recovery in 8 patients; one patient died. In all 9
`patients, the primary disease (RA or CD) improved
`significantly with infliximab therapy.53
`
`Infections – adalimumab
`
`The package insert of adalimumab lists adalimumab’s
`most frequent adverse event versus placebo as upper
`respiratory infection 17% versus 13% for placebo; sinusitis
`11% versus 9%, flu syndrome 7% versus 6%, and urinary
`infection 8% versus 5%.3 In placebo-controlled trials, the
`of was one per year in the adalimumab-treated patients
`and 0.9 year in the placebo-treated patients.3 The
`infections consisted primarily of upper respiratory infec-
`tions, and infections. Most patients continued to take
`adalimumab after the resolved without recurrence of
`infection.3 The incidence of serious infections was 0.04
`year in adalimumab-treated patients and 0.02 year in
`placebo-treated patients. Serious
`infections observed
`included pneumonia, arthritis, prosthetic and post-surgi-
`cal infections, erysipelas, cellulitis, diverticulitis, and . In
`sum, the rates for acquiring common infections such as
`lower tract infections or upper track infection are very low.
`Six cases of opportunistic infections caused by histo-
`plasma, aspergillus, and nocardia were also reported in
`trials of adalimumab.3
`
`Tuberculosis and TNFa blockers
`
`There is a link between TNFa blockers and tuberculosis
`(TB). The FDA has summarized the data on this linkage
`(Table IV).5 Diabetes mellitus and the concomitant use
`of corticosteroids increase a patient’s susceptibility to
`tuberculosis. Specific case reports exist regarding these
`agents and tuberculosis.
`
`Number treated
`Patient years exposure
`Country of use
`USA
`Europe/Norway
`TB cases
`Geography
`USA
`Other countries
`Time to onset
`
`Extrapulmonary
`Miliary
`
`Table IV
`Tuberculosis and TNFa blockers5
`
`Etanercept
`
`w150 000
`w230 000
`
`90%
`10%
`38
`
`20
`18
`Median 11.2 months
`
`34%
`16%
`
`Infliximab
`
`198 235
`227 559
`
`64%
`36%
`172
`
`55
`117
`By six infusions: 75%
`By 7 months: 97%
`30–45%
`NA
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 6
`
`

`

`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`285
`
`Tuberculosis – infliximab
`
`Infliximab is the TNFa agent most closely linked to the
`development of tuberculosis. Testing for tuberculosis
`with the PPD (purified protein derivative) test should
`occur prior to initiation of therapy with infliximab.54 In
`those not so tested, there is a clustering of reports
`shortly after initiation of
`treatment with infliximab,
`which is consistent with reactivation of latent infection
`rather than new infection.55 Despite prophylaxis with
`isoniazid, a 58-year-old patient with mild rheumatoid
`arthritis developed disseminated tuberculosis, pulmon-
`ary aspergillosis and cutaneous herpes simplex infection
`during treatment with infliximab and methotrexate.56
`Development of tuberculosis in a patient treated with
`infliximab alone occurred despite chemoprophylaxis
`with isoniazid.57 In one case there has been noted an
`exacerbation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
`enteritis
`masquerading as Crohn’s disease after treatment with
`infliximab.58 Tuberculosis following therapy with inflix-
`imab may be refractory to antibiotic therapy.59 Extra-
`pulmonary presentation has been seen in 30–50% of
`cases reported and included fever of unknown origin
`(FUO), miliary tuberculosis, or tuberculosis-associated
`lymphadenopathy, peritonitis, meningitis, vertebral and
`bladder disease.60 Miliary tuberculosis after infliximab
`therapy has been reported in a patient in Lebanon.61
`
`Tuberculosis – etanercept and adalimumab
`
`Etanercept and adalimumab can promote the reactiva-
`tion of
`tuberculous, albeit
`to a lesser extent of
`infliximab. Scattered cases of the reactivation and/or
`development of
`tuberculous occurred in the clinical
`tonsillitis62 and
`trials
`for
`etanercept. Tuberculous
`Mycobacteria tuberculosis peritonitis63 have been noted
`in patients receiving etanercept
`treatment. Thirteen
`cases of TB occurred in early adalimumab trials;
`these patients were thought
`to have pre-existing
`disease.64 Once PPD tests were performed to exclude
`quiescent TB before enrolling patients in clinical trials,
`no cases of TB occurred.65 Through 2003, pre- and
`post-screening TB rates in clinical trials of adalimumab
`were 1.3 per 100 patient years and 0.08 (North
`America) and 0.13 (EU) respectively.
`
`suggestion that they worsened CHF and this will be
`discussed below. The mechanism for this effect is poorly
`understood.
`In rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials of TNF antago-
`nists, new-onset and worsening CHF were not observed;
`however, a recent review of post-marketing data with
`etanercept and infliximab documented 51 cases of CHF
`as of February 2002: 30 in patients who received
`etanercept and 21 in patients who received inflix-
`imab.5,67 Forty-two of these cases were of new-onset
`disease, half of which had no identifiable risk factors,
`such as previous myocardial infarction, coronary heart
`disease, or hypertension. Median time to onset was 3.5
`months, and 20% of patients were younger than 50
`years old.5
`Other evidence exists that TNFa blockers do not just
`prevent CHF. They enanced cardiac function in one
`study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
`In this
`study,
`rheumatoid arthritis
`(n=13 171) and osteo-
`arthritis (n=2568) patients were studied during a 2-
`year period ending in June 2002;
`the diagnosis
`of heart
`failure was based on self-report or review
`of medical records.68 Heart
`failure was significantly
`(p,0.05) less common in anti-TNFa-treated patients
`(3.1% [180/5832])
`than in the remaining patients
`(3.8% [281/7339]), even after adjusting for baseline
`differences. In the absence of pre-existing cardiovascular
`disease, the risk of heart failure was low (0.4% [24/
`6251]) and was not related to anti-TNFa therapy.
`
`Cardiovascular disease – etanercept
`
`Two large clinical trials assessing etanercept in the
`treatment of heart failure were terminated early due to
`failure to show positive effect.69 While these studies did
`not demonstrate substantive complications, there was
`a suggestion of worse heart
`failure outcomes with
`the two trials.70
`etanercept
`treatment
`in one of
`Physicians have filed post-marketing reports of worsen-
`ing of CHF, with and without identifiable precipitating
`factors, in patients taking etanercept. Most patients will
`experience an improvement or disappearance of the CHF
`after therapy is stopped but rarely patients can die.71
`Therefore, etanercept should be avoided in patients with
`severe CHF and used with caution in patients with
`milder CHF.
`
`Cardiovascular disease
`
`Cardiovascular disease – infliximab
`
`Tumor necrosis factor exerts negative inotropic effects
`and can promote fibrosis, hypertrophy, and cardiomyo-
`pathy in animal models. Moreover, cardiac specific TNF
`levels are regulated by pressure and volume load in
`animals and in humans. Because of these effects, trials
`were conducted evaluating the use of etanercept and
`infliximab for congestive heart failure (CHF). These trials
`show benefit.66 In fact,
`did not
`there was
`some
`
`There is evidence that treatment with infliximab can
`worsen heart failure.72 In a study of 150 patients with
`moderate-to-severe CHF (New York Heart Association
`[NYHA] class III–V), patients were treated with three
`infusions of infliximab 5 mg, 10 mg or placebo over 6
`weeks. Those treated with infliximab, especially at
`10 mg/kg doses, had worse outcomes. When published,
`the report noted 7/101 infliximab-treated patients had
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 7
`
`

`

`286
`
`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`the 49 patients treated with
`died versus none of
`placebo.73 The package insert of
`infliximab has been
`altered to reflect this and it should not generally be used
`in patients with moderate-to-severe CHF. Some have
`suggested that infliximab should be used with caution in
`patients with mild CHF (NYHA class I/II).74
`
`Cardiovascular disease – adalimumab
`
`No trial assessing adalimumab has been performed
`assessing its utility in the treatment of CHF. However,
`due to the results of trials with other TNFa blockers it
`should be avoided in those with severe CHF. Adalimu-
`mab is contraindicated in patients with moderate-to-
`severe CHF (NYHA class
`III–IV)
`in the European
`Union.75
`
`Demyelinating disease
`
`Preliminary evidence suggested that blocking the effects
`of TNFa may result in an amelioration of multiple
`sclerosis (MS). To this end, a TNFa blocker named
`lenercept, a recombinant TNF receptor p55-immuno-
`globulin fusion protein (sTNFR-IgG p55), was developed
`and studied for the treatment of patients with MS.76
`Lenercept was studied in a clinical trial of 168 patients
`with MS. These patients received 10, 50, or 100 mg of
`lenercept, or placebo intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks
`for up to 48 weeks. Although in animals, lenercept had
`previously demonstrated some protection against experi-
`mental allergic
`encephalomyelitis,
`the
`trial
`failed.
`Patients with MS who were treated with lenercept
`demonstrated more frequent and severe exacerbations of
`MS and more severe neurologic deficits than did the
`patients taking placebo. It was notable, however, that in
`the two treatment groups the number of magnetic
`resonance imaging (MRI) lesions was similar.
`Limited evidence suggests that etanercept, infliximab
`and adalimumab should be avoided in patients with
`or a history of multiple sclerosis.1–3 The FDA has
`summarized this data (Table V).5 Mohan et al77 noted
`that 19 patients with similar neurological events
`were identified from the FDA database: 17 following
`etanercept administration and two following infliximab
`
`All events
`Multiple sclerosis — new onset and relapse
`Optic neuritis
`Neuropathy
`Paresthesias
`Myelitis
`Guillain—Barre´/chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder
`
`Table V
`Demyelinating disorder linked to etanercept and infliximab5
`
`administration for inflammatory arthritis. All neurolo-
`gical events were temporally related to use of anti-TNFa
`blocker therapy, with partial or complete resolution on
`discontinuation. One patient exhibited a positive re-
`challenge phenomenon; that is, the patient developed
`neurological problems with therapy, which resolved
`when therapy was stopped and symptoms returned
`when therapy was tried again.
`
`Demyelinating disease – etanercept
`
`The package insert for etanercept notes that it has
`‘‘been associated with rare cases of new onset or
`exacerbation of central nervous system demyelinating
`disorders, some presenting with mental status changes
`and some associated with permanent disability’’, and
`‘‘with cases of
`transverse myelitis, optic neuritis,
`multiple sclerosis, and new-onset or exacerbation of
`seizure disorders.’’1 Rare reports have linked etanercept
`with the development of multiple sclerosis.78 A case
`report has noted paraplegia in a patient with rheuma-
`toid arthritis treated with etanercept who had repeated
`neurological evaluations revealing no abnormalities and
`who had experienced painful paresthesias in both legs
`for 1 year prior to treatment with etanercept.79
`
`Demyelinating disease – infliximab
`infliximab2 states it has been
`The package insert of
`associated in rare cases with neuritis, and new onset or
`of
`symptoms and/or
`radiographic of demyelinating
`disorders,80 including sclerosis, and that it should be
`used with caution in patients with pre-existing or recent
`onset of or disorders. Several reports note that it can
`cause optic neuritis.81,82 Additional cases of optic
`neuritis have been reported.83,84 The role of
`re-
`challenge with infliximab after development of neuro-
`logical complications is unclear. Cisternas et al85 have
`reported the case of a 34-year-old man with a history of
`Guillain-Barre´ syndrome with severe psoriatic arthritis
`and very extensive skin involvement who experienced
`a resolution of his psoriasis but who developed a
`recurrence of Guillain-Barre´ syndrome after infliximab
`treatment. The Guillain-Barre´ syndrome was treated
`successfully with intravenous immunoglobulin, which
`
`Etanercept
`
`Infliximab
`
`29
`19
`5
`5
`0
`0
`0
`
`68
`21
`0
`37
`0
`1
`9
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2020, Page 8
`
`

`

`N Scheinfeld
`
`The side effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers
`
`287
`
`was administered (2 g/kg in 5 days). Subsequent
`treatment with infliximab 100 mg resulted in no
`recurrence of Guillain-Barre´ syndrome.
`
`Demyelinating disease – adalimumab
`
`The package insert of adalimumab notes the risk of
`neurological disease with adalimumab treatment and
`explains that it should not be used in patients with such
`disease and should be discontinued if such diseases
`occur.3
`
`Lupus
`
`the TNFa blockers have been associated the
`All
`development of drug-induced lupus. The mechanism
`for this is unclear but may be linked to the rise of
`autoimmune antibody titers that
`these medications
`induce, which will be discussed later in this article.
`This lupus resolves with a discontinuation of the anti-
`lupus
`TNFa therapy. The risk of the development of
`with such therapy is extremely low.
`
`Lupus – etanercept
`
`treatment of
`Lupus has occurred in the context of
`rheumatoid arthritis with etanercept.86–88 Reports have
`linked etanercept with increased auto-antibody titers
`and lupus in a variety of contexts.89 Etanercept has
`induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.90
`One patient was noted to have a patch of erythema with
`follicular hyperkeratosis at the injection site of etaner-
`cept and other similar lesions at non-injection sites
`whose histology revealed discoid lupus.91 Drug-induced
`systemic lupus erythematosus associated with etaner-
`cept
`therapy has occurred in a child with juvenile
`idiopathic arthritis92 and in other contexts.93
`
`Lupus – infliximab
`
`Infliximab has been reported to induce systemic lupus
`erythematosus.94 It can induce a lupus-like syndrome
`that resolves with its discontinuation.95,96 One report
`noted that this lupus-like syndrome was associated with
`inflammatory arthritis and an urticarial and papulos-
`quamous rash and was accompanied by high titers of
`antinuclear, double-stranded DNA, glomerular-binding,
`and histone antibodies and by reduced levels of the C4
`component of complement.97 In clinical studies,
`four
`patients developed clinical symptoms consistent with a
`lupus-like syndrome, three with rheumatoid arthritis
`and one with Crohn’s disease. All
`four patients
`improved following discontinuation of
`therapy and
`appropriate medical treatment. No patients had lupus
`that manifested in the central nervous system or
`kidneys.2
`
`Lupus – adalimumab
`
`Of 2334 patients who received adalimumab, one patient
`developed signs consistent with new-onset lupus-like
`syndrome; these signs improved following discontinua-
`tion of the drug.3 There were no instances l

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket