throbber
1186
`
`Thalidomide for Patients with Recurrent Lymphoma
`
`Barbara Pro, M.D.1
`Anas Younes, M.D.1
`Maher Albitar, M.D.2
`Nam H. Dang, M.D.1
`Felipe Samaniego, M.D.1
`Jorge Romaguera, M.D.1
`Peter McLaughlin, M.D.1
`Fredrick B. Hagemeister, M.D.1
`Maria A. Rodriguez, M.D.1
`Marilyn Clemons, R.N.1
`Fernando Cabanillas, M.D.1
`
`1 Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The Univer-
`sity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Hous-
`ton, Texas.
`
`2 Department of Hematopathology, The University
`of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
`Texas.
`
`Address for reprints: Barbara Pro, M.D., Department
`of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas
`M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Bou-
`levard, Unit 429, Houston, TX 77030; Fax:
`(713)
`794-5656; E-mail: bpro@mdanderson.org
`
`Received September 2, 2003; revision received
`November 18, 2003; accepted December 19,
`2003.
`
`© 2004 American Cancer Society
`DOI 10.1002/cncr.20070
`
`BACKGROUND. Thalidomide has significant clinical activity in patients with mul-
`tiple myeloma. However, its activity against other lymphoid tumors is unknown.
`The authors reported their experience with thalidomide in patients with recurrent/
`refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in patients with Hodgkin disease.
`METHODS. Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years) who had undergone a median
`of 5 previous treatment regimens were treated with escalating doses of thalidomide
`(200 – 800 mg per day) until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity was ob-
`served. The authors measured serum levels of angiogenesis factors before and after
`treatment.
`RESULTS. One patient (5%) with evidence of recurrent gastric mucosa—associated
`lymphoid tissue lymphoma achieved a complete response, and 3 patients (16%)
`achieved stable disease.
`CONCLUSIONS. The current study suggests that thalidomide has limited single-
`agent activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent or refractory lymphoma.
`Cancer 2004;100:1186 –9. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
`
`KEYWORDS: thalidomide, multiple myeloma, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin disease,
`single-agent activity.
`
`Thalidomide is an oral sedative with antiinflammatory, immuno-
`
`modulatory, and antiangiogenic properties.1 Several clinical trials
`have investigated the activity of thalidomide in solid and hematologic
`malignancies.2–5 In patients with recurrent and refractory multiple
`myeloma, thalidomide has an overall response rate of 30%.6 Because
`of this favorable response rate, thalidomide was recently combined
`with rituximab, achieving a high response rate in a small number of
`patients with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma.7 However, the single-
`agent activity of thalidomide in patients with recurrent lymphoma
`remains unknown. We report our experience with thalidomide in
`patients with recurrent and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
`(NHL) and Hodgkin disease (HD).
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Patients were eligible for thalidomide treatment if they had recurrent
`or refractory NHL or HD, a Karnofsky performance status of ⬎ 60, and
`were ⬎ 16 years. Patients were excluded if there was evidence of
`central nervous system involvement with lymphoma, human immu-
`nodeficiency virus infection, had received antilymphoma therapy
`within 3 weeks, or required concurrent steroids. Patients of childbear-
`ing age were eligible provided that they were practicing adequate
`contraception. Negative results for serum pregnancy testing were
`required before study entry and monthly thereafter for all women of
`childbearing potential.
`Thalidomide was administered orally at a starting dosage of 200
`mg per day. The dosage was increased every 2 weeks up to a maxi-
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2012, Page 1
`
`

`

`TABLE 1
`Patient Characteristics
`
`Characteristic
`
`Median age in yrs (range)
`Median no. of previous treatment regimens (range)
`Histology
`Diffuse large cell
`Follicular small cleaved
`Small lymphocytic
`Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
`Mantle cell
`Hodgkin disease
`Pretreatment LDH
`Normal
`High
`
`LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
`
`No. of patients (%)
`
`62 (30–78)
`5 (2–7)
`
`6 (32)
`4 (21)
`3 (16)
`1 (5)
`3 (16)
`2 (11)
`
`14 (74)
`5 (26)
`
`mum of 800 mg per day. Treatment was continued
`with the maximum tolerated dose until disease pro-
`gression or intolerable toxicity. Restaging studies were
`conducted after 8 weeks of treatment and every 3
`months thereafter. Toxicity was graded according to
`the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Crite-
`ria (Version 2.0). We evaluated toxic effects every 2
`weeks during the dose escalation phase and then
`monthly. The primary objective was to assess the ac-
`tivity and safety profile of thalidomide. Secondary ob-
`jectives were to analyze the effects of thalidomide on
`serum expressions of vascular endothelial growth fac-
`tor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), he-
`patocyte growth factor, tumor necrosis factor alpha,
`and interleukin 6 and to correlate the levels of these
`cytokines with clinical responses. We obtained speci-
`mens for measuring these angiogenic factors at the
`time of registration, every 2 weeks for 8 weeks, and
`every 3 months thereafter. Serum concentrations of
`cytokines were determined using enzyme-linked im-
`munosorbent assays (Quantikine; R&D Systems, Min-
`neapolis, MN).
`
`RESULTS
`Between August 2000 and October 2001, after obtain-
`ing informed consent from each patient and approval
`from the institutional review board, we registered 21
`patients for the study. Two patients withdrew consent
`after registration,
`leaving 19 patients evaluable for
`treatment toxicity or response. Patients had a median
`age of 62 years (range, 30 –78 years) and had received
`a median of 5 previous treatment regimens (range, 2–7
`regimens). Seventeen patients had NHL, and two had
`HD (Table 1).
`Treatment was discontinued during the first 2
`weeks for 3 patients, due to either pancytopenia (n
`
`Thalidomide in Lymphoma/Pro et al.
`
`1187
`
`⫽ 1) or rapidly progressing disease (n ⫽ 2). All other
`patients received ⱖ 8 weeks of therapy with a median
`dosage of 400 mg of thalidomide. Treatment was rea-
`sonably well tolerated, with the most common side
`effects being of Grade I/II. Peripheral neuropathy was
`observed in 76% of the patients, fatigue in 52%, edema
`in 52%, and constipation in 41%. The thalidomide
`dose was escalated to the scheduled level of 800 mg
`per day in 7 patients (41%).
`One male patient with recurrent mucosa-associ-
`ated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stom-
`ach achieved a pathologic complete response 2
`months after initiation of thalidomide. He previously
`experienced treatment failure after receiving cyclo-
`phosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and pred-
`nisone (CHOP), fludarabine, radiotherapy, and ritux-
`imab. Pretreatment
`endoscopy
`revealed patchy
`erythema of the gastric body with some mucosa cob-
`blestoning. Multiple biopsies confirmed the diagnosis
`of recurrent MALT lymphoma. After 4 months of treat-
`ment, a follow-up endoscopy showed a scarred area at
`the site that was previously abnormal. Multiple biop-
`sies were negative for evidence of disease. He received
`a reduced dose of thalidomide (100 mg per day) due to
`fatigue and lethargy and response was maintained at
`the lower dose. Treatment was continued for 9
`months, at which time treatment was discontinued
`due to bradycardia. His disease remains in remission
`19 months after his initial response was documented.
`Three patients had stable disease, two with large cell
`histology and one with small lymphocytic lymphoma
`(SLL). The first patient with transformed large B-cell
`lymphoma was a 65-year-old male who previously
`experienced treatment failure after CHOP-type che-
`motherapy and autologous bone marrow transplanta-
`tion. Pretreatment radiographic studies revealed left
`paraaortic adenopathy and bulky left external iliac
`lymph node disease. This patient received thalido-
`mide for 4 months, at which time treatment was dis-
`continued due to progressive disease. The second pa-
`tient with large B-cell lymphoma was a 56-year-old
`female who had experienced failure after 3 previous
`treatment regimens,
`including cisplatin-based and
`methotrexate-based regimens. At the time of study
`entry, she had enlarging multicompartment cervical
`adenopathy. Both patients had stable disease after 2
`months of treatment. The patient with SLL was a 75-
`year-old male who previously experienced treatment
`failure after receiving fludarabine-based chemother-
`apy and rituximab. Before treatment, he had paraaor-
`tic and mesenteric adenopathy. Stable disease was
`maintained for ⬎ 9 months. Serum levels of angio-
`genic factors were determined before and after ther-
`apy in seven patients (Fig. 1). Treatment with thalid-
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2012, Page 2
`
`

`

`1188
`
`CANCER March 15, 2004 / Volume 100 / Number 6
`
`FIGURE 1. Serum levels of (A) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), (B) basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), (C) hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), (D)
`tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-␣), and (E) interleukin 6 (IL-6) before treatment with thalidomide and at the time of evaluation of response. In the one
`patient who achieved a complete response (solid line), levels of VEGF and bFGF decreased from 85 pg/mL and 14 pg/mL (pretreatment) to 36 pg/mL and
`7 pg/mL, respectively. In patients with stable disease (dashed lines) and patients with progressive disease (dotted lines), serum levels of angiogenic factors
`were variably affected.
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2012, Page 3
`
`

`

`omide variably affected the level of these factors.
`However, in the one patient who achieved a complete
`response, serum levels of VEGF and b-FGF were sig-
`nificantly decreased.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The current results indicate that thalidomide used as a
`single agent has minimal activity in heavily pretreated
`patients with lymphoma. These findings differ strik-
`ingly from those of a recent study that treated patients
`with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma. In that study,
`the thalidomide dosage was escalated from 200 mg
`per day to 400 mg per day on Day 15. Rituximab was
`administered at 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 doses. The
`combination induced clinical responses in 10 of 11
`patients (91%), including complete responses in 3 pa-
`tients.7 In our series, three patients with mantle cell
`lymphoma received thalidomide and no responses
`were observed. Although patient selection may ac-
`count for this difference, other factors may also exist.
`Most antiangiogenesis agents such as thalidomide are
`cytostatic. Increased activity may be observed only
`when used in combination with other agents.8 It is
`also possible that thalidomide enhanced rituximab
`activity by modulating the immune response. Alterna-
`tively, thalidomide may have made mantle cell lym-
`phoma cells more sensitive to rituximab by modulat-
`ing intracellular resistance pathways such as nuclear
`factor Kappa B (NF-kB). Our data certainly do not
`support the use of thalidomide as a single agent in
`patients with recurrent and refractory lymphoma. Al-
`
`Thalidomide in Lymphoma/Pro et al.
`
`1189
`
`though the findings presented by Drach et al.7 are
`encouraging, the number of patients reported on is
`insufficient, and therefore, it is too early to conclude
`whether thalidomide-based therapy will be of clinical
`value for patients with recurrent lymphoma.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. D’Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalido-
`mide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci
`U S A. 1994;91:4082– 4085.
`2. Drake MJ, Robson W, Mehta P, Schofield I, Neal DE, Leung
`HY. An open-label Phase II study of low-dose thalidomide in
`androgen-independent prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;
`88:822– 827.
`3. Baidas SM, Winer EP, Fleming GF, et al. Phase II evaluation
`of thalidomide in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
`J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2710 –2717.
`4. Bertolini F, Mingrone W, Alietti A, et al. Thalidomide in
`multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes and histio-
`cytosis. Analysis of clinical results and of surrogate angio-
`genesis markers. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:987–990.
`Piccaluga PP, Visani G, Pileri SA, et al. Clinical efficacy and
`antiangiogenic activity of thalidomide in myelofibrosis with
`myeloid metaplasia. A pilot study. Leukemia. 2002;16:1609 –
`1614.
`Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of
`thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med.
`1999;341:1565–1571.
`7. Drach J, Kaufmann H, Puespoek A, et al. Marked antitumor
`activity of rituximab plus thalidomide in patients with re-
`lapsed/resistant mantle cell lymphoma [abstract]. Blood.
`2002;100:606a.
`8. Arrieta O, Guevara P, Tamariz J, Rembao D, Rivera E, Sotelo
`J. Antiproliferative effect of thalidomide alone and com-
`bined with carmustine against C6 rat glioma. Int J Exp
`Pathol. 2002;83:99 –104.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`IPR2018-00685
`Celgene Ex. 2012, Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket